Literature DB >> 35763515

Etiology of acute febrile illnesses in Southern China: Findings from a two-year sentinel surveillance project, 2017-2019.

Jeanette J Rainey1, Casey Siesel2, Xiafang Guo3, Lina Yi4, Yuzhi Zhang1, Shuyu Wu1, Adam L Cohen2, Jie Liu5,6, Eric Houpt5, Barry Fields2, Zhonghua Yang3, Changwen Ke4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Southern China is at risk for arborvirus disease transmission, including Zika virus and dengue. Patients often present to clinical care with non-specific acute febrile illnesses (AFI). To better describe the etiology of AFI, we implemented a two-year AFI surveillance project at five sentinel hospitals in Yunnan and Guangdong Provinces.
METHODS: Between June 2017 and August 2019, we enrolled patients between 2 and 65 years of age presenting at one sentinel hospital in Mengla County, Yunnan, and four in Jiangmen City, Guangdong, with symptoms of AFI (acute onset of fever ≥ 37.5°C within the past 7 days) without respiratory symptoms or diarrhea. Demographic, epidemiologic, and clinical information was obtained and entered into a web-based AFI surveillance database. A custom TaqMan Array card (TAC) was used to test patients' whole blood specimens for 27 different pathogens using real-time polymerase chain reaction assays.
RESULTS: During the two-year project period, 836 patients were enrolled; 443 patients from Mengla County and 393 patients from Jiangmen City. The median age was 33 years [range: 2-65], and most were hospitalized [641, 77%]. Of 796 patients with valid TAC results, 341 (43%) were positive for at least one of the 10 unique pathogens detected. This included 205 (26%) patients positive for dengue virus, 60 (8%) for Orientia tsutsugamushi, and 42 (5%) for Coxiella burnetii. Ten patients (1%) in Jiangmen City tested positive for malaria, 8 of whom reported recent travel outside of China. TAC results were negative for 455 (57%) patients. None of the patients had a positive TAC detection for Zika virus.
CONCLUSIONS: The project detected variability in the etiology of AFI in Southern China and highlighted the importance of differential diagnosis. Dengue, O. tsutsugamushi, and C. burnetii were the most frequently identified pathogens among enrolled AFI patients. As a non-notifiable disease, the frequent detection of C. burnetii is noteworthy and warrants additional investigation. The project provided a framework for routine surveillance for persons presenting with AFI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35763515      PMCID: PMC9239456          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Introduction

Despite global improvements in access to health care and reduction in malaria transmission, the global burden of acute febrile illnesses (AFI) remains high [1-3]. Recent studies have suggested that almost 80% of patients presenting with acute febrile illness (AFI), including those in malaria endemic regions, are due to non-malaria etiologies [4]. Zika, dengue, and chikungunya are viral infections that often cause acute febrile illnesses and can be under- or misdiagnosed due to the lack of appropriate diagnostic testing [5-7]. As a result, many of these AFI patients are treated according to clinical presentation [8]. The reliance on clinical presentation alone can lead to the misuse of antimicrobials [9] as well as poor patient outcomes. This is particularly the case for Zika virus, which like many other causes of AFI, is difficult to diagnose [10] and may clinically mimic other infections such as Salmonella enterica, Listeria spp., and Brucella spp. [2, 3]. China is at risk for arbovirus transmission and AFI, primarily due to the climate, presence of mosquito vectors, and highly mobile populations. A recent scoping review identified two publications on AFI surveillance from China [11]. These publications included a multi-country investigation of typhoid fever from 2008 [12] and a surveillance project to identify persons infected with the novel Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) bunyavirus from 2011 [13]. Recently developed multi-pathogen molecular diagnostic platforms, such as the TaqMan Array Card (TAC) (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), can be used to detect multiple targets (i.e., pathogens) from a single patient specimen [14-16]. These diagnostic platforms could help identify etiologies for various syndromes more efficiently than single pathogen specific assays, commonly used in older surveillance projects. Although extensive research has been conducted elsewhere in Asia [17], information on the etiology of AFI in southern China remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, we implemented a two-year AFI sentinel surveillance project at five hospitals in Guangdong and Yunnan Provinces. Both provinces have experienced previous outbreaks of dengue and remain at risk for importation of vector-borne diseases [18-22]. We used the customized AFI TAC to identify the etiology of patients presenting with AFI and from a small number of healthy controls recruited from the same sentinel hospitals. The primary objectives of the project were to describe the geographic variability in the etiology of AFI, inform public health strategies to prevent and respond to emerging pathogens, and guide clinical management.

Methods

Study setting

The AFI surveillance project was conducted between July 2017 to June 2019 at four sentinel hospitals in Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province and at one sentinel hospital in Mengla County, Yunnan Province [23]. Jiangmen City is in the Pearl River Delta in south-central Guangdong Province. In 2015, the city had a population of 3,850,000. Each year, over 300,000 overseas Chinese residents working in the Americas and Europe return to Jiangmen City to visit relatives or for trade, business, and tourism. Enping County is under the jurisdiction of Jiangmen City. The county reported 13 cases of Zika virus from March to April 2016, all imported from overseas Chinese residing in Venezuela [24]. Aedes albopictus–which is associated with dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus transmission—is the predominant mosquito vector in Jiangmen City. Of the four sentinel hospitals in Jiangmen City, two were in Enping County and two in Xinhui District. Two were tertiary hospitals and two were township level facilities. All four provided inpatient care. Mengla County is in southern Yunnan Province and shares borders with Vietnam, Laos, and Myanmar to the east, south, and west, respectively. The county had a population of 194,360 in 2015. Both Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti mosquitos are found in the county. The A. aegypti mosquito is the primary vector for several pathogens, including dengue and the Zika virus. Although malaria was declared officially eliminated from China in 2021 [25, 26], Mengla County continues to experience imported malaria cases from neighboring Asian countries, including Myanmar, where the Anopheles mosquito vector remains abundant [27]. The AFI project was implemented in a single tertiary hospital in Mengla County that provided inpatient care.

