Beatriz Lozano-Torres1,2,3,4, Juan F Blandez1,2,4, Irene Galiana1,2,3,4, José A Lopez-Dominguez5, Miguel Rovira5, Marta Paez-Ribes6, Estela González-Gualda6, Daniel Muñoz-Espín6, Manuel Serrano5,7, Félix Sancenón1,2,3,4, Ramón Martínez-Máñez1,2,3,4. 1. Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación de Reconocimiento Molecular y Desarrollo Tecnológico (IDM), Universitat Politècnica de València-Universitat de València, Camí de Vera S/ N, Valencia 46022 Spain. 2. Unidad Mixta UPV-CIPF de Investigación en Mecanismos de Enfermedades y Nanomedicina, Universitat Politècnica de València, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe, C/Eduardo Primo Yúfera 3, Valencia 46012, Spain. 3. CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Av. Monforte de Lemos, 3-5. Pabellón 11. Planta 0, Madrid 28029, Spain. 4. Unidad Mixta de Investigación en Nanomedicina y Sensores. Universitat Politècnica de València, IIS La Fe, Av. Fernando Abril Martorell, 10, Torre A 7a̲ planta, Valencia 46026, Spain. 5. Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Carrer de Baldiri Reixac, 10, Barcelona 08028, Spain. 6. CRUK Cancer Centre Early Detection Programme, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Box 197, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, U.K. 7. Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
Cellular senescence is a state of stable cell cycle arrest that can negatively affect the regenerative capacities of tissues and can contribute to inflammation and the progression of various aging-related diseases. Advances in the in vivo detection of cellular senescence are still crucial to monitor the action of senolytic drugs and to assess the early onset or accumulation of senescent cells. Here, we describe a naphthalimide-styrene-based probe (HeckGal) for the detection of cellular senescence both in vitro and in vivo. HeckGal is hydrolyzed by the increased lysosomal β-galactosidase activity of senescent cells, resulting in fluorescence emission. The probe was validated in vitro using normal human fibroblasts and various cancer cell lines undergoing senescence induced by different stress stimuli. Remarkably, HeckGal was also validated in vivo in an orthotopic breast cancer mouse model treated with senescence-inducing chemotherapy and in a renal fibrosis mouse model. In all cases, HeckGal allowed the unambiguous detection of senescence in vitro as well as in tissues and tumors in vivo. This work is expected to provide a potential technology for senescence detection in aged or damaged tissues.
Cellular senescence is a state of stable cell cycle arrest that can negatively affect the regenerative capacities of tissues and can contribute to inflammation and the progression of various aging-related diseases. Advances in the in vivo detection of cellular senescence are still crucial to monitor the action of senolytic drugs and to assess the early onset or accumulation of senescent cells. Here, we describe a naphthalimide-styrene-based probe (HeckGal) for the detection of cellular senescence both in vitro and in vivo. HeckGal is hydrolyzed by the increased lysosomal β-galactosidase activity of senescent cells, resulting in fluorescence emission. The probe was validated in vitro using normal human fibroblasts and various cancer cell lines undergoing senescence induced by different stress stimuli. Remarkably, HeckGal was also validated in vivo in an orthotopic breast cancer mouse model treated with senescence-inducing chemotherapy and in a renal fibrosis mouse model. In all cases, HeckGal allowed the unambiguous detection of senescence in vitro as well as in tissues and tumors in vivo. This work is expected to provide a potential technology for senescence detection in aged or damaged tissues.
Cellular
senescence is a biological
process occurring in response to stress or damage and whose main role
is to trigger tissue repair and to prevent the proliferation of stressed
or damaged cells.[1] Senescence triggered
by excessive proliferation is known as “replicative senescence”,[2] but senescence can also be triggered through
diverse procedures, such as activation of oncogenes, inhibition of
tumor suppressor genes, accumulation of DNA damage, the presence of
reactive oxygen species (ROS), or nucleolar stresses among others.
