| Literature DB >> 22377135 |
De Wu1, Jie Wu, Qiaoli Zhang, Haojie Zhong, Changwen Ke, Xiaoling Deng, Dawei Guan, Hui Li, Yonghui Zhang, Huiqiong Zhou, Jianfeng He, Linghui Li, Xingfen Yang.
Abstract
A disease outbreak with dengue-like symptoms was reported in Guangdong Province, China, in October 2010. Testing results confirmed that the pathogen causing the outbreak was chikungunya virus. Phylogenic analysis indicated that this virus was a member of the Indian Ocean clade of the East/Center/South African subgroup of chikungunya virus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22377135 PMCID: PMC3309566 DOI: 10.3201/eid1803.110034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Cases of chikungunya infection in Guangdong, China, September 1–October 1, 2010. Black bar sections indicate clinical cases and white bar sections cases confirmed by molecular analysis.
Characteristics of case-patients and serum sample detection for chikungunya virus, Guangdong, China, 2010*
| Case-patient ID no. | Age, y/sex | Date of symptom onset, Sep 2010 | Signs and symptoms | Test results | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fever | Red face | Headache | Arthralgia | Myalgia | MR | Virus isolation | Real-time RT-PCR/RT-PCR | IgM/ IgG | ||||
| D10112 | 33/F | 27 | + | – | – | + | + | + | – | +/+ | –/– | |
| D10113 | 7/M | 29 | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | +/+ | –/– | |
| D10114 | 62/M | 30 | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | +/+ | –/– | |
| D10115 | 48/F | 30 | + | – | – | + | – | + | + | +/+ | –/– | |
| D10116 | 60/M | 28 | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | +/– | –/– | |
| D10117 | 39/M | 27 | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | +/– | +/– | |
| D10118† | 59/M | 19 | + | + | – | + | – | + | ND | –/ND | +/+ | |
| D10119 | 59/F | 26 | – | + | – | + | – | + | ND | –/ND | –/– | |
| D10120 | 10/F | 26 | + | – | + | – | – | + | ND | –/ND | +/– | |
| D10121† | 56/F | 21 | + | + | – | + | – | + | ND | –/ND | +/– | |
| D10122† | 24/F | 21 | + | + | – | + | + | + | ND | –/ND | +/– | |
| D10123 | 3/F | 26 | + | – | – | – | – | + | – | +/– | –/– | |
| D10124 | 60/M | 26 | + | – | – | + | + | + | – | +/+ | –/– | |
| D10125 | 60/F | 29 | + | – | – | + | + | + | – | +/+ | +/– | |
| D10126 | 39/M | 28 | + | – | – | + | + | + | – | +/+ | +/– | |
*All samples were obtained on October 1, 2010. ID, identification; MR, maculopapular rash; RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; +, positive; –, negative; ND, not done. † Convalescent-phase case-patient.
Figure A1Effect of chikungunya virus nucleic acid–positive serum specimens on C6/36 and BHK-21 cells, Guangdong, China, 2010. A) Control (uninfected) C6/36 cells. B) Infected C6/36 cells, showing cytopathic effect. C) Control (uninfected) BHK-21 cells. D) Infected BHK-21 cells, showing cytopathic effect. (Original magnifications ×200.)
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of partial envelope 1 gene sequences of chikungunya viruses, Guangdong, China, 2010. Numbers along branches indicate bootstrap values. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site.