Literature DB >> 21970880

Ki 67 is a major, but not the sole determinant of Oncotype Dx recurrence score.

S Sahebjam1, R Aloyz, D Pilavdzic, M-L Brisson, C Ferrario, N Bouganim, V Cohen, W H Miller, L C Panasci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunohistological assessment of Ki 67 expression is less expensive than Oncotype Dx, which is currently used to identify patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer, who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: The relationship of immunohistologically measured Ki 67 to Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) was examined in 53 cases of T1-2 N0 M0 (oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2/neu negative) breast cancer.
RESULTS: There was a strong linear correlation between Ki 67 value and the Oncotype Dx RS. All patients in the low Ki 67 group (Ki 67 of ≤ 10%) had Oncotype Dx RSs of low or intermediate risk. The vast majority of patients (93.8%) in the high-Ki 67 group (Ki 67 ≥ 25%) had oncotype RSs of high or intermediate risk.
CONCLUSION: Ki 67 proliferation value is a major, but not the sole determinant of Oncotype Dx score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21970880      PMCID: PMC3241562          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Ki 67 protein is found in proliferating cells. It is present in the nuclei of cells in G1, S, G2, and M phases of the cell cycle. Ki 67 protein levels are low during G1- and early S-phase, and gradually increase to reach a maximum during mitosis. Therefore, Ki 67 protein expression can be a useful marker of cell proliferation (Urruticoechea ). Multiple studies have shown an association of Ki 67 expression with prognosis and response to systemic treatments in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. High-Ki 67 expression has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer recurrence and cancer death (Lee ; Colleoni ; Kronqvist ; Penault-Llorca ). Tumours with high Ki 67 before neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher rate of pathologic response, and lower Ki 67 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with favourable disease-free survival (DFS; Nishimura ; Yerushalmi ). At least two studies have suggested that patients with high-Ki 67 tumours may benefit more from adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (Viale , 2008b; Penault-Llorca ). The Oncotype Dx gene test (Genomic Health, Redwood City, CA, USA) is a commercially available reverse transcriptase PCR assay (RT–PCR) of 21 genes, which uses a specific algorithm to calculate the recurrence score (RS) for oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers. On the basis of RS, patients are considered low risk (RS<18), intermediate risk (18⩽RS<31), or high risk (RS⩾31). Although different cancer-related genes including ER and HER-2 expression are included in calculating the RS, five proliferation genes (Ki 67, STK 15, Survivin, CCNB 1, and MYBL 2) are heavily weighted and especially important in this calculation (Paik ). This test is currently used for predicting the risk of recurrence in lymph node-negative ER-positive breast cancers, and is considered by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as an option to help decision-making in this group of patients. Unfortunately, the high cost of this multigene assay limits its’ use in daily practice in many countries. The aim of this study was to compare the correlation of immunohistologically measured Ki 67 protein expression with the Oncotype Dx RS in patients with lymph node-negative ER/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancers.

Materials And Methods

With approval from the Institutional Research Ethics Committee, we analysed 53 cases of T1–2 N0 M0 (ER/PR-positive, HER-2-negative) breast cancer treated in the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada. These cases were chosen randomly from a pool of patients with early-stage breast cancer, who had Oncotype Dx analysis of their tumour. Pathology reports were reviewed and histological type, tumour size, Nottingham grade, perineural invasion status, lymphovascular invasion status, invasive tumour necrosis, ER levels, and PR levels were recorded. ER and PR levels were recorded as per the Allred Score (Harvey ). All tumours were HER-2 negative, using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Sentinel lymph node sampling data were available in all patients and no lymph node involvement was reported. The Oncotype Dx RS results were provided by Genomic Health test reports. Patients were stratified to three risk groups as per Oncotype RS: low risk (RS<18), intermediate risk (18⩽RS<31), and high risk (RS⩾31) (Paik ). Ki 67 expression was examined by IHC of formalin-fixed deparaffinised tissue, using prediluted rabbit monoclonal antibody against human Ki 67 (Clone 30-9, Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA) at a concentration of 2 μg ml−1. Slides were stained on automated immunostainer Benchmark XT from Ventana, using the iView DAB Detection Kit. The same tissue blocks were used for both Oncotype Dx testing and Ki 67 immunostaining. Results were assessed without the use of an image analysis system. The fraction of positive cells (in percentage) with definite nuclear immunostaining, including mild, moderate, and strong was counted. The representative fields were chosen at low magnification and included at least two areas at the most cellular edges of tumour, and one area in the centre. The number of cells counted at high-power magnification varied depending on distribution of Ki 67 immunopositive staining. For cases with even distribution, the Ki 67 staining was determined with 400–600 tumoural cells, but in cases with uneven distribution, up to 2500 tumoural cells were counted. The stained slides were evaluated by two of the authors when the distribution of Ki-67-positive tumoural cells was uneven, or when the percentage of immunoreactivity was near the cut-off points. Patients were divided into low-risk (Ki 67<10%), intermediate-risk (10%⩽Ki 67<25%), and high-risk group (Ki 67⩾25%) on the basis of the expression of Ki 67. Ki 67<10% was considered low, based on a cut-off point used by Kronqvist and Breast International Group Trial 1-98 (Viale , 2008b). However, as there were other studies that used Ki 67>20% as their cut-off point, we decided to consider Ki 67⩾25% as high (Colleoni ; Viale , 2008b). By doing so, we could study the group of patients with Ki 67 values falling between these two numbers (Ki 67 intermediate group). The SPSS version 19 (Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Linear regression, univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and partial correlation analysis were performed.

