J B Senthil Kumar1, Parthasarathi Das2, Vibha Tandon1. 1. Drug Discovery Laboratory, Special Centre for Molecular Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, India. 2. Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India.
Abstract
The azaindole (AI) framework continues to play a significant role in the design of new antiviral agents. Modulating the position and isosteric replacement of the nitrogen atom of AI analogs notably influences the intrinsic physicochemical properties of lead compounds. The intra- and intermolecular interactions of AI derivatives with host receptors or viral proteins can also be fine tuned by carefully placing the nitrogen atom in the heterocyclic core. This wide-ranging perspective article focuses on AIs that have considerable utility in drug discovery programs against RNA viruses. The inhibition of influenza A, human immunodeficiency, respiratory syncytial, neurotropic alpha, dengue, ebola, and hepatitis C viruses by AI analogs is extensively reviewed to assess their plausible future potential in antiviral drug discovery. The binding interaction of AIs with the target protein is examined to derive a structural basis for designing new antiviral agents.
The azaindole (AI) framework continues to play a significant role in the design of new antiviral agents. Modulating the position and isosteric replacement of the nitrogen atom of AI analogs notably influences the intrinsic physicochemical properties of lead compounds. The intra- and intermolecular interactions of AI derivatives with host receptors or viral proteins can also be fine tuned by carefully placing the nitrogen atom in the heterocyclic core. This wide-ranging perspective article focuses on AIs that have considerable utility in drug discovery programs against RNA viruses. The inhibition of influenza A, human immunodeficiency, respiratory syncytial, neurotropic alpha, dengue, ebola, and hepatitis C viruses by AI analogs is extensively reviewed to assess their plausible future potential in antiviral drug discovery. The binding interaction of AIs with the target protein is examined to derive a structural basis for designing new antiviral agents.
The prevalence of fused N-heterocyclic building blocks in pharmaceuticals,
functional materials, and natural products suggests their versatility for industrial and
innovative applications with promising intellectual property scope.[1−8] In this context, azaindole
(AI) analogs have been applied as diverse therapeutics due to their antiviral,
antibacterial, anticancer, and antiasthma activity and have also been applied against
central nervous system (CNS) disorders.[9−14] Their widespread
therapeutic application is partially due to the unique physicochemical properties of the AI
ring. Recently, it was observed that the introduction of a nitrogen atom to replace a
−CH group in aromatic and heteroaromatic rings can, under some circumstances, lead to
improved physicochemical and pharmacological properties.[9] AIs function as
H-bond acceptors and donors through their pyridine moiety and pyrrole N–H,
respectively, which make them attractive building blocks.[15] The different
derivatives of azaindoles with diverse substituents at the C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6 positions
can be synthesized easily in the laboratory.[13] Vemurafenib
(1g), venetoclax (1h), peficitinib (1i), and
decernotinib (1j), which are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs
(Figure A), are fair representations of the
potential for AIs to be efficacious drugs.
Figure 1
(A) AI-derived, FDA-approved drugs. (B) Comparison of the physicochemical parameters
pKa (basic), ionization, and lipid–water
distribution ratios (D) of indoles, purines, and AIs.
(A) AI-derived, FDA-approved drugs. (B) Comparison of the physicochemical parameters
pKa (basic), ionization, and lipid–water
distribution ratios (D) of indoles, purines, and AIs.Currently, emerging RNA viruses, such as ebola, influenza, and severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS) viruses, continue to pose a significant threat to global public health,
causing substantial morbidity and mortality, leading to large, unpredictable health care
burdens worldwide.[16] AIs are prominent heterocyclic motifs in inhibitors
of structural and nonstructural proteins from a number of RNA viruses. Intrigued by the
development of AI-based frameworks as potential antiviral agents and their future
perspective, here we present a critical review spanning the first decade of the 21st
century. This review encompasses the physicochemical properties and pharmacological
activities of AI analogs against the target proteins of HIV-1, respiratory syncytial virus,
dengue virus, ebola virus, hepatitis C virus, neurotrophic alphavirus, and influenza virus
to provide an understanding of their application and potential in antiviral drug
discovery.
Physicochemical Properties That Enable AIs To Serve as a Potential Tool for Biological
Applications
Early investigations of the intrinsic physicochemical properties and in vivo and in vitro
pharmacology of unsubstituted AIs have demonstrated their drug-like properties (Figure B).[1,2,17,18] The four
positional isomers of AI analogs, i.e., 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-AIs, exhibit significantly
different pKa values and lipid–water distribution ratios
(D value) (Figure A).[19,20] The
heterobicyclic ring system of AIs consists of a condensed, π-deficient pyridine ring
and a π-excessive pyrrole ring.[12,13,21] Incorporating a nitrogen atom into indole to
form an AI (1c–f, Figure A) confers basic properties to the molecule but reduces the lipid–water
distribution ratio compared with that of indole (1a and
1c–f, Figure B).[19] All 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-AIs can form cations to different
extents at pH 7.4 (1c–f, Figure B). More significantly, 5- and 6-AIs exist in their cationic form to
an extent of 88% and 78%, respectively, at body pH (1d and 1e,
Figure B). However, 7-AI exists mostly as a free
base at body pH since it exhibits a low degree of ionization (0.15%). The combination of the
D value, the pKa, and the degree of
ionization critically determines the uptake of AIs across biological membranes. The reduced
D values of 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-AIs and 3-, 5-, and 7-triAIs (purine)
compared with that of indole depends on both the number and the positions of the nitrogen
atoms in the aromatic core (Figure A).[19] For example, the two nitrogen atoms in 7-AI are in close proximity, leading
to a nearly 2-fold reduction in the D value compared with that of indole.
However, when the two nitrogen atoms are further apart, the D value drops
by nearly one-sixth. The combined effect of the numbers and positions of the nitrogen atoms
is reflected in the D value of purine, which is 250-fold lower than that of
indole. The chemical stability of AIs is higher than that of indoles under acidic conditions
due to protonation of the pyridine nitrogen, which also renders them capable of forming
salts. The 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-AIs can be regarded as excellent bioisosteres of indole or
purines that differ only by exchange of a sp2 CH fragment(s) by a nitrogen
atom(s) and vice versa.[12,13,19]The fluorescence properties and proton-transfer tautomerism of AIs have been skillfully
applied to form optical probes to investigate protein–protein and
protein–nucleic acid interactions.[22−29] The use of AIs
as optical probes for macromolecular interaction studies provides distinctive advantages
over the traditionally used indole analogs. For example, the fluorescence decay of
7-azatryptophan (a 7-AI analog) over most of the pH range is a single exponential when
emission is collected over the entire band; however, for tryptophan (an indole analog), a
nonexponential fluorescence decay was observed, which made the protein fluorescence more
difficult to interpret.[30]Thus, 7-azatryptophan was incorporated into synthetic peptides, bacterial proteins, and DNA
oligonucleotides as an alternative to tryptophan to study the macromolecular structure and
dynamics.[31,32] In
these studies, 7-AI underwent solvent-assisted excited-state proton transfer (ESPT)
catalyzed by alcohols, resulting in an N-7-H tautomer form (Figure ) that exhibited green emission (∼510
nm).[33−36] However, when water was used as the solvent, the N-7-H
tautomer-mediated green color emission was not observed due to the slower proton-transfer
rate constant (∼109s–1) as well as dominant
radiationless deactivation pathways. One approach to overcome this difficulty was to
increase the acidity of the N-1-H form by attaching an electron-withdrawing group such as
cyano at C-3, which facilitated the overall ESPT rate in water, thus promoting intensive
N-7-H proton-transfer tautomer emission of green light (Figure B).[33] Alternatively, the pyrrole element was
replaced by a pyrazole moiety to form 2,7-diazaindole in which N-2 acted as an efficient
electron-withdrawing group to increase the acidity of the N-1-H form (Figure C). Thus, 7-AIs and 2,7-diazaindole analogs serve as
unprecedented biosensing tools for site-specific water environments in proteins without
disrupting their native structure.[33] We believe that the intrinsic
fluorescence properties of AIs can also be strategically exploited for the detection and
fluorescence imaging of viral macromolecules and thus possess diagnostic value.
Figure 2
(A) Protic solvent-catalyzed ESPT mechanism for 7-AI and its derivatives. This
mechanism incorporates a fast excited-state equilibrium between polysolvated and 1:1
cyclic hydrogen-bonded N-1-H/H2O (or methanol) followed by proton tunneling
kpt, which has been unambiguously proven by the kinetic
deuterium isotopic effect under the assumption of k–1
> k1 and kpt. Overall ESPT
rate constant, krxn, can be expressed as
krxn =
(k1/k–1)kpt.
(B) Proposed excited-state double-proton-transfer mechanism and hydrogen-bonded
structure of 3-cyano-7-azaindole in water. (C) Proposed schematic diagram of a
proton-transfer cycle for 2,7-diazaindole and 2,7-diazatryptophan in water.
(A) Protic solvent-catalyzed ESPT mechanism for 7-AI and its derivatives. This
mechanism incorporates a fast excited-state equilibrium between polysolvated and 1:1
cyclic hydrogen-bonded N-1-H/H2O (or methanol) followed by proton tunneling
kpt, which has been unambiguously proven by the kinetic
deuterium isotopic effect under the assumption of k–1
> k1 and kpt. Overall ESPT
rate constant, krxn, can be expressed as
krxn =
(k1/k–1)kpt.
(B) Proposed excited-state double-proton-transfer mechanism and hydrogen-bonded
structure of 3-cyano-7-azaindole in water. (C) Proposed schematic diagram of a
proton-transfer cycle for 2,7-diazaindole and 2,7-diazatryptophan in water.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) and Azaindole-Based Inhibitors
HIV belongs to the family Retroviridae, subfamily
Orthoretrovirinae, and genus Lentivirus. HIV is
classified into HIV-1 and HIV-2 based on genetic characteristics and differences in viral
antigens. The genome of HIV-1 consists of two identical, single-stranded RNA molecules
enclosed within the virus particle core. HIV-1 contains nine genes, namely, gag,
pol, env, tat, rev, nef, vpr, vif, and vpu/vpx, that encode 16
viral proteins that play fundamental roles in the HIV-1 lifecycle.[37−39] The first three genes, gag, pol, and
env, encode structural proteins (matrix, capsid, nucleocapsid, and p6),
viral enzymes (protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase), and env proteins (gp120 and
gp41).[37] The rest of the genes encode regulatory proteins
(tat and rev) and accessory proteins (nef, vpr,
vif, vpu/vpx). vpu is found exclusively in HIV-1, whereas HIV-2
carries vpx.[40] The efficient replication mechanism at
different stages of the HIV-1 life cycle is achieved by the physical interaction of pairs of
viral proteins.[41] For instance, the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120
physically interacts with gp41 during viral entry. In addition to HIV pairwise protein
interactions, HIV–host protein interactions are known to play essential roles for HIV
to take over human cellular systems.The HIV-1 life cycle consists of approximately nine stages (Figure ). Briefly, binding of the virus to a cluster of differentiation
(CD4) glycoproteins on the host cell surface induces conformational changes in the env
trimer that allow the interaction of gp120 with either the CCR5 or the CXCR4 coreceptor,
which triggers the next step in the viral fusion process, the rearrangement of gp41. After
fusion, the viral RNA is transcribed into linear, double-stranded DNA by HIV-1 reverse
transcriptase. The double-stranded DNA is then transported across the nuclear membrane and
inserted into the cellular DNA by the enzyme integrase. The integrated HIV-1 provirus serves
as a template for the transcription of both viral messenger and genomic RNA by cellular Pol
II polymerase. The fully spliced viral RNA, which encodes essential structural and
nonstructural proteins, is translated, and the assembly of viral RNA and proteins on the
cell surface forms new virions through budding, which are released to infect another host
cell (Figure ). Since the introduction of the
first FDA-approved drug zidovudine to treat HIV-1 in 1987, significant progress has been
achieved in HIV-1 drug discovery. Currently, 5 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
(NRTIs), 5 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 6 protease inhibitors
(PIs), 1 fusion inhibitor, 1 CCR5 antagonist, 4 integrase inhibitors, 1 attachment
inhibitor, 1 pharmacokinetic enhancer, and 24 fixed-dose combinations of one or more drug
classes have been approved by the FDA.
Figure 3
Different targets in the HIV-1 cycle and AI-based inhibitors in this cycle.
Different targets in the HIV-1 cycle and AI-based inhibitors in this cycle.The latest addition to the above list, the attachment inhibitor fostemsavir
(2), a 6-AI-based prodrug, was approved by the FDA on July 2, 2020 as a
therapeutic agent for highly treatment-experienced subjects.[42] Despite
the availability of 24 individual drugs (including 2) and 24 fixed-dose
combinations, the pursuit of a more effective, mechanistically distinct and
noncross-resistant class of drugs to overcome drug toxicity continues in the absence of an
effective vaccine, the risk of viral resistance, and the emergence of comorbidities
associated with long-term combined antiretroviral therapy (cART).AI analogs have played a prominent role in the development of HIV-1-attachment inhibitors
(Figure ). The insightful installation of a
basic nitrogen atom to replace a CH moiety of indole prototypes to form an AI core provided
substantial improvements in the molecular, physicochemical, and pharmaceutical properties
that translated into better pharmacological and developability profiles. This part of the
perspective explores the salient element of the development of AI-based HIV-1-attachment and
integrase inhibitors.
Figure 4
Summary of SAR studies conducted with indole-3-glyoxamide-based inhibitors of HIV-1
attachment.
Summary of SAR studies conducted with indole-3-glyoxamide-based inhibitors of HIV-1
attachment.