This type of senescence is known as stress-induced premature senescence
(SIPS).[3] Senescence has a relevant physiological
role during development and promotes tissue regeneration in response
to circumstantial damage, but the inefficient elimination of senescent
cells during aging or upon persistent damage can produce inflammation,
fibrosis, tissue aging, tumorigenesis, and metastasis.[1,4−6]Evidence is accumulating that the selective
elimination of senescent
cells ameliorates a wide variety of aging-associated diseases, reverts
long-term degenerative processes, and extends both lifespan and healthspan
in mice.[7,8] Inspired by these findings, there is a growing
interest in developing drugs capable to induce apoptosis preferentially
in senescent cells. In fact, senotherapies (treatments with senolytic
or senomorphic drugs) are a new strategy to prevent cell-autonomous
and non-cell-autonomous effects of senescent cells.[9−11] Senolytic drugs
kill senescent cells preferentially over nonsenescent cells; whereas,
senomorphic drugs reduce the secretion of proinflammatory and profibrotic
factors by senescent cells but without killing them.[12,13] Such drugs would contribute to the therapeutic treatment of senescence-associated
diseases and may stimulate the long-term idea that rejuvenation might
be possible.[6] A related important issue
in the field of senotherapy is the development of new highly selective
and sensitive tools to detect cellular senescence.[14] These probes are expected to play an essential role in
the detection of senescent cells in aged or damaged tissues, help
in the discrimination between senolytic (selectively killing senescent
cells) and senomorphic (selectively suppressing SASP) drugs, or monitor
the action of senotherapeutics in multiple age-related disorders.[12,13]Some of the most important markers of senescent cells are
senescence-associated
heterochromatic foci (SAHF),[15,16] activation of tumor
suppressors and cell cycle inhibitors (e.g., p53, p16INK4a, and p21),[17−20] the overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins (e.g., BCLs),[21] the absence of proliferative markers (Ki67),[22] the loss of important chromatin structural proteins
(Lamin B1, HMGB1, and HGMB2),[23] a senescence-associated
secretory phenotype (SASP),[24] and the presence
of high levels of lysosomal β-galactosidase (β-Gal) activity,
known as senescence-associated β-galactosidase, (SA-β-Gal).[25] Monitoring β-Gal activity using chromofluorogenic
molecular-based probes represents a simple and accurate manner to
track senescence in most of the cases, and several β-Gal probes
are commercially available. However, most of these probes cannot be
applied to in vivo models.[12,13] For example, fluorescein-di-(β-D-galactopyranoside) (FDG)
requires the use of chloroquine in order to increase lysosomal pH,[26,27] 4-methylumbelliferyl β-D-galactopyranoside (MUG) is not permeable
to cells,[28] and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside
(X-Gal)[29] is toxic and therefore cells
need to be previously fixed. These drawbacks have boosted the interest
in developing molecular sensors for the monitoring of β-Gal
activity that could work on live cells and tissues. More recently,
((E)-2-(2-(6-hydroxy-2,3-dihydro-1H-xanthen-4-yl)vinyl)-3,3-dimethyl-1-propyl-3H-indol-1-ium),
known as Spider-Gal, has gained importance as an SA-β-Gal detection
kit, especially for flow cytometry since the fluorophore is covalently
anchored to the cell after hydrolysis. However, this could be a problem
when applying in vivo and cause long-term toxicity.[30] Most of the described probes are based on classical
one-photon fluorophores linked to the anomeric carbon of β-galactose.
In one-photon probes, the biological target is only detected by an
intensity-responsive fluorescent signal, which can be interfered with
the excitation and emission efficiency, probe concentration, and surrounding
conditions.[31,32] As an alternative, the design
of molecular probes using two-photon fluorophores has attracted great
attention in the last years due to their improved three-dimensional
spatial localization, prolonged observation time, increased imaging
depth, minimized fluorescence background and light scattering, and
lower tissue injury.[33] In addition, one
typical inaccuracy when developing SA-β-Gal probes is their
validation in biological models, which is not directly related to
senescence. In most cases, the method used in previous in
vitro studies are based on lacZ gene transfection
and in vivo using mouse models in which tumors are
labelled with avidin-β-Gal[34,35] or transfected
with the pCMV-lacZ plasmid[36] that results in high levels of cytosolic β-Gal expression,[37−44] which is unrelated to the lysosomal human β-Gal, encoded by
the GLB1 gene, naturally overexpressed in senescent cells. As a consequence,
there are still a very limited number of selective two-photon fluorescent
probes for the detection of bona fide cellular senescence in vivo models. Specifically, SG1 was the first two-photon
ratiometric probe to detect senescent cells in vitro,[45] and AHGa was the first two-photon
probe to detect cellular senescence in vivo.[46]Taking into account our interest in the
development of fluorogenic
sensors,[47−51] we report herein the synthesis and characterization of a new two-photon
naphthalimide-styrene probe (HeckGal in Figure A) for in vivo detection of senescence. The HeckGal probe consists
of a naphthalimide-styrene fluorophore (Heck in Figure A) covalently linked
to an acetylated β-galactose through the anomeric carbon. HeckGal is poorly emissive, whereas a sudden revival of the
emission is observed in the presence of lysosomal β-Gal activity.
The probe is tested in vitro in human cancer cell
lines, including SK-Mel-103 and A549 cells, a breast murine cancer
line (4 T1), and in a human BJ fibroblast cell line, undergoing senescence
by different triggers. The probe is also tested in vivo in BALB/cByJ female mice bearing 4 T1 breast cancer tumors treated
with senescence-inducing chemotherapy, and in a model of renal fibrosis
induced by treatment with folic acid in C57BL/6 J male mice.
Figure 1
Synthesis of
the probe and the mechanism of action in mice. (A)
Synthetic route used for the preparation of the probe: (a) CH3ONH2·3HCl, Et3N, and dioxane; (b)
TBDPSCl, imidazole, and DMF; (c) n-BuLi, Ph3PCH3I, and THF; (d) Pd(OAc)2, (O-tolyl)3P, Et3N, and DMF; and (e) NaOH/MeOH
and acetobromo-α-D-galactose. (B) Schematic representation of
the application of the probe in two in vivo models
of senescence: (i) kidney fibrotic C57BL/6 J male mice induced by
treatment with folic acid and (ii) BALB/cByJ female mice bearing 4
T1 breast cancer tumors treated with senescence-inducing chemotherapy.
(iii) Fluorescence emission spectra (λex = 488 nm)
of HeckGal (yellow) and Heck fluorophore
(orange) in aqueous solutions (pH 7)–DMSO (0.01%).