Results

The pathologic characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Pathological characteristics of tumours

  Number (%)
Size
 ⩽1 cm6 (11.3)
 >1 cm47 (88.7)
  
Histology
 Ductal48 (90.6)
 Lobular5 (9.4)
  
Nottingham grade
 115 (28.3)
 229 (54.7)
 39 (17)
  
Ki 67
 Low (<10)16 (30.2)
 Intermediate (10⩽Ki 67<25)21 (39.6)
 High (Ki 67⩾25)16 (30.2)
  
ER level (Allred score)
 Negative (<3)0 (0)
 Weak (3–4)1 (1.9)
 Strong (⩾5)52
  
PR level (Allred score)
 Negative (<3)6 (11.3)
 Weak (3–4)9 (17)
 Strong (⩾5)38 (71.7)
  
Oncotype Dx RS category
 Low (RS⩽17)25 (47.2)
 Intermediate (18⩽RS⩽30)20 (37.7)
 High (RS⩾31)8 (15.1)

Abbreviations: ER=oestrogen receptor; PR=progesterone receptor; RS=recurrence score.

The median Ki 67 value was 17.3% (range 2–90%). The median Oncotype RS was 18 (range 7–60). There was a strong linear correlation between Ki 67 expression and Oncotype RS (correlation coefficient=0.73, P-value<0.001; Figure 1).
Figure 1

Correlation of Oncotype DX RS with Ki 67 value. Correlation coefficient=0.73, P-value<0.001.

There was also a significant correlation between Nottingham grade and Oncotype RS on univariate analysis (correlation coefficient=0.52, P-value<0.001). The correlation of Ki 67 and Oncotype RS remained robust (correlation coefficient=0.6, P-value<0.001), even after controlling for the effect of Nottingham grade by using partial correlation analysis and multivariate analysis. On the other hand, there was no significant correlation between Nottingham grade and Oncotype RS when the effect of Ki 67 was controlled (correlation coefficient=0.064, P-value=0.65). This suggests that the correlation found between Nottingham grade and Oncotype RS on univariate analysis was most likely due to the effect of Ki 67. We also analysed the correlation between other histopathological characteristics of tumour with Oncotype RS. Previously, Flanagan ) reported significant correlation between nuclear grade, mitotic count, ER score, and PR score . In our study, there was a weak but significant correlation between nuclear grade and Oncotype RS (correlation coefficient=0.39, P-value=0.005). This correlation was weaker but still significant, when the effect of Ki 67 was controlled by using partial correlation analysis (correlation coefficient=0.32, P-value=0.047). There was a significant correlation between mitosis score (measured as part of Nottingham scoring) and Oncotype RS in univariate analysis (correlation coefficient=0.39, P-value=0.005). This correlation was not significant when the effect of Ki 67 was controlled in multivariate analysis and partial analysis (correlation coefficient=0.054, P-value=0.714). In previous studies, lower expression of PR has been associated with higher Oncotype RS (Flanagan ; Tang ). Tang ) demonstrated that among ER-positive tumours, PR-poor tumours had significantly higher Oncotype RS. Our results were consistent with these findings. ER/PR expression had a significant inverse correlation with Oncotype RS, but did not affect the correlation between Ki 67 and Oncotype RS. Lower expression of PR was associated with higher Oncotype RS (correlation coefficient=−0.56, P-value<0.001), which was independent from the effect of ER expression. The combination of ER/PR expression and Ki 67 had a very strong correlation with Oncotype RS (correlation coefficient=0.84, (0.75–0.93) P-value<0.001). There was no significant correlation between perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, invasive tumour necrosis, and Oncotype RS on multivariate analysis. Most patients (93.85%) in the high-Ki 67 group (Ki 67⩾25%) had Oncotype RS of high or intermediate risk. All patients in low-Ki 67 group (Ki 67 of <10%) had RS of low or intermediate risk (Table 2).
Table 2