HIV-1-Attachment Inhibitors
HIV-1 particles infiltrate host cells (T-cells, monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic
cells) which express the CD4 glycoprotein receptor to initiate infection. The glycosylated
gp120 surface protein of HIV-1 particles physically interacts with gp41 via noncovalent
interactions to form the trimeric env spikes. The gp120 protein contains five conserved
domains (C1–C5) and five variable domains (V1–V5), which form three key
structural regions: the inner domain, the outer domain, and the bridging sheet of the
HIV-1 envelope.[43] The gp41 protein contains an
N-terminal fusion peptide (FP), two heptad-repeat domains (HR1 and HR2),
and a transmembrane anchor (TM).[44] Binding of the HIV-1 envelope
protein gp120 to CD4 cells expressed on T-cells triggers an outward domain shift to
relieve some of the noncovalent interactions between gp120 and gp41, opening the
coreceptor (CCR5 or CXCR4) binding site.[45,46] Following engagement of the coreceptor, gp120 undergoes
further conformational changes that trigger a conformational rearrangement of gp41 to
expose the fusion peptide which inserts into the host membrane, leading to fusion of the
host cell membrane with the virus and allowing the capsid to enter the cytosol. Each of
these discrete steps in the HIV-1-entry process has been verified to be a promising target
for anti-HIV-1 drug development. The classification of HIV-1-entry inhibitors depends on
their distinctive mechanism of action in the sequential viral entry processes, such as
virus attachment (CD4-gp120 interaction), coreceptor binding (CCR5 and CXCR4 inhibitors),
and membrane fusion.[47]Indole glyoxamide 3 (Figure ),
which is an early identified HIV-1 attachment inhibitor (EC50 = 153 nM in a
pseudotype assay), served as a prototype for many 6-AI-based inhibitors, including the
recently FDA-approved prodrug 2 (Figure B).[48−50] The low in vitro
cytotoxicity against a panel of human cell lines, specificity for HIV-1, and synthetic
accessibility to allow the introduction of diverse chemical substituents on 3
led to a series of SAR investigations (Figure ),
which collectively contributed to development of the prodrug, fostemsavir (2,
Figure B).The introduction of either F or OCH3 at the C-4 or C-7 position of the indole
ring resulted in an increase in antiviral potency (Table ).[48] The 4-fluoro derivative 4 was observed to
be 50-fold more potent than the congener 3 in the pseudotype antiviral assay.
The introduction of other substituents, such as Cl, Br, OC2H5, and
CN, at C-4 or C-7 also enhanced antiviral potency as compared with 3. The
observed increase in the antiviral potency of the disubstituted products 5
and 6 (Table ) demonstrates the
synergistic effect of C-4 and C-7 substitutions. Substitution on C-5 or C-6 and alkylation
of the indole nitrogen, however, did not yield an impressive outcome. Furthermore,
pharmacokinetic profiling indicated that 3 exhibited modest oral
bioavailability (Fpo = 29% at a dose of 25 mg per kilogram
(mpk)) and high clearance (57 mL/min/kg) in rats. Similarly, 4
(EC50 = 2.6 nM in the pseudotype assay) displayed modest bioavailability (17%
at a dose of 25 mpk) and clearance (48 mL/min/kg). In contrast, the 4,7-dimethoxy
derivative 6 afforded superior oral availability (107%) and low clearance
(5.2 mL/min/kg). Moreover, the potency of the 4,7-dimethoxy derivative was also 5-fold
improved over that of the monofluoro analog 4 (Table ).
Table 1
HIV-1 Pseudotype Virus Inhibitory Activity, Oral Bioavailability, and Clearance
In Vivo of Substituted Indole Glyoxamide Analogs
substituted
indoles
compound no.
R1
R2
EC50 (nM)
Fpo (%) in ratsa
CL (mL/min/kg) after IV injection in rats
3
H
H
153
29b
57c
4
F
H
2.6
17b
48c
5
F
F
0.35
11c
46.9d
6
OCH3
OCH3
0.23
107c
5.2d
Dosed as solutions in PEG 400/EtOH (90:10).
At 25 mpk.
At 5 mpk.
At 1 mpk.
Dosed as solutions in PEG 400/EtOH (90:10).At 25 mpk.At 5 mpk.At 1 mpk.Initially, a higher emphasis was placed on optimizing the 4-fluoro derivative
4 based on its promising antiviral profile toward a panel of HIV-1 viruses
(Table ) and its superior oral bioavailability
(∼100%) in dogs and monkeys dosed at 10 mpk as a solution in PEG 400/ethanol (90:10
v/v). Compound 4 demonstrated good pharmacokinetic properties in the rat and
dog following oral dosing as solutions in PEG 400/ethanol. However, the bioavailability of
4 was substantially poorer than that of the solution form when administered
as a suspension. Further efforts were made to improve the physicochemical properties of
4 by installing a nitrogen atom and an electron-donating methoxy
substituent at the C-7 and C-4 positions, respectively, to create the 7-AI analog
7, which showed a 34-fold improvement in solubility over 4
(Figure ).[51] The X-ray
cocrystal structure data for 7 indicated a mix of H-bonding and hydrophobic
interactions with gp120, with the benzoyl group forming parallel and offset
π-stacking interactions with Phe382 and Trp427 of gp120, respectively.[52] Two hydrogen bonds, one between the backbone N–H group of Trp427
and the oxoacetamide carbonyl group of 7 and another bond between the
carboxylate group of Asp113 and the azaindolic N–H group of 7, were
observed in the cocrystal (Figure B).
Table 2
HIV-1-Inhibitory Activity of Compounds 4 and 7 against
a Panel of Macrophage and T Cell-Tropic HIV-1 Virusesa
4
7
virus
EC50 (nM)
EC50 (nM)
LAI (T)
2.93
2.68
SF-2 (T)
62.4
26.5
NL4–3 (T)
30.8
2.94
Bal (M)
18.1
15.5
SF-162 (M)
ND
3.46
JRFL (M)
2.39
1.47
TLAV (dual)
13.6
0.85
ND: Not determined. T: T-tropic virus that utilizes the CXCR4 coreceptor. M:
macrophage-tropic virus that utilizes both the CXCR4 and the CCR5 coreceptors for
entry.
Figure 6
Active 4-AI analogs 8 and 9 with their potency and
cytotoxicity. Here, a mnemonic in which substitution around the attached
heteroaromatic ring at C-7 that allows coplanarity with the 4-azaindole was proven to
be a useful guide as a predictor of optimal potency within a series.
Figure 5
(A) Improvement in the solubility of 4 upon introduction of a nitrogen
atom to replace C-7 and polar methoxy substituents on the indole ring. (B)
Two-dimensional interaction diagram of 7 with HIV-1 gp120 (PDB 5U7M).
(A) Improvement in the solubility of 4 upon introduction of a nitrogen
atom to replace C-7 and polar methoxy substituents on the indole ring. (B)
Two-dimensional interaction diagram of 7 with HIV-1 gp120 (PDB 5U7M).ND: Not determined. T: T-tropic virus that utilizes the CXCR4 coreceptor. M:
macrophage-tropic virus that utilizes both the CXCR4 and the CCR5 coreceptors for
entry.The antiviral potency of 7 against a panel of macrophage-tropic and
T-cell-tropic HIV-1, which utilize the CCR5 (M-tropic) or CXR4 (T-tropic) coreceptors to
enter host cells, respectively, is shown in Table , which revealed the combined effect of introducing nitrogen and a methoxy
substituent on the indole ring in improving both the solubility and the antiviral
properties.The pharmacokinetic data also favored the advancement of 7 into clinical
trials. However, a phase 1 dose-escalation study in normal healthy subjects revealed that
the observed plasma concentration was lower than the targeted efficacious level in
HIV-1-infected individuals; therefore, further studies were halted. In parallel, the 4-AI
isomers 8 and 9 were also studied and found to have improved
potency and PK profiles over those of 7 (Figure ).[53] Nevertheless, more
promising compounds in the related 6-AI core series were subsequently identified (vide
infra).Active 4-AI analogs 8 and 9 with their potency and
cytotoxicity. Here, a mnemonic in which substitution around the attached
heteroaromatic ring at C-7 that allows coplanarity with the 4-azaindole was proven to
be a useful guide as a predictor of optimal potency within a series.The subsequent focus was directed toward the 4,6-dimethoxy analog 6, which
possessed good antiviral potency (EC50 = 0.23 nM). However, oxidative
metabolism of 6 in microsomal preparations from human liver resulted in
demethylation at the C-4 and C-7 positions, arousing concern for the potential formation
of indoloquinolone 11 in in vivo. In order to prevent the
formation of a reactive quinone, the analogue 10 was designed by introducing
a nitrogen atom at the C-6 position of the indole core of 6 (Figure ).
Figure 7
Installing a nitrogen at C-6 of 6 to form the 6-AI analog
10 to prevent formation of a reactive indoloquinone
11.
Installing a nitrogen at C-6 of 6 to form the 6-AI analog
10 to prevent formation of a reactive indoloquinone
11.The oral bioavailability of 10 in rats, dogs, and monkeys after
administration as a solution in 90% PEG 400, 10% EtOH was 90%, 57%, and 60%, respectively,
whereas 7 exhibited 19%, 77%, and 24% oral bioavailability, respectively, in
the same species. Compound 10 demonstrated a clean preclinical safety profile
and advanced into phase 1 clinical study. However, in clinical trials, the area under
curve (AUC) and Cmax did not increase proportionally with the
administration of increasing dose of compound 10 from 200 to 800 mg. The
plasma exposure of 10 showed a 3-fold increase in a solution formulation at a
dose of 200 mg, but a 3–5-fold increase was observed when it was administered along
with a high-fat meal over the 400–1200 mg dose range. The excessive pill burden and
the requirement for dosing with a high-fat meal to achieve targeted plasma exposure posed
a challenge that hindered the further development of 10.A phosphonooxymethyl prodrug approach was designed to improve the solubility of
10 in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and to take advantage of the enzyme
alkaline phosphatase, which is expressed on the intestinal brush border membrane, to
release 10 from the phosphonooxymethyl prodrug 12 by a
presystemic cleavage mechanism (Figure ).[54] Thus, presystemic dephosphorylation of the phosphonooxymethyl prodrug
12, formulated as its (S)-(+)-lysine salt, in the GIT
releases the short-lived N-hydroxymethyl derivative 12a,
which rapidly liberates one molecule of formaldehyde to produce the parent drug
10. However, a potential concern was the need to avoid precipitation of the
parent drug upon dephosphorylation and prior to absorption; thus, balancing the kinetics
of phosphate cleavage and the rate of absorption was essential for success. The successful
delivery of parent drug 10 is a function of its biopharmaceutical
classification system (BCS) class 2 designation based on its experimentally measured low
solubility and high intrinsic membrane permeability. The lysine salt of phosphonooxymethyl
prodrug 12 demonstrated an improved solubility of >12 mg/mL at pH 5.4 as
compared to parent compound 10 which has a solubility of 0.04 mg/mL at pH
4–8. The rapid conversion of 12 into the parent molecule
10 was observed after iv administration to rats, dogs and monkeys. The
absolute bioavailability of the parent drug 10 after oral administration of
12 was 62%, 93%, and 67% in rats, dogs and monkeys, respectively. Plasma
exposure of 12 increased in a linear manner following administration of 16,
72, and 267 mpk of the prodrug to rats. The AUC and Cmax of
10 were increased up to 3-fold when administered in the prodrug form
compared with the administration of the parent drug as a suspension. Similarly, prodrug
12 showed a dose-proportional increase in plasma concentrations at doses
ranging from 25 to 800 mg in human clinical studies. Prodrug 12 showed
improved clinical potential of 10, further development was abandoned in favor
of fostemsavir (2).
Figure 8
Structure of the (S)-(+)-lysine salt of the phosphonooxymethyl
prodrug 12, short-lived hydroxy methyl intermediate 12a, and
parent drug 10.
Structure of the (S)-(+)-lysine salt of the phosphonooxymethyl
prodrug 12, short-lived hydroxy methyl intermediate 12a, and
parent drug 10.Continued SAR studies explored the introduction of carboxamide,[55]
sulfonamide, and heteroaryl[56] substituents at the C-7 position of the
indole core which led to the identification of compounds with enhanced antiviral potency.
Carboxamide 13 showed high human liver microsome stability (HLM) and modest
Caco-2 permeability, whereas oxadiazole 14 showed a balanced profile in terms
of HLM stability and Caco-2 permeability. However, these substituted indoles were unable
to deliver the targeted combination of physicochemical properties and drug-like profiles
needed in a clinical candidate (13 and 14, Figure B). These findings resulted in the pursuit of the 6-AI
core in an effort to overcome the pharmaceutical issues confronted by
10.[57]
Figure 9
(A) General structure of 4-fluoro/methoxy indole glyoxamides. (B) C-7-Substituted
4-fluoroindole glyoxamides with the antiviral potency, microsomal stability, membrane
permeability, and oral bioavailability of 13 and 14
presented, and structures of potent HIV-1 inhibitors 15 (methylated
thiazole) and 16 (thiazole).
(A) General structure of 4-fluoro/methoxy indole glyoxamides. (B) C-7-Substituted
4-fluoroindole glyoxamides with the antiviral potency, microsomal stability, membrane
permeability, and oral bioavailability of 13 and 14
presented, and structures of potent HIV-1 inhibitors 15 (methylated
thiazole) and 16 (thiazole).In this context, C-7-linked amides and both substituted and unsubstituted heterocycles
were installed on the 4-fluoro-6-AI template (Figure ). The C-linked methylamide 17 (EC50 = 0.09 nM) was
suggested to form internal H bonds with the indole NH (amide C=O) and pyridine
nitrogen (amide NH) of the 6-AI core, thereby stabilizing a planar conformation. The
presence of internal H bonding was corroborated by the X-ray structure of pyrazole
18 (EC50 = 0.07 nM), which revealed H bonding between
N-1 of the pyrazole ring and NH of the azaindole to confer coplanarity
to this part of the molecule (Figure ). In the
case of oxazole 19 (EC50 = 0.15 nM), despite poor internal H
bonding, coplanarity was preserved by means of a positive electrostatic interaction
between the O atom of oxazole and the indole NH.[57] However, the oxazole
20 (EC50 = 3.56 nM) and the imidazole 21
(EC50 = 1.3 nM) encountered unfavorable intramolecular interactions (Figure ) due to electron pair repulsion. Thus, the
observed loss of the antiviral potencies of 20 and 21 confirmed
a correlation between coplanarity at this region of the molecule and antiviral
potency.
Figure 10
Suggested favorable and unfavorable intramolecular interactions exemplified by
C-7-substituted, 4-fluoro-6-AI analogs.
Suggested favorable and unfavorable intramolecular interactions exemplified by
C-7-substituted, 4-fluoro-6-AI analogs.Two structural analogs of 6-azaindoles (22-23) having
1,2,4-triazole and its 1,2,3-triazole isomer installed at the C-7 position offered
promising antiviral and pharmacokinetic profiles (Table ).
