| Literature DB >> 35685977 |
Hong Seok Kim1, Jung-Wee Park1, Young-Kyun Lee1, Alessandro Alan Porporati2, Yong-Chan Ha3, Kyung-Hoi Koo1.
Abstract
Background: In ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty, firm locking is necessary between a ceramic liner and an acetabular metal shell to prevent dissociation of the liner from the metal shell. We evaluated surgeons' awareness of the technique for inserting the ceramic liner and measured the impaction force applied by surgeons during the insertion of the ceramic liner.Entities:
Keywords: Awareness; Ceramic liner; Impaction technique; Total hip arthroplasty
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35685977 PMCID: PMC9152890 DOI: 10.4055/cios21102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Surg ISSN: 2005-291X
Fig. 1Surgeons were asked to impact a ceramic liner (BIOLOX delta; CeramTec, Plochingen, Germany) into the metal shell using an impaction simulator (CeramTec).
Demographics of 224 Participants
| Variable | Number | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | ||
| < 40 | 60 | |
| 40–50 | 88 | |
| 51–60 | 49 | |
| 61–70 | 22 | |
| > 70 | 5 | |
| Duration of THA experience (yr) | ||
| < 1 | 8 | |
| 1–3 | 35 | |
| 3–5 | 30 | |
| 5–10 | 29 | |
| > 10 | 122 | |
| Annual number of THAs | ||
| < 10 | 86 | |
| 10–20 | 35 | |
| 21–50 | 73 | |
| 51–100 | 19 | |
| 101–200 | 5 | |
| > 200 | 6 | |
| Proportion of use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in THAs (%) | ||
| 0 | 11 | |
| 0–20 | 79 | |
| 20–40 | 35 | |
| 40–60 | 19 | |
| 60–80 | 18 | |
| 80–100 | 62 | |
THA: total hip arthroplasty.
Answers from the 224 Participants
| Question | Number (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Do you clean the inner surface of metal shell before inserting the ceramic liner? | 216 (96.4) | |
| Do you dry up the inner surface of metal shell before inserting the ceramic liner? | 193 (86.2) | |
| Do you perform impaction? | 220 (98.2) | |
| How many times do you impact the liner? | ||
| 1 | 44 (19.6) | |
| 2 | 62 (27.7) | |
| 3 | 77 (34.4) | |
| > 3 | 37 (16.5) | |
| Awareness on impaction force to ceramic liner (how much impaction force is necessary to securely lock a ceramic liner?) | ||
| Does not need impaction | 1 (0.4) | |
| Light strike (> 2 kN) | 52 (23.2) | |
| Moderate strike (> 4 kN) | 87 (38.8) | |
| Strong strike (> 6 kN) | 20 (9.0) | |
| As strong as possible | 2 (0.8) | |
| I don't know | 62 (27.7) | |
| Do you check complete and symmetric seating of the ceramic liner? | 223 (99.6) | |
| How do you check complete and symmetric seating of the ceramic liner? | ||
| Visual | 48 (21.4) | |
| Finger | 72 (32.1) | |
| Visual and finger | 95 (42.4) | |
| Instrument (elevator or freer) | 8 (3.6) | |
| Proportion of repositioning of the ceramic liner (%) | ||
| < 1 | 215 (96.0) | |
| < 5 | 7 (3.1) | |
| < 10 | 1 (0.4) | |
| < 50 | 1 (0.4) | |
| How often do you encounter problem(s) during the insertion of the ceramic liner? | ||
| Never | 133 (59.4) | |
| Sometimes | 89 (39.7) | |
| Regularly | 2 (0.9) | |
| What problem(s) do you encounter during the insertion of the ceramic liner? | ||
| Difficult insertion | 44 (19.6) | |
| Malseating | 45 (20.1) | |
| Toggling due to a deformation of metal shell | 2 (0.9) | |
Fig. 2Impaction force according to the awareness of impaction force.