Literature DB >> 21369717

Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing?

K H Allison1, P L Kandalaft, C M Sitlani, S M Dintzis, A M Gown.   

Abstract

Oncotype DX(TM) is an RT-PCR-based assay used to predict chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers. We were interested if routinely available pathologic parameters could predict Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores (RS) in subsets of patients. We identified 173 breast cancers with available RSs and used 104 of these as a test set and 69 cases as a validation set. Pathologic characteristics including size, histologic type, Nottingham grade, and lymphatic invasion were recorded. Test set cases were stained for ER, progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, Ki67, CyclinD1, BCL2, D2-40, and P53. Statistical correlations with RS and regression tree analysis were performed. The validation set was subjected to analysis on the basis of grade, PR, and Ki67. In the test set, grade, PR levels and Ki67 had the strongest correlation with RS (P = 0.0002-0.0007). Regression tree analysis showed grade and PR as factors that could segregate cases into RS categories, with Ki67 adding value in certain subsets. A subset of cancers with a high likelihood of having a low RS (0-18) was identified with the following characteristics: grade 1, strong PR expression (Allred score ≥ 5) and Ki67 ≤ 10%. No cases with these characteristics had a high RS (≥ 31) and 73% had a low RS. Cancers highly likely to have a high RS were grade 3, low to absent PR expression (Allred score <5) and Ki67 > 10%. 80% of cases with these characteristics had a high RS and no cases had a low RS. Our validation set had similar findings in these two subsets. In conclusion, When cost and time are a consideration and the added value of Oncotype DX(TM) testing is in question, it may be reasonable to assume the results of this test in two specific subsets of breast cancers: (1) grade 1, high PR, low Ki67 cancers (low RS), and (2) grade 3, low PR, high Ki67 cancers (high RS).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21369717     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1416-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  43 in total

1.  Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Bradley M Turner; Kristin A Skinner; Ping Tang; Mary C Jackson; Nyrie Soukiazian; Michelle Shayne; Alissa Huston; Marilyn Ling; David G Hicks
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool.

Authors:  Anne A Eaton; Catherine E Pesce; James O Murphy; Michelle M Stempel; Sujata M Patil; Edi Brogi; Clifford A Hudis; Mahmoud El-Tamer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Algorithms for prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score using clinicopathologic data: a review and comparison using an independent dataset.

Authors:  Michael R Harowicz; Timothy J Robinson; Michaela A Dinan; Ashirbani Saha; Jeffrey R Marks; P Kelly Marcom; Maciej A Mazurowski
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Breast cancer subtype intertumor heterogeneity: MRI-based features predict results of a genomic assay.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Sutton; Jung Hun Oh; Brittany Z Dashevsky; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya P Apte; Sunitha B Thakur; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Will oncotype DX DCIS testing guide therapy? A single-institution correlation of oncotype DX DCIS results with histopathologic findings and clinical management decisions.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Lin; Kelly Mooney; Winward Choy; Soo-Ryum Yang; Keegan Barry-Holson; Kathleen Horst; Irene Wapnir; Kimberly Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

Authors:  Esther C Yoon; Christopher Schwartz; Edi Brogi; Katia Ventura; Hannah Wen; Farbod Darvishian
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Correlations Between Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and Classic Risk Factors in Early Breast Cancer: Results of A Prospective Multicenter Study in Turkey.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Ajlan Atasoy; Erhan Gökmen; Mustafa Özdoğan; Nilufer Güler; Cihan Uras; Engin Ok; Orhan Demircan; Abdurrahman Işıkkdoğan; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Fatma Şen; Pınar Saip
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-07-01

8.  Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Maggie Chon U Cheang; Miguel Martín; Joel S Parker; Eva Carrasco; Rosalía Caballero; Scott Tyldesley; Karen Gelmon; Philip S Bernard; Torsten O Nielsen; Charles M Perou
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A Validated Model for Identifying Patients Unlikely to Benefit From the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay.

Authors:  Michele M Gage; Martin Rosman; W Charles Mylander; Erica Giblin; Hyun-Seok Kim; Leslie Cope; Christopher Umbricht; Antonio C Wolff; Lorraine Tafra
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Comprehensive Histologic Scoring to Maximize the Predictability of Pathology-generated Equation of Breast Cancer Oncotype DX Recurrence Score.

Authors:  Thaer Khoury; Xiao Huang; Xiwei Chen; Dan Wang; Song Liu; Mateusz Opyrchal
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.