Literature DB >> 28114567

Retinotopic to Spatiotopic Mapping in Blind Patients Implanted With the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis.

Avi Caspi1, Arup Roy2, Jessy D Dorn2, Robert J Greenberg2.   

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify the precision of mapping from retinotopic (retina-centered) to spatiotopic (world-centered) coordinates in blind humans implanted with a retinal prosthesis device. Additionally, to demonstrate that an eye tracker can be calibrated on sightless patients based on the percept from a visual implant.
Methods: We directly activated epiretinal electrodes to create retinotopic stimuli and recorded the location of the percept at world-based coordinates. In contrast to normal Argus II use where stimulation is a function of the captured scene's image, in this research we directly controlled the waveform in each electrode and measured the percept's location using a trackable handheld marker. For eye tracking, pupil images were recorded with a timestamp synchronized to the stimulation and marker positions.
Results: Remapping of the measured world locations to the position of the electrodes on the retina is feasible by accounting for eye orientation at the onset of stimulation. Transformation of pupil images to the eye's orientation (i.e., eye tracker calibration) can be done by solving for the variables that minimize the spread of the remapped retinal electrode locations. After mapping to retinal coordinates based on eye positions, the measured precision of pointing was 2° to 3°, which is comparable to open-loop pointing in sighted individuals. Conclusions: The brain accurately maps the artificial vision induced by a retinal prosthesis based on instantaneous gaze position. Remapping based on eye position is feasible and will increase visual stability in prosthetic vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28114567     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-20398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  Alterations in cortical and thalamic connections of somatosensory cortex following early loss of vision.

Authors:  James C Dooley; Leah A Krubitzer
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Effect of Oral Valproic Acid vs Placebo for Vision Loss in Patients With Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Randomized Phase 2 Multicenter Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David G Birch; Paul S Bernstein; Alessandro Iannacone; Mark E Pennesi; Byron L Lam; John Heckenlively; Karl Csaky; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Kevin L Winthrop; Thiran Jayasundera; Dianna K Hughbanks-Wheaton; Judith Warner; Paul Yang; Gary Edd Fish; Michael P Teske; Neal L Sklaver; Laura Erker; Elvira Chegarnov; Travis Smith; Aimee Wahle; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Jennifer McCormack; Robert Lindblad; Steven Bramer; Stephen Rose; Patricia Zilliox; Peter J Francis; Richard G Weleber
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Sequential epiretinal stimulation improves discrimination in simple shape discrimination tasks only.

Authors:  Breanne Christie; Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Avi Caspi; Francesco V Tenore; Roberta L Klatzky; Gislin Dagnelie; Seth Billings
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 5.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Gaze Compensation as a Technique for Improving Hand-Eye Coordination in Prosthetic Vision.

Authors:  Samuel A Titchener; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Improvement in reading performance through training with simulated thalamic visual prostheses.

Authors:  Katerina Eleonora K Rassia; John S Pezaris
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Eye Movement Compensation and Spatial Updating in Visual Prosthetics: Mechanisms, Limitations and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nadia Paraskevoudi; John S Pezaris
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01

9.  Optoelectronic Devices for Vision Restoration.

Authors:  Victor Wang; Ajay E Kuriyan
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2020-04-20

10.  Motion Parallax Improves Object Recognition in the Presence of Clutter in Simulated Prosthetic Vision.

Authors:  Cheng Qiu; Kassandra R Lee; Jae-Hyun Jung; Robert Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.