| Literature DB >> 35945202 |
Alexandra Lautarescu1,2, Alexandra F Bonthrone3, Maximilian Pietsch3,4, Dafnis Batalle3,4, Lucilio Cordero-Grande3,5,6, J-Donald Tournier3, Daan Christiaens3,7, Joseph V Hajnal3, Andrew Chew3, Shona Falconer3, Chiara Nosarti3,8, Suresh Victor3,9, Michael C Craig4,10, A David Edwards3,9,11,12, Serena J Counsell3.
Abstract
Maternal prenatal depression is associated with increased likelihood of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions in offspring. The relationship between maternal depression and offspring outcome may be mediated by in-utero changes in brain development. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled in vivo investigations of neonatal brains, minimising the effect of postnatal influences. The aim of this study was to examine associations between maternal prenatal depressive symptoms, infant white matter, and toddler behaviour. 413 mother-infant dyads enrolled in the developing Human Connectome Project. Mothers completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (median = 5, range = 0-28, n = 52 scores ≥ 11). Infants (n = 223 male) (median gestational age at birth = 40 weeks, range 32.14-42.29) underwent MRI (median postmenstrual age at scan = 41.29 weeks, range 36.57-44.71). Fixel-based fibre metrics (mean fibre density, fibre cross-section, and fibre density modulated by cross-section) were calculated from diffusion imaging data in the left and right uncinate fasciculi and cingulum bundle. For n = 311, internalising and externalising behaviour, and social-emotional abilities were reported at a median corrected age of 18 months (range 17-24). Statistical analysis used multiple linear regression and mediation analysis with bootstrapping. Maternal depressive symptoms were positively associated with infant fibre density in the left (B = 0.0005, p = 0.003, q = 0.027) and right (B = 0.0006, p = 0.003, q = 0.027) uncinate fasciculus, with left uncinate fasciculus fibre density, in turn, positively associated with social-emotional abilities in toddlerhood (B = 105.70, p = 0.0007, q = 0.004). In a mediation analysis, higher maternal depressive symptoms predicted toddler social-emotional difficulties (B = 0.342, t(307) = 3.003, p = 0.003), but this relationship was not mediated by fibre density in the left uncinate fasciculus (Sobel test p = 0.143, bootstrapped indirect effect = 0.035, SE = 0.02, 95% CI: [-0.01, 0.08]). There was no evidence of an association between maternal depressive and cingulum fibre properties. These findings suggest that maternal perinatal depressive symptoms are associated with neonatal uncinate fasciculi microstructure, but not fibre bundle size, and toddler behaviour.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35945202 PMCID: PMC9363426 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02073-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 7.989
Maternal and infant characteristics.
| Characteristic | Whole sample ( | High EPDS ( | Low EPDS ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother | EPDS, median (range) | 5 (0–28) | 13 (11–28) | 4 (0–10) |
| EPDS-3A, median (range) | 3 (0–9); | 6 (2–9); | 2 (0–7); | |
| History poor MH, | 115 (27.8%) | 27 (51.9%) | 88 (24.4%) | |
| SSRI use, | 8 (1.9%) | 3 (5.8%) | 5 (1.4%) | |
| Age, years, median (range) | 34 (17–46) | 34 (24–42) | 34 (17–46) | |
| IMD scores, median (range) | 27.37 (1.55–61.37) | 25.05 (5.06–46.99) | 27.83 (1.55–61.37) | |
| quintile, | ||||
| 1 (least deprived) | 21 (5.4%) | 2 (4.1%) | 19 (5.5%) | |
| 2 | 32 (8.2%) | 5 (10.2%) | 27 (7.9%) | |
| 3 | 69 (17.6%) | 8 (16.3%) | 61 (17.8%) | |
| 4 | 163 (41.6%) | 23 (46.9%) | 140 (40.8%) | |
| 5 (most deprived) | 107 (27.3%); | 11 (22.4%); | 96 (28.0%); | |
| Smoking, | 12 (2.9%) | 1 (1.9%) | 11 (3.0 %) | |
| No | 385 (93.2%) | 47 (90.4%) | 338 (93.6%) | |
| No, stopped | 16 (3.9%) | 4 (7.7%) | 12 (3.3%) | |
| Alcohol, | 40 (9.7%); | 4 (7.7%) | 36 (10%); | |
| Substance use, | 2 (0.5%); | 0 (0%) | 2 (0.6%); | |
| Ethnicity, | ||||
| White British/Irish | 177 (49%) | 14 (26.9%) | 163 (45.2%) | |
