| Literature DB >> 35806354 |
Myriam Janeth Salazar-Terreros1, Jean-Paul Vernot1,2.
Abstract
Cellular senescence is recognized as a dynamic process in which cells evolve and adapt in a context dependent manner; consequently, senescent cells can exert both beneficial and deleterious effects on their surroundings. Specifically, senescent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) in the bone marrow (BM) have been linked to the generation of a supporting microenvironment that enhances malignant cell survival. However, the study of MSC's senescence role in leukemia development has been straitened not only by the availability of suitable models that faithfully reflect the structural complexity and biological diversity of the events triggered in the BM, but also by the lack of a universal, standardized method to measure senescence. Despite these constraints, two- and three dimensional in vitro models have been continuously improved in terms of cell culture techniques, support materials and analysis methods; in addition, research on animal models tends to focus on the development of techniques that allow tracking leukemic and senescent cells in the living organism, as well as to modify the available mice strains to generate individuals that mimic human BM characteristics. Here, we present the main advances in leukemic niche modeling, discussing advantages and limitations of the different systems, focusing on the contribution of senescent MSC to leukemia progression.Entities:
Keywords: MSC senescence; aging; in vitro models; in vivo models; leukemia; leukemic niche
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35806354 PMCID: PMC9266537 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Common 2D and 3D in vitro culture models for cancer research. The use of young or senescent MSC as a support in 2D or 3D cultures for studying BM niche biology could exert differential effects on leukemic cell biology. In 2D cultures, cells grow as a suspension or as a monolayer on a flat plastic surface that can be coated or not with matrix components (fibronectin, collagen, vitronectinetc.); these kinds of systems may include one, two or more types of cells. On the other hand, 3D cultures have been developed to improve the representation of architectural, multicomponent complexity of the biochemical interactions in cancer and BM biology. Probably, the simplest way to obtain a 3D conformation is to induce the formation of spheroids composed by one or more cellular types; this can be accomplished by spontaneous formation on low-attachment surfaces, magnetic levitation, spinner flasks, among others. The use of different types of scaffolds provides a support for cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and migration. The scaffolds can be built with biomaterials, such as decellularized native tissues, ceramic (hydroxyapatite, bioglass), natural (collagen, fibrin, alginate, chitosan) or synthetic polymers (polyethylene glycol, polycaprolactone, poly(hydroxyethylmethacrylate), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)). Among the most frequently used polymers, hydrogels are preferred for their similarities to ECM mechanical properties. The application of 3D bioprinting techniques (not depicted) and the development of microchips compatible to single-cell methodologies have allowed the engineering of devices where a flow can be applied to improve cell proliferation/migration, add immune cells or test compounds in situ in a way that maintains microenvironments physically and biochemically differentiated but allow communication among them. Depending on the microchip device design and the inclusion or not of scaffolds, different culture models can be obtained. Based on [65,66,67] {Borghesan, 2020 #585; Cucchi, 2020 #586; Rodrigues, 2021 #584}.
Figure 2Approaches for developing leukemia murine models. (A) Carcinogen-induced models: leukemic mice induced by carcinogen administration (chemical, ionizing radiation). (B) Syngeneic models: leukemic mice established by injection of murine cancer cell lines in immunocompetent hosts. (C) Mosaic, viral, and transposon induced models: leukemic mice originated from oncogenes engineered in a viral vector through transfected murine HSC, causing oncogene or aberrant proto-oncogene expression or disruption of tumor suppressor genes; similar results are obtained from transposon sequences inserted into the host genome. HSC can be manipulated using either retroviral transduction or genome editing techniques. (D) Transgenic models: leukemic mice established by genetic manipulation of cancer-causing genes injected or electroporated into embryonic stem cell (ESC) or fertilized zygotes; ESC that have incorporated the vector are injected into tetraploid blastocysts. These blastocysts or the transformed zygotes are transplanted into pseudopregnant receptive females, whose offspring is monitored to detect leukemic individuals. (E) Xenograft models: leukemic mice are obtained from immunocompromised hosts that have been inoculated with primary patient samples or human cell lines. Hu = Mice reconstituted with human immune system. Hu-CDX (cell line xenograft) originated from immunodeficient mice inoculated with human cancer cell lines. Hu-PDX (human patient-derived xenograft) originated from patient’s biopsies without applying ex vivo culturing prior to transplantation. Hu-CAR: immunocompetent mice inoculated bearing human tumor xenograft and administered a CAR therapeutic. Green letters: advantages. Red letters: disadvantages. Blue inset: examples of gene targets for each type of leukemia studied with the model. The graph is based on [129], with additional information from [145,147,148,149].