William B Carpenter1, Abhijit A Lavania2, Julia S Borden3, Luke M Oltrogge3, Davis Perez1, Peter D Dahlberg1,4, David F Savage3, W E Moerner1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 2. Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 3. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 4. Division of CryoEM and Bioimaging, SSRL, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States.
Abstract
Diffusion of biological nanoparticles in solution impedes our ability to continuously monitor individual particles and measure their physical and chemical properties. To overcome this, we previously developed the interferometric scattering anti-Brownian electrokinetic (ISABEL) trap, which uses scattering to localize a particle and applies electrokinetic forces that counteract Brownian motion, thus enabling extended observation. Here we present an improved ISABEL trap that incorporates a near-infrared scatter illumination beam and rapidly interleaves 405 and 488 nm fluorescence excitation reporter beams. With the ISABEL trap, we monitored the internal redox environment of individual carboxysomes labeled with the ratiometric redox reporter roGFP2. Carboxysomes widely vary in scattering contrast (reporting on size) and redox-dependent ratiometric fluorescence. Furthermore, we used redox sensing to explore the chemical kinetics within intact carboxysomes, where bulk measurements may contain unwanted contributions from aggregates or interfering fluorescent proteins. Overall, we demonstrate the ISABEL trap's ability to sensitively monitor nanoscale biological objects, enabling new experiments on these systems.
Diffusion of biological nanoparticles in solution impedes our ability to continuously monitor individual particles and measure their physical and chemical properties. To overcome this, we previously developed the interferometric scattering anti-Brownian electrokinetic (ISABEL) trap, which uses scattering to localize a particle and applies electrokinetic forces that counteract Brownian motion, thus enabling extended observation. Here we present an improved ISABEL trap that incorporates a near-infrared scatter illumination beam and rapidly interleaves 405 and 488 nm fluorescence excitation reporter beams. With the ISABEL trap, we monitored the internal redox environment of individual carboxysomes labeled with the ratiometric redox reporter roGFP2. Carboxysomes widely vary in scattering contrast (reporting on size) and redox-dependent ratiometric fluorescence. Furthermore, we used redox sensing to explore the chemical kinetics within intact carboxysomes, where bulk measurements may contain unwanted contributions from aggregates or interfering fluorescent proteins. Overall, we demonstrate the ISABEL trap's ability to sensitively monitor nanoscale biological objects, enabling new experiments on these systems.
For nanoscale biological objects
in solution, Brownian fluctuations dominate their translational dynamics.
Because of their stochastic trajectories and fast diffusion, individual
objects are commonly immobilized for extended study,[1,2] which may undesirably perturb them from their native states.[1−5] One approach is to use stage motion to rapidly track and follow
single particles in solution, which has been demonstrated on particles
with diffusion coefficients as large as approximately 10 μm2/s.[6−8] To make extended
measurements without tethering, anti-Brownian electrokinetic (ABEL)
traps have also been developed[9] to apply
electrokinetic positional feedback on single fluorescent objects,
thereby greatly reducing Brownian motion.[10−12] These traps
have been used to directly measure the dynamics of single enzymes,[13] photosynthetic complexes,[14−17] and even single organic fluorophores.[18] Typically, these molecules can be held for seconds,
until photobleaching or blinking interrupts continuous positional
monitoring.To overcome the need for fluorescence to estimate
position, our
lab recently developed the interferometric scattering ABEL (ISABEL)
trap, which tracks a nanoparticle’s position by its scattering
interfered with a local oscillator arising from the back reflection
off a water–quartz interface in the sample cell.[19] The interference between the scattered and reflected
light enhances the sensitivity by producing a signal that scales linearly
with the particle’s polarizability, which may be interpreted
as mass for objects with fixed composition.[20−22] Our initial
study demonstrated trapping of gold nanoparticles as small as 20 nm
and showed that polymer nanoparticles down to 50 nm diameter could
be held for more than 30 s. Fluorescently labeled particles could
also be trapped far beyond the time of photobleaching. Interferometric
positional monitoring, independent of fluorescence, opens the door
to studying weakly fluorescent biological objects or introducing complex
fluorescence excitation protocols.One such nanoscale biological
object is the carboxysome, a proteinaceous
microcompartment ∼100 nm in diameter, which is responsible
for the fixation of CO2 into organic carbon in many autotrophic
bacteria.[23−26] The chemoautotroph Halothiobacillus neapolitanus contains α-carboxysomes, whose operon encodes 10 proteins
that collectively assemble into carboxysomes, including rubisco large
(CbbL) and small subunits (CbbS), a disordered scaffolding protein
(CsoS2), carbonic anhydrase (CsoSCA), two pentameric shell protein
paralogues (CsoS4AB), three hexamer shell protein paralogues (CsoS1ABC),
and a pseudohexameric shell protein (CsoS1D).[24,27] The self-assembled accumulation of rubisco and carbonic anhydrase
inside the roughly icosahedral[28] shell
(Figure a) has evolved
to create a high local concentration of rubisco and CO2 to overcome rubisco’s low turnover rate and outcompete deleterious
oxygenation reactions.[29] Functional carboxysomes
can also be recombinantly grown in Escherichia coli,[23] which aids in inserting fluorescent
reporters but also increases the diversity of shapes, sizes, and integrity
of the shell (Figure b). This paper reports exclusively on E. coli-derived carboxysomes.
