Literature DB >> 35693996

Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening.

Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn1, Amporn Robkhonburi1, Maria Asad-Dehghan1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of capillary blood glucose (CBG) compared to conventional venous plasma glucose (VPG) testing for 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) in gestational diabetes (GDM) screening.
Methods: A total of 300 women were enrolled and 50-g GCT for GDM screening was offered. At 1 h after glucose loading, CBG was evaluated by CONTOUR® PLUS glucose meter by well-trained nurses immediately after venipuncture for VPG. Results of CBG were compared with those from VPG to evaluate its accuracy. Women with venous plasma glucose > 140 mg/dL were offered 100-g OGTT for GDM diagnosis.
Results: The mean age was 30.2 years and the mean gestational age at testing was 21.8 weeks. GDM was diagnosed in 34 women (11.3%). The mean VPG was 142.1 ± 32.9 mg/dL and the mean CBG was 129.3 ± 33.5 mg/dL. Mean difference was -12.3 ± 12.5 mg/dL, corresponding to -8.8 ± 11.4%. CBG significantly correlated with VPG with correlation coefficient of 0.929, p < 0.001. In the detection of abnormal 50-g GCT results (VPG ≥ 140 mg/dL), at 126 mg/dL cutoff, CBG had sensitivity of 92.5%, specificity of 81.8%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82.8%and 92%. None of the GDM would have been missed if CBG was used.
Conclusion: CBG by a certified glucose meter could be considered as an alternative to conventional VPG testing for 50-g GCT for GDM screening using 126 mg/dL cutoff value. © The Japan Diabetes Society 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  50-g glucose challenge test; Accuracy; Capillary blood glucose; Gestational diabetes; Venous plasma glucose

Year:  2022        PMID: 35693996      PMCID: PMC9174389          DOI: 10.1007/s13340-022-00572-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetol Int        ISSN: 2190-1678


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kai J Buhling; Wolfgang Henrich; Siri L Kjos; Gerda Siebert; Elizabeth Starr; Christine Dreweck; Ursula Stein; Joachim W Dudenhausen
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Comparison of venous plasma glucose and capillary whole blood glucose in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a community-based study.

Authors:  Vijayam Balaji; Balaji S Madhuri; Arunachalam Paneerselvam; Thiyagarajah Arthi; Veerasamy Seshiah
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Performance of the Roche Accu-Chek active glucose meter to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus using fasting capillary blood.

Authors:  Gurdeep S Dhatt; Mukesh M Agarwal; Yusra Othman; Satish C Nair
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus based on various screening strategies in western Kenya: a prospective comparison of point of care diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Sonak D Pastakia; Benson Njuguna; Beryl Ajwang' Onyango; Sierra Washington; Astrid Christoffersen-Deb; Wycliffe K Kosgei; Ponnusamy Saravanan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Accuracy and user performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Michael Caswell; Joy Frank; Maria T Viggiani; Scott Pardo; Nancy Dunne; Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham; Robert Morin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Accuracy and precision assessment of a new blood glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Li-Nong Ji; Li-Xin Guo; Li-Bin Liu
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Nancy Dunne; Maria T Viggiani; Scott Pardo; Cynthia Robinson; Joan Lee Parkes
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.945

10.  Use of capillary blood glucose for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Balaji Bhavadharini; Manni Mohanraj Mahalakshmi; Kumar Maheswari; Gunasekaran Kalaiyarasi; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Mohan Deepa; Harish Ranjani; Miranda Priya; Ram Uma; Sriram Usha; Sonak D Pastakia; Belma Malanda; Anne Belton; Ranjit Unnikrishnan; Arivudainambi Kayal; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.