Literature DB >> 27491695

Long-term Repeatability and Reproducibility of Phosphene Characteristics in Chronically Implanted Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects.

Yvonne H-L Luo1, Joe Jiangjian Zhong2, Monica Clemo2, Lyndon da Cruz3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previously published literatures of acute studies on few subjects have shown contradictory evidence on the reproducibility and characteristics of the elicited phosphenes, despite using the same stimulating parameters with epiretinal electrode arrays. In this study, we set out to investigate the long-term repeatilibity and reproducibility of phosphenes in subjects chronically implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis (Second Sight Medical Products, Inc., Sylmar, CA, USA).
DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series and reliability study.
METHODS: Six Argus II subjects of >5 years implantation from a single site participated. The 4-electrode cluster ("quad") closest to fovea was stimulated in each subject with a fixed biphasic current. Perceived phosphenes were depicted relative to subjective visual field center. The stimulus was applied at reducing time intervals from 20 minutes to 1 second. Two sets of stimulations were performed on the same day and 2 further sets repeated on a separate visit >1 week apart.
RESULTS: Each subject depicted phosphenes of consistent shapes and sizes, and reported seeing the same colors with the fixed stimulating parameters, irrespective of the interstimuli intervals. However, there is a wide intersubject variation in the phosphene characteristics. Four subjects drew phosphenes in the same visual field quadrant, as predicted by the quad-fovea location. Two subjects depicted phosphenes in the same hemifield as the expected locations.
CONCLUSION: Phosphenes for each subject were consistently reproducible in all our chronically implanted subjects. This has important implications in the development of long-term pixelated prosthetic vision for future devices.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27491695     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  14 in total

1.  Model-Based Recommendations for Optimal Surgical Placement of Epiretinal Implants.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine; Ariel Rokem
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2019-10-10

2.  Immersive Virtual Reality Simulations of Bionic Vision.

Authors:  Justin Kasowski; Michael Beyeler
Journal:  Augment Hum (2022)       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.

Authors:  Breanne Christie; Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Avi Caspi; Francesco V Tenore; Roberta L Klatzky; Gislin Dagnelie; Seth Billings
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  A Computational Model of Phosphene Appearance for Epiretinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Jacob Granley; Michael Beyeler
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2021-11

Review 5.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  A Patient-Specific Computational Framework for the Argus II Implant.

Authors:  Kathleen E Finn; Hans J Zander; Robert D Graham; Scott F Lempka; James D Weiland
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-11

7.  Multisensory perception in Argus II retinal prosthesis patients: Leveraging auditory-visual mappings to enhance prosthesis outcomes.

Authors:  Noelle R B Stiles; Vivek R Patel; James D Weiland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Visual Prosthesis: Interfacing Stimulating Electrodes with Retinal Neurons to Restore Vision.

Authors:  Alejandro Barriga-Rivera; Lilach Bareket; Josef Goding; Ulises A Aregueta-Robles; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  A model of ganglion axon pathways accounts for percepts elicited by retinal implants.

Authors:  Michael Beyeler; Devyani Nanduri; James D Weiland; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Advances in retinal prosthesis systems.

Authors:  Edward Bloch; Yvonne Luo; Lyndon da Cruz
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.