Distribution of cases by Ki 67 value and Oncotype Dx RS

  Low-oncotype RS (%) Intermediate- oncotype RS (%) High-oncotype RS (%)
Low Ki 6712 (75)4 (25)0 (0)
Intermediate Ki 6712 (57.1)9 (42.9)0 (0)
High Ki 671 (6.25)7 (43.85)8 (50)

Abbreviation: RS=recurrence score.

Discussion

Oncotype Dx testing provides valuable prognostic and predictive information in patients with early-stage breast cancers. Unfortunately, the high price limits the accessibility of this test to all patients. Hence, there has been increasing interest to find simple pathology tests, which can help predict the recurrence of disease. As Ki 67 is one of the proliferation genes assessed routinely by IHC in different malignancies, several investigators have studied its prognostic and predictive value in different stages of breast cancer treatment. High-Ki 67 expression detected by IHC has been reported as the strongest individual prognostic factor of breast cancer death or recurrence in patients with T1 N0 M0 disease (Kronqvist ). Ki 67 positivity in more than 10% of cancer cells increased the odds of breast cancer death or relapse by 11-fold (Kronqvist ). In another study, the 4-year DFS was lower for patients with T1 N0 M0 breast cancer and Ki 67 value ⩾20%, compared with T1 N0 M0 breast cancer and Ki 67<20% 93.3% vs 99.2%, respectively (Colleoni ). Ki 67 value has also been considered as a strong predictive factor for effectiveness of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy. In a study by Nishimura ), pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with Ki 67 values. A higher pathological complete response rate was found in patients with higher Ki 67 values, and there was no pathological response in patients with Ki 67 less than 25%. Ki 67 after neoadjuvant treatment was predictive of DFS. The lower Ki 67 (<12%) was associated with favourable DFS (Nishimura ). Expression of Ki 67 in ER-positive breast cancer patients has been associated with benefit from docetaxel treatment in the adjuvant setting; 5-year DFS was higher in patients with ER-positive/Ki 67-positive tumours (84%) vs ER-positive/Ki 67-negative tumours (81%) when they were treated with adjuvant docetaxel (Penault-Llorca ). Greater benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy with Letrozole vs Tamoxifen has been observed in patients with Ki 67 value>10% (Viale , 2008b). Ki 67 has been also found to be highly effective in dividing ER-positive tumours into luminal A and luminal B subtypes (Hugh ). One of the limitations of the use of Ki 67 value is the lack of a standardised scoring system, which should be addressed, as multiple studies, including ours, have underlined the potential use of this test in decision-making. Our study reveals a strong correlation between Ki 67 value and Oncotype DX RS, especially in tumours with Ki 67 value ⩾25%. Our findings strengthen two recent publications by Gwin ) and Allison ). Gwin ) studied the association between Ki 67 value and Oncotype Dx RS in a series of 32 patients with lymph node-negative ER/PR-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer. Although no correlation analysis was presented in this article, overall association was found between Ki 67 value and Oncotype RS in most cases. They also noticed unexpectedly high-Ki 67 value in patients with low RS. One of the limitations of the study was the fact that none of the 32 patients had high RS. On the basis of these findings, the authors suggested the combination of Oncotype DX and Ki 67 values for identifying tumours with a high potential of recurrence (Gwin ). In addition, recently, Ki 67 was significantly associated with Oncotype RS, Nottingham grade, and angiolymphatic invasion (Williams ). Previously, Flanagan ) had shown a significant correlation between Nottingham grade and Oncotype RS (correlation coefficient=0.59, P<0.01). In a recently published article by Allison ), the correlation of Ki 67 and routine pathological parameters with Oncotype RS was studied. In this study, Nottingham grade had the strongest overall association with Oncotype RS and was used in combination with the PR level to divide cases into different subgroups. A unique finding in our study is the fact that the correlation between Nottingham score and Oncotype RS disappeared when the effect of Ki 67 value was controlled. Our findings suggest that Ki 67 is the major driver of the correlation found between Nottingham grade and Oncotype RS. We also found that the likelihood of a tumour with Ki 67⩾25% having a high or intermediate Oncotype RS is >90%, and these patients may be the group that benefit the most from adjuvant chemotherapy. In summary, our data suggests that Ki 67 is the major but not the sole determinant of Oncotype RS. It will be of great interest to study an immunopanel consisting of Ki 67 with other proliferation markers measured by Oncotype Dx, that is, STK 15, Survivin, CCNB1, and MYBL2.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Proliferation marker Ki-67 in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ander Urruticoechea; Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Routine pathologic parameters can predict Oncotype DX recurrence scores in subsets of ER positive patients: who does not always need testing?

