| Literature DB >> 35897699 |
Sarusha Santhiravel1,2, Alaa El-Din A Bekhit3, Eresha Mendis4, Joe L Jacobs5,6, Frank R Dunshea7,8, Niranjan Rajapakse4, Eric N Ponnampalam9.
Abstract
The gastrointestinal tract of humans is a complex microbial ecosystem known as gut microbiota. The microbiota is involved in several critical physiological processes such as digestion, absorption, and related physiological functions and plays a crucial role in determining the host's health. The habitual consumption of specific dietary components can impact beyond their nutritional benefits, altering gut microbiota diversity and function and could manipulate health. Phytochemicals are non-nutrient biologically active plant components that can modify the composition of gut microflora through selective stimulation of proliferation or inhibition of certain microbial communities in the intestine. Plants secrete these components, and they accumulate in the cell wall and cell sap compartments (body) for their development and survival. These compounds have low bioavailability and long time-retention in the intestine due to their poor absorption, resulting in beneficial impacts on gut microbiota population. Feeding diets containing phytochemicals to humans and animals may offer a path to improve the gut microbiome resulting in improved performance and/or health and wellbeing. This review discusses the effects of phytochemicals on the modulation of the gut microbiota environment and the resultant benefits to humans; however, the effect of phytochemicals on the gut microbiota of animals is also covered, in brief.Entities:
Keywords: digestive process; gut microbiota; health and wellness; metabolic diseases; phytochemicals; plant foods
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35897699 PMCID: PMC9332059 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Classification of Dietary Phytochemicals (self-generated) [EC: epicatechin; EGC: epigallocatechin; ECG: epicatechin gallate; EGCG: epigallocatechin 3-gallate].
Figure 2The influence of phytochemicals on GM and key roles of GM in humans (Self-generated).
Figure 3Simple illustration of the metabolic pathway of dietary phytochemicals in human body (self-generated).
Figure 4Chemical structures of flavones (apigenin, baicalein, chrysin, and luteolin) (self-generated).
Figure 5Chemical structures of flavanones (hesperetin, naringenin, hesperidin, and naringin) (self-generated).
Figure 6Chemical structures of flavanols (epicatechin, epigallocatechin, epicatechin gallate, and epigallocatechin gallate) (self-generated).
Figure 7Chemical structures of flavonols (quercetin, kaempferol, myricetin, isorhamnetin, and rutin) (self-generated).
Figure 8Chemical structures of flavanonols (astilbin, engeletin, and taxifolin) (self-generated).
Figure 9Chemical structures of isoflavones (daidzein, genistein, glycitein, formononetin, and daidzin) (self-generated).
Figure 10Chemical structures of anthocyanins (delphinidin, cyanidin, pelargonidin, malvidin, petunidin, and peonidin) (self-generated).
Figure 11Chemical structure of curcumin (self-generated).
Figure 12Chemical structures of hydroxybenzoic acids (p-hydroxybenzoic acid, gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, and vanillic acid) (self-generated).
Figure 13Chemical structures of hydroxycinnamic acids (p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, sinapic acid, ferulic acid, and chlorogenic acid) (self-generated).
Figure 14Chemical structures of resveratrol and piceatannol (self-generated).
Figure 15Chemical structures of carotenoids (astaxanthin, lutein, and lycopene) (self-generated).
Figure 16The potential benefits of phytochemicals associated with gut microbiota (self-generated).
Studies carried out in animals to evaluate the impacts of phytochemicals on the alteration in the gut microbiome.
| Phytochemical | Animal | Effect on Microbiome and Related Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tea polyphenols | Pigs | Enhanced the prevalence of lactobacilli, while reducing that of Bacteroidaceae, | [ |
| Coffee and caffeic acid | Rats with colon cancer | Supplementation specifically suppressed neoplastic cell transformation and colon cancer metastasis in mice via inhibition of TOPK (T-LAK cell-originated protein kinase) and MEK1 | [ |
| Green tea extracts | Calves | Decreased the abundance of | [ |
| Grape pomace extracts | Lamb | Suppressed the growth of pathogenic bacteria | [ |
| Seaweed extract | White sheep ewes | Lactic acid bacteria count in ewes and lambs was decreased and the growth of | [ |
| Red wine extract rich in proanthocyanidin | Rats with colon cancer | Supplemented rats showed a significantly greater abundance of | [ |
| Quercetin | High-fat-diet fed rats | Down-regulated | [ |
| Proanthocyanidins | Rats | Increased the prevalence of | [ |
| Resveratrol | Rats with DSS-induced colitis | Promoted the cell counts of | [ |
| Polyphenols present in Chinese propolis, Brazilian propolis | Rats with DSS-induced colitis | Altered the composition of intestinal microflora, including a decrease in | [ |
| Lowbush wild blueberries | Rats | Increased the population of | [ |
| Resveratrol | Rats with colon cancer | Decreased functions of host intestinal mucosal and fecal enzymes, including β-galactosidase, α-glucoronidase, α-glucosidase, nitroreductase, and mucinase | [ |
| Polyphenols from fungi | Rats with DSS-induced colitis | Modified the composition of colonic microflora by decreasing the ratio of | [ |
| Grape pomace | Broiler | Increased the population of | [ |
| Polyphenols present in | Rats with DSS induced colitis | Modified the composition of colonic microflora, by increasing the ratio of | [ |
Figure 17Impact of phytochemicals and diet rich in phytochemicals on metabolic diseases by modifying intestinal microflora (self-generated).