Literature DB >> 21082239

Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03).

Masahide Kondo1, Shu-Ling Hoshi, Takeharu Yamanaka, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Masakazu Toi.   

Abstract

The 21-gene signature is validated as a good predictor of recurrence for lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer in Japanese patient population. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of two scenarios designed to include the assay into Japan's social health insurance benefit package: one for LN-, ER+, ESBC and another for LN-/+, ER+, ESBC. An economic decision tree and Markov model under Japan's health system from the societal perspective is constructed with new evidence from the Japanese validation study. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are estimated as ¥384,828 (US$3,848) per QALY for the indication for LN- scenario and ¥568,533 (US$5,685) per QALY for the indication for LN-/+ scenario. Both are not more than the suggested social willingness-to-pay for one QALY gain from an innovative medical intervention in Japan, ¥5,000,000/QALY (US$50,000/QALY). Sensitivity analyses show that this result is plausibly robust, since ICERs do not exceed the threshold by various changes of assumptions made and values employed. In conclusion, the inclusion of the assay in Japan's social health insurance benefit package for not only LN- diseases but also LN+ diseases is cost-effective. Such a decision can be justifiable as an efficient use of finite resources for health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21082239     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1243-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  25 in total

Review 1.  Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on Therapy Selection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  E Nilüfer Güler
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-10-01

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Weixiong Dang; Ilana Richman; Sarah S Mougalian; Suzanne B Evans; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Estimating the OncotypeDX score: validation of an inexpensive estimation tool.

Authors:  Anne A Eaton; Catherine E Pesce; James O Murphy; Michelle M Stempel; Sujata M Patil; Edi Brogi; Clifford A Hudis; Mahmoud El-Tamer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 4.  Diagnostic tests based on gene expression profile in breast cancer: from background to clinical use.

Authors:  Laura Zanotti; Alberto Bottini; Camillo Rossi; Daniele Generali; Maria Rosa Cappelletti
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-23

5.  Prospective Clinical Utility Study of the Use of the 21-Gene Assay in Adjuvant Clinical Decision Making in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Invasive Breast Cancer: Results From the SWITCH Study.

Authors:  Joseph Gligorov; Xavier B Pivot; William Jacot; Hervé L Naman; Dominique Spaeth; Jean-Louis Misset; Rémy Largillier; Jean-Loup Sautiere; Anne de Roquancourt; Christophe Pomel; Philippe Rouanet; Roman Rouzier; Frederique M Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-06-25

6.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use and Health Care Costs After Introduction of Genomic Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Anil Vachani; Sakhena Hin; Lin Yang; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Katrina Armstrong; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cost-effectiveness of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in the context of multifactorial decision making to guide chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Michaela A Dinan; Kevin A Schulman; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Michael Marrone; Alison Stewart; W David Dotson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.