Table 3
Comparison of Antiviral and Rat Pharmacokinetic Profiles of 10,
22, and 23a
Dosed as solutions in PEG 400/EtOH (90:10 v/v).
Oral Cmax and AUC adjusted to 5 mg/kg.
Human plasma binding.
Dosed as solutions in PEG 400/EtOH (90:10 v/v).Oral Cmax and AUC adjusted to 5 mg/kg.Human plasma binding.Compounds 22 (EC50 = 0.07 nM) and 23
(EC50 = 0.05 nM) showed 10-fold greater inhibitory activity against HIV-1
infection in the pseudotype assay compared with that of 10 (EC50 =
0.88 nM). The inhibitory activity of 23 was also preserved toward a much
broader range of subtype B laboratory strains. Compared with that of 10, the
pharmacokinetic profiles of 22 and 23 were improved with 10-fold
lower iv clearance, while the plasma exposure after oral dosing was improved by
approximately 13-fold for 22 and 23 (Table
). Safety pharmacology data for 23 indicated no
significant cardiac liability in a hERG channel patch clamp assay and no mutagenicity in
an Ames reverse mutation assay. On the basis of these data, the 1,2,3-triazole
23 was advanced into a phase I clinical trial with human subjects in which
23 was formulated as a spray-dried dispersion and dosed at 100, 200, 400,
800, and 1200 mg to normal healthy volunteers. However, the exposure profile was not
satisfactory for conducting an efficacy study in HIV-1-infected patients. The aqueous
crystalline solubility of 23 was found to be low (7 μg/mL), which was
believed to be responsible for its poor bioavailability at high doses.A phosphonooxymethyl prodrug formulation, 24, similar to that of
10, was also prepared (Figure )
in an effort to enhance the plasma exposure profile of 23 following oral
administration; however, at targeted exposure margins in preclinical toxicology studies,
the low aqueous solubility of the parent resulted in crystallization in tissues.
Figure 11
Structure of the (S)-(+)-lysine salt of phosphonooxymethyl prodrug
24.
Structure of the (S)-(+)-lysine salt of phosphonooxymethyl prodrug
24.The idea to attach C-7, N-linked azoles as a design concept was also
explored in the 4-methoxy-substituted 6-AI series (Figure ) in an effort to overcome the solubility limitations of the
4-fluoro-6-AI series, but the improvement in solubility was modest. The unsubstituted
1,2,4-triazole 25 was characterized by superior antiviral and pharmacokinetic
profiles in preclinical species. However, the safety pharmacology data were not
encouraging, as 25 inhibited CYP3A4 and the hERG ion channel, arousing
concern for potential drug–drug interactions and cardiac liabilities. However,
these liabilities were solved with substitution on the 1,2,4-triazole ring of
25 which provided the 3-methyl-substituted analog 26 (also
known as temsavir), which retained the improved pharmacokinetic properties in rats
observed with the unsubstituted congener 25.
Figure 13
(A) Temsavir (26) binds between the inner and the outer domains of gp120
and under the β20−β21 loop (PDB 5U7O). AI moiety interacts with gp120 via hydrophobic
interactions and forms H bonds with Asp113 from the α1-helix of the gp120 inner
domain and Trp427 of the outer domain. Benzamide moiety occupies the site of gp120
that is occupied by Trp427 in the open state such that Trp427 and the
β20−β21 loop are pushed toward the CD4-binding loop, thereby
blocking CD4. (B) Two-dimensional diagram of temsavir interactions with the gp120
protein. (C) Structure of temsavir (26).
Prominently, the pharmacokinetic profile of 26 was notably improved over
10 in terms of its low clearance, ∼2-fold increased half-life, and
8-fold higher plasma exposure after oral dosing.[48,58] In addition, 26 demonstrated
acceptable oral bioavailability (52%) when dosed as a suspension in dogs and monkeys.
However, 26 showed low crystalline aqueous solubility (0.022 mg/mL) but high
membrane permeability. These characteristics of 26 placed this molecule as a
BCS class 2. The tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane salt of the phosphonooxymethyl derivative
of 26, known as fostemsavir 2 (Figure ), was prepared as a prodrug. It exhibited >11 mg/mL aqueous
solubility and 80–122% oral bioavailability for the parent drug 26 in
rats, dogs, and monkeys.[48,58] At lower doses (≤25 mg), the AUCs of both 26 and
2 displayed similar trends in rats and dogs; however, at 200 mg/kg,
administration of the prodrug 2 demonstrated superior plasma exposure of the
parent drug compared with that of 26.
Figure 12
Structure, intramolecular H bonding between N-linked C-7 azoles and
the 6-AI ring (25–30), and structure of fostemsavir
(2).
Structure, intramolecular H bonding between N-linked C-7 azoles and
the 6-AI ring (25–30), and structure of fostemsavir
(2).Comprehensive biochemical profiling demonstrated that attachment inhibitors based on
6-AIs bind to HIV-1 gp120 and interfere with its attachment to the CD4
receptor.[50,58]
Another mechanism has been proposed in which 6-AIs hinder the exposure of gp41 following
CD4 and coreceptor-induced conformational changes by forming a ternary complex with gp41
and gp120. The binding mode of 26 to gp120 from X-ray cocrystal studies
indicated that the benzoyl group of 26 engages in parallel π-stacking
interactions with Trp427 in the inner and outer interface domains of the
β20−β21 loop of gp120 (Figure ). Two H bonds, first between the backbone NH moiety
of Trp427 and the oxoacetamide C=O of 26 and second between the
azaindolic N–H group and the side chain carboxylate group of Asp113, have been
observed. In addition to the above, compound 26 binds with gp120 through
hydrophobic interactions with Trp112, Asp113, Leu116, Thr202, Val255, Phe382, Ile424,
Met426, Trp427, Gln432, Met434, and Met 475. The analysis of the cocrystal structure of
26 with HIV-1 env revealed that 26 does not allow CD4 to bind
to gp120, which is necessary for conversion of the prefusion conformation of the env
trimer to the postfusion conformation. At low concentration, 26 stabilizes a
prefusion conformation of the env trimer and interferes with the env conformational
changes induced by the CD4, whereas at higher concentration 26 binds at the
allosteric site in such a manner that it does not allow CD4 attachment on gp120.(A) Temsavir (26) binds between the inner and the outer domains of gp120
and under the β20−β21 loop (PDB 5U7O). AI moiety interacts with gp120 via hydrophobic
interactions and forms H bonds with Asp113 from the α1-helix of the gp120 inner
domain and Trp427 of the outer domain. Benzamide moiety occupies the site of gp120
that is occupied by Trp427 in the open state such that Trp427 and the
β20−β21 loop are pushed toward the CD4-binding loop, thereby
blocking CD4. (B) Two-dimensional diagram of temsavir interactions with the gp120
protein. (C) Structure of temsavir (26).Figure A provides the summary of the
structure-guided optimization pathway along with a brief synopsis on the important outcome
of each pathway presented. Figure B presents
important essential structural features for AI-based attachment inhibitors.
Figure 14
(A) Summary of the structure–activity-guided optimization of HIV-1 entry
inhibitors leading to the discovery of fostemsavir. (B) Required structural features
of AI-based HIV-1 attachment inhibitors.
(A) Summary of the structure–activity-guided optimization of HIV-1 entry
inhibitors leading to the discovery of fostemsavir. (B) Required structural features
of AI-based HIV-1 attachment inhibitors.The application of a bioconjugation strategy to generate chemically programmed antibodies
by covalently attaching the entry inhibitors 7 and
10 to monoclonal antibody (mAb) 38C2 via an
N-acyl-β-lactam-derived linker has been described.[59] This study was focused on identifying an AI–antibody conjugate that
would recognize gp120 by targeting the conserved attachment inhibitor binding site. It was
hypothesized that the covalent conjugation of a mAb 38C2 (aldolase antibody) with gp120
inhibitors will improve the pharmacokinetics profile of the inhibitors. Accordingly,
N-acyl-β-lactam derivatives 31 and 32
were synthesized using inhibitors 7 and 10 and then covalently
linked to mAb 38C2 to afford chemically programmed antibodies 33 and
34 (Figure ). Subsequently, the
conjugated bivalent antibodies 33 and 34 and their corresponding
N-acyl-β-lactam derivatives 31 and 32
were advanced into virus neutralization assays using U87.CD4.CCR5 cells transfected with
HIV-1 infectious virus (JRFL) to monitor their antiviral efficacy. Compounds
31 and 32 demonstrated IC50 values of >200 and
67.50 nM, respectively. The conjugated antibodies 33 and 34
exhibited IC50 values of >1000 and 128.6 nM, respectively.
Figure 15
(A) Inhibition of the HIV-1 gp120 protein through the monoclonal antibody
(mAb)-conjugated inhibitors 33 and 34 synthesized from
N-acyl-β-lactams 31 and 32,
respectively; mAb covalently linked to 33 and 34 promoted
binding of these molecules to gp120 and inhibited CD4-mediated entry of HIV-1 into
cells. (B) Structures of N-acyl-β-lactam derivatives
31 and 32 derived from 7 and
10.
(A) Inhibition of the HIV-1 gp120 protein through the monoclonal antibody
(mAb)-conjugated inhibitors 33 and 34 synthesized from
N-acyl-β-lactams 31 and 32,
respectively; mAb covalently linked to 33 and 34 promoted
binding of these molecules to gp120 and inhibited CD4-mediated entry of HIV-1 into
cells. (B) Structures of N-acyl-β-lactam derivatives
31 and 32 derived from 7 and
10.The weak neutralization activities of 31 and 33 were consistent
with low gp120 binding due to the C-4 substitution, which disrupted JRFL–gp120
binding, as reported earlier. The significant IC50 values of 32
and 34 indicates that the linker attachment at the C-7 position preserved the
binding affinity. This SAR study discovered C-7 as a viable site of conjugation on the
attachment inhibitors for increased antiviral activity.The mAb-conjugated derivative 34 showed higher IC50 values when
compared to the nonconjugated derivative 32, suggesting that the bivalent
conjugate between the small molecule and the antibody does not interact effectively with
HIV-1 gp120. Hence, a similar strategy may facilitate their application in designing novel
chemically programmed antibodies, chemically programmed vaccines , and topical
microbicides.[59]A field-based three-dimensional (3D) virtual-screening program using Blaze (Cresset,
Litlington, UK) software was carried out by Tuyishime et al. in the search for new leads
to design a novel HIV-1-entry inhibitor.[60] Initially, a bioactive 3D
conformation template for screening and bioisosteric replacement was created by applying
field and shape information from compounds 26, 7, and
10 (Figure ). This template
consists of a field point pattern showing a condensed representation of the
compound’s shape, electrostatics, and hydrophobicity. When two structures have
similar field point patterns, they are predicted to have similar receptor receptivity
patterns. The top 1000 compounds out of 6 million commercially available compounds were
found to have field point similarity to the template molecule 26 (Figure ). Fifty of them were purchased and
evaluated for their activity against the HIV-1YU-2env pseudotype and
amphotropic murine leukemia virus (AMLV) env pseudotyped HIV-1 virus. However, this study
resulted in very few potent structures, with 35 demonstrating an
IC50 value of 13.1 μM (Figure ). Compound 35 lacks an azaindolic NH moiety, which is a critical
element of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor pharmacophore, and while showing a degree of
chemical diversity, it shares the piperazine benzamide moiety found in the BMS
compounds.
Figure 16
Structure of the top-scored entry inhibitors using the Blaze (Cresset, Litlington,
UK) field-based virtual screen experiments. Point-wise procedure was as follows: (1) a
relevant bioactive conformation was prepared based on an active molecule, (2) field
points were generated to its specified conformation to obtain the Blaze pharmacophore
seed, (3) alignment of every structure to this seed was searched in the Blaze database
based on their field point patterns, and (4) top-scoring molecules are listed as 3D
alignments to the search query, along with their score (molecular similarity based on
50% shape, 50% fields).
Structure of the top-scored entry inhibitors using the Blaze (Cresset, Litlington,
UK) field-based virtual screen experiments. Point-wise procedure was as follows: (1) a
relevant bioactive conformation was prepared based on an active molecule, (2) field
points were generated to its specified conformation to obtain the Blaze pharmacophore
seed, (3) alignment of every structure to this seed was searched in the Blaze database
based on their field point patterns, and (4) top-scoring molecules are listed as 3D
alignments to the search query, along with their score (molecular similarity based on
50% shape, 50% fields).Furthermore, an in silico scaffold-hopping experiment and subsequent in vitro studies
revealed that replacement of the piperazine ring of 35 with a
octahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole heterocycle (36) preserved
the in vitro antiviral properties. By appending the headgroup of 36 to
8, a new molecule 37 was designed and synthesized to study the
potential attributes of octahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole substitution
(Figure ). In subsequent studies, a
1,2,4-triazole ring was incorporated at the C-7 position of the AI, yielding
38, which exhibited an IC50 value of 0.0008 μM in a
HIV-1JR-CSF assay. In a parallel study, the cyclohexene variant
39 of 38 was also designed, which exhibited high antiviral
potency, i.e., IC50 values of 2.0 and 0.6 nM against HIV-1JR-CSF
(pseudotyped HIV-1 virus) and HIV-1HxBc2 (wild-type mutant), respectively.Recently, a group of researchers tried lattice-based engineering in an effort to identify
better conditions for obtaining cocrystal data with HIV-1 entry inhibitors. In this study,
small-molecule-based entry inhibitors, including temsavir (26), were examined
against the improved lattice (Figure ).[61] From the compounds screened, 40 showed ∼100-fold
higher potency than 26 against laboratory-adapted HIV-1 strain NL4-3
(EC50 values = 0.019 vs 2.2 nM) and ∼20-fold higher potency
(IC50 ≈ 0.002 μM) than that of 26 (IC50
≈ 0.04 μM) against a panel of 30 strains of HIV-1. Interestingly, more than
one-half of the virus strains were neutralized with IC50 values in the
subnanomolar range. Further, 40 showed 10.6-fold higher potency
(IC50= 0.0015 μM) than 26 (IC50 = 0.0159
μM) against 208 strains of HIV-1. Moreover, in isothermal calorimetry studies,
40 showed 8.6-fold higher affinity toward the HIV-1 env trimer than
26. It was observed that the piperidine ring in 40 adopted a
twisted-boat conformation and had higher energy as compared to other derivatives of this
class of compounds having a piperidine ring in the chair conformation.