Figure 1
Visualizations of carboxysomes and characteristics
of the redox-sensitive
GFP mutant roGFP2. (a) The carboxysome consists of a porous proteinaceous
shell and the internal cargo rubisco, carbonic anhydrase, and the
scaffolding protein CsoS2. roGFP2 is targeted inside the carboxysome
using the N-terminal sequence from carbonic anhydrase. (b) Cryo-TEM
image of a cluster of α-carboxysomes recombinantly expressed
in E. coli, demonstrating the variety
of shapes, sizes, and integrity. (c) Changes in the fluorescence excitation
spectrum of roGFP2 enable ratiometric readout of the redox environment.
The fully oxidized spectrum (blue) is bimodal and gives a high fluorescence
ratio R405/488, while the fully reduced
spectrum (red) consists of one peak and produces a low fluorescence
ratio. The vertical arrows indicate the excitation wavelengths used
in this study for ratiometric measurements. (d) The ratiometric fluorescence
from roGFP2 decreases when the reductant TCEP is added.
Visualizations of carboxysomes and characteristics
of the redox-sensitive
GFP mutant roGFP2. (a) The carboxysome consists of a porous proteinaceous
shell and the internal cargo rubisco, carbonic anhydrase, and the
scaffolding protein CsoS2. roGFP2 is targeted inside the carboxysome
using the N-terminal sequence from carbonic anhydrase. (b) Cryo-TEM
image of a cluster of α-carboxysomes recombinantly expressed
in E. coli, demonstrating the variety
of shapes, sizes, and integrity. (c) Changes in the fluorescence excitation
spectrum of roGFP2 enable ratiometric readout of the redox environment.
The fully oxidized spectrum (blue) is bimodal and gives a high fluorescence
ratio R405/488, while the fully reduced
spectrum (red) consists of one peak and produces a low fluorescence
ratio. The vertical arrows indicate the excitation wavelengths used
in this study for ratiometric measurements. (d) The ratiometric fluorescence
from roGFP2 decreases when the reductant TCEP is added.Structural and simulation studies posit that the proteinaceous
shell preferentially allows the bidirectional diffusion of metabolically
important species such as HCO3– and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate[30,31] and therefore is expected to support a chemical environment distinct
from the surrounding cytosol.[32,33] The protein shell is
also thought to establish a distinctly oxidizing redox environment
within the carboxysome relative to the known reducing environment
of the cytosol.[29,33−36] However, these hypotheses remain
unconfirmed because of the lack of direct measurements on selective
shell permeability and redox dynamics. Because of the variation of
carboxysome size, shape, and integrity and to mitigate contamination
from purification byproducts, it would be highly beneficial to study
carboxysomes at the single-particle level. Our goal is not only to
trap but also to sense the redox chemical environment inside individual
carboxysomes using a local fluorescent protein reporter, roGFP2, which
encodes redox information in its fluorescence excitation spectrum
(Figure c). We have
genetically targeted approximately 3–15 copies of roGFP2 inside
individual carboxysomes (Figure S1). The
ratio of fluorescence brightness from 405 and 488 nm excitation is
related to the concentration of reducing species in solution (Figure d) and gives a readout
that does not rely on the GFP copy number.To enable fluorescence
excitation spectroscopy of roGFP2 inside
carboxysomes, we have redesigned the ISABEL trap.[19] In the new configuration (vide infra), the scatter illumination
beam has been red-shifted to 800 nm in the near-IR to open up the
visible region for fluorescence reporters without photobleaching them.