Study design and case definitions

We defined AFI as a patient with fever (axillary temperature ≥ 37.5°C or history of fever) with onset within the last 7 days and no other targeted symptoms (e.g., cough, sore throat, diarrhea). Verbal reports of fever with onset within the last 7 days (e.g., temperature ≥ 37.5°C measured at home) were accepted for patients who were not febrile at the time of enrolment. All patients between 2 and 65 years of age meeting the AFI definition and seeking care at one of the five sentinel hospitals were eligible for enrolment. Starting in July 2018, we initiated enrollment of controls, with the aim of establishing associations between pathogen detection and symptomatic illness [11]. Patients between 2 and 65 years of age seeking care for non-infectious illnesses, or persons accompanying patients who did not have an infectious illness and had not experienced an AFI within the last 30 days, were eligible as controls. The original goal was to enroll one control for every five cases. However, due to logistical challenges, including obtaining consent from the healthy adults, controls were only enrolled at Mengla County Hospital. If eligibility criteria were met, each AFI patient and control was assigned a unique project ID and written informed consent was obtained. Project staff then captured demographic, clinical, epidemiologic risk (including recent travel), and vaccination history information. As part of routine care, AFI patients were tested for dengue using the Colloidal Gold NS1 antigen test (Wondfo, Guangzhou, China) when warranted and, in Mengla County, for malaria using the Wondfo One Step Malaria HRP2/pLDH (P.f/Pan) test cassette rapid diagnostic test (RDT, Wondfo). Staff recorded patient information, including RDT results when available, on standard paper investigation report forms. The same enrollment procedures and paper investigation report form were used for recruited controls. Clinical and RDT data were not captured from controls.

TAC specimen collection and testing

Following completion of the investigation report form and routine care, project staff at the sentinel hospitals collected venous whole blood samples from AFI patients and enrolled controls using a 5 ml EDTA vacutainer and transported the samples in a cold box (4°C) to the project laboratory. Specimens were stored at -70°C in designated laboratory in Jiangmen City and were periodically shipped on dry ice to the Guangdong Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Guangzhou, China for diagnostic testing using TAC. The first half of the specimens stored at -70°C in the designated laboratory in Mengla County were tested at the Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, and the remaining specimens were tested at the Guangdong Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Guangzhou, China. The TAC is a 384-well real-time PCR platform (i.e., 48 wells for each of the 8 samples) developed by Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). The AFI TAC layout included 13 viral, 11 bacterial, and 3 protozoan pathogens known to cause AFI. Based on prior validation work, duplicate wells were reserved for bacterial pathogens to improve the detection sensitivity because of their potential low pathogen load in blood, and single wells were reserved for others to maximize the ability of the card to detect a range of pathogens (Fig 1). The TAC testing methods have been previously described [14]. Briefly, total nucleic acid was extracted from up to 2.5 mL of whole blood using High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid (Roche Diagnostics) and eluted in 150 μL of elution buffer. 75μL of total nucleic acid extract was mixed with 25μL of TaqMan Fast Virus 1 Step Master mix (Thermo Fisher), in a 100μL reaction, then pipetted into the inlet port on the card. Cards were centrifuged (1 min at 1,200 rpm twice), sealed and the inlet ports were removed as directed by the manufacturer’s instructions. All AFI TACs were run on the ViiA 7 or QuantStudio 7 Flex real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher) using PCR cycling conditions comprising of 10 minutes at 50°C, 20 seconds at 95°C, followed by 45 two-step cycles of 3 seconds of 95°C and 30 seconds at 60°C. A positive result was defined by ≤35 cycle threshold (Ct) value. Bacteriophage MS2 and phocine herpesvirus (PhHV) were spiked to the blood samples during nucleic acid extraction as extrinsic controls to monitor extraction and amplification. One extraction blank was included in each batch of extraction to monitor lab contamination. The results were deemed valid only when the corresponding extrinsic controls or extraction blanks yielded valid results.
Fig 1

Layout of AFI TaqMan Array Card (TAC), June 2017 –July 2019, China.

Data management and analysis

Paper investigation forms were completed at the sentinel hospitals and maintained at Jiangmen City CDC and Mengla County CDC. On a weekly basis, sentinel hospital staff entered data from the investigation forms into the AFI Epidemiologic Dynamic Data Collection (EDDC) platform, a customized web-based surveillance interface tool and database [28]. The AFI EDDC platform was developed by China CDC with input from project staff at Guangdong CDC and Yunnan Institutes of Parasitic Diseases (YIPD) [23]. Data were downloaded from the AFI-EDDC database into Excel and imported into RStudio (R version 4.1.0, RStudio version 1.4.1717) for cleaning and analysis [29]. We described demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, epidemiologic risk factors and TAC results of enrolled AFI patients and performed bivariate and multivariate analyses to assess associations between demographic characteristics, epidemiologic risks, and TAC results. TAC results for enrolled controls were described. We calculated X2 tests to examine differences in the demographic characteristics of AFI patients enrolled across the five sentinel hospitals, and generated odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) from our bivariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. Due to frequent detection of dengue during the study period, we assessed the statistical agreement between TAC results and the NS1 dengue antigen RDT using Cohen’s kappa statistic. We repeated this analysis to assess agreement between TAC results and the malaria RDT used in Mengla County. A p-value of 0.05 was used to assess statistical significance.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at China CDC, Guangdong Provincial CDC, YIPD, and US CDC. Written consent was obtained from eligible patients, or the patient’s legal guardian if the patient was < 18 years of age. Guangdong CDC and Yunnan Institutes of Parasitic Diseases developed and disseminated guidelines for counseling and care for any pregnant women identified with a positive Zika virus infection during the project.

Results

Enrollment demographics and clinical presentation

From 21 June 2017–22 August 2019, 836 patients were screened for eligibility and enrolled in the surveillance project. This included 393 patients enrolled at the four sentinel hospitals in Jiangmen City and 443 at the single sentinel hospital in Mengla County (Table 1). Of the enrolled patients, 187 (22%) were children and adolescents 2 to 17 years of age, and 649 (78%) were adults 18 to 65 years of age. More than half (471, 56%) of enrolled patients were male, and 263 (31%) were employed in farming, manufacturing, or fishing industries.
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of patients enrolled in the acute febrile illness surveillance project by location in China, June 2017 –August 2019.

