Literature DB >> 35685977

Surgeons' Awareness and Impaction Technique of a Ceramic Liner into a Metal Shell.

Hong Seok Kim1, Jung-Wee Park1, Young-Kyun Lee1, Alessandro Alan Porporati2, Yong-Chan Ha3, Kyung-Hoi Koo1.   

Abstract

Background: In ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty, firm locking is necessary between a ceramic liner and an acetabular metal shell to prevent dissociation of the liner from the metal shell. We evaluated surgeons' awareness of the technique for inserting the ceramic liner and measured the impaction force applied by surgeons during the insertion of the ceramic liner.
Methods: To evaluate the awareness, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire including techniques for ceramic liner insertion. The impaction force was measured using an impaction simulator in 224 surgeons.
Results: Most surgeons answered that they cleaned and dried up the inner surface of the metal shell before inserting a ceramic liner (96.4% and 86.2%, respectively), and 74.6% checked the correct seating of the ceramic liner. However, only 23.2% correctly answered that a minimum of 2kN (a light strike) was necessary to obtain a sufficient fit between the metal shell and the ceramic liner. The impaction force was weaker than 2 kN in 9.4% of the surgeons. Conclusions: Education about the adequate impaction force to obtain a firm fit of the ceramic liner is necessary for surgeons who perform total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.
Copyright © 2022 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Awareness; Ceramic liner; Impaction technique; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35685977      PMCID: PMC9152890          DOI: 10.4055/cios21102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg        ISSN: 2005-291X


Since 1994, contemporary ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have been used for total hip arthroplasty (THA) especially in young active patients because of excellent wear property and almost negligible osteolysis.1234) The new alumina matrix composite ceramic, incorporating zirconia, was introduced in 2003. The composite ceramic has markedly reduced the incidence of ceramic fractures; however, the incidence of ceramic liner fractures seems to vary geographically.56789) The variation in the incidence of ceramic fractures could be related to handling. Insufficient engagement between the ceramic liner and acetabular metal shell can lead to a dissociation of the liner from the metal shell. Liner dissociation has been known as a cause of ceramic liner fractures.2101112) A tight concentric fit is necessary between a ceramic liner and a metal shell to avoid the risk of dissociation. Surgeons should clean and dry up the inner surface of the metal shell before inserting the liner. During the insertion, they should check whether the liner has been concentrically and completely seated into the metal shell. Then, surgeons should impact the liner with at least a light strike (> 2 kN) according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) guideline.131415) To date, there has been no study about whether surgeons are aware of this guideline. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate whether surgeons had accurate knowledge on the ASTM guideline and to measure the impaction force of surgeons to fix the ceramic liner into the metal shell.

METHODS

We conducted a survey and an impaction test during 19 orthopedic meetings, which were held from March 2018 to March 2019. Before the survey, we developed a questionnaire to test surgeon’s knowledge on how to handle and insert ceramic liners. In the questionnaire, we asked (1) Do you clean inner surfaces of the metal shell before insertion of the liner? (2) Do you dry up inner surfaces of the metal shell before insertion of the liner? (3) Do you perform impaction? (4) How many times do you impact the liner? (5) Are you aware of optimal impaction force to the ceramic liner? (6) Do you check complete and symmetric seating of the ceramic liner? (7) How do you check seating of the liner? (8) How often do you reposition the ceramic liner? (9) How often do you encounter problems during the insertion of the ceramic liner? (10) What are problems during the insertion of the ceramic liner (Supplementary Material 1)? After filling out the questionnaire, surgeons were asked to impact a ceramic liner (BIOLOX® delta; CeramTec, Plochingen, Germany) into the metal shell according to their usual manner during the operation using an impaction simulator (Fig. 1). A total of 224 arthroplasty surgeons who visited the manufacturer booth during 19 orthopedic congresses throughout the study period (Supplementary Material 2) answered the questionnaire and performed the impaction test (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Surgeons were asked to impact a ceramic liner (BIOLOX delta; CeramTec, Plochingen, Germany) into the metal shell using an impaction simulator (CeramTec).

Table 1

Demographics of 224 Participants

VariableNumber
Age (yr)
< 4060
40–5088
51–6049
61–7022
> 705
Duration of THA experience (yr)
< 18
1–335
3–530
5–1029
> 10122
Annual number of THAs
< 1086
10–2035
21–5073
51–10019
101–2005
> 2006
Proportion of use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in THAs (%)
011
0–2079
20–4035
40–6019
60–8018
80–10062

THA: total hip arthroplasty.

Ethics Approval

This study, including using the questionnaire, was approved as exempt by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (X-1907-552-904).

RESULTS

Answers to the Questionnaires

Most participants answered that they cleaned (96.4%) and dried up (86.2%) the inner surface of the metal shell before inserting the ceramic liner, checked symmetric complete seating of the ceramic liner (99.6%), and impacted the ceramic liner (98.2%). However, only 23.2% of the participants correctly answered that a minimum of 2 kN (a light strike) was necessary to obtain a secure fit between the metal shell and the ceramic liner, and only 42.4% checked the liner seating by inspection and finger-palpation. In terms of problems during the insertion, 40.6% answered that they had experienced difficult insertion, malseating, or deformation of the metal shell (Table 2).
Table 2

