Literature DB >> 18583153

Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data.

J-Donald Tournier1, Chun-Hung Yeh, Fernando Calamante, Kuan-Hung Cho, Alan Connelly, Ching-Po Lin.   

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted imaging can potentially be used to infer the connectivity of the human brain in vivo using fibre-tracking techniques, and is therefore of great interest to neuroscientists and clinicians. A key requirement for fibre tracking is the accurate estimation of white matter fibre orientations within each imaging voxel. The diffusion tensor model, which is widely used for this purpose, has been shown to be inadequate in crossing fibre regions. A number of approaches have recently been proposed to address this issue, based on high angular resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (HARDI) data. In this study, an experimental model of crossing fibres, consisting of water-filled plastic capillaries, is used to thoroughly assess three such techniques: constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), super-resolved CSD (super-CSD) and Q-ball imaging (QBI). HARDI data were acquired over a range of crossing angles and b-values, from which fibre orientations were computed using each technique. All techniques were capable of resolving the two fibre populations down to a crossing angle of 45 degrees , and down to 30 degrees for super-CSD. A bias was observed in the fibre orientations estimated by QBI for crossing angles other than 90 degrees, consistent with previous simulation results. Finally, for a 45 degrees crossing, the minimum b-value required to resolve the fibre orientations was 4000 s/mm(2) for QBI, 2000 s/mm(2) for CSD, and 1000 s/mm(2) for super-CSD. The quality of estimation of fibre orientations may profoundly affect fibre tracking attempts, and the results presented provide important additional information regarding performance characteristics of well-known methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18583153     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  189 in total

1.  An ex vivo imaging pipeline for producing high-quality and high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging datasets.

Authors:  Tim B Dyrby; William F C Baaré; Daniel C Alexander; Jacob Jelsing; Ellen Garde; Lise V Søgaard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Optimal real-time estimation in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Pablo Casaseca-de-la-Higuera; Antonio Tristán-Vega; Santiago Aja-Fernández; Carlos Alberola-López; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Raúl San José Estépar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 3.  Challenges in diffusion MRI tractography - Lessons learned from international benchmark competitions.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Alessandro Daducci; Klaus Maier-Hein; Cyril Poupon; Jean-Christophe Houde; Vishwesh Nath; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Directional functions for orientation distribution estimation.

Authors:  Yogesh Rathi; Oleg Michailovich; Martha E Shenton; Sylvain Bouix
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ben Jeurissen; Alexander Leemans; Jacques-Donald Tournier; Derek K Jones; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Pushing the limits of in vivo diffusion MRI for the Human Connectome Project.

Authors:  K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging of the developing brain.

Authors:  A Paydar; E Fieremans; J I Nwankwo; M Lazar; H D Sheth; V Adisetiyo; J A Helpern; J H Jensen; S S Milla
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Design and validation of diffusion MRI models of white matter.

Authors:  Ileana O Jelescu; Matthew D Budde
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2017-11-28

9.  Empirical consideration of the effects of acquisition parameters and analysis model on clinically feasible q-ball imaging.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Justin A Blaber; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging probabilistic tractography of the auditory radiation.

Authors:  J I Berman; M R Lanza; L Blaskey; J C Edgar; T P L Roberts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.