Authors:  K H Allison; P L Kandalaft; C M Sitlani; S M Dintzis; A M Gown
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Minimal and small size invasive breast cancer with no axillary lymph node involvement: the need for tailored adjuvant therapies.

Authors:  M Colleoni; N Rotmensz; G Peruzzotti; P Maisonneuve; G Viale; G Renne; C Casadio; P Veronesi; M Intra; R Torrisi; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed Ki-67 labeling index in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: results from Breast International Group Trial 1-98 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with letrozole.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Meredith M Regan; Alan S Coates; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Eugenio Maiorano; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Stephen G Braye; Christian Ohlschlegel; Patrick Neven; Zsolt Orosz; Wojciech P Olszewski; Fiona Knox; Beat Thürlimann; Karen N Price; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Barry A Gusterson; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Predictive value of tumor Ki-67 expression in two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Fausto Maffini; Eugenio Maiorano; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Rastko Golouh; Tiziana Perin; R W Brown; Anikó Kovács; Komala Pillay; Christian Ohlschlegel; Barry A Gusterson; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Melina B Flanagan; David J Dabbs; Adam M Brufsky; Sushil Beriwal; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Breast cancer subtypes and response to docetaxel in node-positive breast cancer: use of an immunohistochemical definition in the BCIRG 001 trial.

Authors:  Judith Hugh; John Hanson; Maggie Chon U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Charles M Perou; Charles Dumontet; John Reed; Maryla Krajewska; Isabelle Treilleux; Matthieu Rupin; Emmanuelle Magherini; John Mackey; Miguel Martin; Charles Vogel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Predicting aggressive outcome in T1N0M0 breast cancer.

Authors:  P Kronqvist; T Kuopio; M Nykänen; H Helenius; J Anttinen; P Klemi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  24 in total

1.  Use of modified Magee equations and histologic criteria to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Bradley M Turner; Kristin A Skinner; Ping Tang; Mary C Jackson; Nyrie Soukiazian; Michelle Shayne; Alissa Huston; Marilyn Ling; David G Hicks
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Is breast cancer staging obsolete?

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Increased expression of tumor proliferation genes in Hispanic women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Kalinsky; Emerson A Lim; Eleni Andreopoulou; Avni M Desai; Zhezhen Jin; Yifan Tu; Hanina Hibshoosh; Antai Wang; Heather Greenlee; Katherine D Crew; Matthew Maurer; Joseph A Sparano; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Dynamics of Protein Expression Reveals Primary Targets and Secondary Messengers of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Signaling in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Andrei P Drabovich; Maria P Pavlou; Christina Schiza; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Do we need biomarkers to predict the benefit of adding adjuvant taxanes for treatment of breast cancer?

Authors:  José Pérez-García; Javier Cortés
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  BreastMark: an integrated approach to mining publicly available transcriptomic datasets relating to breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Stephen F Madden; Colin Clarke; Patricia Gaule; Sinead T Aherne; Norma O'Donovan; Martin Clynes; John Crown; William M Gallagher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  WDHD1 is essential for the survival of PTEN-inactive triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Ayse Ertay; Huiquan Liu; Dian Liu; Ping Peng; Charlotte Hill; Hua Xiong; David Hancock; Xianglin Yuan; Marcin R Przewloka; Mark Coldwell; Michael Howell; Paul Skipp; Rob M Ewing; Julian Downward; Yihua Wang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  Comparison of EndoPredict and Oncotype DX test results in hormone receptor positive invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Varga; Peter Sinn; Florian Fritzsche; Arthur von Hochstetter; Aurelia Noske; Peter Schraml; Christoph Tausch; Andreas Trojan; Holger Moch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Molly E Klein; David J Dabbs; Yongli Shuai; Adam M Brufsky; Rachel Jankowitz; Shannon L Puhalla; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Prognostic value of gene signatures and proliferation in lymph-node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristin Jonsdottir; Jörg Assmus; Aida Slewa; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ivar Skaland; Jan P A Baak; Emiel A M Janssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.