Answers from the 224 Participants

QuestionNumber (%)
Do you clean the inner surface of metal shell before inserting the ceramic liner?216 (96.4)
Do you dry up the inner surface of metal shell before inserting the ceramic liner?193 (86.2)
Do you perform impaction?220 (98.2)
How many times do you impact the liner?
144 (19.6)
262 (27.7)
377 (34.4)
> 337 (16.5)
Awareness on impaction force to ceramic liner (how much impaction force is necessary to securely lock a ceramic liner?)
Does not need impaction1 (0.4)
Light strike (> 2 kN)52 (23.2)
Moderate strike (> 4 kN)87 (38.8)
Strong strike (> 6 kN)20 (9.0)
As strong as possible2 (0.8)
I don't know62 (27.7)
Do you check complete and symmetric seating of the ceramic liner?223 (99.6)
How do you check complete and symmetric seating of the ceramic liner?
Visual48 (21.4)
Finger72 (32.1)
Visual and finger95 (42.4)
Instrument (elevator or freer)8 (3.6)
Proportion of repositioning of the ceramic liner (%)
< 1215 (96.0)
< 57 (3.1)
< 101 (0.4)
< 501 (0.4)
How often do you encounter problem(s) during the insertion of the ceramic liner?
Never133 (59.4)
Sometimes89 (39.7)
Regularly2 (0.9)
What problem(s) do you encounter during the insertion of the ceramic liner?
Difficult insertion44 (19.6)
Malseating45 (20.1)
Toggling due to a deformation of metal shell2 (0.9)

Impaction Force

The impaction force ranged from 0.5 kN to 13.3 kN (mean, 4.1 ± 2.1 kN). In 9.4% of the participants, the impaction force was weaker than the minimum requirement of 2 kN. The measured impaction force was 3.2 ± 1.8 kN in 52 participants who answered light strike (> 2 kN) was necessary, 4.5 ± 1.6 kN in 87 who answered moderate strike (> 4 kN) was necessary, 6.4 ± 2.9 kN in 20 who answered a strike (> 6 kN) was necessary, 8.4 ± 6.0 kN in 2 who answered a strike as strong as possible was necessary, and 3.5 ± 1.8 kN in 62 who answered they did not know suitable impaction force (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Impaction force according to the awareness of impaction force.

DISCUSSION

An appropriate technique is necessary in order to properly insert and fit a ceramic liner into the metal shell. The inner surface of the metal shell should be cleaned and dried.616) To prevent a fracture of the ceramic liner, the liner should be seated completely and symmetrically.6) According to the ASTM guideline, surgeons should impact a ceramic liner with at least a light strike (> 2 kN) to obtain a secure fit between the liner and the metal shell.1315) In our study, most surgeons answered that they cleaned and dried up the inner surface of metal shell before inserting the ceramic liner (96.4% and 86.2%, respectively), and 74.6% checked the correct seating of the ceramic liner. However, 76.8% of the surgeons did not know the guideline impact of > 2 kN and 9.4% impacted the liner with a force weaker than 2 kN. Surgeons may be reluctant to firmly impact the ceramic liner because they may perceive the ceramic material as brittle (i.e., lacking the plastic deformation of metals), despite the very high strength of modern ceramics for THA. This reluctance may increase the risk of incomplete seating of the ceramic liner.17) The ASTM guideline recommends drying up the metal shell with gauze before inserting the ceramic liner and fitting the liner with strong impact. However, whether these maneuvers are mandatory to prevent malseating of the ceramic liner has not been validated yet. Our study might be associated with a selection bias. The participants might not represent the general population of arthroplasty surgeons. We did not recruit the participants by random sampling. The participants were surgeons who visited the manufacturer booth due to an interest in ceramic implants. Second, we did not evaluate the correlation between the surgeon’s experience and the impaction force. Among the participants, 27% were younger than 40 years and 38% had less than 10 THAs per year. Third, other risk factors for ceramic fractures were not considered. Some liner with lower taper angle might be difficult to insert symmetrically.12) Our study showed that an education about the adequate impaction force to obtain a secure fit of the ceramic liner is necessary for surgeons who perform THA using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. The results of our study might serve as a guide especially for inexperienced arthroplasty surgeons to optimally fix the ceramic liner during ceramic-on-ceramic THA.
  15 in total

1.  Mixed ceramic combinations in primary total hip arthroplasty achieved reassuring mid-to-longterm outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Castagnini; Barbara Bordini; Federico Biondi; Monica Cosentino; Susanna Stea; Francesco Traina
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Jeong Joon Yoo; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Kang Sup Yoon; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A focused update on preventing ceramic fractures in hip arthroplasty: is the ‘cup’ half full?

Authors:  S Konan; S Alazzawi; B-H Yoon; Y-H Cha; K-H Koo
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses.

Authors:  Annelie Rehmer; Nicholas E Bishop; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 5.  Does Biolox Delta ceramic reduce the rate of component fractures in total hip replacement?

Authors:  P Massin; R Lopes; B Masson; D Mainard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: 14 to 16-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Bun-Jung Kang; Yong-Chan Ha; Dae-Woong Ham; Sun-Chul Hwang; Young-Kyun Lee; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years.

Authors:  Roshan P Shah; John A Scolaro; Roger Componovo; Jonathan P Garino; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.118

8.  Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyung-Hoi Koo; Yong-Chan Ha; Woon Hwa Jung; Sang-Rim Kim; Jeong Joon Yoo; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry.

Authors:  D P Howard; P D H Wall; M A Fernandez; H Parsons; P W Howard
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 10.  What every surgeon should know about Ceramic-on-Ceramic bearings in young patients.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; François Roubineau; Charlie Bouthors; Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.