Synthesis of
the probe and the mechanism of action in mice. (A)
Synthetic route used for the preparation of the probe: (a) CH3ONH2·3HCl, Et3N, and dioxane; (b)
TBDPSCl, imidazole, and DMF; (c) n-BuLi, Ph3PCH3I, and THF; (d) Pd(OAc)2, (O-tolyl)3P, Et3N, and DMF; and (e) NaOH/MeOH
and acetobromo-α-D-galactose. (B) Schematic representation of
the application of the probe in two in vivo models
of senescence: (i) kidney fibrotic C57BL/6 J male mice induced by
treatment with folic acid and (ii) BALB/cByJ female mice bearing 4
T1 breast cancer tumors treated with senescence-inducing chemotherapy.
(iii) Fluorescence emission spectra (λex = 488 nm)
of HeckGal (yellow) and Heck fluorophore
(orange) in aqueous solutions (pH 7)–DMSO (0.01%).
Experimental Section
Materials
All chemical reagents
were purchased from
Sigma–Aldrich, while anhydrous solvents and phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS, 0.01 M) were purchased from Scharlab S.L. and used without
further purification. Palbociclib was purchased from Selleckchem,
and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine
serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco. Flat-bottom clear 96-well plates
were purchased from Promega. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS)
and the data was recorded with a TripleTOF T5600 (ABSciex, U.S.A.)
spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were collected
on a Bruker FT-NMR Avance 400 (Ettlingen, Germany) spectrometer at
300 K, using TMS as an internal standard. HPLC measures were obtained
by a Waters 1525 binary HPLC pump, and spectra were recorded by a
Waters 2998 photodiode array at 260 nm. Fluorescence spectra were
recorded by a JASCO FP-8500 fluorescence spectrophotometer, Luminescence
was collected in a VICTOR multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer). Confocal
fluorescence images were taken on a Leica TCS SP8 AOBS, and two-photon
images were acquired using a multiphoton Olympus FV1000MPE confocal
microscope. Images were analyzed using ImageJ software. The SK-Mel-103
(human melanoma) cancer cell line and 4 T1 (breast cancer cells) were
acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). BALB/cByJ
female mice were purchased from Charles River laboratories, France.
Hydrolysis Reaction
The hydrolysis reaction of the HeckGal probe by β-Gal enzyme was analyzed by fluorescence
spectroscopy and by HPLC–UV techniques. For this purpose, 2
μL of human β-Gal enzyme was added to PBS (pH 7)–DMSO
(0.01%) solutions of HeckGal (10–5 M),
and the emission spectrum at 552 nm was recorded with time (Figure S7a). After 15 min, HeckGal was completely hydrolyzed, and the emission band of the product
closely correlated with the emission intensity of pure Heck fluorophore solution. Furthermore, in the same reaction condition,
HPLC–UV studies (Figure S7b) corroborated
these results. Time-conversion plots of HeckGal and its
reaction intermediates (Heck and β-Gal) were determined
by analyzing reaction aliquots by reversed-phase liquid chromatography
using a KromasilC18 column as the stationary phase, eluting under
isocratic conditions 0.8 mL/min (87.4:12.5:0.1 vol % H2O/CH3CN/CH3COOH) and using a photodiode array
detector. Retention time (Rt) for Heck was 18.17 min,
while Rt for HeckGal was 8.55 min and 4.60 min for human
β-Gal enzyme.
Cell Lines
SK-Mel-103 (human melanoma)
cancer cells
and 4 T1 (mouse breast cancer cells) were obtained from ATCC. Cells
were maintained in a DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and incubated
in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were
routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination using the mycoplasma
tissue culture NI (MTC-NI) rapid detection system (Gen-Probe). For
senescence induction, cells were supplemented for 2 weeks with media
containing 5 μM palbociclib.
In Vitro Viability Assays
SK-Mel-103
(human melanoma) cancer and 4 T1 (mouse breast cancer) cells were
used for cell viability assays. Cells were maintained in a DMEM supplemented
with 10% FBS and incubated in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C. For senescence induction, cells were supplemented
with a DMEM containing 5 μM palbociclib for 2 weeks. Control
and senescent cells were placed in flat-bottom-clear 96-well plates
at a density of 6000 and 4000 cells per well, respectively. The following
day cells were treated with serial dilutions of HeckGal or Heck. Viability was assessed 48 h later with CellTiter-GLO
luminescent cell viability assay. Raw data were obtained by measuring
luminescence in a VICTOR multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer).
Mouse Models
Balb/cByJ mice were maintained at the
Spanish Research Centre Principe Felipe (CIPF) in accordance with
the recommendations of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal
Science Associations (FELASA). Breast 4 T1 tumors were established
by using 4 T1 cells. Cells were routinely cultured in a DMEM supplemented
with 10% FBS and penicillin–streptomycin. In order to generate
breast tumors, cells were trypsinised, counted with a LUNA automated
cell counter, and injected subcutaneously in the left breast of 28
to 34 week-old BALB/cByJ female mice at a concentration of 0.5 ×
106 cells in a volume of 100 μL. Tumor volume was
measured every 2 days with a caliper and calculated as V = (a × b2)/2 where a is the longer and b is the shorter of
two perpendicular diameters. Palbociclib or vehicle was administered
by daily oral gavage for 7 days with 100 mg/kg dissolved in 50 mM
sodium lactate, at pH 5 in order to induce senescence. Then, HeckGal was intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered at a concentration
of 6 mg/mL in a DMEM (5% DMSO) in a volume of 200 μL. Mice were
sacrificed 2 h later by CO2 exposure in a euthanasia chamber,
and tumors and organs (lung, liver, kidney, or spleen) were immediately
removed. Tumors and organs were analyzed immediately after harvesting. Heck was detected using an excitation wavelength of 500 nm
and an emission wavelength of 540 nm. Fluorescence images were taken
on an IVIS spectrum imaging system and analyzed by using living imaging
software from Caliper Life Sciences. On the other hand, 2 month-old
C57BL/6 J male mice were maintained at the Institut de Recerca Biomèdica
(IRB). All animal procedures were carried out in compliance with the
regulations of the Animal Care and Use Ethical Committee of the Barcelona
Science Park (CEEA-PCB) and the Catalan Government under the recommendations
of the FELASA. In order to generate renal fibrosis, mice were i.p
injected with a single dose of either 250 mg/kg of folic acid or vehicle.
