| Literature DB >> 22356933 |
Camila Moroti1, Loyanne Francine Souza Magri, Marcela de Rezende Costa, Daniela C U Cavallini, Katia Sivieri.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The consumption of foods containing probiotic and prebiotic ingredients is growing consistently every year, and in view of the limited number of studies investigating their effect in the elderly.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22356933 PMCID: PMC3305430 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-11-29
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Clinical characteristics at baseline of the volunteers
| Clinical characteristics | GS (n = 9) | GP (n = 9) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 55.47a ± 2.0 | 56,89 a ± 1.7 |
| Height (m) | 1.65 a ± 1.2 | 1.64 a ± 1.3 |
| Weight (Kg) | 75.43 a ± 2.01 | 75.89 a ± 2.00 |
| BMI (Kg/m2)* | 27.70 a ± 0.78 | 28.21 a ± 0.85 |
| Diabetes | 9 | 9 |
| Hypertension | 7 | 8 |
| Smoking | 5 | 4 |
| Energy (kcal/day) | 2144.6 a ± 643.5 | 2322.4 a ± 543.5 |
Values are mean ± SD. Statistical comparison of groups: means with identical minuscule letters in the same line do not differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05). GS group symbiotic shake, GP group placebo shake, *BMI body massindex
Figure 1Study design.
Lipid profile of the symbiotic and placebo groups during pre-ingestion and ingestion of the symbiotic shake
| Parameter | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | Variation in the period T0-T3 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group S | 229.67 ± 55.51 a | 175.33 ± 49.09 b | 188.22 ± 29.03 ab | 170.33 ± 28.85 b | -25.84% (p < 0.05) |
| Group P | 204.00 ± 3.97 a | 160.56 ± 19.94 a | 194.67 ± 49.75 a | 191.44 ± 33.78 a | -4.69% (p > 0.05) |
| Group S | 43.33 ± 12,94 a | 48.78 ± 13,10 a | 51.11 ± 15.16 a | 58.56 ± 11.08 a | +35.15% (p > 0.05) |
| Group P | 50.22 ± 18.30 a | 49.22 ± 14.67 a | 49.33 ± 18.72 a | 55.11 ± 14.34 a | +9.74% (p > 0.05) |
| Group S | 190.44 ± 58.19 a | 126.56 ± 43.00 b | 137.11 ± 30.39 b | 111.78 ± 24.68 b | -41,30 (p < 0.05) |
| Group P | 153.78 ± 18.21 a | 111.33 ± 29.06 a | 145.33 ± 59.96 a | 136.33 ± 32.79 a | -11.35 (p > 0.05) |
| Group S | 317.56 ± 101.08 a | 248.89 ± 62.95 ab | 204.00 ± 89,90 b | 199.22 ± 54,60 b | -37.27% (p < 0.05) |
| Group P | 239.44 ± 58.38 a | 217.33 ± 56.47 a | 226.33 ± 126.23 a | 198.56 ± 66.07 a | -17.07% (p > 0.05) |
Means followed by the same lower case letters in the same line are not statistically different within the same group (P < 0.05)
T0: Pre-ingestion period, T1: 10th day of ingestion, T2: 20th day of ingestion, T3: 30th day of ingestion
Group S: Individuals who consumed the symbiotic shake
Group P: Individuals who consumed the placebo shake
Effect of the consumption of a symbiotic shake and a placebo shake on glycemia (mg/dL)
| Period | Group S | Group P |
|---|---|---|
| 191.11 ± 18.31 a | 136.78 ± 19.47 a | |
| 128.56 ± 29.23 b | 121.33 ± 1.00 a | |
| 123.22 ± 27.78 b | 110.11 ± 19.90 a | |
| 116.78 ± 18.96 b | 110.56 ± 29.90 a | |
Means followed by the same lower case letters in the same column are not statistically different within the same group (P < 0.05)
T0: Pre-ingestion period, T1: 10th day of ingestion, T2: 20th day of ingestion, T3: 30th day of ingestion
Group S: Individuals who consumed the symbiotic shake
Group P: Individuals who consumed the placebo shake