TotalJiangmen CityMengla CountyP-value
No. 836No. 393No. 443
Sex < .001
    Female365 (44%)146 (37%)219 (49%)
    Male471 (56%)247 (63%)224 (51%)
Age * .002
    Mean (SD)33 (±18)35 (±18)31 (±17)
    Median (IQR)33 (21–48)34 (23–50)31 (17–46)
Age Categories .063
    2–553 (6%)24 (6%)29 (7%)
    5–17134 (16%)51 (13%)83 (19%)
    18–45403 (48%)189 (48%)214 (48%)
    46–65246 (29%)129 (33%)117 (26%)
Nationality .33
    Chinese809 (97%)383 (97%)426(96%)
    Other**27 (3%)10 (3%)17 (4%)
Occupation < .001
    Farmer, Manufacturing, Fisherman263 (31%)63 (16%)200 (45%)
    Homemaker66 (8%)60 (15%)6 (1%)
    Office worker47 (6%)29 (7%)18 (4%)
    Other 265 (32%)152 (39%)113 (26%)
    Student185 (22%)81 (21%)104 (23%)
    Transportation (taxi driver, truck driver)10 (1%)8 (2%)2 (0%)
Education < .001 
    Primary School185 (22%)64 (16%)121 (27%)
    Lower than Primary18 (2%)3 (1%)15 (3%)
    High School352 (42%)201 (51%)151 (34%)
    Current Student171 (20%)69 (18%)102 (23%)
    College110 (13%)56 (14%)54 (12%)

*Age rounded down to full year.

**Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1).

*Age rounded down to full year. **Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1). Most enrolled patients (809, 97%) were Chinese and 27 (3%) were foreign nationals, including 16 from Laos, 8 from Venezuela, and 1 each from Myanmar, South Africa, and Mexico. Across the two-year project period, AFI patient enrolment peaked in April and May (X2 = 118.05, p-value < .001) in Jiangmen City and in September and October (X2 = 241.49, p-value < .001) in Mengla County (Fig 2).
Fig 2

Temporal distribution of patients enrolled in the acute febrile illness surveillance project by TaqMan Array Card (TAC) diagnostic test results and location, China, June 2017–July 2019.

Thirty-five controls were screened for eligibility and enrolled at the sentinel hospital in Mengla County. Two (6%) controls were between 2 to 17 years of age and 33 (94%) were adults 18 to 65 years of age. Approximately half (18, 51%) of the controls were male, and the majority (29, 83%) were employed in the farming, manufacturing, or fishing industry. Of the 35 controls, 26 (74%) were from Laos and 9 (26%) were Chinese nationals. Of the 836 enrolled AFI patients, 825 (99%) presented with fever at the sentinel hospital (mean axillary temperature was 38.7°C [range: 37.5–41.8°C]). Enrolment relied on history of fever ≥ 37.5°C (within the last 7 days) for the remaining 11 (1%) patients. In addition to fever, the most frequently reported AFI patient symptoms were headache (464, 56%), chills (394, 47%), and muscle pain (283, 34%) (Table 2). The majority of AFI patients (641, 77%) were hospitalized at the time of enrolment.
Table 2

Clinical presentation* of patients enrolled in the acute febrile illness surveillance project by location in China, June 2017 –July 2019.

Clinical PresentationTotalJiangmen CityMengla County
n = 836n = 393n = 443
Fever at enrolment**825 (99%)388 (99%)437 (99%)
Rash127 (15%)29 (7%)98 (22%)
Redeyes35 (4%)13 (3%)22 (5%)
Joint pain144 (17%)36 (9%)108 (24%)
Headache464 (56%)171 (44%)293 (66%)
Chills394 (47%)180 (46%)214 (48%)
Muscle Pain283 (34%)70 (18%)213 (48%)
Vomiting99 (12%)49 (12%)50 (11%)
Bloody Sputum9 (1%)4 (1%)5 (1%)
Bone Pain57 (7%)30 (8%)27 (6%)
Nose/Gum Bleeding14 (2%)7 (2%)7 (2%)
Swollen Joints10 (1%)4 (1%)6 (1%)

*Of the 836 AFI patients, 641 (77%) were hospitalized at the time of enrollment; 303 (77%) in Jiangmen City.

and 338 (76%) in Mengla County. The remaining 195 (23%) patients were enrolled as outpatients.

**Eleven (1%) patients were eligible based on reported history of fever within the last 7 days.

*Of the 836 AFI patients, 641 (77%) were hospitalized at the time of enrollment; 303 (77%) in Jiangmen City. and 338 (76%) in Mengla County. The remaining 195 (23%) patients were enrolled as outpatients. **Eleven (1%) patients were eligible based on reported history of fever within the last 7 days.

Epidemiologic factors

Of the 836 enrolled patients, 70 (8%) reported travel within the three months prior to symptom onset—31 (44%) reported international travel and 39 (56%) reported travel to other provinces in China. One patient in Mengla County indicated receiving an organ transplant within 30 days of symptom onset, and 9 (1%) patients received blood or blood products during this same timeframe. Five patients were pregnant at the time of enrolment. None of the AFI patients reported previous contact with someone diagnosed with the Zika virus.

TAC results

Of the 796 (95%) patients with valid TAC results, 333 (42%) patients were positive for a single pathogen and eight (<1%) patients had co-infections with two of the pathogens on TAC (Table 3, Table A in S1 File). Blood samples were not available for the remaining 40 (5%) patients. A total of 10 different bacterial, viral, and protozoan etiologies were detected using TAC. This included 10 unique pathogens detected from 95 patients in Jiangmen City and 7 unique pathogens from 246 patients in Mengla County. Positive TAC detections occurred primarily during April through June in Jiangmen City (n = 41/95, 43%) and August through October in Mengla County (n = 165/246, 67%).
Table 3

TaqMan Array Card (TAC) diagnostic test results* and cycle threshold values (Ct) for patients enrolled in the acute febrile illness surveillance project by location in China, June 2017–July 2019.

