Gaspar Delso1, Bradley Kemp2, Sandeep Kaushik3, Florian Wiesinger3, Tetsuro Sekine4. 1. GE Healthcare Waukesha, WI, USA. Electronic address: gaspar.delso@ge.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. GE Healthcare Waukesha, WI, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The impact of MR-based attenuation correction on PET quantitation accuracy is an ongoing cause of concern for advanced brain research with PET/MR. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new, template-enhanced zero-echo-time attenuation correction method for PET/MR scanners. METHODS: 30 subjects underwent a clinically-indicated 18F-FDG-PET/CT, followed by PET/MR on a GE SIGNA PET/MR. For each patient, a 42-s zero echo time (ZTE) sequence was used to generate two attenuation maps: one with the standard ZTE segmentation-based method; and another with a modification of the method, wherein pre-registered anatomical templates and CT data were used to enhance the segmentation. CT data, was used as gold standard. Reconstructed PET images were qualified visually and quantified in 68 volumes-of-interest using a standardized brain atlas. RESULTS: Attenuation maps were successfully generated in all cases, without manual intervention or parameter tuning. One patient was excluded from the quantitative analysis due to the presence of multiple brain metastases. The PET bias with template-enhanced ZTE attenuation correction was measured to be -0.9% ± 0.9%, compared with -1.4% ± 1.1% with regular ZTE attenuation correction. In terms of absolute bias, the new method yielded 1.1% ± 0.7%, compared with 1.6% ± 0.9% with regular ZTE. Statistically significant bias reduction was obtained in the frontal region (from -2.0% to -1.0%), temporal (from -1.2% to -0.2%), parietal (from -1.9% to -1.1%), occipital (from -2.0% to -1.1%) and insula (from -1.4% to -1.1%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the co-registration of pre-recorded anatomical templates to ZTE data is feasible in clinical practice and can be effectively used to improve the performance of segmentation-based attenuation correction.
PURPOSE: The impact of MR-based attenuation correction on PET quantitation accuracy is an ongoing cause of concern for advanced brain research with PET/MR. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new, template-enhanced zero-echo-time attenuation correction method for PET/MR scanners. METHODS: 30 subjects underwent a clinically-indicated 18F-FDG-PET/CT, followed by PET/MR on a GE SIGNA PET/MR. For each patient, a 42-s zero echo time (ZTE) sequence was used to generate two attenuation maps: one with the standard ZTE segmentation-based method; and another with a modification of the method, wherein pre-registered anatomical templates and CT data were used to enhance the segmentation. CT data, was used as gold standard. Reconstructed PET images were qualified visually and quantified in 68 volumes-of-interest using a standardized brain atlas. RESULTS: Attenuation maps were successfully generated in all cases, without manual intervention or parameter tuning. One patient was excluded from the quantitative analysis due to the presence of multiple brain metastases. The PET bias with template-enhanced ZTE attenuation correction was measured to be -0.9% ± 0.9%, compared with -1.4% ± 1.1% with regular ZTE attenuation correction. In terms of absolute bias, the new method yielded 1.1% ± 0.7%, compared with 1.6% ± 0.9% with regular ZTE. Statistically significant bias reduction was obtained in the frontal region (from -2.0% to -1.0%), temporal (from -1.2% to -0.2%), parietal (from -1.9% to -1.1%), occipital (from -2.0% to -1.1%) and insula (from -1.4% to -1.1%). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the co-registration of pre-recorded anatomical templates to ZTE data is feasible in clinical practice and can be effectively used to improve the performance of segmentation-based attenuation correction.
Authors: Ahmadreza Rezaei; Georg Schramm; Stefanie M A Willekens; Gaspar Delso; Koen Van Laere; Johan Nuyts Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Paul Kyu Han; Debra E Horng; Kuang Gong; Yoann Petibon; Kyungsang Kim; Quanzheng Li; Keith A Johnson; Georges El Fakhri; Jinsong Ouyang; Chao Ma Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Tetsuro Sekine; Alfred Buck; Gaspar Delso; Bradley Kemp; Edwin E G W Ter Voert; Martin Huellner; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sandeep Kaushik; Florian Wiesinger; Geoffrey Warnock Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Francesca De Luca; Martin Bolin; Lennart Blomqvist; Cecilia Wassberg; Heather Martin; Anna Falk Delgado Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: João M Sousa; Lieuwe Appel; Inés Merida; Rolf A Heckemann; Nicolas Costes; Mathias Engström; Stergios Papadimitriou; Dag Nyholm; Håkan Ahlström; Alexander Hammers; Mark Lubberink Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2020-12-28
Authors: J E Mackewn; J Stirling; S Jeljeli; S-M Gould; R I Johnstone; I Merida; L C Pike; C J McGinnity; K Beck; O Howes; A Hammers; P K Marsden Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2020-05-05