Literature DB >> 31664096

NEMA Performance Evaluation of CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET and Comparison with the whole-body and dedicated brain PET systems.

Laura Moliner1, Maria J Rodríguez-Alvarez2, Juan V Catret3, Antonio González2, Víctor Ilisie2, José M Benlloch2.   

Abstract

This article presents system performance studies of the CareMiBrain dedicated brain PET according to NEMA NU 2-2012 (for whole-body PETs) and NU 4-2008 (for preclinical PETs). This scanner is based on monolithic LYSO crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The results obtained for both protocols are compared with current commercial whole body PETs and dedicated brain PETs found in the literature. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, NECR and scatter-fraction are characterized with NEMA standards, as well as an image quality study. A customized image quality phantom is proposed as NEMA phantoms do not fulfil the necessities of dedicated brain PETs. The full-width half maximum of the radial/tangential/axial spatial resolution of CareMiBrain reconstructed with FBP at 10 and 100 mm from the system center were, respectively, 1.87/1.68/1.39 mm and 1.86/1.91/1.40 mm (NU 2-2012) and 1.58/1.45/1.40 mm and 1.64/1.66/1.44 mm (NU 4-2008). Peak NECR was 49 kcps@287 MBq with a scatter fraction of 48% using NU 2-2012 phantom. The sensitivity was 13.82 cps/kBq at the center of the FOV (NU 2-2012) and 10% (NU 4-2008). Contrast recovery coefficients for customizing image quality phantom were 0.73/0.78/1.14/1.01 for the 4.5/6/9/12 mm diameter rods. The performance characteristics of CareMiBrain are at the top of the current technologies for PET systems. Dedicated brain PET systems significantly improve spatial resolution and sensitivity, but present worse results in count rate measurements and scatter-fraction tests. As for the comparison of preclinical and clinical standards, the results obtained for solid and liquid sources were similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31664096      PMCID: PMC6820763          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51898-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  22 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner.

Authors:  Hugo W A M de Jong; Floris H P van Velden; Reina W Kloet; Fred L Buijs; Ronald Boellaard; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/PET-computed tomography in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; Simin Dadparvar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Performance Characteristics of the Whole-Body Discovery IQ PET/CT System.

Authors:  Gabriel Reynés-Llompart; Cristina Gámez-Cenzano; Inmaculada Romero-Zayas; Laura Rodríguez-Bel; José L Vercher-Conejero; Josep M Martí-Climent
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array.

Authors:  R L Siddon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner.

Authors:  Gaspar Delso; Sebastian Fürst; Björn Jakoby; Ralf Ladebeck; Carl Ganter; Stephan G Nekolla; Markus Schwaiger; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET-MRI system.

Authors:  H Zaidi; N Ojha; M Morich; J Griesmer; Z Hu; P Maniawski; O Ratib; D Izquierdo-Garcia; Z A Fayad; L Shao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The MINDVIEW project: First results.

Authors:  José M Benlloch; Antonio J González; Roberto Pani; Enrico Preziosi; Carl Jackson; John Murphy; Julio Barberá; Carlos Correcher; Sebastian Aussenhofer; Daniel Gareis; Dimitris Visvikis; Julien Bert; Bengt Langstrom; Lars Farde; Miklos Toth; Jenny Haggkvist; Fabio V Caixeta; Klas Kullander; Ian Somlai-Schweiger; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.361

8.  Performance of a brain PET camera based on anger-logic gadolinium oxyorthosilicate detectors.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Richard Freifelder; Christopher A Cardi; Lars-Eric Adam; Kilian Bilger; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Concept of an upright wearable positron emission tomography imager in humans.

Authors:  Christopher E Bauer; Julie Brefczynski-Lewis; Gary Marano; Mary-Beth Mandich; Alexander Stolin; Peter Martone; James W Lewis; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman; Stan Majewski
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Initial evaluation of the Celesteion large-bore PET/CT scanner in accordance with the NEMA NU2-2012 standard and the Japanese guideline for oncology FDG PET/CT data acquisition protocol version 2.0.

Authors:  Tomohiro Kaneta; Matsuyoshi Ogawa; Nobutoku Motomura; Hitoshi Iizuka; Tetsu Arisawa; Ayako Hino-Shishikura; Keisuke Yoshida; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  7 in total

1.  Performance Characteristics of a Dual-Sided Position-Sensitive Sparse-Sensor Detector for Gamma-ray Imaging.

Authors:  William C J Hunter; Donald Q DeWitt; Robert S Miyaoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-07

2.  Performance evaluation of dedicated brain PET scanner with motion correction system.

Authors:  Yuya Onishi; Takashi Isobe; Masanori Ito; Fumio Hashimoto; Tomohide Omura; Etsuji Yoshikawa
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  Relating18F-FDG image signal-to-noise ratio to time-of-flight noise-equivalent count rate in total-body PET using the uEXPLORER scanner.

Authors:  Edwin K Leung; Yasser G Abdelhafez; Eric Berg; Zhaoheng Xie; Xuezhu Zhang; Reimund Bayerlein; Benjamin Spencer; Elizabeth Li; Negar Omidvari; Aaron Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Jinyi Qi; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.174

4.  Evaluation of STIR Library Adapted for PET Scanners with Non-Cylindrical Geometry.

Authors:  Viet Dao; Ekaterina Mikhaylova; Max L Ahnen; Jannis Fischer; Kris Thielemans; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-06-18

5.  Simulation study of a coincidence detection system for non-invasive determination of arterial blood time-activity curve measurements.

Authors:  Yassine Toufique; Othmane Bouhali; Pauline Negre; Jim O' Doherty
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2020-05-07

6.  Monte Carlo Characterization of the Trimage Brain PET System.

Authors:  Luigi Masturzo; Pietro Carra; Paola Anna Erba; Matteo Morrocchi; Alessandro Pilleri; Giancarlo Sportelli; Nicola Belcari
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-01-23

7.  Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Organ-Targeted PET Camera.

Authors:  Justin Stiles; Brandon Baldassi; Oleksandr Bubon; Harutyun Poladyan; Vivianne Freitas; Anabel Scaranelo; Anna Marie Mulligan; Michael Waterston; Alla Reznik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.847

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.