Figure 17
(A) Interaction of 40 with the BG505 SOSIP.664 env trimer (PDB 6MU7), resulting in improved lattice
and molecular features associated with enhanced neutralization potency;
40 is shown as yellow sticks. (B) Two-dimensional diagram demonstrating
the interaction between the inhibitor (40) and BG505 SOSIP.664 env
trimers. (C) Structure of 40.
(A) Interaction of 40 with the BG505 SOSIP.664 env trimer (PDB 6MU7), resulting in improved lattice
and molecular features associated with enhanced neutralization potency;
40 is shown as yellow sticks. (B) Two-dimensional diagram demonstrating
the interaction between the inhibitor (40) and BG505 SOSIP.664 env
trimers. (C) Structure of 40.Investigation of the cocrystal structures of 40 with the BG505 SOSIP.664 env
trimer revealed hydrophilic interactions between the tail of 40 and the BG505
trimer protein. The direct interaction of the N-acylethanolamine tail
with the side chains of residues Lys117, Arg429, and Gln432 of the HIV-1 env trimer
through its terminal hydroxyl group accounted for the improved potency of 40.
In addition, an H-bond was formed between Asp113 of env and the amidic nitrogen on the
tail of 40. Furthermore, these functional groups present on the tail can
adopt different conformations that are, in turn, useful to accommodate the different
conformations of the β20−β21 structural element in different viral
clades. Compound 40 was found to be potentially versatile for interacting
with HIV-1 env as its tail contains two functional groups that can be either hydrogen-bond
donors or acceptors. Thus, investigation of the functional groups on the tail side of
other AI analogs may lead to a better understanding of protein-binding interactions.
HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors
Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are a class of antiretroviral agents used
to treat HIV-1 infection. Four drugs raltegravir (41a), elvitegravir
(41b), dolutegravir (41c), and bictegravir (41d)
are used for the treatment of patients preferably in combination with two nucleosides
reverse transcriptase inhibitors. HIV-1 integrase (IN) is responsible for catalyzing viral
cDNA integration into the host cell genome.[62,63] Since human cells lack a homologue, HIV-1 IN has been
considered an attractive therapeutic target for HIV-1 treatment. However, the appearance
of mutations in integrase causes resistance to several IN inhibitors, and the development
of better tolerable and more effective drug regimens aiming to improve long-term HIV-1
therapy remains an unmet need.[64,65]The discovery of improved integrase inhibitors has mainly focused on preventing the
incorporation of viral DNA into the host genome by inhibiting the metal-dependent activity
(Mg2+/Mn2+) of the integrase-regulated strand transfer (ST)
step.[66−68] The active site of IN
adopts an active conformation in which the carboxylate groups of Asp64, Asp116, and Glu152
coordinate two Mg2+ ions near the reactive 3′-OH of the viral DNA. One
metal ion, coordinated by Asp128 and Glu221, activates the 3′-OH group of the viral
DNA for ST. Simultaneously, the other ion, bound by Asp128 and Asp185, destabilizes the
scissile phosphodiester group in the target DNA. When used in highly active antiretroviral
therapy (HAART), the pyrimidine-based integrase inhibitor raltegravir (41a)
demonstrated significant and sustained suppression of viral RNA levels to fewer than 50
copies/mL accompanied by a substantial increase in CD4 immune cell counts.[69] Long-term therapy in HIV-1-infected subjects with 41a induced
mutations at amino acids 143, 148, and 155 in integrase together with associated secondary
mutations. The Gly155His mutants emerge first and are eventually replaced by Gln148His
mutants usually in combination with Gly140Ser. In addition to the above mutations, viral
strains isolated from patients also harbor Tyr143Arg and Gln148Arg mutations. These
mutations have become the primary cause of resistance to 41a in
HIV-1-infected subjects. Elvitegravir (EVG, 41b, Figure
),[70] which contains a quinoline core and
dolutegravir (DTG, 41c, Figure ),[71] which contains a
pyrido[1′,2′:4,5]pyrazino[2,1-b][1,3]oxazine core, were
the next set of drugs approved which have displayed improved efficacy against
RAL-resistant strains.[72−74] However, viral strains
that are highly resistant to EVG and DTG demonstrated multiple mutations in the integrase
protein.[75,76]
Bictegravir, 41d
(2,5-methanopyrido[1′,2′:4,5]pyrazino[2,1-b][1,3]oxazepine)
and 41c (Figure ) share similar
functional characteristics and have much higher genetic barriers to resistance.[77]41d displayed inhibitory activity against HIV-1 strains resistant to
INSTI’s as compared to 41c. The double mutants Gly140Ser/Gln148Arg and
Gly140Ser/Gln148His showed higher susceptibility to 41d as compared to
41c.[78]
Figure 18
FDA-approved HIV-1 integrase inhibitors 41a–d.
FDA-approved HIV-1 integrase inhibitors 41a–d.Earlier literature showed that apart from metal-binding motifs, a hydrophobic aryl chain
that coordinates to a proximal hydrophobic pocket via specific interactions is also
necessary to inhibit the strand-transfer step.[79,80] Accordingly, different types of core moieties have been
studied, including hydroxylated aromatics, diketo acids, naphthyridine carboxamides,
pyrrolloquinolones, dihydroxypyrimidine carboxamides, AI hydroxamic acids,
2-hydroxyisoquinoline-1,3(2H,4H)-diones,
6,7-dihydroxy-1-oxoisoindolines, quinolone-3-carboxylic acids, and carbamoylpyridines.
AI-based carboxylic acids 42a and 42b emerged from further SAR
studies, but due to their modest activity and good ligand efficiencies (Figure A), they were further modified to AI–hydroxamic
acids 42c and 42d (Figure B).[81]
Figure 19
(A) Bidentate metal binding of picolinic acid and binding of two Mg2+ ions
to picolinic hydroxamic acid. (B) Structural modification from AI carboxylic acids
42a and b to the AI hydroxamic acids 42c and
42d and then to the N- and
O-alkylated derivatives 42e and 42f. (C)
Modification of the AI N-methyl hydroxamic acid core at the C3
position in the search for potent inhibitors 43a and 43b of
the HIV-1 IN enzyme.
(A) Bidentate metal binding of picolinic acid and binding of two Mg2+ ions
to picolinic hydroxamic acid. (B) Structural modification from AI carboxylic acids
42a and b to the AI hydroxamic acids 42c and
42d and then to the N- and
O-alkylated derivatives 42e and 42f. (C)
Modification of the AI N-methyl hydroxamic acid core at the C3
position in the search for potent inhibitors 43a and 43b of
the HIV-1 IN enzyme.These hydroxamic acids have shown a 40-fold increase in potency in enzymatic assays as
compared to carboxylic acid-containing compounds and offered structurally simple scaffolds
as novel HIV-1 IN inhibitors (Figure B).[81] However, following metabolic modification that can
lead to activation, these compounds can undergo a Lossen rearrangement to yield
potentially mutagenic isocyanates. Therefore, to prevent this reaction process, alkylation
of either the NH or the OH was explored; however, this resulted in a small loss in potency
for 42e and 42f. The N-methylated compound
42e showed stability against oxidative metabolism in human liver microsomes
but was rapidly cleared by phase 2 metabolism via glucuronidation in dogs (Figure B). Here, increasing the size of the alkyl
group did not modify the turnover rate in human hepatocytes and a reduction in antiviral
activity was observed. When both N and O-atoms in the AI hydroxamic acid were alkylated,
there was a complete loss of HIV-1 integrase inhibitory activity.Attempting to attenuate glucuronidation rates and improve the metabolic stability, the
β position (C-3) of the pyrrolyl ring of the AI nucleus was substituted with amines,
ethers, amides, and acyclic C chains.[82] The substitution patterns of a
piperazin-2-one (43a) and (S)-pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide
(43b) at the C-3 position of 6-AI derivatives (Figure
C) emerged as active molecules with half-lives of 1.2 and
6.2 h, respectively, in a dog PK experiment. Further, human PK parameters for the
N-methyl hydroxamate (42b) were projected from dog PK
data, which suggested low blood clearance (Clb = 5.5 mL/min/kg) and moderate
bioavailability (F = 41%) and a reasonable half-life (4.5 h). This core showed lower log
D values as compared to earlier hydroxamic acid analogs, resulting in
an attenuated clearance rate in human hepatocytes.Since the N-methyl AI hydroxamates 43a and 43b
were found to have an allylic-type steric interaction between the eclipsed hydroxamate
N-methyl group and the 4-H atom of the pyridine ring of bicyclic
systems (Figure ), conformational analysis of
simplified picolinamide-N-methyl hydroxamate was performed in order to
evaluate the impact of this interaction on the viral inhibition activity.[83] The global minimum calculated for picolinamide-N-methyl
hydroxamate (Figure ) was found to be a
pyridine N–H-bonded conformer I (NCCO torsion = −179.42°,
ONCO torsion = −178.77°) in which all relevant atoms from the pyridine N to
the hydroxamate O were essentially in the same plane. Conformer I was
assigned to have ΔE = 0.0 kcal/mol. Among the five possible
conformers, the best conformer II, with a constrained coplanar metal-binding
domain, showed a very high ΔE value of 5.926 kcal/mol that was
higher in energy than I (NCCO torsion = 0.34°, ONCO torsion =
0.32°). Therefore, to overcome this issue, conformational restriction by the
introduction of a ring was explored as an approach to restraining the metal-binding motif,
resulting in N-hydroxy-dihydronaphthyridinone 44a. This
molecule exhibited higher potency and a lower log D value which
translated into an improved LipE value. In addition to the six-membered
N-hydroxy-dihydronaphthyridinone 44a, the seven-membered
ring retained nanomolar biochemical and cellular inhibitory potencies with an
IC50 value of 23 nM and EC50 value of 18 nM, respectively. The
five-membered ring homologue lost significant potency, presumably due to the modified
“bite” angles which would differentially reduce the metal-binding ability
(Figure ). Hence, the six-membered ring was
pursued further.[83] The above data showed that the locked conformation
of the metal-binding motifs contributed significantly to the formation of a stable
M(HL2)2 complex (where M = Mg2+, Mn2+ and L
= ligand) and thus was more beneficial for coordination with the catalytic core of the
enzyme.
Figure 20
Structure of the 6-AI hydroxamate-based active molecule 44b and its
potency.
Structure of the 6-AI hydroxamate-based active molecule 44b and its
potency.In the substituted class, the C3-piperidine 44b exhibited a better
combination of antiviral potency, membrane permeability, and clearance in both human liver
microsomes and human hepatocytes (Figure ).Compound 44b showed human PK predictions that were comparable to
43b but offered 300-fold higher antiviral potency, resulting in a
significantly lower projected human dose of 32 mg bid that would offer improved safety
margins.Further, substitution of three carbon chains at the C-3 position confirmed tolerance
within the pharmacophore but poor bioavailability following oral administration.
Therefore, considering each subseries of substitution at C-3, the general trend toward
higher LipE values at lower log D was observed, which is of interest and
perhaps counterintuitive. The β-substituent is solvent exposed and does not require
extensive desolvation for binding; however, additional interactions with the protein or
metal bound to the protein cannot be discounted. Finally, placing a sulfonamide
substituent at C-3 afforded the desired virus inhibition and LipE properties but led to
poor absorption, a possible effect of low permeability due to the polar sulfonamide
moiety. All of the C3-substituted derivatives were able to attenuate clearance rates in
human hepatocytes.In further study, a medicinal chemistry strategy was applied that largely retained the
naphthyridinone ring system that efficiently coordinated to bound metal ions
(45a) while introducing structural changes that can be effective for
improving the extent and rate of conjugation of the N-hydroxyl group
(45b and 45d), such as steric hindrance of a hydroxyl group
and electronic deactivation or removal of this group (45c, Figure A).[84] On the basis of these points,
substitutions around the dihydronaphthyridinone and benzyl systems were made.
Figure 21
(A) Generalized structures with a metal-binding character from the 6-AI series
targeted to lower phase 2 metabolism. (B) Dihydronaphthyridinone system containing the
active molecule 45e.
(A) Generalized structures with a metal-binding character from the 6-AI series
targeted to lower phase 2 metabolism. (B) Dihydronaphthyridinone system containing the
active molecule 45e.In this series, 45e (Figure B)
was designated a potent ST inhibitory candidate (IC50 = 40.5 nM) that showed no
activity against DNA polymerase α/β, targeted human liver microsome stability,
and appreciable aqueous solubility. Compound 45e successfully inhibited
laboratory strains and patient viral isolates cultured in peripheral blood mononuclear
cells.No significant inhibition of ion channels, receptors, enzymes, or transporters in a CEREP
broad ligand-screening panel was observed with 45e. In addition, an advantage
in terms of potency over the approved ST inhibitors 41a and 41b
was found compared with that of the wild type for all of the mutants tested. Compound
45e (Figure B) exhibited a
<10-fold difference in potency compared with that of the wild type for all of the
mutants tested with one exception, the double-mutant Gly140Ser/Gln148Lys virus.The projected pharmacokinetic profile of 45e in humans suggested a clearance
rate of 18 mL/min/kg, a volume of distribution of 5.7 L kg–1, 2
mL/min/kg in vivo hepatic clearance from liver microsomes, 5 mL/min/kg in vivo hepatic
clearance from liver microsomes + UDPGA (uridine-diphospho-glucuronic acid), 6 mL/min/kg
in vivo hepatic clearance from hepatocytes, and a short half-life of 2.8 h. However, due
to its projected short half-life, 45e was not further pursued for clinical
development.On the basis of the studies explained above, we propose a 6-AI-containing planar
heteroaromatic two-metal-binding pharmacophore model to design potent integrase inhibitors
(Figure ). The additional nitrogen atom of
the 6 AI nucleus interacts with the Mg2+ or Mn2+ ions through
coordinate bond formation present at the active site of IN enzyme. The nitrogen and oxygen
atoms are known to be hard Lewis bases, while Mg2+ is a hard Lewis
acid.[66,85] The hard
Lewis bases act as donors, and the acids acts as acceptors. At the N-1 position, a
flexible linker of 2–3 carbon atoms and an aromatic group that extends into an
adjacent hydrophobic space are crucial for designing a potent inhibitor chemotype.
