| Literature DB >> 35539746 |
Jun-Ling Ren1, Ai-Hua Zhang1, Ling Kong1, Xi-Jun Wang1,2,3.
Abstract
Metabolomics is the systematic study of all the metabolites present within a biological system, which consists of a mass of molecules, having a variety of physical and chemical properties and existing over an extensive dynamic range in biological samples. Diverse analytical techniques are needed to achieve higher coverage of metabolites. The application of mass spectrometry (MS) in metabolomics has increased exponentially since the discovery and development of electrospray ionization and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization techniques. Significant advances have also occurred in separation-based MS techniques (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, and ion mobility-mass spectrometry), as well as separation-free MS techniques (direct infusion-mass spectrometry, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry, mass spectrometry imaging, and direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry) in the past decades. This review presents a brief overview of the recent advanced MS techniques and their latest applications in metabolomics. The software/websites for MS result analyses are also reviewed. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35539746 PMCID: PMC9081429 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra01574k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1MS-based technologies currently used for metabolomics. CE: capillary electrophoresis; DART: direct analysis in real time; DESI: desorption electrospray ionization; DI: direct infusion; DTIMS: drift-time ion mobility-mass spectrometry; FAIMS: field asymmetric ion mobility-mass spectrometry; GC: gas chromatography; HILIC: hydrophilic interaction chromatography; IM-MS: ion mobility-mass spectrometry; LAESI: laser ablation electrospray ionization; LC: liquid chromatography; MALDI: matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; MSI: mass spectrometry imaging; RPLC: reversed-phase liquid chromatography; SFC: supercritical fluid chromatography; SIMS: secondary ion mass spectrometry; TWIMS: traveling-wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry.
Advantages and disadvantages of MS-based metabolomics
| Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|
| GC-MS | Suitable for the detection of volatile metabolites | Unsuitable for non-volatile and thermally unstable metabolites |
| Highly repeated retention times | Sample pre-processing process is tedious and often requires derivatization | |
| Universal database facilitates the identification of the structure | ||
| LC-MS | Simple sample preparation | Ion suppression |
| Can be matched with multiple MS detectors | Metabolites can not be detected without form adduct ions | |
| Wide coverage of detectable metabolites | ||
| CE-MS | Low sample volume required for the detection, especially suitable for precious samples | System stability is less stable than LC-MS, GC-MS |
| Affected by salt in the sample | ||
| IM-MS | Isomers can be distinguished | Determination structural information indirectly from CCS values |
| Fast detection speed | ||
| The three-dimensional structure of metabolites can be determined in dynamic motion | ||
| DI-MS | High-throughput detection of samples | Ion suppression |
| The data processing process is relatively simple | Isomers cannot be distinguished | |
| MALDI-MS | Short sample analysis time | Reproducibility is greatly affected by the matrix and sample processing |
| Low sample consumption | Quantitative analysis is difficult to achieve | |
| High salt tolerance | ||
| MSI | Enables | Imaging effect is affected by resolution |
| It takes longer time to complete the detection under the high resolution | ||
| DART-MS | Samples can be analyzed directly without the extraction process | Polar compounds are difficult to ionize |
| Low sample consumption | Ion suppression | |
| Sample analysis cycle was sharply shortened |
Fig. 2Flowchart depicting the basic workflow of GC-MS, LC-MS, and CE-MS techniques.
Fig. 3Scheme of IM-MS technique. Reprinted with permission from ref. 72. Copyright (2017) Nature.
Fig. 4Flowchart depicting the basic workflow of MALDI-MS. Reprinted with permission from ref. 101. Copyright (2018) ACS Publications.
Fig. 5Flowchart depicting the basic workflow of MALDI MSI. Reprinted with permission from ref. 125. Copyright (2010) Nature.
Fig. 6Flowchart depicting the basic workflow of SIMS MSI. Reprinted with permission from ref. 101. Copyright (2018) ACS Publications.
Fig. 7Scheme of DESI MSI technique. Reprinted with permission from ref. 136. Copyright (2006) Science.
Fig. 8Flowchart depicting the basic workflow of LAESI MSI. Reprinted with permission from ref. 101. Copyright (2018) ACS Publications.
Fig. 9Scheme of DART MSI technique. Reprinted with permission from ref. 149. Copyright (2011) Elsevier.
MS-based metabolomics data processing and analysis software/websites
| Software/website | Accepted data forms | Statistics | Pathway analysis | Data visualization | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MarkerLynx | .raw | ✓ | ✓ | Waters | |
| MarkerView | .d | ✓ | ✓ | AB Sciex | |
| MassHunter | all | ✓ | ✓ | Aglient | |
| Mass Profiler | all | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Aglient |
| MetQuest | .raw | ✓ | ✓ | Thermo | |
| SIEVE | .raw | ✓ | ✓ | Thermo | |
| IDEOM | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MathDAMP | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MAVEN | all | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| MetAlign | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MetboAnalyst | all | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
|
| MET-COFEA | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MET-XAlign | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MS-DIAL | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MsXelerator | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| MZmine | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| msCompare | all | ✓ |
| ||
| OpenMS | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| SMART | all | ✓ | ✓ |
| |
| XCMS | all | ✓ | ✓ |
|
Fig. 10Trends in MS-based metabolomics.