| Literature DB >> 34079817 |
Susanne Holtze1, Ekaterina Gorshkova2,3, Stan Braude4, Alessandro Cellerino5,6, Philip Dammann7,8, Thomas B Hildebrandt1,9, Andreas Hoeflich10, Steve Hoffmann11, Philipp Koch12, Eva Terzibasi Tozzini13, Maxim Skulachev14, Vladimir P Skulachev14, Arne Sahm11.
Abstract
Most research on mechanisms of aging is being conducted in a very limited number of classical model species, i.e., laboratory mouse (Mus musculus), rat (Rattus norvegicus domestica), the common fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) and roundworm (Caenorhabditis elegans). The obvious advantages of using these models are access to resources such as strains with known genetic properties, high-quality genomic and transcriptomic sequencing data, versatile experimental manipulation capabilities including well-established genome editing tools, as well as extensive experience in husbandry. However, this approach may introduce interpretation biases due to the specific characteristics of the investigated species, which may lead to inappropriate, or even false, generalization. For example, it is still unclear to what extent knowledge of aging mechanisms gained in short-lived model organisms is transferable to long-lived species such as humans. In addition, other specific adaptations favoring a long and healthy life from the immense evolutionary toolbox may be entirely missed. In this review, we summarize the specific characteristics of emerging animal models that have attracted the attention of gerontologists, we provide an overview of the available data and resources related to these models, and we summarize important insights gained from them in recent years. The models presented include short-lived ones such as killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri), long-lived ones such as primates (Callithrix jacchus, Cebus imitator, Macaca mulatta), bathyergid mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber, Fukomys spp.), bats (Myotis spp.), birds, olms (Proteus anguinus), turtles, greenland sharks, bivalves (Arctica islandica), and potentially non-aging ones such as Hydra and Planaria.Entities:
Keywords: Greenland shark; Heterocephalus glaber; Hydra oligactis; Myotis; Nothobranchius furzeri; Proteus anguinus; Senescence; resistance to cancer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34079817 PMCID: PMC8166319 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.660959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
Overview of alternative animal models.
| Common name | Latin name | Taxonomy (Phylum, Class) | Adult body mass | Conservation status [1] | Genome sequenced (size, quality, # protein-coding genes) | Transcriptome available | Life span | Expected life span* | Laboratory husbandry effort |
| Laboratory mouse | Chordata, mammalia | 20–35 g [2] | LC | 2.6-Gb; 47x; 30,000 [3] | 10 tissues [4] | 2-3, max. 3.8 y [5] | 0.51 [5] | Small [6] | |
| Laboratory rat | Chordata, mammalia | 250-550 g [7] | LC | 2.75-Gb; 7x; 22,841 [8] | 11 tissues [9] | 2-3, max. 4 y [10] | 0.32 [5] | Small [6] | |
| Common fruit fly | Arthropoda, insecta | 0.8–1.3 mg [11] | n.n. | 120-Mb; whole-genome shotgun; 13,600 [12] | 5 tissues; 30 dev. Stages [e.g., 13] | 60 – 80 d [14] | - | Small [15] | |
| Roundworm | Nematoda, chromadorea | 1μg [16] | n.n. | 97-Mb; 6x; 19,099 [17] | 4 tissues [18] | 14 – 21 d [19] | - | Small [15] | |
| Capuchin monkey | Chordata, mammalia | 2.7-3.7 kg [20] | VU | 2.6-Gb; 47x; 20,740 [21] | - | 55 y [22] | High [23] | ||
| Rhesus monkey | Chordata, mammalia | 6.3-11.4kg [24] | LC | 2.87-Gb; 5x; 21,256 [25] | 11 tissues [26] | 40 y [27] | High [28] | ||
| Common marmoset | Chordata, mammalia | 400 g [29] | LC | 2.26-Gb; 6x; 21,168 [30] | 4 tissues [31] | 22 y [32] | Medium to high [33] | ||
| Bowhead whale | Chordata, mammalia | 50 to > 100 t [34] | LC | 2.87-2.91 Gb; 150x; 22,672 [35] | 3 tissues [36] | 211 y [37] | Longest-lived mammal [37] | Impossible | |
| Mechow’s mole-rat | Chordata, mammalia | 345 g (M) 252 g (F) [38] | LC | - | 5 tissues [10] | 20 y [39] | 1.94 [39] | Medium [40] | |
| Naked mole rat | Chordata, mammalia | 33.9 ± 4.9 g [41] | LC | 2.7-Gb; > 20 x; 22,561 [42] | 10 tissues [43] | 32 y [44] | 5 [45] | Medium [46] | |
| Brandt’s bat | Chordata, mammalia | 7 g [47] | LC | 2.0 Gb; whole-genome shotgun; 22,256 [48] | 3 tissues [48] | 41 y [49] | 9.8 [49] | Difficult [50] | |
| Budgerigar | Chordata, aves | 40 g [51] | LC | 1.1 Gb; 160x; 15,470 [52] | 1 tissue [53] | > 20 [54] | >1 [55]; reproductive life span 5x rats/mice [51] | Small[56] | |
| Northern fulmar | Chordata, aves | 650-1000 g [57] | LC | 1.14 Gb; 33x; 14306 [52] | - | > 50 [51]; Mean 30 y [58] | Ages more slowly than humans [59] | Medium to high [60] | |
| Japanese quail | Chordata, aves | 100 g [51] | NT | 1.75 Gb; 172x; 30,810 [61] | 7 tissues [62] | 6 y, max. 11 y [51] | short-lived for birds [51] | Small [63] | |
| Blanding’s Turtle | Chordata, reptilia | 750-1400 g [64] | EN | - | - | 75 y [65] | 37 [65] | Medium [66] | |
| Painted Turtle | Chordata, reptilia | 600 g [67] | LC | 2.59-Gb;18x; 21,796 [68] | 1 tissue [69] | 40 y [67] | 15-25 [67] | Medium [66] | |
| Axolotl | Chordata, amphibia | 60–110 g [70] | CR | 32-Gb, 7x; 23,251 [71] | 16 tissues [72] | 10-15 y; max. 25 y [70] | > 1 [70] | Small [70] | |