Thirty-four days after treatment, the animals were administered either
with a single i.p injected dose of HeckGal (13.33 mg/mL
200 μL) in DMSO 1% corn oil or with vehicle. Animals were euthanized
5 h later by CO2 exposure in a euthanasia chamber, and
the kidneys were excised for observation with an IVIS imager (PerkinElmer).
Preparation of Mouse Tumor Slices for Imaging Experiments
Tumors from Balb/cByJ mice ortothopically injected with 4 T1 cells
treated or not treated with palbociclib were excised and cut in half.
They were pasted onto a petri dish exposing a tumor surface as smooth
as possible. The slices were incubated with a 10 mM solution of HeckGal for 2 h at 37 °C in a dry incubator, and then
washed three times with PBS and observed under a two-photon confocal
microscope (Olympus FV1000MPE). The images were acquired at different
penetration depths (λex = 820 nm).
Results and Discussion
Synthesis,
Characterization, Spectroscopic Features, and the
Mechanism
The HeckGal probe was synthesized
following the synthetic procedure shown in Figure A. Naphthalimide 1 was obtained
by the reaction between 4-bromo-1,8-naphthalic anhydride and methoxylamine
in refluxing dioxane. In parallel, the hydroxyl group of 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde
was protected with t-butylchlorodiphenylsilane (TBDPSCl)
yielding compound 2, in which the aldehyde was converted
into a double bond using a Wittig reaction resulting in compound 3. A Heck cross-coupling reaction between compounds 1 and 3 yielded Heck fluorophore.
Finally, Heck was consecutively reacted with NaOH, in
order to remove the phenolic proton, and with 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-α-D-galactopyranosyl bromide (Gal) yielding
the HeckGal probe. The final probe and intermediate compounds
were fully characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR,
and HRMS (Figures S1–S5). PBS (pH
7)–DMSO (0.01%) solutions of the Heck fluorophore
(10–5 M) presented an intense emission band centered
at 550 nm (Φ = 0.875) when excited
at 488 nm (Figure B (iii)). In contrast, excitation at 488 nm of PBS (pH 7)–DMSO
(0.01%) solutions of HeckGal resulted in a weak broad
emission (Φ = 0.074) (Figure B (iii)). The low
emission intensity of HeckGal, when compared to that
of Heck, is ascribed to a photoinduced electron transfer
process from the galactose unit to the excited fluorophore. It was
also assessed that the emission intensity of Heck remained
unchanged in the 4–9 pH range (Figure S6). After assessing the photophysical properties, time-dependent fluorescent
measurements in PBS (pH 7)–DMSO (0.01%) solutions of HeckGal in the presence of β-Gal were carried out (Figure S7A). Progressive enhancement of the emission
at 550 nm was observed due to the generation of free Heck produced by the enzyme-induced hydrolysis of the O-glycosidic bond in HeckGal. The reaction was also analyzed
by HPLC (Figure S7B), which showed the
progressive vanishing of the HeckGal peak (at ca. 8.5
min) with the subsequent appearance of the Heck signal
at ca. 8.2 min.HeckGal displays several advantages
when compared with the recently reported AHGa probe. HeckGal presents a more extended conjugated framework that is reflected
in a marked increase, of almost 100 nm, in the two-photon excitation
wavelength. This increase in excitation wavelength might allow greater
tissue penetrability, less phototoxicity, and reduced light scattering.
Moreover, the molecule generated after HeckGal hydrolysis
with β-Gal enzyme (i.e., the Heck fluorophore)
shows a remarkable higher quantum yield of 0.875, making the HeckGal probe more suitable for the differentiation between
senescent and nonsenescent cells with high basal levels of the β-Gal
enzyme. In addition, a comparative table of HeckGal and
other cell senescence probes published in the last 3 years is shown
in the Supporting Information (Table S1).