 TotalMedianJiangmen CityMengla County
n = 796Ct Value (range)n = 374n = 422
Bacteria
    Brucella spp.14 (2%)34.1 (32.5–34.5)1 (0%)13 (3%)
    Coxiella burnetiid42 (5%)30.0 (22.3–34.8)41 (11%)1 (0%)
    Leptospira spp.5 (1%)32.5 (27.8–34.6)2 (1%)3 (1%)
    Orientia tsutsugamushi60 (8%)30.5 (24.1–34.2)23 (6%)37 (9%)
    Rickettsia spp.9 (1%)34.7 (32.4–34.9)1 (0%)8 (2%)
    Salmonella Typhi2 (0%)34.6 (34.4–34.9)1 (0%)1 (0%)
    Streptococcus suis1 (0%)21.41 (0%)0 (0%)
Viruses
    Dengue virus205 (26%)23.9 (13.2–35.0)16 (4%)189 (45%)
    Hepatitis E1 (0%)35.01 (0%)0 (0%)
Protozoa
    Plasmodium spp.10 (1%)13.0 (5.56–34.7)10 (3%)0 (0%)
No pathogen detected 455 (57%)-279 (75%)176 (42%)

*The number of TAC results is greater than the number of enrolled patients due to the eight patients who had co-infections with two of the pathogens on TAC.

*The number of TAC results is greater than the number of enrolled patients due to the eight patients who had co-infections with two of the pathogens on TAC. The most common pathogens detected among enrolled patients in Mengla County were DENV (189; 45%), Orientia tsutsugamushi (37; 9%), and Brucella spp. (13; 3%). The most common pathogens in Jiangmen City were Coxiella burnetii (41, 11%), O. tsutsugamushi (23, 6%), and DENV (16, 4%). Of the 41 cases of C. burnetii in Jiangmen City, 29 (71%) were detected from patients enrolled at Xinhui District Hospital and another 10 (24%) from Enping County Hospital (Table B in S1 File). Ten (3%) patients in Jiangmen City had positive TAC detections for Plasmodium spp.. None of the AFI patients tested positive for Zika virus. TAC results were negative for all 27 pathogens for the 35 enrolled controls.

Factors associated with positive TAC results

In our multivariate logistic regression model, reported residence in Mengla County (aOR = 5.5, p-value < .001) was the only factor associated with having a positive TAC detection, independent of other epidemiologic and demographic risk factors (Table C in S1 File). In our etiology specific analysis, TAC detections for dengue were more likely for patients enrolled in Mengla County (aOR = 30.7, p-value < .001), and less likely for males (aOR = 0.6, p-value = .020) and current students (aOR = .1, p-value = .001) (Table 4). TAC detections for O. tsutsugamushi were more likely among adults at least 18 years of age (aOR = 18.0, p-value < .001) (Table 5), while C. burnetti was more likely detected among males (aOR = 3.3, p-value = .005) and less likely among patients enrolled in Jiangmen City (aOR = 0.02, p-value < .001) (Table 6).
Table 4

Association between patient characteristics/epidemiologic factors and detection of dengue on the TaqMan Array Card (TAC)* diagnostic testing platform, China, June 2017–July 2019.

Characteristic/Epidemiologic riskTAC+ DengueCrude OR (95% CI)ORa (95% CI)
n (%)
Location
    Mengla County189 (92.2%)18.1 (10.9–32.2)30.7 (16.8–60.7)
    Jiangmen City16 (7.8%)RefRef
Nationality
    Other*4 (1.9)0.5 (0.1–1.4)0.3 (0.1–1.0)
    Chinese201 (98.1%)RefRef
Sex
    Male92 (44.9%)0.5 (0.4–0.7)0.6 (0.4–0.9)
    Female113 (55.1%)RefRef
Age group
    > = 18 years178 (86.8%)2.3 (1.5–3.7)0.7 (0.3–1.8)
    2–17 years27 (13.2%)RefRef
Occupation
    Farmer, manufacturing, fisherman87 (42.4%)3.6 (1.7–8.5)0.5 (0.2–1.4)
    Transportation (e.g., taxi/bus driver)1 (0.5%)0.8 (0.1–5.5)0.4 (0.1–4.5)
    Office worker15 (7.3%)3.4 (1.3–9.4)1.0 (0.3–4.0)
    Student18 (8.8%)0.7 (0.3–1.9)0.1 (0.01–0.3)
    Other76 (37.1%)2.8 (1.4–6.7)0.8 (0.3–2.2)
    Homemaker8 (3.9%)RefRef
Education
    Less than primary school6 (2.9%)4.2 (1.3–12.6)0.8 (0.1–3.8)
    Primary school55 (26.8%)3.3 (1.9–5.8)0.8 (0.2–2.8)
    High school80 (39.0%)2.2 (1.3–3.8)0.7 (0.2–2.6)
    College43 (21.0%)4.7 (2.6–8.7)1.4 (0.3–5.6)
    Currently in school21 (10.2%)RefRef
Travel prior to onset
    No192 (93.7%)1.4 (0.7–2.7)0.5 (0.2–1.2)
    Yes13 (6.3%)RefRef

*Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1).

Table 5

Association between patient characteristics/epidemiologic factors and detection of Orientia tsutsugamushi on the TaqMan Array Card (TAC)* diagnostic testing platform, China, June 2017–July 2019.

