Literature DB >> 21673395

Electric crosstalk impairs spatial resolution of multi-electrode arrays in retinal implants.

R G H Wilke1, G Khalili Moghadam, N H Lovell, G J Suaning, S Dokos.   

Abstract

Active multi-electrode arrays are used in vision prostheses, including optic nerve cuffs and cortical and retinal implants for stimulation of neural tissue. For retinal implants, arrays with up to 1500 electrodes are used in clinical trials. The ability to convey information with high spatial resolution is critical for these applications. To assess the extent to which spatial resolution is impaired by electric crosstalk, finite-element simulation of electric field distribution in a simplified passive tissue model of the retina is performed. The effects of electrode size, electrode spacing, distance to target cells, and electrode return configuration (monopolar, tripolar, hexagonal) on spatial resolution is investigated in the form of a mathematical model of electric field distribution. Results show that spatial resolution is impaired with increased distance from the electrode array to the target cells. This effect can be partly compensated by non-monopolar electrode configurations and larger electrode diameters, albeit at the expense of lower pixel densities due to larger covering areas by each stimulation electrode. In applications where multi-electrode arrays can be brought into close proximity to target cells, as presumably with epiretinal implants, smaller electrodes in monopolar configuration can provide the highest spatial resolution. However, if the implantation site is further from the target cells, as is the case in suprachoroidal approaches, hexagonally guarded electrode return configurations can convey higher spatial resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21673395     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  19 in total

1.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

2.  Virtual electrode design for increasing spatial resolution in retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Carlos Cela; Robert Marc; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2016-04-27

3.  Targeted Stimulation of Retinal Ganglion Cells in Epiretinal Prostheses: A Multiscale Computational Study.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Mark Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 5.  Optopharmacological tools for restoring visual function in degenerative retinal diseases.

Authors:  Ivan Tochitsky; Richard H Kramer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.

Authors:  Breanne Christie; Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Avi Caspi; Francesco V Tenore; Roberta L Klatzky; Gislin Dagnelie; Seth Billings
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Xin Lei; Tiffany Huang; Henri Lorach; Roopa Dalal; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Quasi-monopolar stimulation: a novel electrode design configuration for performance optimization of a retinal neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Gita Khalili Moghadam; Robert Wilke; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell; Socrates Dokos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fractal Electrodes as a Generic Interface for Stimulating Neurons.

Authors:  W J Watterson; R D Montgomery; R P Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cortical responses elicited by photovoltaic subretinal prostheses exhibit similarities to visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yossi Mandel; Georges Goetz; Daniel Lavinsky; Philip Huie; Keith Mathieson; Lele Wang; Theodore Kamins; Ludwig Galambos; Richard Manivanh; James Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.