Figure 22
(A) Two metal-binding pharmacophore model of the IN inhibitor. (B) Planar
heteroaromatic pharmacophore can be of 6 + 6, 5 + 6, 6 + 5, and 5 + 5 fused ring
system.
(A) Two metal-binding pharmacophore model of the IN inhibitor. (B) Planar
heteroaromatic pharmacophore can be of 6 + 6, 5 + 6, 6 + 5, and 5 + 5 fused ring
system.
Human Orthopneumovirus/Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a respiratory pathogen that belongs to the
Paramyxoviridae family with a single-stranded, negative-sense RNA (15.2
kb) genome.[86,87] RSV is
the main cause of bronchiolitis and acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) in
infants, adults, and immunocompromised patients.[88] The viral envelope is
comprised of three proteins: the fusion protein (F), attachment glycoprotein (G), and small
hydrophobic (SH) protein.[89] The virulence of RSV occurs mainly through
the surface proteins F and G. The initial step of RSV attachment to the host is carried out
by the G protein, while the F protein mediates RSV envelope fusion, which releases the viral
genome into the host cell, while the role of the SH protein in either process is somewhat
enigmatic. There are two subtype strains, RSV-A (629 bp) and RSV-B (724–762 bp),
which are defined by the nucleotide sequences in the ectodomain of the F protein. As the RSV
F protein is a key player in viral infection, it is imperative to discuss the structure and
mechanism of this protein.
RSV Fusion Protein
The RSV F protein is a glycoprotein that after proteolysis is comprised of two subunits,
a 55 kDa, carboxy-terminal F1 subunit (137–574 residues) and a 15 kDa
amino-terminal F2 subunit (26–109 residues).[90] The
F1 and F2 elements are covalently connected via disulfide bonds to
form a heterodimeric protomer. Three F1/F2 heterodimers associate to
form the mature trimeric form of the F protein. The trimerization results in a
spheroidal-shaped prefusion conformation of the F protein heterodimer. The unstable
prefusion conformation of F is refolded into the postfusion conformation. During the
refolding, the fusion peptides are withdrawn from the central cavity and projected away
from the viral membrane. If another membrane, such as a host cell membrane, is in close
proximity, the fusion peptides will insert into the membrane with the F protein thus
binding to both membranes. The prefusion confirmation is highly unstable and proceeds to
refold via association of the heptad repeats present in the amino and carboxyl termini of
the F1 subunit. Once again, a trimer of hairpins is created that helps to pull
the viral membrane and host membrane together to promote membrane fusion.The postfusion conformation of F is highly stable and melts at >90 °C. From the
literature, it is well known that at some basal rate the unstable prefusion conformation
of RSV F converts into postfusion confirmation. It was observed that both longer
incubation times and incubation at elevated temperatures increase the conversion to the
postfusion conformation.[91,92] This process of refolding is irreversible, giving a stable postfusion
confirmation of F protein.There have been a number of mechanisms proposed for the entry of RSV in host cells.
RSV-infected cells fuse with neighboring cell membranes to generate multinucleated cells
called syncytia. A more recent report indicated that the initial steps of RSV fusion occur
at cholesterol-rich microdomains in the plasma membrane.[93] A subsequent
study demonstrated that RSV utilizes macropinocytosis as an initial entry mechanism
followed by fusion in endosomes.[94] Thus, the evidence now suggests
either a two-step fusion event or fusion in endosomes after macropinocytosis. However, it
may be the case that RSV can fuse at both the plasma membrane and in endocytic vesicles
with different efficiencies depending on the environmental conditions and target cells.
Other options for the fusion mechanism, i.e., provocation by a second viral
glycoprotein[95,96]
and a clamp model,[97] were also not reassuring.The current belief is that the infectious cycle RSV starts with virion attachment to the
apical surface of polarized, ciliated airway epithelial host cells. Subsequently, the
viral fusion (F) glycoprotein causes fusion of the viral and host cell membranes by
undergoing a drastic conformational change. After fusion, the helical ribonucleoprotein
complex (RNP) is released into the host cell cytoplasm followed by replication and
transcription which occur in the cytoplasm in viral inclusion bodies that produce viral
products. The viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) complex is responsible for
transcribing viral mRNA and synthesizing positive-sense nongenome intermediates required
for replication of new negative-sense genomes for packaging into virions.
Clinical Intervention To Inhibit RSV Infection
There has been a persistent attempt to develop an effective treatment regimen to control
RSV infection since the discovery of the virus in the 1950s. Palivizumab (Synagis) is a
humanized IgG-1 mAb that binds the RSV-F protein A epitope and is administered as an
intramuscular injection.[86,98] IgG antibodies, which are involved in the secondary immune response,
have a half-life of approximately 20 days. Palivizumab offers greater activity against RSV
and the relative ease of administration of a smaller volume of drug as an injection,
compared with RSV-IGIV (RSV immune globulin intravenous, a polyclonal IgG product with a
high content of anti-RSV IgG). This drug was approved for the treatment of infants aged
less than 2 years who are suffering from RSV with hemodynamically significant congenital
heart disease (HSCHD). It provides immunoprophylaxis against serious lower respiratory
tract infections (LRTIs) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).[86]
Ribavirin (46a), discovered in 1972 by Witkowski and co-workers,[99] is a guanosine analog that exhibits broad-spectrum activity against
several RNA and DNA viruses (Figure ).[100] Although originally approved only for the treatment of severe RSV
infection in children,[101] it was later used for the treatment of other
viruses. Ribavirin (46a) suffers from low efficacy and requires an
aerosol/intravenous (IV) mode of administration. It is also teratogenic so poses a threat
to healthcare workers who may be exposed to ribavirin aerosols.
Figure 23
Simplified 2D ligand interaction of JNJ 53718678 (46b) with prefusion
RSV F. RSV F is shown as a molecular surface with three identical protomers, each
shown in a different color (FA, green; FB, pink; FC,
tan). JNJ53718678 is shown as a ball-and-stick representation with carbon atoms
colored in gray, nitrogen atoms in blue, oxygen atoms in red, chlorine atoms in dark
green, fluorine atoms in light blue, and sulfur atoms in orange. (Inset) Magnified
view of the binding of JNJ53718678 into the central cavity. Conversion of
46b into different benzimidazoles (47, 48,
and 52) and AI isomers accommodating respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
fusion inhibitors (49–51).
Simplified 2D ligand interaction of JNJ 53718678 (46b) with prefusion
RSV F. RSV F is shown as a molecular surface with three identical protomers, each
shown in a different color (FA, green; FB, pink; FC,
tan). JNJ53718678 is shown as a ball-and-stick representation with carbon atoms
colored in gray, nitrogen atoms in blue, oxygen atoms in red, chlorine atoms in dark
green, fluorine atoms in light blue, and sulfur atoms in orange. (Inset) Magnified
view of the binding of JNJ53718678 into the central cavity. Conversion of
46b into different benzimidazoles (47, 48,
and 52) and AI isomers accommodating respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
fusion inhibitors (49–51).On the basis of phenotypic screening of chemical libraries, several novel
small-molecule-based RSV fusion inhibitors have been identified.[90]
Subsequently, on the basis of crystallographic investigations, it was observed that these
small molecules bound to a fusion intermediate of F and prevented the formation of the
postfusion conformation. To date, all known RSV small-molecule fusion inhibitors bind in
the same pocket and have the same mechanism of action. Two fusion inhibitors, JNJ 53718678
(46b) and GS-5806/presatovir (46C), have been advanced into
phase II clinical trials and performed well in these studies. RSV inhibitor
46b binds to a pocket inside the trimeric ectodomain of the RSV F protein.
This molecule asymmetrically occupies two out of three identical lobes of the binding
pocket and forms aromatic stacking interactions between the inhibitor and the RSV F
residues Phe488 and Phe140 (Figure ).[102] The 5-chloroindole heterocycle is involved in π–π
stacking interactions with Phe488A, Phe488B, and Phe140B and in a weak C–H/π
interaction with Phe140B, which are present between RSV F protomers A and B (FA and FB,
respectively) of lobe 1. Similarly, the
1,3-dihydroimidazo[4,5c]pyridin-2-one group also forms a
π–π stacking interaction with Phe488A and Phe488C and a weak
C–H/π interaction with Phe140A, which are present between RSV F protomers A
and C (FA and FC, respectively) of lobe 2 (Figure ). The formation of these aromatic protein–ligand stacking interactions
seems to be a commonality between all known RSV fusion inhibitors and may lock the central
heterocyclic moieties of these inhibitors in a fixed conformation. In addition to stacking
interactions, other interactions between the protein and 46b were observed.
The 5-Cl group of 46b interacts with the carbonyl oxygen of Thr397[103] through a halogen bond along with a water-mediated H-bonding interaction
between the O atoms of the sulfone and the side chain of Arg339. In addition to the above,
it has been observed that rearrangement of the side chains of Phe140, Phe488, and Phe137
is required to make a hydrophobic environment to trap the CF3 group of
46b.(102) The C3 substitution in the benzimidazolone with
a CF3 group in 46b, instead of the cyclopropyl moiety in
47, contributed to improved metabolic stability and decreased
susceptibility to reactive metabolite formation. Compound 46b exhibited a
mean EC50 = 0.46 nM against recombinant rgRSV224 virus in HeLa cells, whereas
it showed an EC50 ≈ 0.2–20 nM against 8 nonrecombinant RSV-A and
RSV-B strains in plaque reduction assays.[86]Structural comparison of JNJ 53718678 (46b), which possesses an indole
moiety, with BMS-433771 (47) and JNJ-49153390 (48), both of
which have a benzimidazole core (Figure ),
implied that the central heterocyclic core could be replaced without any loss of antiviral
activity provided that the heterocycle offered an opportunity for π-stacking.[102] Encouraged by this finding, 4-, 5-, and 6-azaindole cores were explored
as part of the optimization process (Figure ).
While offering similar antiviral potency (∼EC50 = 1 nM), the 5-chloro
aza-heterocyclic compounds 49 and 50 displayed very different PK
profiles, especially with regard to their distribution to the lungs. However, installing a
nitrogen atom at C5 in the indole renders 51 more basic, which alters the
pKa and lipophilicity, resulting in improved pulmonary
permeability and distribution.[104] According to a reported tissue
distribution model, basic amines with a pKa value of >8
show better uptake,[105] which may be the reason for increased uptake of
51.Compound 51, a 5-azaindole analog of 46b, showed high binding
affinity to the RSV F protein, indicating that the introduction of a nitrogen atom at C-5
may compensate for halogen bonding. The azaindole moiety exhibited improved
π-stacking with Phe488/Phe140.[102] Compound 52 was
synthesized having 3-(methylsulfonyl)-6-azaindole as a C-2 substituent instead of the
benzimidazolone in 46b (Figure )
and found to have 8–10-fold lower potency (EC50 = 78 nM) when compared
to 46b.[106]Furthermore, a survey of pharmacophores of RSV inhibitors indicated that indole
53a, azabenzimidazole 53b, and 5-azaindole 53c
exhibited almost comparable EC50 values in the RSV cell-based assay,[107] similar metabolic stability in human liver microsomes (Figure A), and similar membrane permeability in human cell
lines. A significant difference in their plasma protein-binding profiles was observed
reflecting their differential lipophilicity. The indole analog 53a exhibited
high protein binding in human plasma (3.6% free fraction), whereas azabenzimidazole
(53b) and 5-azaindole (53c) were distinctly less protein bound
(30% and 47.2% free fractions, respectively). The reduced plasma protein binding of
azabenzimidazole 53b and AI 53c could be attributed to the
combined effect of the lipophilic modulation caused by trifluorination at the terminal
carbon of the N-1 propyl chain and the newly installed nitrogen atoms in the core ring
compared with indole 53a.[107] In addition, 53c
was well distributed to the lungs since it has a basic character. Another synthetic
analog, 53d, showed an EC50 value in the nanomolar range in an RSV
A2 assay hosted by HEp-2 cells (Figure B).
Subsequently, the X-ray cocrystallographic structure of 53d in complex with
RSV-A2 suggested that the presence of allylic strain induced by the amide bond forces the
C-2 heteroaryl substituent on the piperidine ring, i.e., pyrazolopyrimidine, to formation
of a dihedral angle of 95°.[108]
Figure 24
(A) Structures of RSV inhibitors containing indole (53a),
azabenzimidazole (53b), and AI (53c). (B)
Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-2-yl analog of RSV inhibitors
(53d). (C) Model for the design of RSV F inhibitors.
(A) Structures of RSV inhibitors containing indole (53a),
azabenzimidazole (53b), and AI (53c). (B)
Pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-2-yl analog of RSV inhibitors
(53d). (C) Model for the design of RSV F inhibitors.On the basis of the above results, we propose a pharmacophore model having a central
fused heterocyclic core system that engages in aromatic stacking interactions with the
prefusion conformation of the RSV F protein as necessary for optimum inhibitory activity
against the virus (Figure C). In addition, a
heteroaromatic ring at the C-2 position of the core system that imparts conformational
flexibility should be attached through a linker (Figure C).[108]
Neurotropic Alphaviruses
Neurotropic alphaviruses or encephalitis viruses, including Western equine encephalitis
virus (WEEV), are transmitted by mosquitoes and infect neurons present in animals and the
human CNS.[109] The positive-stranded m-RNA (12 kb) alphavirus is enclosed
in an icosahedral nucleocapsid that is surrounded by a lipid envelope coated by a viral
envelope containing two glycoproteins, E1 and E2. These two proteins form a stable
heterodimer, and three E2–El heterodimers interact to form the spike required for
viral infection. The alphavirus normally enters through endocytosis in clathrin-coated
vesicles followed by transfer to endosomes, where the low pH results in a conformational
change in the El–E2 heterodimer such that the fusion domain in El is exposed and the
virus envelope fuses with the endosomal membrane.[109]In the alphavirus class, Semliki Forest virus (SFV) and Sindbis virus (SIN) are widely used
as models to study different steps of pathogenicity, including virus entry, endosomal
release, and budding inside the host cells.[110] According to recent
studies; neurotropic alphaviruses can also propagate without capsids. Neurotropic
alphaviruses are considered category B priority pathogens by the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) because they can be aerosolized and released into a
population center as potential bioterrorism agents, causing CNS infections that lead to
potentially fatal encephalitis. Another study showed that WEEV activates transcription
factor, interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) mediated neuronal innate immune pathways, and
any revocation in IRF-3 will cause enhanced virus-mediated injury.[111]
Compounds carrying thienopyrrole (54a–d),[112] indole-2-carboxamides (54e and
54f),[113,114] and pyrrole-2-carboxamide (54g)[115] have
been reported to act as alphavirus replication inhibitors (Figure ). The thieno[3,2-b]pyrroles were identified as a
class of potent antiviral agents via a high-throughput screening (HTS) campaign. The
replicon-based assay used for the HTS and subsequent validation steps implicated viral
replicase proteins as potential targets of these thieno–pyrroles. In the study, the
analogues were evaluated with the cell-based WEEV replicon assay in which the majority of
the WEEV structural genes are replaced with the firefly luciferase gene as a reporter for
viral RNA replication. An MTT assay was performed to evaluate their effects on cell
viability (Figure ). This study produced
54a which exhibited an IC50 of 24.4 μM and a CC50
of >100 μM. Further, structural optimization of 54a started from
substitution of the equipotent benzyl amide instead of the 2-furanylmethyl amide to obtain
54b.[113] The 4-fluorobenzyl group of 54b was
changed to a 4-chlorobenzyl group to afford 54c. The chiral molecule
54d was synthesized using (R)-α-methylbenzylamine and
inhibited the virus with an IC50 of 8.3 μM. Replacement of the
thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole core with an indole core yielded 54e.
