| Literature DB >> 20856980 |
Lin Lin1, Quan Yu, Xiaomei Yan, Wei Hang, Jiaxin Zheng, Jinchun Xing, Benli Huang.
Abstract
Serum samples from kidney cancer patients and healthy controls were analyzed by both direct infusion mass spectrometry (DIMS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with a high resolution ESI-Q-TOFMS. The classification and biomarker discovery capacities of the two methods were compared, and MS/MS experiments were carried out to identify potential biomarkers. DIMS had comparable classification and prediction capabilities to LC-MS but consumed only ~5% of the analysis time. With regard to biomarker discovery, twenty-three variables were found as potential biomarkers by DIMS, and 48 variables were obtained by LC-MS. DIMS is recommended to be a fast diagnostic method for kidney cancer, while LC-MS is necessary when comprehensive screening of biomarkers is required.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20856980 DOI: 10.1039/c0an00265h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Analyst ISSN: 0003-2654 Impact factor: 4.616