| Literature DB >> 35745216 |
Raffaella de Franchis1, Luigi Bozza1, Pasquale Canale1, Maria Chiacchio1, Paolo Cortese1, Antonio D'Avino1, Maria De Giovanni1, Mirella Dello Iacovo1, Antonietta D'Onofrio1, Aniello Federico1, Nicoletta Gasparini1, Felicia Iaccarino1, Giuseppe Romano1, Raffaella Spadaro1, Mariangela Tedesco1, Giuseppe Vitiello1, Angelo Antignani2, Salvatore Auricchio3, Vincenzo Valentino4, Francesca De Filippis4,5, Danilo Ercolini4,5, Dario Bruzzese6.
Abstract
Mediterranean Diet (Med Diet) is one of the healthiest dietary patterns. We aimed to verify the effects of weaning (i.e., the introduction of solid foods in infants previously fed only with milk) using adult foods typical of Med Diet on children eating habits, and on the microbiota composition. A randomized controlled clinical trial on 394 healthy infants randomized in a 1:1 ratio in a Med Diet group weaned with fresh; seasonal and tasty foods of Med Diet and control group predominantly weaned with industrial baby foods. The primary end point was the percentage of children showing a good adherence to Med Diet at 36 months. Secondary end points were mother's changes in adherence to Med Diet and differences in children gut microbiota. At 36 months, children showing a good adherence to Med Diet were 59.3% in the Med Diet group and 34.3% in the control group (p < 0.001). An increase in adherence to the Med Diet was observed in the mothers of the Med Diet group children (p < 0.001). At 4 years of age children in the Med Diet group had a higher gut microbial diversity and a higher abundance of beneficial taxa. A Mediterranean weaning with adult food may become a strategy for early nutritional education, to develop a healthy microbiota, to prevent inflammatory chronic diseases and to ameliorate eating habits in children and their families.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean Diet; complementary feeding; fresh foods; gut microbiota; taste development
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745216 PMCID: PMC9227033 DOI: 10.3390/nu14122486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Study Flow-chart.
Clinical ad demographical characteristics of the sample stratified by treatment arm. Variables are described by mean ± standard deviation (min to max) or absolute frequencies (percentage).
| Control Arm | Med Diet Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Child characteristics | ||
| Age at enrollment (days) | 145.6 + −19.8 (47 to 189) | 145.3 + −18.8 (92 to 197) |
| Gender; female | 102 (51) | 103 (53.1) |
| Birth weight (kg) | 3.2 + −0.4 (1.8 to 4.4) | 3.2 + −0.5 (1.2 to 4.5) |
| Weight at enrollment (kg) | 7.2 + −0.9 (3.8 to 10) | 7.2 + −0.9 (4.9 to 9.9) |
| Only child | 86 (43) | 98 (50.5) |
| Feeding | ||
| Breastfeeding | 48 (24) | 64 (33.2) |
| Formula type | 118 (59) | 100 (51.8) |
| Mixed | 34 (17) | 29 (15) |
| Parents characteristics | ||
| Mothers’ degree | ||
| Primary school | 59 (29.5) | 50 (25.9) |
| Secondary school | 90 (45) | 80 (41.5) |
| Degree or higher | 31 (30.5) | 63 (32.6) |
| Mother BMI (kg/m2) | 25.8 + −4.4 (17.7 to 43.1) | 25 + −4.4 (17.6 to 46.9) |
| Father BMI (kg/m2) | 26.3 + −2.9 (18.7 to 34.8) | 25.9 + −3.1 (17.3 to 36.7) |
| Mothers’ adherence to Med Diet | 62.2 + −13.9 (28.6 to 92.9) | 62.7 + −13.5 (28.6 to 85.7) |
Differences between groups in primary and secondary end points with respect to ITT population. Variables are described by mean ± standard deviation (min to max) or absolute frequencies (percentage) ° Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval); § Mean difference (95% Confidence Interval).
| Control Arm | Med Diet Arm | Treatment Effect | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Children | ||||
| KidMed score ≥ 8; | 62 (34.3%) | 105 (59.3%) | 2.8 (1.82 to 4.3) ° | <0.001 |
| KidMed score | 6.0 ± 2.9 | 7.5 ± 3 | 1.5 (0.9 to 2.1) § | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 16.4 ± 2 | 16.2 ± 1.5 | −0.16 (−0.54 to 0.22) § | 0.413 |
| Overweight; | 29 (17.7) | 18 (11) | 0.58 (0.31 to 1.1) ° | 0.094 |
| Obese; | 2 (1.2) | 0 (0) | NA | NA |
| Parents | ||||
| Mothers’ adherence to Med Diet | 61.5 ± 13.8 (28.6 to 92.2) | 70.3 ± 18.2 (28.6 to 92.2) | 8.6 (4.9 to 12.3) § | <0.001 |
Figure 2Differences between groups according to the single items of the KidMed questionnaire. Between groups differences for each item were assessed using the Chi square test without adjustment for multiple comparisons.
Figure 3Longitudinal trajectories of KidMed score in children stratified by treatment arm. Results are expressed as Estimated Marginal Means (EMM) with the corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CIs). EMM’s were based on a linear mixed models using time as categorical factor.
Clinical ad demographical characteristics of the children analyzed for microbiota stratified by treatment arm. Variables are described by mean ± standard deviation (min to max), median [25th; 75th percentile] or absolute frequencies (percentage).
| Control Arm | Med Diet Arm | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender; female | 14 (56%) | 17 (65.4%) |
| C-Section | 9 (36%) | 9 (34.6%) |
| Weight at T36 (kg) | 14.7 ± 1.6 (12 to 18) | 15.3 ± 1.9 (12.3 to 20.5) |
| Feeding at T36 | ||
| Breastfeeding | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.9%) |
| Formula type | 4 (16.0%) | 3 (11.5%) |
| Cow milk | 21 (84.0%) | 22 (84.6%) |
| KidMed score at T36 | 6.6 ± 2.1 (3 to 11) | 8 ± 3 (0 to 12) |
| Age at microbiota evaluation | 4.0 ± 0.6 (3.3 to 5.5) | 4.3 ± 0.6 (3.4 to 5.6) |
| Number of cumulative antibiotics prescriptions at microbiota evaluation | 4 (1 to 9) | 5 (2 to 7) |
Figure 4Complete linkage clustering of subjects based on gut microbiota composition at genus level. Only genera with a median absolute abundance >2% were considered. The Canberra metric was used to compute distance between each pair of subjects.
Figure 5Boxplots showing the relative abundance of microbial taxa between the Med Diet group (green) and controls (pink). (A): boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR) between the first and third quartiles and the line inside represents the median (2nd quartile). Whiskers denote the lowest and the highest values within 1.5 × IQR from the first and third quartiles, respectively. Between groups differences were assessed by applying pairwise Wilcoxon test. (B): Violin plots showing the difference in four alpha-diversity indices between the Med Diet group and controls. Wilcoxon’s rank sum test was used to assess the significance.