| Literature DB >> 35745208 |
Xin Qian1,2, Qian Si1,2, Guopeng Lin1,2, Minmin Zhu3, Jingyu Lu1,2,4, Hao Zhang1,2,4,5, Gang Wang1,2,5, Wei Chen1,2,4.
Abstract
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing globally. Probiotics have been shown to be an effective intervention for diabetes. This study focused on the relieving effects and possible mechanisms of 16 strains of two dominant Bifidobacterium species (B. bifidum and B. adolescentis, which exist in the human gut at different life stages) on type 2 diabetes (T2D). The results indicated that more B. adolescentis strains appeared to be superior in alleviating T2D symptoms than B. bifidum strains. This effect was closely related to the ability of B. adolescentis to restore the homeostasis of the gut microbiota, increase the abundance of short-chain fatty acid-producing flora, and alleviate inflammation in mice with T2D. In addition, compared with B. bifidum, B. adolescentis had a higher number of core genes, and these genes were more evolutionarily stable, including unique environmental tolerance, carbon and nitrogen utilization genes, and a blood sugar regulation gene, glgP. This may be one of the reasons why B. adolescentis is more likely to colonize in the adult gut and show a superior ability to relieve T2D. This study provides insights into future studies aimed at investigating probiotics for the treatment of metabolic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Bifidobacterium; genome; gut microbiota; inflammation; short-chain fatty acids; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745208 PMCID: PMC9227778 DOI: 10.3390/nu14122479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Strain information used in this study.
| Species | Strain | Number | Source | Culture Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FJSSZ3M10 | 3M10 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FGSZY8M4 (CCFM1108) | 8M4 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FHNFQ26M1 | 26M1 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FGSYC30M5 | 30M5 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FXJKS34M4 | 34M4 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FHNFQ41M3 | 41M3 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FXJCJ50M3 | 50M3 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| HuNan112 (CCFM1261) | 2016 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FJSSZ5M8 | 5M8 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FSDJN705 | 7-05 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FXJCJ9M10 | 9M10 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| JSWX19M5 | 19M10 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| AHWH21M3 | 21M3 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FHNFQ23M2 | 23M2 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| FHNFQ26M7 (CCFM1165) | 26M7 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
|
| JSWX267 | 26-7 | Human faeces | 37 °C, MRS, anaerobic |
Figure 1Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the regulation of glucose metabolism in T2D mice. (a) Animal experimental schedule; (b–g) OGTT and AUCglucose at 1 or 5 weeks after STZ injection, respectively; (h) Insulin level; (i) HOMA-IR. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 2Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the pancreas and liver of T2D mice. (a) H&E staining of pancreas (400×); (b) Histopathological scores of pancreas; (c) H&E staining of the liver (200×); (d) Histopathological scores of liver; (e) liver SOD level; (f) liver MDA level; (g) Principal component analysis of blood glucose and lipid metabolism related index and pancreas and liver pathology. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 3Bifidobacterium treatment altered gut microbiota diversity and structure. (a–d) Alpha diversity index; (e,f) PCoA plot based on beta diversity; (g–m) Relative abundance of different phylum. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 4Bifidobacterium treatment altered gut microbiota at the family and genus levels. (a,c) LEfSe analysis used to label biomarkers in all sample groups; (b,d) Random forest analysis of genus level differences caused by different treatments; (e,f) Prediction of gut microbiota function. C = Control, HFD = Model, M = Metformin, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 in the unpaired t-tests.
Figure 5Effects of different Bifidobacterium on the inflammation and SCFAs regulation of T2D mice. (a–d) IL-6, TNF-α, INF-γ and IL-10 levels in serum; (e) Correlation analysis between inflammatory factors and blood glucose and lipid metabolism and visceral indexes; (f–i) Acetate, propitiate, isobutyrate, and butyrate levels in the feces; (j) Correlation analysis between SCFAs and blood glucose metabolism index and inflammatory factors. Different letters represent statistically significant differences between different groups (p < 0.05), n = 6.
Figure 6Genomic differences between two Bifidobacterium. (a,b) Homologous gene analysis; (c) Veen map of core genes; (d,e) Pan genomic analysis; (f,g) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis; (h–j) KEGG pathway cluster analysis of unique core genes.