Literature DB >> 35613043

Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.

Breanne Christie1, Roksana Sadeghi2, Arathy Kartha3, Avi Caspi4, Francesco V Tenore1, Roberta L Klatzky5,6, Gislin Dagnelie3, Seth Billings1.   

Abstract

Objective. Electrical stimulation of the retina can elicit flashes of light called phosphenes, which can be used to restore rudimentary vision for people with blindness. Functional sight requires stimulation of multiple electrodes to create patterned vision, but phosphenes tend to merge together in an uninterpretable way. Sequentially stimulating electrodes in human visual cortex has recently demonstrated that shapes could be 'drawn' with better perceptual resolution relative to simultaneous stimulation. The goal of this study was to evaluate if sequential stimulation would also form clearer shapes when the retina is the neural target.Approach. Two human participants with retinitis pigmentosa who had Argus®II epiretinal prostheses participated in this study. We evaluated different temporal parameters for sequential stimulation and performed phosphene shape mapping and forced choice discrimination tasks. For the discrimination tasks, performance was compared between stimulating electrodes simultaneously versus sequentially.Main results. Phosphenes elicited by different electrodes were reported as vastly different shapes. For sequential stimulation, the optimal pulse train duration was 200 ms when stimulating at 20 Hz and the optimal gap interval was tied between 0 and 50 ms. Sequential electrode stimulation outperformed simultaneous stimulation in simple discrimination tasks, in which shapes were created by stimulating 3-4 electrodes, but not in more complex discrimination tasks involving ≥5 electrodes. The efficacy of sequential stimulation depended strongly on selecting electrodes that elicited phosphenes with similar shapes and sizes.Significance. An epiretinal prosthesis can produce coherent simple shapes with a sequential stimulation paradigm, which can be used as rudimentary visual feedback. However, success in creating more complex shapes, such as letters of the alphabet, is still limited. Sequential stimulation may be most beneficial for epiretinal prostheses in simple tasks, such as basic navigation, rather than complex tasks such as novel object identification. Creative Commons Attribution license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrical stimulation; electrodes; human; low vision; phosphene; retina; visual neuroprosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35613043      PMCID: PMC9440621          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac7326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  40 in total

1.  Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements.

Authors:  Michael P Barry; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Retinal prosthesis phosphene shape analysis.

Authors:  D Nanduri; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg; M J McMahon; J D Weiland
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2008

4.  Electric crosstalk impairs spatial resolution of multi-electrode arrays in retinal implants.

Authors:  R G H Wilke; G Khalili Moghadam; N H Lovell; G J Suaning; S Dokos
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez Fornos; Jörg Sommerhalder; Lyndon da Cruz; Jose Alain Sahel; Saddek Mohand-Said; Farhad Hafezi; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Long-term Repeatability and Reproducibility of Phosphene Characteristics in Chronically Implanted Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects.

Authors:  Yvonne H-L Luo; Joe Jiangjian Zhong; Monica Clemo; Lyndon da Cruz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Retinotopic to Spatiotopic Mapping in Blind Patients Implanted With the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Avi Caspi; Arup Roy; Jessy D Dorn; Robert J Greenberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Multi-electrode stimulation evokes consistent spatial patterns of phosphenes and improves phosphene mapping in blind subjects.

Authors:  Denise Oswalt; William Bosking; Ping Sun; Sameer A Sheth; Soroush Niketeghad; Michelle Armenta Salas; Uday Patel; Robert Greenberg; Jessy Dorn; Nader Pouratian; Michael Beauchamp; Daniel Yoshor
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 9.184

9.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials.

Authors:  Joseph F Rizzo; John Wyatt; John Loewenstein; Shawn Kelly; Doug Shire
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Eye movements and the perceived location of phosphenes generated by intracranial primary visual cortex stimulation in the blind.

Authors:  Avi Caspi; Michael P Barry; Uday K Patel; Michelle Armenta Salas; Jessy D Dorn; Arup Roy; Soroush Niketeghad; Robert J Greenberg; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 8.955

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Progress and Optimization of Information Processing in Artificial Visual Prostheses.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Rongfeng Zhao; Peitong Li; Zhiqiang Fang; Qianqian Li; Yanling Han; Ruyan Zhou; Yun Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.