| Olm | Chordata, amphibia | 15–20 g [73] | VU | In progress [74] | In progress [74] | Ø 68.5 y, max > 100 y [75] | 3 [75] | Difficult [73] | |
| Mudpuppy | Chordata, amphibia | 50-400 g [76] | LC | - | - | up to 30 y [77] | > 1 [77] | Small [78] | |
| Turquoise killifish | Chordata, osteichthyes | 3 g [79] | LC | 1.24 Gb; 158x; 26,141 [80] | 3 tissues [79; 81] | 9 (max. 12) weeks [82]; 3-7 months [83] | < 1 [66] shortest captive lifespan for a vertebrate [84] | Small [85] | |
| Clownfish | Chordata, osteichthyes | 2-24 g [86] | n.n. | 791 - 794 Mb; 3x; 27 420 [87] | Whole-body, 1 tissue [87,88] | > 20 y [89] | >1 [89] | Medium [90] | |
| Greenland shark | Chordata, chondrichthyes | 140 kg [91] | NT | - | - | 392 ± 120 y [92] | Longest-lived vertebrate [92,93] | Impossible | |
| Octopus | Mollusca, Cephalopoda | 175-3,500 g [94] | LC | 2.4-Gb; 76x; 23,509 [95] | 5 tissues [96] | 1 y [97] | Medium [98] | ||
| Red sea urchin | Echinodermata, Echinoidea | 497.8 ± 32.6 g [99] | n.n. | 0.6 Gb; 83x [100] | Developmental [101] | 200 y [102] | one of the longest-lived sea urchin[103]/animal species [104] | Medium [105] | |
| Green sea urchin | Echinodermata, Echinoidea | 19.5 ± 2.0 g [106] | n.n. | 1.3 Gb; 74x [100,107] | Developmental [108] | Average 3 y, max. 4 y [109] | < 1 [95] | Medium [105] | |
| Ocean quahog clam | Mollusca, bivalvia | 39-90 g [110] | n.n. | - | 2 tissues [111] | Max. 507 y [112] | > 1; Longest-lived non-colonial animal [112] | Small [113] | |
| Platyhelminthes, rhabditophora | 17-57 μg [114] | n.n. | 782.1 Mb; 60x [115] | All cell types [116] | Non-aging [115] | - | Small [117] | ||
| Cnidaria, hydrozoa | 2 × 10–4 g [118] | n.n. | 0.9-1.05 Gb; 2x; 20,000 [119] | All tissues [120] | Potentially eternal (5% > 1000y) [121] | - | Small [122] |
FIGURE 1Overview of the body mass to life expectancy relation of canonical and alternative models of aging research. In mammals and many other species, lifespan generally correlates with body weight; therefore, larger species are expected to live longer (compare with Table 1). Note that the canonical models of aging research are all short-lived in relation to body mass. Selected remarkable traits of some of the mentioned species are highlighted.
FIGURE 2Classical and alternative model species of aging research. In order from left to right, top to bottom: I Human (Homo sapiens); II Laboratory mouse (Mus musculus); III laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus domestica); IV common fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster); V roundworm (Caenorhabditis elegans); VI Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta); VII white-faced capuchin monkey (Cebus imitator); VIII bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus); IX Mechow’s mole-rat (Fukomys mechowii); X naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber); XI Brandt’s bat (Myotis brandtii); XII budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus); XIII northern fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis); XIV Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica); XV Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii); XVI painted turtle (Chrysemys picta); XVII axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum); XVIII olm (Proteus anguinus); XIX turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri); XX clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris); XXI Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus); XXII octopus (Octopus vulgaris); XXIII lobster (Homarus americanus); XXIV red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus); XXV green sea urchin (Lytechinus variegatus); XXVI ocean quahog clam (Arctica islandica); XXVII Planarian (Schmidtea mediterranea); XVIII hydra (Hydra vulgaris). Attributions for used images: V Janine Kirstein; VIII A bowhead whale spyhops off the coast of western Sea of Okhotsk by Olga Shpak licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0; IX Philip Dammann; X, XIII, XVII, XVIII Susanne Holtze; XI Marcus Fritze; XIV; Male Japanese Quail by Ingrid Taylor licensed under CC BY 2.0; IXX Nadine Grimm on behalf of the FLI, Jena; XXI Close up image of a greenland shark taken at the floe edge of the Admiralty Inlet, Nunavut. by Hemming 1952 licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0; XXVI Arctica islandica (Ocean Quahog) by S. Rae licensed under CC BY 2.0; XXVII Anne Schroll on behalf of the FLI, Jena; XVIII Hydra oligactis by Marta Boroń licensed under CC BY 2.0; all other images were taken from Pixabay under the Simplified Pixabay License, links can be provided upon request. This figure was created by Susanne Holtze, IZW Berlin and is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
FIGURE 3Biological pathways and mechanisms identified as potential contributors to longevity on alternative model organisms of aging and survival curve types. (A) The assignment of mechanisms and species does not claim to be complete, as alternative model organisms are not only less well studied than canonical ones, but also not all of the selected mechanisms have so far been addressed in all of the mentioned non-canonical species. Created with BioRender.com. (B) The assignment of survival curve types and species can only be done schematically.