Also, we have introduced two rapidly interleaving excitation beams
at 405 and 488 nm to measure the fluorescence emission from roGFP2.[37]In this work, we directly measured the
redox-dependent ratiometric
fluorescence of single trapped carboxysomes, where air-oxidized carboxysomes
show much more heterogeneous ratiometric fluorescence than reduced
carboxysomes. Despite this heterogeneity, we also observed reduction
kinetics in carboxysomes after mixing with a reductant, in a first
step toward measuring shell permeability. Together, these measurements
demonstrate the ability of the ISABEL trap to go beyond synthetic
nanoparticles to make extended measurements on single biological objects
and show that single-particle measurements on individual carboxysomes
provide a new avenue for measuring their physical and chemical properties.Figure shows the
quartz microfluidic trapping cell and the optical layout of the ISABEL
trap. Nanoparticles in aqueous solution are allowed to diffuse to
the center of the cell’s two crossed channels in a region 1.5–2
μm deep (Figure a). When an infrared electric field Ei is
incident on the particle, the backscattered field Es interferes with the quartz–water interfacial reflection Er, producing a detected intensity Idet given bywhere θ is the phase between the reflected
and scattered fields. The last term on the right-hand side of eq represents the interferometric
contribution to the intensity, which is linear in the scattered field
and thus linear in polarizability and mass for proteinaceous objects.[38] For small particles, |Es|2 is negligible, and |Er|2 can be obtained by a background measurement when there are
no particles in the trapping area. This allows for on-the-fly determination
of the absolute fractional scattering contrast c as
Figure 2
Overview of
the ISABEL trap with interleaved fluorescence excitation.
(a) A focused incident field Ei illuminates
a carboxysome, which radiates the scattered electric field Es that interferes with Er, the reflection from the quartz–water interface. (b)
Top view of the microfluidic trap, where the incident beam is scanned
in a 32-spot Knight’s tour pattern. Electrokinetic feedback
in two dimensions is applied to the particle to push the object toward
a designated location near the center of the illumination scan pattern
(marked “×”). (c) Optical paths of the scatter
and fluorescence beams, described in more detail in Note S2 and Figure S2. The scatter illumination beam is deflected
by two acousto-optic deflectors (AODs) controlled by the field-programmable
gate array (FPGA); it is linearly polarized at the polarizing beam
splitter (PBS), converted to circular polarization with a quarter-wave
plate (λ/4) to be back-reflected, converted back to the orthogonal
linear polarization, and separated for detection on a photodiode.
Position is monitored and feedback voltages are calculated on the
FPGA and then applied to the solution with platinum electrodes. Simultaneously,
the FPGA digitally modulates two CW fluorescence excitation lasers,
alternating each millisecond. Fluorescence emission spanning 500–570
nm is collected on an avalanche photodiode (APD) after spatial filtering
with a 75 μm pinhole. Detected photons are time-tagged on the
FPGA and labeled with the identity of the corresponding excitation
laser. AOM, acousto-optic modulator; DC, dichroic beamsplitter.
Overview of
the ISABEL trap with interleaved fluorescence excitation.
(a) A focused incident field Ei illuminates
a carboxysome, which radiates the scattered electric field Es that interferes with Er, the reflection from the quartz–water interface. (b)
Top view of the microfluidic trap, where the incident beam is scanned
in a 32-spot Knight’s tour pattern. Electrokinetic feedback
in two dimensions is applied to the particle to push the object toward
a designated location near the center of the illumination scan pattern
(marked “×”). (c) Optical paths of the scatter
and fluorescence beams, described in more detail in Note S2 and Figure S2. The scatter illumination beam is deflected
by two acousto-optic deflectors (AODs) controlled by the field-programmable
gate array (FPGA); it is linearly polarized at the polarizing beam
splitter (PBS), converted to circular polarization with a quarter-wave
plate (λ/4) to be back-reflected, converted back to the orthogonal
linear polarization, and separated for detection on a photodiode.