Characteristic/Epidemiologic riskTAC+ O. tsutsugamushiCrude OR (95% CI)ORa (95% CI)
n (%)
Location
    Mengla County37 (61.7%)1.4 (0.9–2.5)1.2 (0.6–2.2)
    Jiangmen City23 (38.3%)RefRef
Nationality
    Other*2 (3.3%)1.0 (0.2–3.6)2.4 (0.3–11.8)
    Chinese58 (96.7%)RefRef
Gender
    Male32 (53.3%)0.9 (0.5–1.5)0.9 (0.5–1.6)
    Female28 (46.7%)RefRef
Age group
    > = 18 years55 (91.7%)3.5 (1.5–10.0)18.0 (3.7–90.6)
    2–17 years5 (8.3%)RefRef
Occupation
    Farmer, manufacturing, fisherman33 (55.0%)3.0 (1.0–12.7)2.4 (0.7–10.9)
    Transportation (e.g., taxi/bus driver)2 (3.3%)5.5 (0.6–39.5)6.2 (0.7–48.8)
    Office worker1 (1.7%)0.4 (0.02–3.6)0.8 (0.04–7.7)
    Student10 (16.7%)1.1 (0.3–5.1)4.3 (0.9–24.1)
    Other11 (18.3%)0.9 (0.3–4.0)0.9 (0.2–4.0)
    Homemaker3 (5.0%)RefRef
Education
    Less than primary school1 (1.7%)1.43(0.1–8.0)0.2 (0.01–1.6)
    Primary school17 (28.3%)2.2 (0.9–5.5)0.4 (0.1–2.1)
    High school32 (53.3%)2.1 (1.0–5.1)0.5 (0.1–2.6)
    College2 (3.3%)0.4 (0.1–1.6)0.1 (0.01–0.9)
    Currently in school8 (13.3%)RefRef
Travel prior to onset
    No59 (98.3%)5.4 (1.2–96.7)6.8 (1.1–138.3)
    Yes1 (1.7%)RefRef

*Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1).

Table 6

Association between patient characteristics/epidemiologic factors and detection of Coxiella burnetii on TaqMan Array Card (TAC) diagnostic testing platform, China, June 2017–July 2019.

Characteristic/Epidemiologic riskTAC+ C. burnettiCrude OR (95% CI)ORa (95% CI)
n (%)
Location
    Mengla County1 (2.4%)0.02 (0.001–0.09)0.02 (0.001–0.1)
    Jiangmen City41 (97.6%)RefRef
Nationality
    Other*0 (0%)--
    Chinese42 (100%)RefRef
Gender
    Male8 (19.0%)3.5 (1.7–8.2)3.3 (1.5–8.2)
    Female34 (81.0%)RefRef
Age group
    > = 18 years41 (97.6%)12.8 (2.8–228.9)2.4 (0.2–103.1)
    2–17 years1 (2.4%)RefRef
Occupation
    Farmer, manufacturing, fisherman7 (16.7%)0.2 (0.07–0.7)0.5 (0.1–1.6)
    Transportation (e.g., taxi/bus driver)3 (7.1%)3.9 (0.7–18.6)2.7 (0.4–15.7)
    Office worker3 (7.1%)0.6 (0.1–2.1)1.1 (0.2–5.4)
    Student1 (2.4%)0.04 (0.002–0.2)0.1 (0.004–1.5)
    Other21 (50.0%)0.8 (0.3–2.1)1.0 (0.4–1.5)
    Homemaker7 (16.7%)RefRef
Education
    Less than primary school0 (0%)--
    Primary school13 (30.9%)13.6 (2.7–247.9)2.1 (0.1–87.1)
    High school23 (54.8%)12.4 (2.6–223.4)1.0 (0.05–40.9)
    College5 (11.9%)8.2 (1.3–158.0)0.6 (0.03–27.1)
    Currently in school1 (2.4%)RefRef
Travel prior to onset
    No39 (92.9%)1.1 (0.4–4.7)1.5 (0.4–6.7)
    Yes3 (7.1%)RefRef

*Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1).

*Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1). *Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1). *Other includes Laos (16), Venezuela (8), Mexico (1), Myanmar (1), and South Africa (1). Additionally, nine of the ten patients with positive TAC results for Plasmodium spp. in Jiangmen City were male, and eight reported international travel within the three months prior to symptom onset, including to Venezuela, Kenya, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Uganda. Dengue was the only pathogen detected among all age groups and both sexes. Two AFI patients with positive TAC results for dengue (in Mengla County and Jiangmen City) and one AFI patient with a positive TAC result for C. burnetti (in Jiangmen City) were pregnant at the time of enrolment.

Clinical presentation of top six etiologies

The six most frequently detected AFI etiologies included DENV, C. burnetti, O. tsutsugamushi, Brucella spp., Rickettsia spp., and Plasmodium spp. Of the 340 positive TAC detections for one of these etiologies (among 333 patients), 229 (67%) reported a headache, 165 (49%) muscle pain, and 155 (46%) chills at the time of enrolment (Table D in S1 File). Most patients reporting a rash (70/81, 86%) and joint pain (65/89, 73%) tested positive for DENV. Eight (10%) other patients with a rash and 14 (16%) with joint pain tested positive for O. tsutsugamushi. This includes two patients in Mengla County with DENV-O. tsutsugamushi co-infections. Hospitalized- and out-patients had similar clinical presentations (headache, chills, and muscle aches) (all p-values > 0.10) at the time of enrolment.

Agreement between TAC and RDTs

Rapid diagnostic tests for dengue and malaria were used at the sentinel hospitals as part of routine care. The overall statistical agreement between the NS1 antigen RDT and TAC results for dengue was high (Cohen’s kappa statistic = 0.84, p-value < .001) (Table E in S1 File). Agreement was 0.85 in Mengla County and 0.009 in Jiangmen City. Of the 370 NS1 dengue negative cases in Jiangmen City, 16 were positive by TAC (corresponding Ct values ranged from 15.3–34.9), and of the two positive NS1 dengue positive cases, both were negative by TAC. None of the 10 AFI patients initially diagnosed with malaria in Mengla County using Wondfo Malaria RDT were confirmed with Plasmodium by TAC.

