Literature DB >> 22443940

Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale.

C Martin1, D P Morgavi, M Doreau.   

Abstract

Decreasing enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants without altering animal production is desirable both as a strategy to reduce global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and as a means of improving feed conversion efficiency. The aim of this paper is to provide an update on a selection of proved and potential strategies to mitigate enteric CH4 production by ruminants. Various biotechnologies are currently being explored with mixed results. Approaches to control methanogens through vaccination or the use of bacteriocins highlight the difficulty to modulate the rumen microbial ecosystem durably. The use of probiotics, i.e. acetogens and live yeasts, remains a potentially interesting approach, but results have been either unsatisfactory, not conclusive, or have yet to be confirmed in vivo. Elimination of the rumen protozoa to mitigate methanogenesis is promising, but this option should be carefully evaluated in terms of livestock performances. In addition, on-farm defaunation techniques are not available up to now. Several feed additives such as ionophores, organic acids and plant extracts have also been assayed. The potential use of plant extracts to reduce CH4 is receiving a renewed interest as they are seen as a natural alternative to chemical additives and are well perceived by consumers. The response to tannin- and saponin-containing plant extracts is highly variable and more research is needed to assess the effectiveness and eventual presence of undesirable residues in animal products. Nutritional strategies to mitigate CH4 emissions from ruminants are, without doubt, the most developed and ready to be applied in the field. Approaches presented in this paper involve interventions on the nature and amount of energy-based concentrates and forages, which constitute the main component of diets as well as the use of lipid supplements. The possible selection of animals based on low CH4 production and more likely on their high efficiency of digestive processes is also addressed. Whatever the approach proposed, however, before practical solutions are applied in the field, the sustainability of CH4 suppressing strategies is an important issue that has to be considered. The evaluation of different strategies, in terms of total GHG emissions for a given production system, is discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22443940     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109990620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  83 in total

1.  Changes in the Rumen Microbiota of Cows in Response to Dietary Supplementation with Nitrate, Linseed, and Saponin Alone or in Combination.

Authors:  Milka Popova; Jessie Guyader; Mathieu Silberberg; Ahmad Reza Seradj; Cristina Saro; Aurélien Bernard; Christine Gérard; Cécile Martin; Diego P Morgavi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Sheep fed with banana leaf hay reduce ruminal protozoa population.

Authors:  Cláudio Eduardo Silva Freitas; Eduardo Robson Duarte; Dorismar David Alves; Isabel Martinele; Marta D'Agosto; Franciane Cedrola; Angélica Alves de Moura Freitas; Franklin Delano Dos Santos Soares; Makenzi Beltran
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Quantifying the responses of mixed rumen microbes to excess carbohydrate.

Authors:  Timothy J Hackmann; Leanne E Diese; Jeffrey L Firkins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Treating cattle with antibiotics affects greenhouse gas emissions, and microbiota in dung and dung beetles.

Authors:  Tobin J Hammer; Noah Fierer; Bess Hardwick; Asko Simojoki; Eleanor Slade; Juhani Taponen; Heidi Viljanen; Tomas Roslin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Feeding of tropical trees and shrub foliages as a strategy to reduce ruminal methanogenesis: studies conducted in Cuba.

Authors:  Denia Caridad Delgado; Juana Galindo; Rogelio González; Niurca González; Idania Scull; Luís Dihigo; Juan Cairo; Ana Irma Aldama; Onidia Moreira
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Methanogenic potential of tropical feeds rich in hydrolyzable tannins1,2.

Authors:  Moufida Rira; Diego P Morgavi; Lucette Genestoux; Sihem Djibiri; Ines Sekhri; Michel Doreau
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  The effect of nitrate and monensin on in vitro ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  M Capelari; W Powers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Bovicins: The Bacteriocins of Streptococci and Their Potential in Methane Mitigation.

Authors:  Anita Kumari Garsa; Prasanta Kumar Choudhury; Anil Kumar Puniya; Tejpal Dhewa; Ravinder Kumar Malik; Sudhir Kumar Tomar
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; Sinéad M Waters; Sinead M Waters; David A Kenny; Christopher J Creevey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.