Position is monitored and feedback voltages are calculated on the
FPGA and then applied to the solution with platinum electrodes. Simultaneously,
the FPGA digitally modulates two CW fluorescence excitation lasers,
alternating each millisecond. Fluorescence emission spanning 500–570
nm is collected on an avalanche photodiode (APD) after spatial filtering
with a 75 μm pinhole. Detected photons are time-tagged on the
FPGA and labeled with the identity of the corresponding excitation
laser. AOM, acousto-optic modulator; DC, dichroic beamsplitter.The particle position is detected by the location
of the maximum
contrast in the sample plane, obtained from a “Knight’s
tour” scan pattern of the near-IR beam steered by two acousto-optic
deflectors.[10] Rapid positional feedback
forces are applied to the solution via voltages calculated on a field-programmable
gate array (FPGA) and two pairs of platinum electrodes placed at the
ends of the crossed microfluidic channels. The particle is directed
to the trap center in two dimensions by electroosmosis.In addition
to the IR trapping beam, the second major difference
from previous work is the addition of two visible lasers in wide-field
illumination for spectroscopic measurements of the trapped object
(Figure c). The FPGA
digitally modulates each laser power with a 2 ms alternating square
wave so that emitted photons from GFP fluorescence can be separated
into two excitation channels (Note S2).Three simultaneous variables are monitored in time for individual
trapped carboxysomes: the absolute fractional scattering contrast
(Note S3), the emission from 405 nm excitation,
and the emission from 488 nm excitation (Figure ). A step change in the fractional scattering
contrast trace at t ≈ 51 s (Figure a, event
(i)) shows that when trapping turns on, a diffusing particle becomes
trapped for >1 s and then leaves when the feedback is turned off.
For these experiments, we toggled feedback on for 2 s and off for
1 s to collect statistics from additional single particles, although
we can trap carboxysomes for tens of seconds if desired (Figure S3). The scattering trace of event (i)
shows a sudden increase in scattering contrast about a mean value
(dark-red line) determined by a changepoint algorithm described below,
with wide fluctuations due to the evolving phase θ between Er and Es as the particle
diffuses in the axial direction. Subsequent trapping events display
various mean scattering values, indicating a range of particle sizes,
including an exceptionally large particle (event (ii)), which is likely
an aggregate of multiple carboxysomes and is excluded from further
analysis. At t ≈ 75s (event (iii)), a somewhat
small object is trapped, which is then replaced by an object of higher
contrast (event (iv)), since anti-Brownian feedback can be applied
to only one object at a time.
Figure 3
Representative multichannel time traces from
a carboxysome trapping
experiment in air-oxidized buffer. When positional feedback is turned
on (white regions), single detected particles are held at the trap
center until feedback is toggled off (gray regions). Trapped roGFP2-labeled
carboxysomes display signal in all three channels, such as in event
(i). (a) Absolute fractional scatter contrast trace, with individual
measurements for each time point (yellow) and average levels for an
event (red) determined by the changepoints found on the 488 nm trace
(b). The black dashed line indicates the scatter threshold used to
reject large aggregates from analysis (Note S3). (b, c) The 488 and 405 nm excitation channels, respectively, and
corresponding average levels determined from a changepoint-finding
algorithm on the 488 nm trace.
Representative multichannel time traces from
a carboxysome trapping
experiment in air-oxidized buffer. When positional feedback is turned
on (white regions), single detected particles are held at the trap
center until feedback is toggled off (gray regions). Trapped roGFP2-labeled
carboxysomes display signal in all three channels, such as in event
(i). (a) Absolute fractional scatter contrast trace, with individual
measurements for each time point (yellow) and average levels for an
event (red) determined by the changepoints found on the 488 nm trace
(b). The black dashed line indicates the scatter threshold used to
reject large aggregates from analysis (Note S3). (b, c) The 488 and 405 nm excitation channels, respectively, and
corresponding average levels determined from a changepoint-finding
algorithm on the 488 nm trace.Simultaneously, we monitor the fluorescence from each carboxysome
via the interleaved 405 and 488 nm excitation (Figure b,c). Low intensity (<50 W/cm2) is necessary at 405 nm to balance
the roGFP2 emission rate with the light-induced photoconversion[39] of roGFP2 chromophores over extended trapping
times (Figures S3 and S4). In event (i),
a steady fluorescence level is present in both channels over the trapping
time, but particles are brighter and background is lower in the 488
nm channel. Fluorescence changepoints and mean fluorescence brightness
were determined with a changepoint-finding algorithm[40] on the 488 nm excitation trace, which provided changepoints
to also find the average levels in the scattering and 405 nm traces.
