Literature DB >> 35939074

Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials.

Pauline Robert1,2,3,4, Ellen Goudemand4, Jérôme Auzanneau3, François-Xavier Oury2, Bernard Rolland5, Emmanuel Heumez6, Sophie Bouchet2, Antoine Caillebotte1, Tristan Mary-Huard1,7, Jacques Le Gouis2, Renaud Rincent8,9.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Phenomic prediction of wheat grain yield and heading date in different multi-environmental trial scenarios is accurate. Modelling the genotype-by-environment interaction effect using phenomic data is a potentially low-cost complement to genomic prediction. The performance of wheat cultivars in multi-environmental trials (MET) is difficult to predict because of the genotype-by-environment interactions (G × E). Phenomic selection is supposed to be efficient for modelling the G × E effect because it accounts for non-additive effects. Here, phenomic data are near-infrared (NIR) spectra obtained from plant material. While phenomic selection has recently been shown to accurately predict wheat grain yield in single environments, its accuracy needs to be investigated for MET. We used four datasets from two winter wheat breeding programs to test and compare the predictive abilities of phenomic and genomic models for grain yield and heading date in different MET scenarios. We also compared different methods to model the G × E using different covariance matrices based on spectra. On average, phenomic and genomic prediction abilities are similar in all different MET scenarios. Better predictive abilities were obtained when G × E effects were modelled with NIR spectra than without them, and it was better to use all the spectra of all genotypes in all environments for modelling the G × E. To facilitate the implementation of phenomic prediction, we tested MET designs where the NIR spectra were measured only on the genotype-environment combinations phenotyped for the target trait. Missing spectra were predicted with a weighted multivariate ridge regression. Intermediate predictive abilities for grain yield were obtained in a sparse testing scenario and for new genotypes, which shows that phenomic selection is an efficient and practicable prediction method for dealing with G × E.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35939074     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04170-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.574


  42 in total

1.  Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize.

Authors:  Theresa Albrecht; Valentin Wimmer; Hans-Jürgen Auinger; Malena Erbe; Carsten Knaak; Milena Ouzunova; Henner Simianer; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genomic Prediction of Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Regression Models.

Authors:  Jaime Cuevas; José Crossa; Víctor Soberanis; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Gustavo de Los Campos; O A Montesinos-López; Juan Burgueño
Journal:  Plant Genome       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 3.  Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Mario P L Calus; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Gustavo de Los Campos; John M Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Transcriptome-Based Prediction of Complex Traits in Maize.

Authors:  Christina B Azodi; Jeremy Pardo; Robert VanBuren; Gustavo de Los Campos; Shin-Han Shiu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

7.  Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information.

Authors:  Selma Forni; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer.

Authors:  Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Deep Kernel for Genomic and Near Infrared Predictions in Multi-environment Breeding Trials.

Authors:  Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Philomin Juliana; Carlos Guzmán; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; José González-Bucio; Juan Burgueño; Abelardo Montesinos-López; José Crossa
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Shrinkage estimation of the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: prediction of the genotype-by-environment interaction in multi-environment breeding trials.

Authors:  Pauline Robert; Ellen Goudemand; Jérôme Auzanneau; François-Xavier Oury; Bernard Rolland; Emmanuel Heumez; Sophie Bouchet; Antoine Caillebotte; Tristan Mary-Huard; Jacques Le Gouis; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.574

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.