Compound 54e demonstrated moderate potency, stability toward oxidative
metabolism, and protective effects that correlate with both in vitro and in vivo antiviral
activity. The indole analog 54e with chirality at the benzylamide expressed the
same eudismic ratio difference in pharmacological activity between the two enantiomers as
observed with the thieno[3,2-b]pyrroles with the
(R)-enantiomer having a superior IC50 value compared to the
(S)-enantiomer. Interestingly, 54f and 54g
showed a 10-fold improvement in IC50 values, suggesting that an ethylene linker
along with the pyridine ring plays a major role in the inhibitory activity of these
molecules.[114] Furthermore, upon moving the nitrogen of the pyridine
ring from the para to the ortho position, a 40-fold decrease in potency was observed. The
pyrrole in 54g is a viable substitute for the indole core of 54f
and reduced the molecular weight and actually diminished the cytotoxicity compared with that
of 54f.
Figure 25
Structures, inhibitory concentration (IC50), and cytotoxicity concentration
(CC50) of neurotropic alphavirus inhibitors: thienopyrrole(s)
(54a–d), indole-2-carboxamides (54e and
54f), and pyrrole-2-carboxamide (54g). IC50 and
CC50 values were calculated from a WEEV replicon assay.
Structures, inhibitory concentration (IC50), and cytotoxicity concentration
(CC50) of neurotropic alphavirus inhibitors: thienopyrrole(s)
(54a–d), indole-2-carboxamides (54e and
54f), and pyrrole-2-carboxamide (54g). IC50 and
CC50 values were calculated from a WEEV replicon assay.Subsequently, bioisosteric replacement of the indole core in 54e with an AI to
provide 55a was examined. The 6-azaindole derivative 55a exhibited
reduced lipophilicity and enhanced solubility while retaining antiviral potency (Figure ).[114] The major efflux
transporter at the blood–brain barrier (BBB), P-glycoprotein (P-gp/MDR1), facilitates
xenobiotic efflux from the CNS. The degree to which P-gp interacts with the molecules was
measured using a rhodamine 123 uptake assay conducted in MDCK cells transfected with human
P-gp (MDR1-MDCKII). Rhodamine-123 is a known P-gp substrate that is actively effluxed from
MDR1-MDCKII cells. Significantly, the 6-azaindole-derived 55a was found to be
more effective in attenuating P-glycoprotein (P-gp/MDR1) recognition. The MDR recognition
value was reduced to 1, suggesting minimal efflux of 55a from cells.
Figure 26
Scaffold hopping from an indole-derived inhibitor (54e) to a 6-azaindole
core (55a) and benzimidazole core (55b) as neurotropic
alphavirus replication inhibitors. MDR1 recognition was assessed by measuring rhodamine
uptake in the presence of the MDR inhibitor tariquidar (5 μM) and either 30
μM of the test compound or vehicle and calculating
(Cav – Cveh) ×
100/(Ctar – Cveh),
where Cav is the concentration of rhodamine 123 in the
presence of an antiviral inhibitor, Cveh is the concentration in the presence
of a vehicle, and Ctar is the concentration of rhodamine 123
in the presence of tariquidar.
Scaffold hopping from an indole-derived inhibitor (54e) to a 6-azaindole
core (55a) and benzimidazole core (55b) as neurotropic
alphavirus replication inhibitors. MDR1 recognition was assessed by measuring rhodamine
uptake in the presence of the MDR inhibitor tariquidar (5 μM) and either 30
μM of the test compound or vehicle and calculating
(Cav – Cveh) ×
100/(Ctar – Cveh),
where Cav is the concentration of rhodamine 123 in the
presence of an antiviral inhibitor, Cveh is the concentration in the presence
of a vehicle, and Ctar is the concentration of rhodamine 123
in the presence of tariquidar.Compound 55a exhibited moderate antiviral activity, IC50 = 4.4
μM, and was not able to effectively reduce the viral load (69.4 pfu/mL) as compared
with 54e (39.3 pfu/mL).[114] Moreover, an eroded metabolic
stability and increase in solubility was observed upon replacement of the indole ring of
54f with the pyrrole in 54g, suggesting that the central
aromatic ring is a major site of metabolism. In addition, the improved metabolic stability
shown by replacement of the indole of 54f with the more electron-deficient
benzimidazole ring in 55b is also consistent with this proposal. A 5-fold
decrease in potency was noted when a propyl linker was used with a pyridine ring instead of
an ethylene linker of 54f.[114] This suggests that the optimum
distance between the amide group and the pyridine ring may be a significant structural
requirement for potent antiviral molecules.A complete loss of antiviral activity was observed upon removal of the aromatic core from
any molecule, which indicates the necessity of an aromatic core. The
p-halogenated benzyl ring at the N-1 position of the aromatic core and a
linker connecting it to the aromatic core are important to achieve significant inhibitory
potency. Considering all of the above findings, we propose the general concept for a
pharmacophore model to develop a potent neurotropic alphavirus inhibitor depicted in Figure .
Figure 27
Proposed pharmacophore model for neurotropic alphavirus inhibitor.
Proposed pharmacophore model for neurotropic alphavirus inhibitor.
Dengue and Ebola Viruses
Dengue virus (DENV) belongs to the Flaviviridae family and is classified
as an “arbovirus” since it is transmitted by arthropod vectors, particularly
mosquitoes, such as Aedes aegypti and to a lesser extent Aedes
albopictus.[116,117] The genome of DENV is a single-stranded and positive-sense RNA. There
are four serotypes, DENV-1, DENV-2, DENV-3, and DENV-4, and each interacts distinctly with
antibodies in human blood serum.[117] Currently, no specific antiviral
drugs are available to treat DENV. A live-attenuated tetravalent vaccine, Dengvaxia
(CYD-TDV), has been developed by Sanofi-Aventis Pasteur Limited, Paris, France, and approved
in endemic countries; however, it exhibits suboptimal protection against DENV-1 and
DENV-2.[118] The vaccine’s varying efficacy across different ages
and serostatus as well as a clear safety signal in seronegative recipients, i.e., that
Dengvaxia enhanced subsequent disease in some seronegative individuals, raised a number of
questions against other dengue vaccine candidates also. Therefore, new therapeutics against
DENV are needed. Ebola virus (EVD) belongs to the Filoviridae family and
has a single-stranded, negative-sense RNA genome. To date, no specific antiviral medications
or approved vaccines are available for EVD.[116]
Adaptor-Associated Kinase 1 (AAKI Inhibitors)
Originally, AAK1 inhibitors were developed to treat neurological disorders and only later
emerged as antiviral agents. Verdonck and co-workers developed AAK1 inhibitors with
broad-spectrum antiviral properties.[119] Their work is based on
targeting the host kinases used by viruses for intracellular membrane trafficking aiding
their entry into host cells. Intracellular trafficking of many RNA viruses is regulated by
clathrin-associated host adaptor proteins controlled by AAK1 and cyclin G-associated
kinase (GAK). Both are serine-threonine kinases belonging to the NUMB-associated kinase
(NAK) family. Anticancer drugs such as sunitinib and erlotinib inhibit AAK1 and exhibit
broad-spectrum in vitro antiviral activity against different viruses, including HCV, DENV,
Zika virus, and West Nile virus. Compound 56, a 7-AI derivative (Figure ), was used as the basis to develop a
series of potent AAK1 inhibitors.
Figure 28
Structures of known adaptor-associated kinase 1 inhibitors 56 and
61, broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor K252a (62), and
tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib 63. Terminal cyano group and C3
position of 56 were optimized to afford 7-azaindole analogs
57 and 58. Replacement of C-2 and C-4 with a N atom in
analogs 59 and 60.
Structures of known adaptor-associated kinase 1 inhibitors 56 and
61, broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor K252a (62), and
tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib 63. Terminal cyano group and C3
position of 56 were optimized to afford 7-azaindole analogs
57 and 58. Replacement of C-2 and C-4 with a N atom in
analogs 59 and 60.Compound 56 was 3-fold more selective for AAK1 than GAK and 8- and 22-fold
more selective for AAK1 than bone morphogenetic protein 2 inducible kinase-2 (BMP2K) and
serine/threonine-protein kinase 16 (STK16), respectively. Furthermore, the binding mode of
56 to AAK1 based on X-ray studies showed that its 7-AI ring directly bound
between the side chain of Ala72 from β2 on the kinase N-lobe and Leu183 of the
C-lobe. N-1 and N-7 of 56 engaged in H-bonding interactions with Asp127 and
Cys129 at the kinase hinge region. Similarly, the terminal aromatic nitrogen of the
pyridine moiety formed a H bond with the side chain of Lys74; however, the nitrogen atom
of the terminal cyano group interacted with the side chain of Asn136 (Figure ).
Figure 29
Binding interactions of compound 56 in the ATP-binding pocket of AAK1.
Terminal cyano group, pyridine nitrogen, N-1, and N-7 of AI are involved in
hydrogen-bonding interactions with amino acid residues Asn136, Lys74, Asp127, and
Cys129, respectively, around the ATP-binding pocket.
Binding interactions of compound 56 in the ATP-binding pocket of AAK1.
Terminal cyano group, pyridine nitrogen, N-1, and N-7 of AI are involved in
hydrogen-bonding interactions with amino acid residues Asn136, Lys74, Asp127, and
Cys129, respectively, around the ATP-binding pocket.The SAR studies with 56 first explored the effect of replacing the
5-(4-cyanophenyl) group with a phenyl, thienyl, and substituted phenyl ring carrying
electron-donating and -withdrawing groups and a halogen. Compounds carrying a
3,4-dimethoxy phenyl ring at the C-5 position (58) showed stronger AAK1
affinity (IC50 = 0.00432 μM) than the positive control sunitinib
(61) (IC50 = 0.0474 μM) (Figure ) and exhibited good activity against DENV-2 (EC50 =
1.64 μM). Further focus was given to replacing the N-acyl moiety of
58 with aromatic, heteroaromatic, and cycloalkyl groups. It was observed
that the 3-pyridyl moiety 58 was critical for AAK1 binding as other
N-acyl analogs showed a 100-fold decrease in AAK1 affinity compared
with 58. However, the amide bond of the N-acyl group in
58 could be replaced with aryl keto, phenyl, and alkynyl groups without a
significant loss in AAK1 affinity. The 3-ethynylpyridine analog 57 was found
to exhibit excellent AAK1 binding (IC50 = 0.00402 μM) and antiviral
potency against DENV-2 (EC50 = 0.72 μM). Scaffold modification of 7-AI
(57) to pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyrazine (60) showed
potent AAK1 binding with an IC50 = 0.00927 μM; however, it also
demonstrated greater cytotoxicity.In parallel, scaffold modification of the 7-AI 58 to the
pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine 59 resulted in a 100-fold
reduction in AAK1 binding affinity (IC50 = 0.462 μM) compared with
58. This study suggested that 57 (AAK1 IC50 =
0.00402 μM; DENV-2 EC50 = 0.72 μM; EBOV EC50 = 1.59
μM) and 58 (AAK1 IC50 = 0.00432 μM; DENV
EC50 = 1.64 μM; EBOV EC50 = 4.24 μM) were the
optimized analogs of 56. However, 56 did not show any
significant inhibitory activity toward EBOV (EC50 > 10 μM).
Furthermore, 56 and 57 were advanced to studies in human primary
dendritic cells, which are physiologically more relevant models for DENV infection.
Compounds 57 and 58 showed dose-dependent inhibition of DENV-2
infection with EC50 values of 0.0428 and 0.739 μM, respectively. Finally,
in the kinase selectivity experiment against 468 kinases, 57 displayed
binding with multiple kinases, including NAK family members, which may explain the
broad-spectrum antiviral effect of 57. Compound 57 showed lower
cytotoxicity (CC50 > 20 μM) toward Huh7 mammalian cells in in
vitro in cell viability assays. Overall, this work demonstrated that the
development of cellular AAK1 inhibitors may represent a promising broad-spectrum antiviral
strategy..7-AI is a well-established hinge-binding scaffold that can adopt different orientations
in the folding cleft of the hinge region of the kinase.[120] The capacity
of 7-AI to engage in H bonding and its amide isosteric characteristics can be tactically
applied in drug discovery studies. For example, the binding interaction of the
broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor K252a (62), the tyrosine kinase inhibitor
nintedanib (63), and 56 with the AAK1 binding pocket
demonstrated the versatility of AIs (Figures
and 30).[121] Despite the differences in their chemical
structures, the pyrrole-2-one moieties of 62 and 63 interact
with Cys129 and Asp127 of the AAK1 binding site. Similarly, 7-azaindole 56
exhibits the same interaction pattern, engaging Asp127 and Cys129 residues through N-1 and
N-7, respectively (Figure ). Hence, two
different molecules having similar functional groups at the correct position may bind
similarly to a protein.