| White Other | 93 (22.5%) | 16 (30.8%) | 77 (21.3%) | |
| Asian/Asian British | 46 (11.1%) | 6 (11.5%) | 40 (11.1%) | |
| Black/Black British | 54 (13.1%) | 10 (19.2%) | 44 (12.2%) | |
| Mixed ethnic group | 16 (3.9 %) | 4 (7.7%) | 12 (3.3%) | |
| Other | 21 (5.1 %) | 2 (3.8%) | 19 (5.3%) | |
| Did not answer | 6 (1.4%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (1.7%) | |
| BMI, median (range) | 23.51 (16.87–43.55); | 23.77 (17.78–41.66) | 23.46 (16.87–43.55); | |
| Infant | Sex, | 223 (54%) | 28 (53.8%) | 195 (54%) |
| Female | 190 (46%) | 24 (46.2%) | 166 (46%) | |
| GA birth, weeks, median (range) | 40 (32.14–42.29) | 39.64 (32.29–42.29) | 40 (32.14–42.29) | |
| PMA scan, weeks, median (range) | 41.29 (36.57–44.71) | 41.29 (36.71–44.14) | 41.29 (36.57–44.71) | |
| Delivery | ||||
| Spontaneous vaginal | 174 (42.1%) | 22 (42.3%) | 152 (42.1%) | |
| Emergency C-Section (labour) | 63 (15.3%) | 11 (21.2%) | 52 (14.4%) | |
| Emergency C-Section (not labour) | 34 (8.2%) | 7 (13.5%) | 27 (7.5%) | |
| Elective C-Section | 45 (10.9%) | 2 (3.8%) | 43 (11.9%) | |
| Instrumental – forceps | 59 (14.3%) | 8 (15.3%) | 51 (14.1%) | |
| Instrumental – ventouse | 38 (9.2%) | 2 (3.8%) | 36 (9.9%) | |
EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, MH mental health, SSRI selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, IMD index of multiple deprivation, BMI pre-pregnancy body mass index, GA gestational age at birth, PMA postmenstrual age.
No missing values unless otherwise indicated in the table.
Fig. 1Visual representation of the tracts in template space.
The top row shows the location of the tracts, coloured by streamline orientation (blue: superior-inferior, red: left-right, green: anterior-posterior). On the bottom row, the middle image shows an example of fibre orientation distributions in a region of crossing fibres, while the left and right images represent “glass-brain” illustrations of the tracts of interest (pink: ventral cingulum, purple: dorsal cingulum, turquoise: uncinate fasciculus).
Behavioural and cognitive outcomes in toddlers.
| Characteristic | Whole sample ( | High EPDS ( | Low EPDS ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| IMD 18 months, median (range) | 25.26 (1.55–61.37); | 25.05 (5.06–53.18); | 25.26 (1.55–61.37); |
| quintile, | |||
| 1 (least deprived) | 28 (9.6%) | 2 (6.1%) | 26 (10.0%) |
| 2 | 32 (11.0%) | 3 (9.1%) | 29 (11.2%) |
| 3 | 52 (17.8%) | 4 (12.1%) | 48 (18.5%) |
| 4 | 110 (37.7%) | 15 (45.5%) | 95 (36.7%) |
| 5 (most deprived) | 70 (24.0%) | 9 (27.3%) | 61 (23.6%) |
| Corrected age, months, median (range) | 18 (17–24) | 18 (17–24) | 18 (17–24) |
| CBCL total T-score, median (range) | 46 (28–69) | 52 (37–66) | 46 (28–69) |
|
| 301 (96.8%) | 32 (91.4%) | 269 (97.5%) |
| Borderline | 10 (3.2%) | 3 (8.6%) | 7 (2.5%) |
| Clinical (≥70) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| CBCL Int. T-score, median (range) | 43 (29–72) | 49 (29–70) | 43 (29–72) |
| CBCL Ext. T-score, median (range) | 48 (28–70) | 54 (28–65) | 47 (28–70) |
| Q-CHAT Total, median (range) | 29 (8–59) | 32 (20–52) | 28 (8–59) |
|
| 272 (87.5%) | 27 (77.1%) | 245 (88.8%) |
| High (≥39) | 39 (12.5%) | 8 (22.9%) | 31 (11.2%) |
| BSID-III Cog. Comp., median (range) | 100 (70–125) | 100 (70–120) | 100 (70–125) |
|
| 291 (93.6%) | 32 (91.4%) | 259 (93.8%) |
| Mild | 20 (6.4%) | 3 (8.6%) | 17 (6.2%) |
| Mod/severe (<70) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Home environment, median (range) | 21 (7–28); | 20 (12–28) | 21 (7–28); |
| Dysfunctional parenting, median (range) | 2.90 (1.43–4.20); | 3.20 (2.37–4) | 2.83 (1.43–4.20); |
EPDS Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, IMD index of multiple deprivation, CBCL Childhood Behaviour Checklist, Q-CHAT Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Int internalising, Ext externalising, BSID-III Cog Comp Bayley’s cognitive composite score. Home environment = score on the Stimulating Parenting Scale, Dysfunctional parenting = score on the Parenting Scale.