Discussion

Our two-year sentinel surveillance project provided information on the etiology of patients presenting with acute febrile illnesses at five sentinel hospitals in Southern China. Ten different bacterial, viral, and protozoan etiologies were detected. Dengue was the most common. However, positive TAC results for O. tsutsugamushi, C. burnetii, and Rickettsia spp. are noteworthy, primarily due to known laboratory diagnostic challenges and under-reporting. These findings highlight the importance of routine testing for these infections to inform clinical management and the development of effective prevention and control measures. Despite the presence of competent mosquito vectors (e.g., A. aegypti and/or albopictus) in Mengla Country and Jiangmen City, Zika virus was not identified as a cause of AFI among patients enrolled in this project. Our findings are consistent with AFI studies conducted elsewhere in South and Southeast Asia [17], which underscore the importance of dengue in the overall AFI disease burden, particularly following the decline of malaria transmission in the region. In Mengla County, repeated introductions of dengue from Laos and lack of local herd immunity were associated with the fall 2017 dengue outbreak, consistent with the epidemiology of the previous dengue outbreak in Yunnan Province in 2013 [19]. Despite consistent ecological risk factors (i.e., subtropical climate), the lower proportion of AFI cases with dengue positive TAC results in Jiangmen City could reflect a lower risk for imported cases or the impact of the intensive vector control policies and practices (against Aedes spp. mosquitos) implemented in the highly urban centers in Guangdong Province following the large dengue outbreak in the Pearl River Delta in 2013 to 2015 [30]. Approximately 13% of all AFI patients–and almost 30% of patients testing positive for at least one pathogen on TAC–were infected with O. tsutsugamushi or C. burnetti, pathogens responsible for scrub typhus and Q fever, respectively. In addition to undifferentiated Rickettsia spp., these infections are the cause of severe febrile morbidity and mortality worldwide but are often under-diagnosed and under-reported [31-33]. Scrub typhus is a nationally notifiable disease in China. A previous analysis of 93,481 scrub typhus cases reported between 2006 and 2016 identified high-risk locations in rural and recently developed areas in Yunnan and Guangdong Provinces [34], with human infections typically peaking in summer and autumn each year [33]. Patients with positive TAC results for O. tsutsugamushi in our project followed this seasonal pattern (consistent with the lifecycle of the mite, Leptotrombidium delicense, responsible for human infections in southern China). Q fever is not a notifiable disease in China, and diagnostic testing is not widely available. C. burnetti infections can occur in people working with livestock and exposed to highly infectious aerosols from birth products, infectious dust particles or contaminated wool [35, 36]. Although human infections have been previously identified in China, primarily from seroprevalence studies [37], our project detected 41 acute Q fever cases in Jiangmen City. Most Q fever cases were male and employed in non-farming industries in Siqian Township and Enping County. These sex and occupational risks factors are consistent with the global epidemiology of Q fever [35]. Information on Q fever and scrub typhus was reviewed during a recent One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization workshop in Beijing [38]. Both diseases were ranked among the top 16 priority zoonotic diseases in China, highlighting the importance of a multi-sectoral approach in the detection, prevention, and control of pathogens responsible for AFI. Due to the close economic and cultural connections between Yunnan and the upper Mekong River Basin, including Laos and Myanmar, we anticipated that the Zika virus would most likely be detected among AFI patients in Mengla County. Retrospective analysis of stored blood samples suggests that Zika virus had been circulating at low levels in Thailand [39], Laos [40], and Myanmar [41] since at least 2006. In 2016, 13 persons returning to Enping County from South America tested positive for Zika virus [24]. However, these persons were identified through two-month screening program at Baiyun International Airport in Guangzhou, with follow-up of travelers at their place of residence. Despite potential exposures, Zika virus was not detected during the two-year surveillance project. Zika virus infection is most concerning for pregnant women and the risk of microcephaly in the developing fetus [42]. During this project, three pregnant women had positive TAC detections (two for dengue and one for C. burnetti). To the best of our knowledge, no negative health impact on the patients or newborns resulted from these infections. The project relied on standard case definitions, eligibility criteria, and TAC customized for Asia, addressing the primary methodological and reporting recommendations for AFI etiology investigations [11]. We detected 2 of the 13 viruses, 7 of 11 bacteria, and 1 of 3 protozoan targets included on TAC. The project also identified several discrepancies between TAC and malaria and dengue rapid diagnostic test results. Previous investigations on the use of the Wondfo RDT in field practice suggest that combing the malaria RDT with microscopy could increase both testing sensitivity and specificity [43]. Similarly, combining the NS1 antigen testing with serology-based assays for IgM and IgG may improve the accuracy of dengue diagnosis, particularly in areas with a lower prevalence of dengue transmission [44]. The large percentage of AFI patients hospitalized at the time of enrollment could reflect the clinical severity of the infection, project recruitment practices (e.g., more convenient blood draw), or presumed dengue diagnoses in which patients with dengue were admitted regardless of disease severity. The two-year project period suggested seasonality for AFI and several pathogens, which can increase clinical awareness and inform public health interventions. Despite important findings on the etiology of AFI in Southern China, the two-year surveillance project was subject to a few limitations. First, not all patients presenting with AFI during the enrollment period were recruited to participate. Although Xinhua District is relatively urban, townships in Mengla County and in Enping County were more rural, resulting in additional travel time and costs to reach project hospitals. Patients with mild or even moderate symptoms may have elected to seek care at commune-level health care facilities or self-treat at home [45]. Secondly, enrollment of pediatric AFI patients was lower than expected, possibly reflecting the large volume (5 ml) of whole blood required for TAC. We also excluded patients presenting with cough and diarrhea from project enrollment, although children testing positive for Rickettisia spp., scrub typhus, and Q fever can often present with these clinical signs and symptoms [32, 33]. As a result, certain pediatric AFI cases may have been inadvertently excluded from our surveillance project. Thirdly, less than half of enrolled AFI patients had a positive TAC detection. Future AFI surveillance projects could combine TAC with multiplex serology platforms such as the Luminex AFI panel. This combined approach could increase diagnostic sensitivity for patients presenting late in the disease course. Fourthly, controls were only enrolled from the sentinel hospital in Mengla County during the second project year (July 2018 to August 2019). Test results from control groups can be used to assess attributable fractions; that is, the proportion of cases with a specific positive TAC result who have symptomatic illness due to the detected pathogen. In this project, all enrolled controls tested negative for the 27 pathogens on TAC. Finally, we were unable to collect information on the health outcomes of the AFI patients enrolled in the project. Several of the detected etiologies, including dengue, malaria, and O. tsutsugamshi can have high mortality rates, particularly if diagnosed late. All patients received care and treatment according to the Chinese national guidelines.