Figure 30
Comparison of the 2D interaction diagrams of the AAK1 binding pocket with (A) K252a
(62), (B) nintedanib (63), and (C) compound
56. (D) Hydrogen bonding in the 7-azaindole versus pyrole-2-one
moiety.
Comparison of the 2D interaction diagrams of the AAK1 binding pocket with (A) K252a
(62), (B) nintedanib (63), and (C) compound
56. (D) Hydrogen bonding in the 7-azaindole versus pyrole-2-one
moiety.A few AAK1 inhibitors that are non-7-azaindole chemotypes carrying pyrazolopyrimidine
(64), pyrrolopyrimidine (65 and 66), and
imidazolopyridazine (67 and 68) pharmacophores are shown in
Figure . These isomeric pharmacophores
incorporate three nitrogen atoms that are positioned differently, and these nitrogens may
be (no X-ray data available) interacting with different amino acid residues at the
ATP-binding pocket depending on their substituents to afford a signatory H-bonding pattern
of AAK1 inhibitors.
Figure 31
Representative examples of reported AAK1 inhibitors.
Representative examples of reported AAK1 inhibitors.A few phosphoinositide-3-kinase γ(PI3Kγ) inhibitors share common H-bonding
donor and acceptor motifs (Figure ).[122] The bicyclic ring in inhibitors engages in a bidentate manner with
Val882, a hinge motif of PI3Kγ. Hence, this bidentate interaction is a determining
factor of the potency of different substituted isoindolenones (Figure
).[123,124] Replacement of the acylaminothiazole ring of 69 with a
7-AI yielded 71 and 74. Both of these compounds exhibited
excellent inhibitory potency with IC50 values of 0.05 and 3.3 nM, respectively,
as compared to the naphthyridinone 70, the azaindole-2-one 72,
and the pyrazolopyridines 73 and 75. The NH in the azaindazole
73 is not suitably oriented for interaction with Val882, and this molecule
displayed 5.4-fold lower potency (IC50 = 0.49 μM) than the isomeric
analog 75 (IC50 = 0.09 μM). Subsequently, the 7-AI analog
71 was found to exhibit greater potency (IC50 = 0.05 μM)
than reference compound 69. Substituting a benzyl acetic acid derivative at
the C-3 position in 71 provided very potent PI3Kγ inhibition
(IC50= 3.3 nM), and this molecule exhibited an acceptable pharmacokinetic
profile in rats (in vivo CL = 1.8 L/h/kg). Thus, the combination of C-3 substitution and
the versatility of the N1 and N7 nitrogen in forming bidentate interactions with the
target sites allows for facile optimization.
Figure 32
(A) Modification of the acylaminothiazole moiety with heterocycles carrying a common
H-bonding motif in the bicyclic core (except in compound 73). (B)
Two-dimensional interaction diagram of PI3Kγ inhibitor 69.
(A) Modification of the acylaminothiazole moiety with heterocycles carrying a common
H-bonding motif in the bicyclic core (except in compound 73). (B)
Two-dimensional interaction diagram of PI3Kγ inhibitor 69.Currently, AAK1 inhibitors are envisioned to be beneficial in countering SARS-CoV-2 entry
into host cells. Compounds 56–58 and their derivatives
can be further optimized and tested against various virus families, including SARS-CoV-2.
Repurposing kinase inhibitors as broad-spectrum antiviral agents is a recent and ongoing
endeavor.[125−128] It has been suggested that kinase inhibition may
significantly surpass viral resistance because the virus does not genetically control the
host kinases. However, toxicity is a major concern associated with kinase inhibition since
host kinases play essential roles in mediating other cellular functions.[119]
Hepatitis C Viruses
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a small enveloped RNA virus composed of 9.6 kb RNA having a long
open reading frame (ORF) flanked by a 5′- and 3′-nontranslated region. It
belongs to the Flaviviridae family, and its genome consists of
single-stranded, positive-sense RNA.[129] The 3′-nontranslated
region contains a poly U/UC tract and a highly conserved 98-nucleotide element that is
required for viral RNA synthesis. The 5′-nontranslated region is the most conserved
among the different genotypes and contains the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) element
which is essential for a direct Cap-independent translation of the ORF region. Translation
results in a precursor polyprotein containing ∼3000 amino acids (aa). The precursor
polyprotein gets processed by the host cell and viral proteases into both structural (S) and
nonstructural (NS) proteins, respectively. The S proteins are comprised of a nucleocapsid
core (C) and the glycosylated transmembrane proteins E1 and E2 required for the attachment
of HCV to host cell receptors and the viroporin p7 that likely forms ion channels essential
for assembly and release of infectious virions. The other precursor protein contains the NS
proteins NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B. The nonstructural proteins play a major role
in replication of the HCV virus. Out of all of the above-mentioned nonstructural proteins,
NS4B represents a druggable and appealing antiviral target, thus making NS4B the last entry
target in the HCV drug discovery process. Although a number of direct antivirus agents were
approved against HCV, none of the drugs have been approved against NS4B to
date.[130,131]
HCV NS4B Inhibitors
Chen and co-workers developed 7-azaindole-based compounds that target the nonstructural,
membrane-bound protein NS4B, an integral hydrophobic membrane protein that plays a pivotal
but undefined role in the HCV RNA replication mechanism.[132] All of
these compounds were evaluated for activity against the genotype 1b HCV replicon by
measuring mRNA levels with respect to cellular GAPDH mRNA in Huh-7 cells. Briefly,
quantitative RT-PCR was performed to quantify the amount of intracellular HCV RNA, and the
concentration of a compound inhibiting HCV RNA replication by 50% (EC50) is
indicated. The indolylpyridine-sulfonamide 76, which exhibited an
EC50 of 7 nM,[133] was chosen as the lead compound, and a
SAR study was performed by replacing the indole ring with isomeric 4-, 5-, 6-, and
7-azaindoles to explore anti-HCV activity (Table ).[132]
Table 4
Structure of Indole Analog 76 (Selective Inhibitor of HCV RNA
replication) and Its AI Analogs 77–86a
EC50 values are the averages of at least two independent determinations.
Huh7 cells harboring genotype 1b (gt 1b) HCV bicistronic replicons were plated at
5000 cells/well in 96-well plates. Compounds were added to the wells with a final
DMSO concentration of 0.5%.
EC50 values are the averages of at least two independent determinations.
Huh7 cells harboring genotype 1b (gt 1b) HCV bicistronic replicons were plated at
5000 cells/well in 96-well plates. Compounds were added to the wells with a final
DMSO concentration of 0.5%.The SAR exploration revealed that the 7-azaindole series with an electronegative
CF3 substituent at C-5 (77) exhibited more potent anti-HCV
activity than the indole analog 76.[132] Analogs
78 and 81 carrying small lipophilic substituents on the
azaindole ring were also found to exhibit good HCV inhibition. However, the unsubstituted
7-azaindole analog 80 was less active (Table ). Similarly, attaching propoxy (85) and isopropoxy
(86) substituents at the C-5 position on the 7-azaindole core was found to
be inferior for anti-HCV activity. Shifting the nitrogen around the aromatic ring to form
isomeric AIs 82–84 with a small lipophilic methyl group
at either C-5 (82) or C-6 (83, 84) resulted in a
significant drop in potency. In pharmacokinetic screening, oral administration of a single
10 mpk dose of the 5-CF3 analog 77 to rats showed excellent
exposure (AUC0–6h = 5833 nM·h) of the compound. It also exhibited
higher exposure (AUC0–24h = 8162 and 5440 nM·h, respectively) in
dogs (PO, 2 mpk) and monkeys (PO, 3 mpk) than 76 (AUC0–24h
= 6858 and 7568 nM·h, respectively). Notably, the C-2 position of AI has been
reported to be vulnerable to oxidative metabolism, leading to C-2 hydroxy
metabolites.[142] However, the C-2 position is occupied in optimized
compound 77; thus, C-2 oxidative metabolism may be avoided.Reports of different chemical classes targeting HCV NS4B, including benzimidazole
87, pyrozolopyrimidine 88, pyrozolopyridines 89
and 90, and imidazolothiazole 91 have emerged (Figure ). The suggestion of a common ligand-binding site at
NS4B is unclear due to the lack of crystal structure data on the NS4B protein, which
hinders structure-based drug discovery.
Figure 33
Representative examples of different chemical classes of reported HCV NSB4
inhibitors.
Representative examples of different chemical classes of reported HCV NSB4
inhibitors.
Influenza A Viruses
Influenza virus belongs to the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses, which
have a negative-sense, single-stranded, and segmented RNA genome with diverse antigenic
characteristics.[134] Current subtypes of influenza A viruses that
routinely circulate in humans include A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) types. Although vaccination
represents the best way to lessen the impact of the disease, the virus varies continuously
due to antigenic drift that can evade pre-existing immunity.[135] Thus,
influenza vaccines are reformulated every year to match circulating strains. Currently,
oseltamivir 92 (oral), zanamivir 93 (inhalation), peramivir
94, and baloxavir-marboxil 95 (oral) are FDA-approved antiviral
drugs that are recommended for the treatment of influenza virus infection (Figure ). At the same time, zanamivir and oseltamivir are also
recommended for chemoprophylaxis.
Figure 34
FDA-approved antiviral drugs recommended for the treatment of recently circulating
influenza viruses.
FDA-approved antiviral drugs recommended for the treatment of recently circulating
influenza viruses.Generally, anti-influenza drugs work best only when they are administered in a timely
manner within 48 h of the onset of infection. The current antiviral standard of care (SOC)
for the treatment of influenza is the neuraminidase inhibitors, oseltamivir, 92
(Figure ), and zanamivir,
93.[136] Zanamivir, 93, has low oral
bioavailability; hence, it is given via the topical route by inhaler, but 92 is
administered orally. These drugs are effective against a variety of type A and B influenza
viruses, but there are three major limitations to these molecules that have emerged in
recent years. First, the neuraminidase inhibitors have only a moderate impact on the
severity of symptoms as well as the duration of illness, and they must be administered
within 24–48 h of the onset of infection. Second, infants suffering with influenza in
a few countries have recently shown the emergence of viruses with mutations in the
neuraminidase gene that encode for drug-resistant neuraminidase proteins. If this frequent
emergence of resistant mutants is found to be a general occurrence in children, it
represents a serious concern, especially since children are an important source of the
spread of influenza in the community. Third, recent reports about H5N1 influenza virus have
shown resistance to oseltamivir. Hence, new anti-influenza therapeutics with a novel
mechanism of action are required.
Novel Polymerase Basic Protein 2 (PB2) Inhibitors of Influenza A Virus
The discovery of alternative therapeutic options for the treatment of influenza virus are
still a challenge, and phenotypic-assay-based drug discovery efforts have been made by a
number of research groups in an effort to identify novel chemotypes. The viral polymerase
is made up of three different subunits, i.e., PB1, PB2, and PA. The heterotrimeric viral
polymerase synthesizes viral mRNAs via a cap-snatching mechanism where it utilizes host
pre-mRNA as a primer for transcription. The PB2 subunit contains a cap-binding domain that
recognizes 7-methyl GTP (m7 GTP) on the 5′-end of the host pre-mRNA. Once host
pre-mRNA is bound to PB2, the PA endonuclease subunit cuts the host RNA strand, leaving
behind a 10–13-nucleotide primer. The PB1 subunit contains the conserved polymerase
domain and utilizes the primer for RNA elongation. In the phenotypic-assay-based drug
discovery effort, the 7-azaindole-based inhibitors target the PB2 cap-binding domain of
the viral polymerase of influenza. Principally, 7-azaindole influenza inhibitors bind to
the PB2 cap-binding domain and interfere with the replication and transcription of the
viral RNA genome to exert pharmacological inhibitory activity.[137]The discovery of 7-azaindole-based anti-influenza compounds emerged from early work by
Clark et al., who first identified a set of 7-azaindole analogs with considerable in vitro
antiviral activity using branched DNA (bDNA) viral replication assay in cells and PB2
fluorescent polarization competition binding assay (Figure ).[138]
Figure 35
Structures of 7-azaindole analogs bearing a dimethyl alanine side chain
96, cyclohexylamine analog 97, and piperidine analog
98.
Structures of 7-azaindole analogs bearing a dimethyl alanine side chain
96, cyclohexylamine analog 97, and piperidine analog
98.A 96-well bDNA assay detects the negative-strand RNA of the influenza A virus (A/PR/8/34
strain) using a set of oligonucleotides designed for the A/PR/8/34 nucleoprotein
transcript.[139] A cell-based antiviral assay was developed that
depends on the multiplication of virus RNA in the infected cells with negative strand RNA
levels being directly measured using the branched-chain DNA (bDNA) hybridization method.
Cells were initially infected with the virus and incubated in the presence of test
compound for approximately 20 h. Viral replication was quantified by determination of
negative strand RNA levels by bDNA assay. The concentrations of the test compound
resulting in viral RNA levels equal to that of 10% of the control wells were reported as
EC90.The binding affinity of compounds for the cap-binding domain of PB2 was determined using
a competition binding fluorescence polarization (FP) assay. PB2 binding was examined using
a 165 amino acid fragment of PB2 that had been identified as the cap-binding domain
portion of the full-length protein. This PB2 domain was incubated with test compounds and
with a 5′-FITC-labeled probe for 60 min at room temperature to reach equilibrium.