In Vitro Validation of the HeckGal Probe
To study the cellular toxicity after prolonged exposure to the HeckGal probe, human melanoma SK-Mel-103 and murine breast
cancer 4 T1 cells were used in cell viability assays, and the results
showed that after 48 h, neither Heck nor HeckGal were toxic for SK-Mel-103 or 4 T1 cells, in both senescence and
nonsenescence states, at concentrations of up to 100 μM (Figure S8). Once proven the probe’s biocompatibility,
the preferential activation of HeckGal in senescent cells in vitro was assessed in senescent SK-Mel-103, 4 T1, A549
(human lung carcinoma), and BJ (human fibroblast) cell lines. Senescence
was induced in SK-Mel-103 and 4 T1 cells by treatment with 5 μM
palbociclib, a well-known specific CDK4/6 inhibitor,[52] for 2 weeks. After palbociclib treatment, the cell morphology
changed, presenting an enlarged and flattened appearance typical of
cellular senescence. Cellular senescence was assessed by SA-β-Gal
activity assay (Figure i (A,H), 2ii (A,H)). Next, control and senescent SK-Mel-103 cells
were seeded in flat-bottom-clear 96-well plates and incubated with
10, 15, and 20 μM solutions of HeckGal in a DMEM
(0.1% DMSO) for 2 h in the case of one-photon studies. In the case
of two-photon studies, cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated
with a 10 μM solution of the probe. Cells were imaged by confocal
microscopy using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and by two-photon
confocal microscopy using a 950 nm excitation wavelength. Control
(Figure i (B,F)) and
senescent (Figure i (I,M)) SK-Mel-103 cells did not show significant background signals
before incubation with HeckGal, especially in two-photon
studies (compare panels I and M in Figure i). Nonsenescent SK-Mel-103 cells showed
weak emission in the presence of increasing concentrations (10, 15,
and 20 μM) of the HeckGal probe (Figure i (C–E,G)), while palbociclib-treated
SK-Mel-103 cells displayed an intense fluorescent signal that increased
for higher HeckGal concentrations (Figure i (J–L,N)). The fluorescent signal
in the cells is attributed to the hydrolysis of HeckGal into the Heck fluorophore that occurred preferably
in senescent cells, which presents an increased β-galactosidase
activity. Moreover, the emission spectrum of Heck, obtained
after two-photon excitation (Figure S9),
corresponds to that obtained in a fluorimeter when using one-photon
488 nm excitation wavelength (Figure B (iii)). Fluorescence quantification from the confocal
images associated with each treatment showed a fluorescence enhancement
(ca. 2.9-fold) in palbociclib-treated SK-Mel-103 cells incubated with
15 μM of the probe in one-photon confocal images (Figure iii (A)) and ca. 3.1-fold for
cells incubated with 10 μM of the probe in two-photon images
(Figure iii (B)).
Moreover, the ability of HeckGal to detect senescent
4 T1 cells was also confirmed. Nontreated and palbociclib-treated
(senescent) 4 T1 cells were incubated with 15 μM solutions of HeckGal or Heck in a DMEM (0.1% DMSO) for 2 h. Figure ii shows that control
4 T1 cells treated with HeckGal (Figure ii (B)) showed a minimal fluorescence when
compared to senescent 4 T1 cells (Figure ii (I)) in the same conditions (3.6-fold
enhancement, Figure iii (C)). This marked difference was not observed when control and
senescent 4 T1 cells were treated with Heck (Figure ii (C,J)), demonstrating
the selectivity of HeckGal to detect cellular senescence.
The versatility of the HeckGal probe was also validated
in other cell lines where senescence was induced with different chemotherapies.
Thus, human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells were treated with cisplatin
(15 μM) for 3 weeks. Further incubation with HeckGal resulted in an enhanced fluorescence (ca. 6.1-fold, see Figure iii (D) for quantification
of images) in cisplatin-treated A549 cells when compared with nontreated
A549 cells (Figure ii (E,L)). Finally, co-staining with typical staining kits did not
affect the Heck fluorescence signal or hydrolysis of HeckGal (Figure S10). The use of
the HeckGal probe was also assessed by fluorescence-activated
cell sorting (FACS) (Figure iii (E,F)) For these studies, control SK-Mel-103 cells and
BJ human fibroblasts (gray) were exposed to 250 nM doxorubicin for
24 h to induce cellular senescence (red). On day 14, control and senescent
cells from both cell lines were treated with 7 μM solutions
of HeckGal for 2 h, detached from the plates, and fluorescence
was subsequently evaluated through FACS. The studies demonstrated
that HeckGal can distinguish between control and senescent
cell populations in doxorubicin-induced SK-Mel-103 and BJ human fibroblasts.
Figure 2
Probe
enables the detection of senescence in various cell lines
regardless of the induction method. (i) Senescence induction was assessed
by SA-β-Gal staining in (A) nontreated and (H) palbociclib-treated
cells. Note that senescent SK-Mel-103 cells present the typical blue
staining. Confocal images of SK-Mel-103 and SK-Mel-103 treated with
palbociclib. (B–E and I–L) One-photon confocal images
of (B–E) control SK-Mel-103 in the (B) absence or (C–E)
presence of 10, 15, and 20 μM of a HeckGal probe,
respectively, and (I–L) SK-Mel-103 treated with palbociclib
in the (I) absence or (J–L) presence of 10, 15, and 20 μM
of the HeckGal probe, respectively. (F, G, M, N) Two-photon
microscopy images of (F, G) nontreated and (M, N) palbociclib-treated
(senescent) SK-Mel-103 cells in (F, M) the absence and (G, N) presence
of 10 μM of the HeckGal probe. Cells were incubated
with HeckGal in a DMEM (10% FBS, 0.1% DMSO) in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 2 h, and then one-photon
images were acquired by using a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8
AOBS), and two-photon images were acquired by using a multiphoton
confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000MPE). (ii) SA-β-Gal staining
of (A) nontreated and (H) palbociclib-treated 4 T1 cells. Note that
senescent 4 T1 cells present the typical blue staining. (B, C, I,
J) Confocal images of (B, C) control 4 T1 cells in the presence of
(B) 15 μM of the HeckGal probe or (C) 15 μM
of Heck and 4 T1 cells treated with (I, J) palbociclib
in the presence of (I) 15 μM of the HeckGal probe
or (J) 15 μM of Heck. SA-β-Gal staining of
(D) nontreated and (K) cisplatin-treated A549 cells. Note that senescent
A549 cells present the typical blue staining. Confocal microscopy
images of (E−G) nontreated and (L–N) cisplatin-treated
A549 cells, exposed to the HeckGal probe. Cells were
incubated with HeckGal (15 μM) in a DMEM + 10%
FBS in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 2
h, and images were acquired by using a confocal microscope (excitation
at 488 nm). (iii) Quantification of the fluorescence emission intensity
relative to the cell surface of control and palbociclib-treated SK-Mel-103
cells incubated with HeckGal visualized with (A) one-photon
confocal imaging and (B) two-photon confocal imaging. Quantification
of the fluorescence emission intensity relative to the cell surface
of control and palbociclib-treated 4 T1 cells incubated with HeckGal or Heck visualized with (C) one-photon
confocal imaging. Quantification of the fluorescence emission intensity
relative to the cell surface of control and cisplatin-treated A549
cells incubated with HeckGal visualized with (D) one-photon
confocal imaging. Error bars represent SEM (n = 3).