Conclusion

The two-year sentinel surveillance project identified the etiologies of AFI patients from five sentinel hospitals in Southern China using TAC, a multi-pathogen diagnostic platform. Although dengue was identified as the primary cause of AFI, the detection of O. tsutusgamshi and C. burnetti highlights the geographical variability in AFI etiology and importance of differential diagnosis. Improved rt-PCR based diagnostic testing for patients presenting with AFI is warranted, particularly for working-aged males engaged in farming, manufacturing, and fishing industries and persons returning from international travel. Approaches to reduce the risk of work-related exposures to mites and infectious animal products are also warranted. The project provided a framework for sentinel surveillance for AFI in China.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the China Center for Disease Control. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. 29 Mar 2022
PONE-D-22-05533
Etiology of acute febrile illnesses in Southern China: findings from a two-year sentinel surveillance project, 2017-2019
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Rainey, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
 
I have received the reviews of your manuscript and both reviewers agreed that this is informative and interesting work.  However, there are still a few concern that needs to be addressed, please see reviewers' insightful comments below.  In addition, it will be nice to have more information regarding the outcome of the patients, including duration of hospitalization, treatment, recovery or death, etc. 
 
Specific comments:
1. Fig.1 is a black box in the PDF file, please upload a file that is viewable.
2. Line 324 - 325, please change "Coxiella burnetii" and "Orientia tsutsugamushi", to "C. burnetii" and "O. tsutsugamushi" 3. Line 378, suggest changing "...detected co-infection." to "....co-infection."
4. Line 424, "...in summer and summer and autumn..." This sentence is a bit confusing, please rephrase. Please submit your revised manuscript by May 13 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Baochuan Lin, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. 3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: "This AFI sentinel surveillance project was funded by the U.S.-China Collaborative Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases Cooperative Agreement #5U2GGH000961-04." We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: "The AFI sentinel surveillance project was funded by the U.S.-China Collaborative Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases Cooperative Agreement #5U2GGH000961-04 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 4. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts: a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide. 5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: N/A Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Overall This is an informative and interesting work. It is important to have the local epidemiology data of etiologies of acute febrile illness. The manuscript is well written; however, if it is possible, the manuscript should be more concise. Major issues. -The manuscript should be shortened and more concise. Minor issues. -Authors defined AFI as fever within 7 days without targeted organ symptoms (e.g., cough, sore throat, diarrhea). However, diarrhea is presented as clinical presentations in Table 2. -Mean day of fever onset should be presented. - For patient treatment outcomes, hospitalization was described but not death. If there was any death, it should be reported the disease. If not, should mention that there is no death. Reviewer #2: Sadly the article only deals with the etiologic agent of AFI, sadly no information regarding the outcome, duration of hospitalization for each positive agent group of patient, any antimicrobial was given, outcome of the patients studied: any serious outcome: death or none at all ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
12 May 2022 Response to Reviewer Academic Editor More information regarding the outcome of the patients, including duration of hospitalization, treatment, recovery or detach, etc. We greatly appreciate this comment. The project was designed as a surveillance project, focused on describing the etiology of patients presenting with AFI at one of the five sentinel hospitals. Project staff collected information from AFI patients at the time of enrollment, with limited follow-up on hospital and non-hospitalized patients. Although we understand the importance of having information on case outcomes, our project was not designed to follow patients prospectively. We do not have the specific outcomes for each patient due to the project design. We propose a new project to enroll and prospectively follow patients with positive TAC detections in the future. 1) Fig 1 is black box in the PDF file, please upload file that is viewable Thank you for letting us know that Figure 1 was not viewable in the PDF version received. We have verified that the current version meets the requirements of PLOS ONE and is viewable in the PDF file. If there are any remaining concerns with the image, please let us know. 2) Line 324 – 325, please change “Coxiella burnetti” and “Orientia tsutsugamushi” to “C. burnettia” and “O. tsutsugamushi” Thank you for identifying this error. We have updated Coxiella burnetti” and “Orientia tsutsugamushi” to “C. burnetti” and “O. tsutsugamushi”, as recommended. 3) Line 378, suggest changing “…detected co-infection” to “…co-infection”. We appreciate this comment and have updated Line 378 (Line 347-348 in the revised manuscript) to read “This includes two patients in Mengla County with DENV-O. tsutsugamushi co-infections”, as recommended. 4) Line 424, “…in summer and summer and autumn…” This sentence is a bit confusing, please rephrase. Thank you for this feedback. We have revised Line 424 (Line 393-394 in the revised manuscript) to read “…in rural and recently developed areas in Yunnan and Guangdong Provinces, with human infections typically peaking in summer and autumn each year.” Additional requirements 1) Confirm manuscripts meets PLOS ONE’S style requirements We have reviewed PLOS ONE’S style requirements and confirm that the revised manuscript (and related figures) meet these requirements. 2) Review and ensure reference list is complete and accurate We have reviewed our references and confirm that the list is complete and accurate. Because we focused on shortening the length of manuscript, a few of the references have been deleted and/or cited in different sections of the manuscript. 3) Remove funding reference from Acknowledgements and ensure is accurate to be included in Funding Statement As required per the PLOS ONE style requirements, we have removed any funding information from the Acknowledgement section. We have verified the accuracy of the statement below – that can be added Funding Statement by the Journal Editors. "The AFI sentinel surveillance project was funded by the U.S.-China Collaborative Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases Cooperative Agreement #5U2GGH000961-04. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 4) Data availability - We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. The authors of the manuscript do not have the legal authority to share the data with our submission of the manuscript. The data collected and analyzed as part of this project covered by the Data Sharing agreement established at the beginning of the project, consistent with the rules and regulations of the China Health Commission. Access to the de-identified dataset can be requested in a letter/email to Dr. Ke Changwen at Kechangwen@cdcp.org.con (for the AFI case data from Jiangmen City) and Dr. Zhonghua Yang at 18987903669 (for the AFI case and control data from Mengla County). 5) Ensure Ethics Statement is included in the Methods Section of the manuscript. We have confirmed that the Ethics Statement is included in the Methods Section. Reviewer #1 Comments 1) The manuscript should be shortened and more concise Thank you for this comment and feedback. Our goal is to publish an easy to read and informative manuscript. As recommended, we have shortened the manuscript to the best of our ability to 4,225 words. 2) Authors defined AFI as fever within 7 days without targeted organ symptoms (e.g., cough, sore throat, diarrhea). However, diarrhea is presented as a clinical presentation in Table 2. Thank you for noting this inconsistency. We have deleted the AFI cases reporting diarrhea and bloody diarrhea/vomiting and regenerated the descriptive and analytical results. The exclusion of these cases did not impact the overall findings and conclusion from the project. Please see Table 2 for the breakdown of signs/symptoms of the 836 cases that meet the eligibility criteria and were included in the final AFI surveillance dataset. 3) Mean day of fever onset should be presented We appreciate this comment. Unfortunately, we did not collect the date of fever onset needed to calculate the mean duration of fever at the time of enrollment. Each hospital requested whether fever onset was during the last 7 days. If yes, and the maximum temperature was >= 37.5 C, the patient was eligible for participation (assuming that all of criteria were met). This approach may have inadvertently enrolled patients who temperature started more than 7 days before contact with the sentinel hospital as well as patients who incorrectly reported an elevated temperature at home, we anticipate that the number of patients incorrectly enrolled are likely to very small. We also anticipate that the mean duration of fever prior to enrolment was likely to vary by distance from the sentinel hospital and the severity of the illness. 4) For patient treatment outcomes, hospitalization was described but not deaths. If there was any death, it should be reported by disease. If not, should mention that that was no death. Thank you for this comment. As mentioned above, the project was designed as a surveillance project, focused on describing the etiology and possible risk factors of patients presenting with AFI at one of the five sentinel hospitals. Project staff collected information from AFI patients at the time of enrollment. The project protocol did not include patient follow-up on hospital and non-hospitalized patients. Although we understand the importance of having information on case outcomes, our project was not designed to follow patients prospectively. As such, we do not have the specific outcomes for each patient due to the project design. We propose a separate project to enroll and prospectively follow patients with positive TAC detections in the future. Reviewer #2 Comments 1) The article only deaths with the etiologic agent of AFI, and no information regarding the outcome, duration of hospitalization for each positive agent group of patients, any antimicrobial was given, outcome of the patients studied, or any serious outcome, death or none at all. Thank you for this comment. The project was designed as a surveillance project, focused on describing the etiology and possible risk factors of patients presenting with AFI at one of the five sentinel hospitals. Project staff collected information from AFI patients at the time of enrollment. The project protocol did not include patient follow-up on hospital and non-hospitalized patients. Although we understand the importance of having information on case outcomes, our project was not designed to follow patients prospectively. As such, we do not have the specific outcomes for each patient due to the project design. We propose a separate project to enroll and prospectively follow patients with positive TAC detections in the future. 14 Jun 2022 Etiology of acute febrile illnesses in Southern China: findings from a two-year sentinel surveillance project, 2017-2019 PONE-D-22-05533R1 Dear Dr. Rainey, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Baochuan Lin, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation. Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed Reviewer #2: (No Response) ********** 2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 6. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: (No Response) Reviewer #2: This manuscript only deal with etiology, no other clinical relation to etiology . ********** 7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No ********** 20 Jun 2022 PONE-D-22-05533R1 Etiology of acute febrile illnesses in Southern China: findings from a two-year sentinel surveillance project, 2017-2019 Dear Dr. Rainey: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Baochuan Lin Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  44 in total