Like the various scattering levels, the fluorescence traces show a
distribution of brightnesses, indicating variation in roGFP2 loading
between carboxysomes. The highly scattering object in event (ii) is
accompanied by high brightness in both channels. The object in event
(iii) is nonfluorescent, possibly being an emptied carboxysome shell,
a protein aggregate that remained after purification, or a dislodged
piece of the polyelectrolyte passivation layer (Note S1). Because this particle is nonfluorescent, it is not
identified by the algorithm. Conversely, the object in event (iv)
shows signal in all three channels, implying that it is a carboxysome.The simultaneously measured levels from scattering and fluorescence
provide correlated data from individual trapping events, yielding
multidimensional statistics measured from carboxysomes in reducing
or air-oxidized buffers (Figure ). Figure a–c shows 2D scatter plots from carboxysomes internally
reduced by 1 mM TCEP in buffer. In these plots, each point represents
the average level found from an individual trapping event, and its
color reflects the local density of points.[4] In the Figure a
marginal histogram, the 488 nm fluorescence distribution is centered
at ∼60 counts/10 ms but spans 2 orders of magnitude. The 2D
scatter plot shows correlation between fluorescence levels and fractional
scattering contrast, with subpopulations within the spread. The 2D
scatter plot in Figure b relating the brightness at 405 nm to scattering shows similar trends,
though with lower brightnesses values centered at ∼5 counts/10
ms. The scattering constrast histogram (Figure c right) appears to be bimodal, peaked at
0.008 and 0.015. In contrast, cryo-TEM imaging reveals that the distribution
of carboxysome diameters is unimodal (μ ± σ = 141
± 31 nm; Figure S5). Because of the
approximate doubling in scattering contrast and unimodal size distribution
from cryo-TEM, the higher-contrast peak likely arises from trapped
carboxysome dimers. The monomer and dimer populations are not readily
separable in a 1D measurement, though they are better separated with
our multidimensional correlated measurements.
Figure 4
Multidimensional statistics
of measurements on individual carboxysomes.
(a, b) Scatter plots and marginal histograms between the 488 and 405
nm fluorescence levels, respectively, with fractional scatter contrast,
presented on logarithmic axes in both dimensions because of the considerable
range measured across carboxysomes. Each point corresponds to a single
trapping event, colored by local density of points. The teal and magenta
horizontal error bars denote the RMS standard error over all brightness
levels. (c) Fractional scattering contrast vs ratiometric fluorescence R405/488 for carboxysomes in 1 mM TCEP reducing
buffer, with the scattering contrast marginal histogram to the far
right. The mean is denoted by μ, and the positions of the two
peaks are indicated. Horizontal error bars denote the experimental
RMS standard error in ratio uncertainty due to brightness fluctuations
about each mean level (Note S4 and Figure S6). (d) Ratio–contrast scatter plot for sfGFP carboxysomes,
demonstrating the narrow distribution measured for a reporter independent
of redox. (e–g) Fluorescence, scatter contrast, and ratio scatter
for carboxysomes in air-oxidized buffer, demonstrating ratios with
a higher mean value and wider distribution than reduced carboxysomes.
(h) Ratio kinetics measured after mixing with TCEP from individual
carboxysomes. Red points correspond to ratios averaged for the number
of carboxysomes shown in the top panel in 2 min windows after mixing
with 330 μM TCEP, and gray points correspond to carboxysomes
without TCEP reductant. Trapping starts approximately 2 min after
mixing to load the sample into the cell, thus starting the experiment.
Red and gray error bars indicate standard errors of the mean ratio
measured in each time bin. The black error bar indicates the same
RMS ratio error as in (g). (i) Ratio histograms from the reducing
experiment, plotted in 10 min intervals. The distribution is broad
and centered at higher values at early times but gradually narrows
and shifts to lower values over time.