(E) Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis for control
SK-Mel-103 (gray) human melanoma cells and doxorubicin-treated SK-Mel-103
(red) cells after treatment with HeckGal. (F) FACS analysis
for control BJ (gray) human fibroblast cells and doxorubicin-treated
BJ (red) cells after treatment with HeckGal. Both cell
lines were treated with 250 nM doxorubicin for 24 h in order to induce
cellular senescence, or with DMSO as the vehicle. After 14 days, upon
complete development of the senescent phenotype, cells were incubated
with 7 μM HeckGal for 2 h, detached from the plates,
and washed twice with PBS. HeckGal fluorescence was subsequently
evaluated by a Sony SA3800 spectral analyzer.
Probe
enables the detection of senescence in various cell lines
regardless of the induction method. (i) Senescence induction was assessed
by SA-β-Gal staining in (A) nontreated and (H) palbociclib-treated
cells. Note that senescent SK-Mel-103 cells present the typical blue
staining. Confocal images of SK-Mel-103 and SK-Mel-103 treated with
palbociclib. (B–E and I–L) One-photon confocal images
of (B–E) control SK-Mel-103 in the (B) absence or (C–E)
presence of 10, 15, and 20 μM of a HeckGal probe,
respectively, and (I–L) SK-Mel-103 treated with palbociclib
in the (I) absence or (J–L) presence of 10, 15, and 20 μM
of the HeckGal probe, respectively. (F, G, M, N) Two-photon
microscopy images of (F, G) nontreated and (M, N) palbociclib-treated
(senescent) SK-Mel-103 cells in (F, M) the absence and (G, N) presence
of 10 μM of the HeckGal probe. Cells were incubated
with HeckGal in a DMEM (10% FBS, 0.1% DMSO) in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 2 h, and then one-photon
images were acquired by using a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8
AOBS), and two-photon images were acquired by using a multiphoton
confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000MPE). (ii) SA-β-Gal staining
of (A) nontreated and (H) palbociclib-treated 4 T1 cells. Note that
senescent 4 T1 cells present the typical blue staining. (B, C, I,
J) Confocal images of (B, C) control 4 T1 cells in the presence of
(B) 15 μM of the HeckGal probe or (C) 15 μM
of Heck and 4 T1 cells treated with (I, J) palbociclib
in the presence of (I) 15 μM of the HeckGal probe
or (J) 15 μM of Heck. SA-β-Gal staining of
(D) nontreated and (K) cisplatin-treated A549 cells. Note that senescent
A549 cells present the typical blue staining. Confocal microscopy
images of (E−G) nontreated and (L–N) cisplatin-treated
A549 cells, exposed to the HeckGal probe. Cells were
incubated with HeckGal (15 μM) in a DMEM + 10%
FBS in 20% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 2
h, and images were acquired by using a confocal microscope (excitation
at 488 nm). (iii) Quantification of the fluorescence emission intensity
relative to the cell surface of control and palbociclib-treated SK-Mel-103
cells incubated with HeckGal visualized with (A) one-photon
confocal imaging and (B) two-photon confocal imaging. Quantification
of the fluorescence emission intensity relative to the cell surface
of control and palbociclib-treated 4 T1 cells incubated with HeckGal or Heck visualized with (C) one-photon
confocal imaging. Quantification of the fluorescence emission intensity
relative to the cell surface of control and cisplatin-treated A549
cells incubated with HeckGal visualized with (D) one-photon
confocal imaging. Error bars represent SEM (n = 3).
(E) Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis for control
SK-Mel-103 (gray) human melanoma cells and doxorubicin-treated SK-Mel-103
(red) cells after treatment with HeckGal. (F) FACS analysis
for control BJ (gray) human fibroblast cells and doxorubicin-treated
BJ (red) cells after treatment with HeckGal. Both cell
lines were treated with 250 nM doxorubicin for 24 h in order to induce
cellular senescence, or with DMSO as the vehicle. After 14 days, upon
complete development of the senescent phenotype, cells were incubated
with 7 μM HeckGal for 2 h, detached from the plates,
and washed twice with PBS. HeckGal fluorescence was subsequently
evaluated by a Sony SA3800 spectral analyzer.
