| Literature DB >> 35887614 |
Matthew G Davey1,2, Amirhossein Jalali3,4, Éanna J Ryan2, Ray P McLaughlin2, Karl J Sweeney2, Michael K Barry2, Carmel M Malone2, Maccon M Keane5, Aoife J Lowery1,2, Nicola Miller1, Michael J Kerin1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: OncotypeDX Recurrence Score© (RS) is a commercially available 21-gene expression assay which estimates prognosis and guides chemoendocrine prescription in early-stage estrogen-receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (ER+/HER2-) breast cancer. Limitations of RS testing include the cost and turnaround time of several weeks. AIM: Our aim is to develop a user-friendly surrogate nomogram capable of predicting RS.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; genomics; personalized medicine; surgical oncology
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887614 PMCID: PMC9318604 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Characteristics of the entire cohort with matched training and test sets.
| Overall ( | Train Set ( | Test Set ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at Diagnosis | 58 (51, 64) | 59 (51, 64) | 58 (51, 65) |
| Menopause Status | |||
| Premenopausal (0) | 137 (31%) | 91 (29%) | 46 (35%) |
| Postmenopausal (1) | 311 (69%) | 224 (71%) | 87 (65%) |
| Diagnostic pathway | |||
| Symptomatic (0) | 289 (65%) | 208 (66%) | 81 (61%) |
| Screening Detected (1) | 159 (35%) | 107 (34%) | 52 (39%) |
| Main Tumor Size | 20 (14, 26) | 20 (15, 26) | 19 (13, 26) |
| Tumor Stage | |||
| T1 | 219 (49%) | 148 (47%) | 71 (53%) |
| T2 | 218 (49%) | 159 (50%) | 59 (44%) |
| T3 | 11 (2.5%) | 8 (2.5%) | 3 (2.3%) |
| Histological Subtype | |||
| IDC | 341 (76%) | 243 (77%) | 98 (74%) |
| ILC | 82 (18%) | 52 (17%) | 30 (23%) |
| Other | 25 (5.6%) | 20 (6.3%) | 5 (3.8%) |
| Tumor Grade | |||
| Grade 1 | 44 (10%) | 28 (9.5%) | 16 (13%) |
| Grade 2 | 296 (70%) | 206 (70%) | 90 (71%) |
| Grade 3 | 82 (19%) | 62 (21%) | 20 (16%) |
| ER Score | |||
| 2 | 2 (0.4%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.8%) |
| 3 | 2 (0.4%) | 1 (0.3%) | 1 (0.8%) |
| 4 | 2 (0.4%) | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) |
| 5 | 3 (0.7%) | 1 (0.3%) | 2 (1.5%) |
| 6 | 16 (3.6%) | 12 (3.8%) | 4 (3.0%) |
| 7 | 56 (12%) | 43 (14%) | 13 (9.8%) |
| 8 | 367 (82%) | 255 (81%) | 112 (84%) |
| PgR Score | |||
| 0 | 62 (14%) | 46 (15%) | 16 (12%) |
| 2 | 6 (1.3%) | 3 (1.0%) | 3 (2.3%) |
| 3 | 21 (4.7%) | 12 (3.8%) | 9 (6.8%) |
| 4 | 26 (5.8%) | 19 (6.1%) | 7 (5.3%) |
| 5 | 48 (11%) | 36 (11%) | 12 (9.1%) |
| 6 | 62 (14%) | 36 (11%) | 26 (20%) |
| 7 | 73 (16%) | 55 (18%) | 18 (14%) |
| 8 | 148 (33%) | 107 (34%) | 41 (31%) |
| OncotypeDX© Recurrence Score | 17 (13, 22) | 17 (13, 22) | 17 (13, 22) |
Legend: N; number, median (IQR); interquartile range, IDC; invasive ductal carcinoma, ILC; invasive lobular carcinoma, T; tumor stage, ER; estrogen receptor, PgR; progesterone receptor.
Multivariable linear regression analysis to predict clinicopathological data capable of predicting continuous Recurrence Score.
| Surrogate RS Model | Beta | 95% CI 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at Diagnosis | −0.01 | −0.02, 0.00 | 0.12 |
| Menopause Status | |||
| Postmenopausal (0) | - | - | - |
| Premenopausal (1) | 0.25 | 0.03, 0.48 | 0.028 |
| Symptomatic Presentation | |||
| Screening Detected (0) | - | - | - |
| Symptomatic (1) | 0.09 | −0.06, 0.23 | 0.2 |
| Tumor Stage | |||
| T1 | - | - | - |
| T2 | 0.03 | −0.10, 0.15 | 0.7 |
| T3 | 0.18 | −0.23, 0.59 | 0.4 |
| Tumor Grade | |||
| Grade 1 | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 0.09 | −0.13, 0.30 | 0.4 |
| Grade 3 | 0.28 | 0.03, 0.52 | 0.026 |
| Histological Subtype | 0.99 | 0.50, 1.72 | 0.9 |
| Increasing ER Score | −0.14 | −0.22, −0.06 | 0.001 |
| Increasing PgR Score | −0.02 | −0.04, 0.00 | 0.11 |
Legend: 1 CI = confidence interval, RS; recurrence score, ER; estrogen receptor, PgR; progesterone receptor.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict clinicopathological data capable of predicting recurrence score > 25.
| Surrogate RS > 25 Model | OR 1 | 95% CI 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at Diagnosis | 1 | 0.95, 1.05 | >0.9 |
| Menopause Status | |||
| Postmenopausal (0) | - | - | - |
| Premenopausal (1) | 1.4 | 0.40, 5.23 | 0.6 |
| Symptomatic Presentation | |||
| Screening Detected (0) | - | - | - |
| Symptomatic (1) | 0.87 | 0.40, 1.96 | 0.7 |
| Tumor Stage | |||
| T1 | - | - | - |
| T2 | 1.37 | 0.47, 3.99 | 0.6 |
| T3 | 3.99 | 0.07, 164 | 0.5 |
| Tumor Grade | |||
| Grade 1 | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 2.22 | 0.57, 14.8 | 0.3 |
| Grade 3 | 5.67 | 1.32, 40.0 | 0.037 |
| Histological Subtype | 0.98 | 0.51, 1.76 | >0.9 |
| Decreasing ER Score | 1.33 | 1.02, 1.66 | 0.05 |
| Decreasing PgR Score | 1.16 | 1.06, 1.25 | 0.002 |
Legend: 1 OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, RS; recurrence score, ER; estrogen receptor, PgR; progesterone receptor.
Figure 1Calibration plots for the nomogram models illustrating the predicted probability for (A) recurrence score as a continuous outcome, and (B) as a binary outcome for recurrence score ≤ 25 and >25.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses performed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of the nomogram models for recurrence score as a continuous variable (area under the curve: 0.719) and recurrence score ≤ 25 and >25 (area under the curve: 0.740).
Figure 3Static nomogram model capable of predicting a ‘surrogate’ recurrence score as a continuous variable.