1.  Zika virus infection in travelers returning from countries with local transmission, Guangdong, China, 2016.

Authors:  Haimei Jia; Meng Zhang; Maoyu Chen; Zhiwen Yang; Jiansen Li; Guo Huang; Dawei Guan; Xiaoli Cen; Lijie Zhang; Qiwen Feng; Jianron Yi; Haojie Zhong; Huilai Ma; Tie Song
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.211

2.  Importation of Zika Virus in China: A significant risk in southern China.

Authors:  Bin Xiang; Pei Gao; Yinfeng Kang; Tao Ren
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 3.  The contributions and achievements on malaria control and forthcoming elimination in China over the past 70 years by NIPD-CTDR.

Authors:  Xinyu Feng; Zhi-Gui Xia; Jun Feng; Li Zhang; He Yan; Linhua Tang; Xiao-Nong Zhou; Shuisen Zhou
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.870

4.  Diagnosis and management of febrile children using the WHO/UNICEF guidelines for IMCI in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Authors:  S H Factor; J A Schillinger; H D Kalter; S Saha; H Begum; A Hossain; M Hossain; V Dewitt; M Hanif; N Khan; B Perkins; R E Black; B Schwartz
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Diagnosis and management of undifferentiated fever in children.

Authors:  Sarah S Long
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  Chikungunya outbreak in Guangdong Province, China, 2010.

Authors:  De Wu; Jie Wu; Qiaoli Zhang; Haojie Zhong; Changwen Ke; Xiaoling Deng; Dawei Guan; Hui Li; Yonghui Zhang; Huiqiong Zhou; Jianfeng He; Linghui Li; Xingfen Yang
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Low Zika Virus Seroprevalence in Vientiane, Laos, 2003-2015.

Authors:  Boris Pastorino; Onanong Sengvilaipaseuth; Anisone Chanthongthip; Manivanh Vongsouvath; Chanthala Souksakhone; Mayfong Mayxay; Laurence Thirion; Paul N Newton; Xavier de Lamballerie; Audrey Dubot-Pérès
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 8.  Global knowledge gaps in acute febrile illness etiologic investigations: A scoping review.

Authors:  Chulwoo Rhee; Grishma A Kharod; Nicolas Schaad; Nathan W Furukawa; Neil M Vora; David D Blaney; John A Crump; Kevin R Clarke
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-11-15

9.  Estimating the incidence of typhoid fever and other febrile illnesses in developing countries.

Authors:  John A Crump; Fouad G Youssef; Stephen P Luby; Momtaz O Wasfy; Josefa M Rangel; Maha Taalat; Said A Oun; Frank J Mahoney
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Treatment seeking behavior and associated factors of suspected dengue fever among Shan people in eastern Shan special region IV, Myanmar: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Jian-Wei Xu; Zadan Ai; Yan Yu; Bian Yu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.