Multidimensional statistics
of measurements on individual carboxysomes.
(a, b) Scatter plots and marginal histograms between the 488 and 405
nm fluorescence levels, respectively, with fractional scatter contrast,
presented on logarithmic axes in both dimensions because of the considerable
range measured across carboxysomes. Each point corresponds to a single
trapping event, colored by local density of points. The teal and magenta
horizontal error bars denote the RMS standard error over all brightness
levels. (c) Fractional scattering contrast vs ratiometric fluorescence R405/488 for carboxysomes in 1 mM TCEP reducing
buffer, with the scattering contrast marginal histogram to the far
right. The mean is denoted by μ, and the positions of the two
peaks are indicated. Horizontal error bars denote the experimental
RMS standard error in ratio uncertainty due to brightness fluctuations
about each mean level (Note S4 and Figure S6). (d) Ratio–contrast scatter plot for sfGFP carboxysomes,
demonstrating the narrow distribution measured for a reporter independent
of redox. (e–g) Fluorescence, scatter contrast, and ratio scatter
for carboxysomes in air-oxidized buffer, demonstrating ratios with
a higher mean value and wider distribution than reduced carboxysomes.
(h) Ratio kinetics measured after mixing with TCEP from individual
carboxysomes. Red points correspond to ratios averaged for the number
of carboxysomes shown in the top panel in 2 min windows after mixing
with 330 μM TCEP, and gray points correspond to carboxysomes
without TCEP reductant. Trapping starts approximately 2 min after
mixing to load the sample into the cell, thus starting the experiment.
Red and gray error bars indicate standard errors of the mean ratio
measured in each time bin. The black error bar indicates the same
RMS ratio error as in (g). (i) Ratio histograms from the reducing
experiment, plotted in 10 min intervals. The distribution is broad
and centered at higher values at early times but gradually narrows
and shifts to lower values over time.Turning to redox ratios, Figure c shows the 2D scatter plot correlating the reduced
roGFP2 fluorescence ratio R405/488 with
the fractional scattering contrast of each carboxysome. The mean of
the ratio distribution is 0.25 (σ = 0.16), a comparatively low
value consistent with reducing conditions (Figure S7). To test the ratio uncertainty due to measurement error,
we also trapped E. coli carboxysomes
labeled with superfolder GFP (sfGFP), whose ratiometric fluorescence
is not redox-dependent (Figure d; also see Figure S8). The tight
ratio distribution from sfGFP-labeled carboxysomes indicates that
the larger ratio spread in roGFP2 carboxysomes arises from ratio variation
between particles. To quantify the measured ratio uncertainty, we
propagated the standard errors on the two fluorescence levels into
their ratio (Note S4) and present the RMS
standard error over all ratios (red error bars in Figure c). In sfGFP carboxysomes,
the ratio spread is comparable to the RMS uncertainty, indicating
that measurement uncertainty dominates the spread. However, for reduced
roGFP2 carboxysomes, the ratio distribution exceeds the bounds of
the RMS error, indicating other contributions to the ratio spread,
which are discussed further below. As well, the ratio distribution
for roGFP2 narrows with larger scattering contrast, attributed to
increased brightness from higher roGFP2 loading in some carboxysomes.
While shot noise dictates that brighter fluorescence increases the
absolute noise, the relative noise influencing ratio uncertainty is
decreased.When roGFP2-carboxysomes are left in air-oxidized
buffer (Figure e–g),
they
display higher ratios on average (μ = 0.46) and a broader distribution
(σ = 0.23). The mean ratio value is consistent with the bulk
redox ratio (Figure S7), but the distribution
shows an unexpectedly large spread. The RMS standard error of the
ratios is comparable to the reduced case but is distinctly smaller
than the spread of the oxidized carboxysome ratio distribution, indicating
additional heterogeneity. The ratio spread is insensitive to pH, added
HCO3–, or added oxidant (1 mM diamide; Figure S8). In particular, roGFP2-labeled carboxysomes are
already in fully
oxidizing environments when exposed to air. The wide spread of redox
ratios likely arises from kinetics of individual roGFP2 molecules,
which may occur on multiple time scales: submillisecond time scale
protonation/deprotonation kinetics,[41] tens
of milliseconds blinking into dark states,[42] and the likely slower kinetics[43] of the
binding and unbinding of the engineered disulfide bridge on the roGFP2
β-barrel. The capabilities of the ISABEL trap combined with
additional biological constructs will allow further investigation
of the heterogeneity in oxidized samples in future work.Figure h,i demonstrates
an hour-long reduction kinetics measurement of the ISABEL trap, where
fluorescence ratios are measured on individual particles after mixing
of air-equilibrated samples into reducing buffer (330 μM TCEP).
