Kriangsak Ruchusatsawat1, Pattara Wongjaroen1, Arisara Posanacharoen1, Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer2, Somchai Sangkitporn1, Derek A T Cummings3, Henrik Salje4. 1. National Institute of Health, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. 2. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, UMR2000, CNRS, Paris, France; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: henrik.salje@pasteur.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the historical and current risk of Zika virus infection in southeast Asia, where the mosquito vector is widespread and other arboviruses circulate endemically. Centralised Zika virus surveillance began in Thailand in January, 2016. We assessed the long-term circulation of Zika virus in Thailand. METHODS: In this observational study, we analysed data from individuals with suspected Zika virus infection who presented at hospitals throughout the country and had biological samples (serum, plasma, or urine) tested for confirmation with PCR at the National Institute of Health laboratories in Bangkok. We analysed the spatial and age distribution of cases, and constructed time-resolved phylogenetic trees using genomes from Thailand and elsewhere to estimate when Zika virus was first introduced. FINDINGS: Of the 3089 samples from 1717 symptomatic individuals tested between January, 2016, and December, 2017, 368 were confirmed to have Zika virus infection. Cases of Zika virus infection were reported throughout the year, and from 29 of the 76 Thai provinces. Individuals had 2·8 times (95% CI 2·3-3·6) the odds of testing positive for Zika virus infection if they came from the same district and were sick within the same year of a person with a confirmed infection relative to the odds of testing positive anywhere, consistent with focal transmission. The probability of cases being younger than 10 years was 0·99 times (0·72-1·30) the probability of being that age in the underlying population. This probability rose to 1·62 (1·33-1·92) among those aged 21-30 years and fell to 0·53 (0·40-0·66) for those older than 50 years. This age distribution is consistent with that observed in the Zika virus epidemic in Colombia. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest persistent circulation within Thailand since at least 2002. INTERPRETATION: Our evidence shows that Zika virus has circulated at a low but sustained level for at least 16 years, suggesting that Zika virus can adapt to persistent endemic transmission. Health systems need to adapt to cope with regular occurrences of the severe complications associated with infection. FUNDING: European Research Council, National Science Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the historical and current risk of Zika virus infection in southeast Asia, where the mosquito vector is widespread and other arboviruses circulate endemically. Centralised Zika virus surveillance began in Thailand in January, 2016. We assessed the long-term circulation of Zika virus in Thailand. METHODS: In this observational study, we analysed data from individuals with suspected Zika virus infection who presented at hospitals throughout the country and had biological samples (serum, plasma, or urine) tested for confirmation with PCR at the National Institute of Health laboratories in Bangkok. We analysed the spatial and age distribution of cases, and constructed time-resolved phylogenetic trees using genomes from Thailand and elsewhere to estimate when Zika virus was first introduced. FINDINGS: Of the 3089 samples from 1717 symptomatic individuals tested between January, 2016, and December, 2017, 368 were confirmed to have Zika virus infection. Cases of Zika virus infection were reported throughout the year, and from 29 of the 76 Thai provinces. Individuals had 2·8 times (95% CI 2·3-3·6) the odds of testing positive for Zika virus infection if they came from the same district and were sick within the same year of a person with a confirmed infection relative to the odds of testing positive anywhere, consistent with focal transmission. The probability of cases being younger than 10 years was 0·99 times (0·72-1·30) the probability of being that age in the underlying population. This probability rose to 1·62 (1·33-1·92) among those aged 21-30 years and fell to 0·53 (0·40-0·66) for those older than 50 years. This age distribution is consistent with that observed in the Zika virus epidemic in Colombia. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest persistent circulation within Thailand since at least 2002. INTERPRETATION: Our evidence shows that Zika virus has circulated at a low but sustained level for at least 16 years, suggesting that Zika virus can adapt to persistent endemic transmission. Health systems need to adapt to cope with regular occurrences of the severe complications associated with infection. FUNDING: European Research Council, National Science Foundation, and National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Henrik Salje; Justin Lessler; Timothy P Endy; Frank C Curriero; Robert V Gibbons; Ananda Nisalak; Suchitra Nimmannitya; Siripen Kalayanarooj; Richard G Jarman; Stephen J Thomas; Donald S Burke; Derek A T Cummings Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer; Marli T Cordeiro; Cynthia Braga; Wayner V de Souza; Ernesto T Marques; Derek A T Cummings Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2011-01-04
Authors: Maria Theresa Alera; Laura Hermann; Ilya A Tac-An; Chonticha Klungthong; Wiriya Rutvisuttinunt; Wudtichai Manasatienkij; Daisy Villa; Butsaya Thaisomboonsuk; John Mark Velasco; Piyawan Chinnawirotpisan; Catherine B Lago; Vito G Roque; Louis R Macareo; Anon Srikiatkhachorn; Stefan Fernandez; In-Kyu Yoon Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Derek A T Cummings; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Justin T Lessler; Aidan McDermott; Rungnapa Prasanthong; Ananda Nisalak; Richard G Jarman; Donald S Burke; Robert V Gibbons Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jane P Messina; Oliver J Brady; Thomas W Scott; Chenting Zou; David M Pigott; Kirsten A Duda; Samir Bhatt; Leah Katzelnick; Rosalind E Howes; Katherine E Battle; Cameron P Simmons; Simon I Hay Journal: Trends Microbiol Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 17.079
Authors: I-Ching Sam; Magelda Montoya; Chong Long Chua; Yoke Fun Chan; Andrew Pastor; Eva Harris Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Brett W Jagger; Kimberly A Dowd; Rita E Chen; Pritesh Desai; Bryant Foreman; Katherine E Burgomaster; Sunny Himansu; Wing-Pui Kong; Barney S Graham; Theodore C Pierson; Michael S Diamond Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Joseph R Biggs; Ava Kristy Sy; Oliver J Brady; Adam J Kucharski; Sebastian Funk; Yun-Hung Tu; Mary Anne Joy Reyes; Mary Ann Quinones; William Jones-Warner; James Ashall; Ferchito L Avelino; Nemia L Sucaldito; Amado O Tandoc; Eva Cutiongco-de la Paz; Maria Rosario Z Capeding; Carmencita D Padilla; Martin L Hibberd; Julius Clemence R Hafalla Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Jeanette J Rainey; Casey Siesel; Xiafang Guo; Lina Yi; Yuzhi Zhang; Shuyu Wu; Adam L Cohen; Jie Liu; Eric Houpt; Barry Fields; Zhonghua Yang; Changwen Ke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Angkana T Huang; Saki Takahashi; Henrik Salje; Lin Wang; Bernardo Garcia-Carreras; Kathryn Anderson; Timothy Endy; Stephen Thomas; Alan L Rothman; Chonticha Klungthong; Anthony R Jones; Stefan Fernandez; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Pawinee Doung-Ngern; Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer; Derek A T Cummings Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Kathryn B Anderson; Darunee Buddhari; Anon Srikiatkhachorn; Gregory D Gromowski; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Alden L Weg; Damon W Ellison; Louis Macareo; Derek A T Cummings; In-Kyu Yoon; Ananda Nisalak; Alongkot Ponlawat; Stephen J Thomas; Stefan Fernandez; Richard G Jarman; Alan L Rothman; Timothy P Endy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897