In Vivo Validation of the HeckGal Probe
Encouraged by the ability of HeckGal to detect cellular
senescence in vitro, we took a step forward and studied
the potential of the HeckGal probe to detect cellular
senescence in vivo in two different disease models
of senescence: (i) BALB/cByJ female mice bearing 4 T1 breast cancer
tumors treated with palbociclib and (ii) C57BL/6 J male mice with
renal fibrosis induced by treatment with folic acid (FA). BALB/cByJ
female mice were orthotopically injected in the mammary fat pad with
4 T1 cells (0.5 × 106 cell/mouse) in order to generate
breast tumors. Seven days later, palbociclib was administered daily
by oral gavage to arrest tumor growth and induce cellular senescence.
One week after, palbociclib treatment was started, 100 μL of HeckGal was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at a concentration
of 13.3 mg/mL, and mice were sacrificed 3 h after treatment. Different
organs (i.e., lungs, liver, kidney, and spleen) and tumors were harvested.
Cellular senescence in palbociclib-treated tumors was assessed by
SA-β-Gal staining (Figure A). The reduction of Ki67, a proliferative marker,
observed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also indicative of cellular
senescence in palbociclib-treated tumors (Figure B). Figure G shows the quantification of the Ki67 signal. Ex vivo IVIS images demonstrated that no fluorescent signal
was observed in control animals, neither in tumors nor in lungs, liver,
kidney, or spleen (Figure C–F), either in the presnce or absence of HeckGal. Tumors of mice treated with palbociclib in the absence of HeckGal were used to monitor tissue autofluorescence, and
they displayed a weak emission. In contrast, tumors from mice previously
treated with palbociclib and i.p. injected with HeckGal showed a strong emission signal in IVIS images (Figure F). Quantification of the average
radiance intensity from organs and tumors was determined for each
condition (Figure H). An emission enhancement of ca. 4.6-fold was observed in tumors
treated with palbociclib when compared to control tumors. These results
demonstrate that HeckGal is a potent tool to visualize
senescence in a breast cancer tumor model treated with senescence-inducing
therapy. Moreover, to evaluate HeckGal penetrability
and their ability for two-photon imaging of senescent cells in the
depth of tissues, fluorescence intensities of tumour slices from vehicle
and palbociclib-treated mice at different depths were measured by
a Z-scan model (Figure I,J). As could be seen in Figure I,J, a marked emission intensity was observed for the
palbociclib-treated tumors administered with the HeckGal probe, and senescent cells could be visualized up to a depth of
150 μm. These results clearly indicated the ability of the HeckGal probe for tracking β-Gal activity at different
depths using two-photon microscopy.
Figure 3
HeckGal probe enables the
detection of senescence
in different disease models of senescence. (A) Representative images
of tumors stained for the SA-β-Gal assay: tumors from vehicle
(left) and palbociclib-treated mice (right). (B) Immunohistochemical
detection of the proliferation marker Ki67 in paraffin sections of
tumors from vehicle (top) and palbociclib-treated mice (bottom). (C–F)
IVIS images of organs and tumors from BALB/cByJ female mice bearing
4 T1 breast cancer cells: From left to right and from top to bottom:
lungs, liver, tumor, kidney, and spleen; (C) Vehicle mice, (D) vehicle
mice treated with (13.33 mg/mL, 100 μL), (E) mice treated with
palbociclib for 1 week, (F) palbociclib-treated mice injected with HeckGal (13.33 mg/mL, 100 μL). Mice were sacrificed
2 h post-HeckGal treatment. (G) Quantification of the
Ki67 signal in paraffin sections of tumors from vehicle (top) and
palbociclib-treated mice (bottom). Error bars represent s.d. (H) Quantification
of average radiance intensity from organs and tumors showed in images
(C), (D), (E), and (F). Error bars represent SEM (n = 3 for each condition). (I) Two-photon fluorescence depth images
of HeckGal in tumor tissue slices from vehicle (up) and
palbociclib-treated mice (down). The slices were incubated with HeckGal (10 mM) for 2 h at 37 °C in a dry incubator.
The images were acquired at different penetration depths (λex = 820 nm). (J) 3D representation of images shown in Figure I demonstrating the
greater penetrability of HeckGal in tumor tissue slices
from palbociclib-treated mice (down) compared to tumor tissue slices
from vehicle mice (up).
HeckGal probe enables the
detection of senescence
in different disease models of senescence. (A) Representative images
of tumors stained for the SA-β-Gal assay: tumors from vehicle
(left) and palbociclib-treated mice (right). (B) Immunohistochemical
detection of the proliferation marker Ki67 in paraffin sections of
tumors from vehicle (top) and palbociclib-treated mice (bottom). (C–F)
IVIS images of organs and tumors from BALB/cByJ female mice bearing
4 T1 breast cancer cells: From left to right and from top to bottom:
lungs, liver, tumor, kidney, and spleen; (C) Vehicle mice, (D) vehicle
mice treated with (13.33 mg/mL, 100 μL), (E) mice treated with
palbociclib for 1 week, (F) palbociclib-treated mice injected with HeckGal (13.33 mg/mL, 100 μL). Mice were sacrificed
2 h post-HeckGal treatment. (G) Quantification of the
Ki67 signal in paraffin sections of tumors from vehicle (top) and
palbociclib-treated mice (bottom). Error bars represent s.d. (H) Quantification
of average radiance intensity from organs and tumors showed in images
(C), (D), (E), and (F). Error bars represent SEM (n = 3 for each condition). (I) Two-photon fluorescence depth images
of HeckGal in tumor tissue slices from vehicle (up) and
palbociclib-treated mice (down). The slices were incubated with HeckGal (10 mM) for 2 h at 37 °C in a dry incubator.