This measurement can be employed on dilute samples or where it is
important to exclude ruptured fragments, large aggregates, and free
roGFP2. Here, ratios are collected from individual carboxysomes as
in Figure and averaged
over 2 min intervals, thus pooling ∼15 carboxysomes for each
time point (numbers in upper panel of Figure h). After mixing of carboxysomes with reducing
buffer, the ratios decrease on a time scale of ∼15 min (red
trace in Figure h)
and settle at the reduced ratio mean of 0.22. This measurement recapitulates
the ensemble reduction kinetics (Figure S7), indicating that the bulk measurement is not dominated by external
roGFP2. Along with the mean values in each time interval, the single-particle
measurements allow us to measure the ratio distribution over time
(Figure i). In this
case, the ratios first show a broader spread (σ = 0.21 between
0 and 10 min), reflecting both the initially oxidized population and
its partial reduction over 10 min. The redox state of the carboxysome
population shifts over time to a more equilibrated narrower distribution
of reduced carboxysomes (σ = 0.08 between 30 and 40 min). The
capability to select individual particles in a heterogeneous sample
and the ability to measure the spread of the redox ratio over time
demonstrate the distinct advantages of single-particle over ensemble
measurements.In summary, we have demonstrated that individual
carboxysomes can
be trapped in solution with active feedback using interferometric
detection of their optical scattering from a near-infrared laser.
We introduced rapidly interleaving 405 and 488 nm excitation lasers to monitor
the ratiometric fluorescence from individual
roGFP2-labeled carboxysomes, decoupling the fluorescence channels
from the positional monitoring to measure intermittent signals with
low excitation intensity. Carboxysomes recombinantly expressed in E. coli display wide distributions of scattering
contrasts and fluorescence brightness, which can be directly monitored
by trapping individual particles. Reduced and oxidized carboxysomes
show low and high values of the average redox ratio R405/488, respectively. Controlling for chemical environment,
single-carboxysome roGFP2 ratios display a wide range of values, indicative
of the small numbers (N ≈ 3–15) of
roGFP2 per carboxysome and other sources of heterogeneity, particularly
evident in oxidized environments. We can observe minute time scale
redox kinetics over the population of carboxysomes, which enables
kinetic measurements for biological samples that are highly dilute
or contain unwanted contributors to signal such as free roGFP2. Taken
together, these experiments demonstrate the ability of the ISABEL
trap to monitor nanoscale biological objects like carboxysomes, viruses,
and exosomes for extended times and to expand the range of local reporter
experiments that can be done in these systems.
Authors: Randall H Goldsmith; Leandro C Tabares; Dorota Kostrz; Christopher Dennison; Thijs J Aartsma; G W Canters; W E Moerner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Todd O Yeates; Cheryl A Kerfeld; Sabine Heinhorst; Gordon C Cannon; Jessup M Shively Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Gabriela S Schlau-Cohen; Quan Wang; June Southall; Richard J Cogdell; W E Moerner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: André Gemeinhardt; Matthew P McDonald; Katharina König; Michael Aigner; Andreas Mackensen; Vahid Sandoghdar Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Luke M Oltrogge; Thawatchai Chaijarasphong; Allen W Chen; Eric R Bolin; Susan Marqusee; David F Savage Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: H Wang; X Yan; H Aigner; A Bracher; N D Nguyen; W Y Hee; B M Long; G D Price; F U Hartl; M Hayer-Hartl Journal: Nature Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lauren Ann Metskas; Davi Ortega; Luke M Oltrogge; Cecilia Blikstad; Derik R Lovejoy; Thomas G Laughlin; David F Savage; Grant J Jensen Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 17.694