Tobias Bracht1, David Linden2, Paul Keedwell3. 1. Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bolligenstrasse 111, 3000 Bern 60, Switzerland. Electronic address: bracht@puk.unibe.ch. 2. Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatry Genetics & Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. 3. Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Depressed mood, anhedonia, psychomotor retardation and alterations of circadian rhythm are core features of the depressive syndrome. Its neural correlates can be located within a frontal-striatal-tegmental neural network, commonly referred to as the reward circuit. It is the aim of this article to review literature on white matter microstructure alterations of the reward system in depression. METHOD: We searched for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-studies that have explored neural deficits within the cingulum bundle, the uncinate fasciculus and the supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle/anterior thalamic radiation - in adolescent and adult depression (acute and remitted), melancholic depression, treatment-resistant depression and those at familial risk of depression. The relevant diffusion MRI literature was identified using PUBMED. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included. In people at familial risk for depression the main finding was reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in the cingulum bundle. Both increases and decreases of FA have been reported in the uncinate fasciculus in adolescents. Reductions of FA in the uncinate fasciculus and the anterior thalamic radiation/supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle during acute depressive episodes in adults were most consistently reported. LIMITATIONS: Non-quantitative approach. CONCLUSIONS: Altered cingulum bundle microstructure in unaffected relatives may either indicate resilience or vulnerability to depression. Uncinate fasciculus and supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle microstructure may be altered during depressive episodes in adult MDD. Future studies call for a careful clinical stratification of clinically meaningful subgroups.
BACKGROUND: Depressed mood, anhedonia, psychomotor retardation and alterations of circadian rhythm are core features of the depressive syndrome. Its neural correlates can be located within a frontal-striatal-tegmental neural network, commonly referred to as the reward circuit. It is the aim of this article to review literature on white matter microstructure alterations of the reward system in depression. METHOD: We searched for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-studies that have explored neural deficits within the cingulum bundle, the uncinate fasciculus and the supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle/anterior thalamic radiation - in adolescent and adult depression (acute and remitted), melancholic depression, treatment-resistant depression and those at familial risk of depression. The relevant diffusion MRI literature was identified using PUBMED. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included. In people at familial risk for depression the main finding was reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in the cingulum bundle. Both increases and decreases of FA have been reported in the uncinate fasciculus in adolescents. Reductions of FA in the uncinate fasciculus and the anterior thalamic radiation/supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle during acute depressive episodes in adults were most consistently reported. LIMITATIONS: Non-quantitative approach. CONCLUSIONS: Altered cingulum bundle microstructure in unaffected relatives may either indicate resilience or vulnerability to depression. Uncinate fasciculus and supero-lateral medial forebrain bundle microstructure may be altered during depressive episodes in adult MDD. Future studies call for a careful clinical stratification of clinically meaningful subgroups.
Authors: Roza M Vlasova; Prabha Siddarth; Beatrix Krause; Amber M Leaver; Kelsey T Laird; Natalie St Cyr; Katherine L Narr; Helen Lavretsky Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Robert G Briggs; Meherzad Rahimi; Andrew K Conner; Goksel Sali; Cordell M Baker; Joshua D Burks; Chad A Glenn; James D Battiste; Michael E Sughrue Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Negar Fani; Vasiliki Michopoulos; Sanne J H van Rooij; Cherita Clendinen; Raven A Hardy; Tanja Jovanovic; Barbara O Rothbaum; Kerry J Ressler; Jennifer S Stevens Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Glenda M. MacQueen; Stefanie Hassel; Stephen R. Arnott; Addington Jean; Christopher R. Bowie; Signe L. Bray; Andrew D. Davis; Jonathan Downar; Jane A. Foster; Benicio N. Frey; Benjamin I. Goldstein; Geoffrey B. Hall; Kate L. Harkness; Jacqueline Harris; Raymond W. Lam; Catherine Lebel; Roumen Milev; Daniel J. Müller; Sagar V. Parikh; Sakina Rizvi; Susan Rotzinger; Gulshan B. Sharma; Claudio N. Soares; Gustavo Turecki; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez; Joanna Yu; Mojdeh Zamyadi; Stephen C. Strother; Sidney H. Kennedy Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Bryan Howell; Ki Sueng Choi; Kabilar Gunalan; Justin Rajendra; Helen S Mayberg; Cameron C McIntyre Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Nandita Vijayakumar; Nicholas B Allen; Meg Dennison; Michelle L Byrne; Julian G Simmons; Sarah Whittle Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556