The images were acquired at different penetration depths (λex = 820 nm). (J) 3D representation of images shown in Figure I demonstrating the
greater penetrability of HeckGal in tumor tissue slices
from palbociclib-treated mice (down) compared to tumor tissue slices
from vehicle mice (up).To assess the versatility
of the probe, HeckGal was
also tested to detect cellular senescence in a renal fibrosis model.
For this purpose, C57BL/6 J male mice were i.p. injected with a single
dose of 250 mg/kg of FA in order to generate renal fibrosis. Thirty-four
days post-FA injection, the presence of cellular senescence in the
kidneys was evaluated with p21 IHC immunostaining. An increase in
the p21 signal was observed in the kidneys of FA-treated mice, confirming
cellular senescence (Figure A). Figure C shows the quantification of positive p21 nuclei. Once cellular
senescence was assessed in this model, 200 μL of HeckGal were i.p. injected at a concentration of 6.6 mg/mL (DMSO 1% corn
oil).
Figure 4
(A) Immunostaining for p21 in kidney slides. (B) IVIS images of
kidneys from mice with renal fibrosis induced by FA treatment. From
left to right: Vehicle mice + HeckGal (6 mg/mL, 200 μL),
FA-treated mice (with renal fibrosis) + HeckGal (6.6
mg/mL, 200 μL), and FA-treated mice (with renal fibrosis). Mice
were sacrificed 5 h post-HeckGal injection. (C) Quantification
of the p21 signal in paraffin sections of kidney from vehicle and
FA-treated mice. Error bars represent SEM. (D) Quantification of average
radiance intensity from kidneys showed in the 4B image. Error bars
represent SEM (n = 3 for control mice treated with
the probe and FA-treated mice, and n = 4 for FA-treated
mice + HeckGal).
(A) Immunostaining for p21 in kidney slides. (B) IVIS images of
kidneys from mice with renal fibrosis induced by FA treatment. From
left to right: Vehicle mice + HeckGal (6 mg/mL, 200 μL),
FA-treated mice (with renal fibrosis) + HeckGal (6.6
mg/mL, 200 μL), and FA-treated mice (with renal fibrosis). Mice
were sacrificed 5 h post-HeckGal injection. (C) Quantification
of the p21 signal in paraffin sections of kidney from vehicle and
FA-treated mice. Error bars represent SEM. (D) Quantification of average
radiance intensity from kidneys showed in the 4B image. Error bars
represent SEM (n = 3 for control mice treated with
the probe and FA-treated mice, and n = 4 for FA-treated
mice + HeckGal).Mice were euthanized 5 h post-HeckGal treatment, kidneys
were excised and analyzed by IVIS imaging. Kidneys from control mice
treated with HeckGal presented a very weak fluorescent
signal (Figure B,
left), whereas kidneys from FA-treated mice and injected with HeckGal (Figure B, middle) exhibited an intense emission (5.8-fold higher). FA-treated
mice did not present any significant auto-fluorescence in the absence
of the HeckGal probe (Figure B, right). Figure D showed the quantification of average radiance
intensity from kidneys showed in 4B images.
Conclusions
In summary, we report herein the synthesis of a new two-photon
fluorescent probe for the detection of cellular senescence in vivo. HeckGal is based on a naphthalimide
core linked to acetylated galactose that quenches the emission of Heck fluorophore. HeckGal is hydrolysed into
the highly fluorescent Heck fluorophore in the presence
of the β-Gal enzyme. In vitro detection of
cellular senescence using HeckGal was assessed in senescent
SK-Mel-103, A549, 4 T1, and BJ cell lines, in which senescence was
induced by treatment with different therapies. The probe was validated
to detect cellular senescence by one-photon and by two-photon confocal
images and by FACS. The use of HeckGal to detect cellular
senescence was also validated in vivo in BALB/cByJ
mice bearing 4 T1 breast tumors, where senescence was induced with
palbociclib. Ex vivo IVIS images showed that fluorescence
ascribed to the hydrolyzed HeckGal probe (Heck fluorophore) was only observed in senescent tumors, whereas a negligible
emission was found in other organs. Besides, HeckGal probe
was also tested in a renal fibrosis model induced with FA. In this
model, emission was only observed in fibrotic senescent kidneys from
FA-treated mice. We hope that the studies presented here will help
in the field of cellular senescence diagnosis in more translatable in vivo models. We also envisage that HeckGal or similar probes can be essential tools in the detection of senescent
cells in aged or damaged tissues and to assess treatment response
of senolytics in aging-related diseases.
Authors: Lu Peng; Meng Gao; Xiaolei Cai; Ruoyu Zhang; Kai Li; Guangxue Feng; Aijun Tong; Bin Liu Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 6.331
Authors: Estela González-Gualda; Marta Pàez-Ribes; Beatriz Lozano-Torres; David Macias; Joseph R Wilson; Cristina González-López; Hui-Ling Ou; Sofía Mirón-Barroso; Zhenguang Zhang; Araceli Lérida-Viso; Juan F Blandez; Andrea Bernardos; Félix Sancenón; Miguel Rovira; Ljiljana Fruk; Carla P Martins; Manuel Serrano; Gary J Doherty; Ramón Martínez-Máñez; Daniel Muñoz-Espín Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 9.304