No missing values unless otherwise indicated in the table. The cut-offs used to indicate high scores on the CBCL, Q-CHAT, and BSID-III as are per [69–71, 113] and are used for descriptive purposes only.
Associations between maternal depressive symptoms and infant white matter.
| EPDS model | EPDS x Sex (female) model | Model fit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tract | Metric | B | B | R2 | F(df) | ||||
| UF-L | FD | 0.0005 | 2.96 | 0.003 (.027)* | 0.58 | F(6,385) = 90.11 | |||
| FDC | −0.0008 | −2.62 | 0.009 (0.054) | 0.73 | F(8,383) = 134.1 | ||||
| Log(FC) | −0.0007 | −1.33 | 0.183 | 0.72 | F(7,384) = 143.4 | ||||
| UF-R | FD | 0.0006 | 3.04 | 0.003 (0.027)* | 0.57 | F(6,385) = 87.92 | |||
| FDC | 0.0004 | 2.30 | 0.022 (0.099) | 0.74 | F(7,384) = 158.3 | ||||
| Log(FC) | −0.0007 | −1.37 | 0.171 | 0.74 | F(7,384) = 157.6 | ||||
| CD-L | FD | 0.0003 | 1.66 | 0.099 | 0.34 | F(6,385) = 35.1 | |||
| FDC | 0.0003 | 2.10 | 0.037 (0.133) | 0.65 | F(7,384) = 102.8 | ||||
| Log(FC) | 0.0003 | 0.53 | 0.592 | 0.78 | F(7,384) = 201.2 | ||||
| CD-R | FD | 0.0002 | 1.40 | 0.160 | 0.37 | F(6,385) = 38.89 | |||
| FDC | 0.0003 | 1.71 | 0.088 | 0.66 | F(7,384) = 110.6 | ||||
| Log(FC) | 0.0003 | 0.52 | 0.607 | 0.74 | F(7,384) = 157.9 | ||||
| CV-L | FD | 0.0002 | 1.23 | 0.218 | 0.40 | F(6,385) = 45.04 | |||
| FDC | 0.0002 | 1.10 | 0.271 | 0.66 | F(7,384) = 110 | ||||
| Log(FC) | −0.0001 | −0.32 | 0.750 | 0.80 | F(7,384) = 223.9 | ||||
| CV-R | FD | 0.0002 | 1.21 | 0.228 | 0.44 | F(6,385) = 51.8 | |||
| FDC | 0.0001 | 0.91 | 0.362 | 0.68 | F(7,384) = 120.3 | ||||
| Log(FC) | −0.00007 | −0.16 | 0.870 | 0.79 | F(7,384) = 214 | ||||
All models (R squared) were significant at p < 0.001. The R squared values reported are the adjusted ones, given that models have different numbers of variables. Covariates were gestational age at birth, postmenstrual age at scan, infant sex, maternal IMD at enrolment, maternal history of mental health. In addition, for FDC and log(FC) models, ICV was also included as a covariate. If EPDS by sex interaction was not significant, it was removed from the model and these cells are blank.
UF-L left uncinate fasciculus, UF-R right uncinate fasciculus, CD-L left dorsal cingulum, CD-R right dorsal cingulum, CV-L left ventral cingulum, CV-R right ventral cingulum, B = unstandardized coefficients, q = p values after FDR correction.
*Results that survive FDR correction for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 2Plots showing the relationships between variables of interest.
A–D Contain plots showing the relationship between EPDS and white matter microstructure and macrostructure, controlling for effect of covariates. For mean FD left (A) and right (B) uncinate fasciculus and mean FDC right uncinate fasciculus (D), the main model is plotted. For mean FDC left uncinate fasciculus (C), the model with EPDS by Sex interaction is plotted. The relationship between EPDS and mean FD in the left and right uncinate fasciculus (A, B) survived FDR correction. E Contains a plot from robust regression, showing the relationship between mean FD in the left uncinate fasciculus and total Q-CHAT score, controlling for the effect of covariates.
Fig. 3Dot-and-whisker plot for the multiple linear regression model predicting mean FD in the left uncinate fasciculus.
The black dots represent the regression coefficient estimate with 95% confidence intervals. The caption contains Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), with smaller values indicating a better fit. For a model without EPDS, the AIC is −2193 and BIC is −2165, indicating a worst fit.