| Literature DB >> 35624886 |
Hidehiko Okazawa1, Masamichi Ikawa1,2, Tetsuya Tsujikawa1, Tetsuya Mori1, Akira Makino1, Yasushi Kiyono1, Yasunari Nakamoto2, Hirotaka Kosaka3, Makoto Yoneda1,4.
Abstract
Oxidative stress imaging using diacetyl-bis (N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) (Cu-ATSM) was applied to the evaluation of patients with early Alzheimer's disease (eAD). Ten eAD patients (72 ± 9 years) and 10 age-matched healthy controls (HCs) (73 ± 9 years) participated in this study. They underwent dynamic PET/MRI using 11C-PiB and 64Cu-ATSM with multiple MRI sequences. To evaluate cerebral oxidative stress, three parameters of 64Cu-ATSM PET were compared: standardized uptake value (SUV), tracer influx rate (Kin), and a rate constant k3. The input functions were estimated by the image-derived input function method. The relative differences were analyzed by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) using SUV and Kin images. All eAD patients had positive and HC subjects had negative PiB accumulation, and MMSE scores were significantly different between them. The 64Cu-ATSM accumulation tended to be higher in eAD than in HCs for both SUV and Kin. When comparing absolute values, eAD patients had a greater Kin in the posterior cingulate cortex and a greater k3 in the hippocampus compared with lobar cortical values of HCs. In SPM analysis, eAD had an increased left operculum and decreased bilateral hippocampus and anterior cingulate cortex compared to HCs. 64Cu-ATSM PET/MRI and tracer kinetic analysis elucidated cerebral oxidative stress in the eAD patients, particularly in the cingulate cortex and hippocampus.Entities:
Keywords: 11C-PiB; 64Cu-ATSM; Alzheimer’s disease; PET/MRI; oxidative stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35624886 PMCID: PMC9138060 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11051022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Demographic characteristics of study participants (mean ± SD).
| HC | eAD | |
|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 10 |
| Age (years) | 72.6 ± 9.0 | 71.8 ± 9.3 |
| Sex (male/female) | 5/5 | 7/3 |
| Education (years) | 14.0 ± 3.0 | 12.0 ± 1.9 |
| Duration (years) | - | 2.1 ± 1.6 |
| MMSE score | 29.2 ± 0.9 | 23.7 ± 2.6 * |
| CDR score | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.5 * |
| CDR-SB score | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 4.7 ± 2.5 * |
HC—healthy control; eAD—patients with early Alzheimer’s disease; MMSE—Mini-Mental State Examination; CDR—Clinical Dementia Rating; CDR-SB—CDR sum of boxes. * p < 0.0001.
Figure 1Kinetic model of 64Cu-ATSM. 64Cu(II) is reduced to 64Cu(I) and irreversibly dissociated from ATSM chelate. Therefore, the 1-tissue compartment 3-parameter model represents the tracer kinetics well.
Figure 2An example of ROIs for frontal (blue), temporal (green), parietal (magenta), and occipital (red) lobes, hippocampus (orange) and posterior cingulate cortex (gray) drawn in a single subject.
Figure 3Representative images of HCs (A) and eAD (B) for SUV and Kin (mL/min/100 g) PET image (left) and fusion image (right). The right end column shows sagittal view of SUV (top two rows) and Kin (bottom two rows). The left end column shows T1WI-MRI of identical slice location. Note accumulations of the PCC and hippocampus are elevated in eAD patients compared with HCs.
Figure 4(A) The whole arterial blood radioactivity concentration was estimated by the IDIF method (circle), which was then corrected to the real input function (x and solid line) by the undissociated rate of 64Cu-ATSM (insert) [11]. (B) The Patlak plot calculated from the corrected IDIF (Cp) and cerebral tissue counts (Ct) shows good linearity in the later phase of 64Cu-ATSM PET scan (slope: 0.032, r2 = 0.994). The slope represents Kin value. (C) Representative NLS fitting based on two-tissue compartment three-parameter model. The fitting provides an estimate of k3.
Regional parametric values of SUV, Kin, and k3 in each group (mean ± SD).
| SUV | HC | eAD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal | 6.60 ± 0.59 | 7.11 ± 0.58 | ||
| Parietal | 6.74 ± 0.68 | 7.29 ± 0.62 | ||
| Temporal | 6.93 ± 0.66 | 7.46 ± 0.61 | ||
| Occipital | 6.78 ± 0.70 | 7.40 ± 0.62 | ||
| Hippocampus | 6.67 ± 0.59 | 6.96 ± 0.68 | ||
| PCC | 7.26 ± 0.59 | 7.93 ± 0.53 | ||
| Frontal | 3.65 ± 0.83 | 3.93 ± 0.45 | ||
| Parietal | 3.67 ± 0.89 | 4.06 ± 0.45 | ||
| Temporal | 3.84 ± 0.84 | 4.19 ± 0.61 | ||
| Occipital | 3.82 ± 0.88 | 4.28 ± 0.52 | ||
| Hippocampus | 3.78 ± 0.94 | 4.09 ± 0.75 | ||
| PCC | 3.80 ± 0.87 | 4.43 ± 0.80 † | ||
| k3 (×102 /min) | ||||
| Frontal | 5.86 ± 1.40 | 6.50 ± 1.45 | ||
| Parietal | 5.47 ± 1.22 | 6.41 ± 1.52 | ||
| Temporal | 5.79 ± 1.32 | 6.43 ± 1.04 | ||
| Occipital | 5.83 ± 1.23 | 6.76 ± 1.87 | ||
| Hippocampus | 6.37 ± 1.54 | 7.22 ± 2.05 * | ||
| PCCk | 5.76 ± 1.38 | 6.77 ± 1.67 | ||
HC—healthy control; eAD—patients with early Alzheimer’s disease; SUV—standardized uptake value; PCC—posterior cingulate cortex. † p < 0.05 compared with frontal and parietal lobes of HCs. * p < 0.05 compared with all lobes and PCC of HCs.
Figure 5Mean values of regional Kin (mL/min/100 g) (A), k3 (×102 /min) (B), and K1 (mL/min/100 g) (C) obtained by the manual ROIs method. Kin of eAD (gray) in the PCC region was significantly greater than those of the frontal and parietal regions in HCs (white) (* p < 0.05). On the other hand, k3 of eAD in the hippocampus was greater than other cortical values of HCs (* p < 0.05), particularly in the parietal region († p < 0.01). K1 in the hippocampus showed significant decreases for both groups († p < 0.01) compared with the frontal and parietal regions including PCC. SUV did not show regional differences (see Table 2).
Figure 6SPM analysis showed regional differences between eAD and HCs. (A) HC minus eAD (SUV) showed regional reductions of eAD in ACC and bilateral hippocampus. (B) eAD minus HC (Kin) showed a regional increase in left central operculum of eAD.