Values for probe-only wells were used as the background. PB2
Kd values were determined by fitting the
background-subtracted data to an equation for competitive displacement of a fluorescent
probe.The X-ray cocrystal structure of 96 complexed with the PB2 cap-binding
domain (165 amino acid fragments) suggested that 96 and m7GTP (a
known binder to PB2) displayed similar hydrogen-bonding interactions with the side-chain
residues of PB2, engaging Glu361 and Lys376. The N-1 NH2, O-6 of
m7GTP and N-1 and N-7 elements of 96 were involved in H bonding
(Figure B).[138] The AI
core of 96 was sandwiched between the aromatic side chains of His357 and
Phe404, while the pyrimidine ring was π-stacked against Phe323. Although the
dimethylalanyl moiety of 96 occupied the region to which the sugar phosphate
group of m7GTP was bound, no direct polar interactions were observed with
positively charged residues, such as Lys-339, Arg-355, and His-357. It was postulated that
optimization of the amino substituent at the 4 position of the pyrimidine ring in
96 formed polar interactions with amino acids present around the sugar
phosphate-binding region of m7GTP. To extend the structure toward the sugar
phosphate-binding region of PB2, a series of compounds was synthesized by appending
cycloalkyl, piperidine, diaminocyclohexyl, and cyclohexyl carboxylate functionalities on
the amino substituent at the 4 position of the pyrimidine ring in compound 96
(Figure ). Consequently, the binding
interactions of the cyclohexyl carboxylate-bearing [2,2,2]-bicyclooctane analog
99 with PB2 were similar to those of m7GTP (Figure C). In addition, the carboxylic group of
99 showed water-mediated interactions with the nitrogen of His357 and
Gln406 as well as with the carbonyl group of Arg355. Overall, this study confirmed that
7-methylguanine and 7-azaindole occupy the same binding site in PB2. Furthermore,
99 demonstrated potent antiviral activity against a broad range of
influenza type A strains in in vitro studies, Table . This study describes the emergence of several potent compounds; among them,
99 and the diaminocyclohexyl-based analog 102 were advanced to
in vivo studies. Compound 99 provided 100% protection against
influenza-induced death in mice when the test compound was administered at three doses
(10, 3, or 1 mpk b.i.d. for 10 days) starting 48 h postinfection. However,
102 demonstrated only 75% survival when dosed at 30 mpk b.i.d for 10 days
beginning 48 h postinfection. The standard drug oseltamivir, a neuroaminidase inhibitor
when administered at the clinically relevant human equivalent dose (10 mpk b.i.d.) in the
same animal model after 48 h of infection, did not provide any survival benefits.
Figure 36
Comparison of the binding interactions of m7GTP and 7-azaindole analogs at
the cap-binding domain of PB2. (A) m7GTP complexed with the PB2 cap-binding
domain (PDB 4NCE).
N-1,2-NH2 and O-6 of the guanine ring are involved in binding
interactions with Glu361 and Lys376. (B, C, D, and E) Compounds 96,
99, 100, and (R)-101
complexed with the PB2 cap-binding domain, respectively. Compounds 93
(PDB 4NCM), 99 (PDB
4P1U), 100 (PDB
4YD0), and
(R)-101 (PDB 5JUR) occupied the same binding site of m7GTP and
exhibited similar binding interactions with Glu361 and Lys376 residues; however, N-1
and N-7 of the AI ring were involved in H-bonding interactions.
Table 5
In Vitro bDNA-Binding Assay and PB2 Fluorescence Competitive Binding Assay of
Compounds 96, 99, and 102
Concentration of the test compound resulting in viral RNA levels equal to 10% of
the control wells is reported as the EC90.
Affinity of the cap-binding domain of the PB2 subunit as measured in a fluorescence
polarization competition binding assay.
Comparison of the binding interactions of m7GTP and 7-azaindole analogs at
the cap-binding domain of PB2. (A) m7GTP complexed with the PB2 cap-binding
domain (PDB 4NCE).
N-1,2-NH2 and O-6 of the guanine ring are involved in binding
interactions with Glu361 and Lys376. (B, C, D, and E) Compounds 96,
99, 100, and (R)-101
complexed with the PB2 cap-binding domain, respectively. Compounds 93
(PDB 4NCM), 99 (PDB
4P1U), 100 (PDB
4YD0), and
(R)-101 (PDB 5JUR) occupied the same binding site of m7GTP and
exhibited similar binding interactions with Glu361 and Lys376 residues; however, N-1
and N-7 of the AI ring were involved in H-bonding interactions.Concentration of the test compound resulting in viral RNA levels equal to 10% of
the control wells is reported as the EC90.Affinity of the cap-binding domain of the PB2 subunit as measured in a fluorescence
polarization competition binding assay.Boyd and co-workers performed SAR studies on 99 by replacing the COOH group
with different isosteres.[140] One of the resulting compounds
100, which incorporates a tetrazole ring in place of the COOH moiety,
exhibited 13- and 16-fold lower viral potency in the CPE and bDNA assays when compared to
99. However, the isoxazole analog 103 was equipotent to
99 in the CPE assay and only 3-fold less potent than 99 in the
bDNA assay (Table ).
Table 6
In Vitro Cytopathic Effect (CPE) Viral Assay and bDNA Assay of Compounds
99, 100, and 103
MDCK cells were incubated with the test compounds and influenza A virus (A/PR/8/34
strain) for 72 h, and the concentration of the test compound resulting in 50% cell
protection is reported as the IC50.
Concentration of the test compound resulting in viral RNA levels equal to 1% of the
control wells is reported as the EC99.
MDCK cells were incubated with the test compounds and influenza A virus (A/PR/8/34
strain) for 72 h, and the concentration of the test compound resulting in 50% cell
protection is reported as the IC50.Concentration of the test compound resulting in viral RNA levels equal to 1% of the
control wells is reported as the EC99.The crystal structure data and computational studies suggested that 100
retained the H-bonding interactions with Lys376 and Glu361 of PB2 similar to
99. The carboxylic acid group of 99 exhibited two
water-mediated interactions with the ε nitrogens of His357 and Gln406 and the
backbone carbonyl group of Arg355. However, 100 did not show any such
water-mediated interactions between PB2 and the tetrazole ring, which might be the reason
behind the loss of antiviral potency. The antiviral profile of the isoxazole analog
103 was appreciable and comparable to that of 99, barring the
3-fold lower potency in the bDNA assay (Table ).
In general, these studies indicated that a negative charge is required for in vitro
antiviral potency. However, none of the compounds were advanced for preclinical
studies.Farmer and co-workers[141] replaced the alanine dimethylamide side chain
of 96 with an acyclic β-amino acid fragment bearing a nonpolar
tert-butyl group (Figure )
to form enantiomeric pairs. It was envisaged that attaching a nonpolar group at the
β position may afford potential hydrophobic interactions with the aromatic amino
acid residues Phe323, Phe325, and Phe404 present in the phosphate-binding region of PB2
while retaining the key-interactions, i.e., interaction of 7-azaindole core with Glu361
and Lys376. First, to validate this assumption, a docking analysis of compound
(R)-101 into the active site of PB2 followed by
superimposition of the X-ray structure of 96 complexed with PB2 was conducted
(Figure ). The overlay of 96
and (R)-101 at the cap-binding region of PB2 revealed good
superimposition, and the tert-butyl group occupied the same area as the
α-methyl dimethyl amide functionality. Encouraged by these findings, two
enantiomeric pairs, namely, (R)-101,
(S)-101 and (R)-104,
(S)-104, were synthesized and evaluated for their binding
affinity and antiviral potency. In support of the docking studies, the
(R)-enantiomers (R)-101 and
(R)-104 exhibited excellent binding affinity to PB2
(Kd = 0.003 and <0.003 μM, respectively) and
antiviral potency (EC90 = 0.03 and 0.023 μM, respectively), whereas the
(S)-enantiomers (S)-101 and
(S)-104 were less potent (Figure ). Furthermore, the X-ray cocrystal structure data for
(R)-101 bound to PB2 suggested that
N-1 and N-7 of the AI ring formed a H bond with Glu361
and Lys376 (Figure E), the AI ring was
sandwiched between His357 and Phe404, while the pyrimidine ring was engaged in a
π-stacking interaction with Phe323. The X-ray data also demonstrated that the
hydrophobic pocket defined by the three phenylalanine residues Phe323, Phe325, and Phe404
could be utilized to forge stronger interactions with larger side chains (Figure E).
Figure 37
Structure of enantiomeric pairs of (R,S)-101 and
(R,S)-104 of 7-azaindole analogs bearing a
tert-butyl-substituted beta amino acid side chain; in vitro bDNA
and PB2 fluorescence competition binding assay of enantiomeric pairs.
Structure of enantiomeric pairs of (R,S)-101 and
(R,S)-104 of 7-azaindole analogs bearing a
tert-butyl-substituted beta amino acid side chain; in vitro bDNA
and PB2 fluorescence competition binding assay of enantiomeric pairs.On the basis of the above findings, additional schemes were designed to develop a series
of compounds having branched carbon chains (Figure ).[141] This study suggested that interactions with the
hydrophobic pocket of PB2 could be increased by the incorporation of hydrophobic groups on
the side chain of the pyrimidine ring in AI analogs.
Figure 38
Structures of 7-azaindole analogs bearing substituted butanoic acids as side chains
and their optimized spirocyclobutane analog 105h.
Structures of 7-azaindole analogs bearing substituted butanoic acids as side chains
and their optimized spirocyclobutane analog 105h.Among the analogs 105a–h, the spiro cyclobutane analog
105h exhibited the highest anti-influenza activity. The overall cellular
potency and target affinity of (R)-101 (bDNA EC90
= 0.03 μM and PB2 Kd = 0.003) and 105h
(bDNA EC90 = 0.01 μM and PB2 Kd ≤
0.003) led to further study to assess the antiviral activity against a broad range of
influenza type A strains. Interestingly, (R)-101 demonstrated potent antiviral activity against a broad range of
influenza type A strains, including oseltamivir carboxylate-resistant isolates and the
pandemic-causing H1N1 and H5N1 strains. In addition, the PK profiles of
(R)-101 and 105h showed desirable iv and oral
exposure in animal studies. (R)-101 provided complete
protection at all three tested doses with all animals surviving (10, 30, and 60 mpk b.i.d
for 10 days). Similarly, 105h also showed a complete survival benefit but
only when dosed at 3, 10, and 30 mpk b.i.d beginning at 48 h postinfection. Thus,
(R)-101 and 105h showed efficacy even giving
it after 48 h in an influenza mouse model. However, the standard drug oseltamivir was
devoid of efficacy in this mouse model when tested at the clinically relevant human
equivalent dose (10 mpk b.i.d).Notably, the primary metabolite observed for 102 (Table
) in human hepatocytes was due to oxidation at the C-2
position of the 7-azaindole ring to form the 2-hydroxy-substituted metabolite
106 (Figure ) mediated by the
cytosolic enzyme aldehyde oxidase (AO), which catalyzes the oxidation of aza-heterocycles
and aldehydes, amide hydrolysis, and diverse reductions.[142]
Figure 39
Structures of the 2-hydroxy metabolite of 1,3-diaminocyclohexyl morpholine urea
analog 106 and 1,3-diaminocyclohexyl pyrrolidine urea analog
107.
Structures of the 2-hydroxy metabolite of 1,3-diaminocyclohexyl morpholine urea
analog 106 and 1,3-diaminocyclohexyl pyrrolidine urea analog
107.To bypass the AO-mediated metabolism of 7-azaindoles, C-2-substituted compounds were
synthesized incorporating a range of functionalities, including the addition of hydroxy
methyl, methyl, cyclopropyl, carboxylic acid, oxime, and secondary alcohol groups (Figure B). This strategy was applied to
109, which has a pyrrolidine urea moiety and was found to be 12-fold more
potent than 102 in the bDNA assay.[142] In parallel,
replacement of the C-2 carbon atom with a nitrogen atom to form an azaindazole ring
(108a–h) was also envisioned as an approach to counter
AO-mediated metabolism (Figure A).
Figure 40
(A) Substituted 7-azaindazoles (108a–f). (B)
C-2-Substituted 7-azaindoles (109a–g) and optimized
analog 2-hydroxy methyl-substituted pyrrolidine urea 109g.
(A) Substituted 7-azaindazoles (108a–f). (B)
C-2-Substituted 7-azaindoles (109a–g) and optimized
analog 2-hydroxy methyl-substituted pyrrolidine urea 109g.Human liver cytosol stability studies have indicated that 109a,
109b, 109f, and 109g (Figure
B) bypass AO-mediated metabolism at the C-2 position
compared with compounds 102 and 107. The PK profiles of
107, 109g, and 108a in both mice and rats were
favorable. Furthermore, the X-ray cocrystal structure of the complex of 109g
bound to the PB2 subunit revealed that the interaction between the PB2 domain and
109g was similar to that of earlier molecules. An additional interaction
was observed between the C-2 hydroxy methyl group through H bonds with Glu 361 and Arg 332
(Figure A).
Figure 41
Binding interactions of the 7-azaindole-based 2-hydroxymethyl-substituted
1,3-diaminocyclohexyl pyrrolidine urea 109g and indole analog
110 at the cap-binding domain of PB2. (A) Binding interactions of
compound 109 at the m7GTP binding site (PDB 5BUH), and involvement of N-1 and N-7
in the H-bonding interaction with Glu361 and Lys376 and 2-hydroxy methyl group
interaction with Arg332 and Glu361. (B) Binding mode of compound 110 at
the same binding site (PDB 6S5V). Fluorine at C7 interacts with Lys376, whereas N-1 interacts with
Glu361. In addition, the terminal carboxylic acid group interacts with Arg355.
Binding interactions of the 7-azaindole-based 2-hydroxymethyl-substituted
1,3-diaminocyclohexyl pyrrolidine urea 109g and indole analog
110 at the cap-binding domain of PB2. (A) Binding interactions of
compound 109 at the m7GTP binding site (PDB 5BUH), and involvement of N-1 and N-7
in the H-bonding interaction with Glu361 and Lys376 and 2-hydroxy methyl group
interaction with Arg332 and Glu361. (B) Binding mode of compound 110 at
the same binding site (PDB 6S5V). Fluorine at C7 interacts with Lys376, whereas N-1 interacts with
Glu361. In addition, the terminal carboxylic acid group interacts with Arg355.McGowan and collaborators envisaged that 5,7-difluoroindoles could be effective
bioisosteres of the 7-azaindole ring system in which the fluorine atom at the 7 position
could mimic an aromatic nitrogen atom and adopt a similar binding mode.[143] In view of this, the 5,7-difluoroindole analog 110 of
99 was synthesized (Figure ).
In addition, substituents with similar sizes or electronic characteristics to fluorine,
such as methyl, cyano, and chloro groups at the C-5 position, were also prepared.
Figure 42
Bioisosteric replacement of 5-fluoroazaindole with 5,7-difluoroindole.
Bioisosteric replacement of 5-fluoroazaindole with 5,7-difluoroindole.X-ray cocrystal studies of 110 (Figure B) indicated that the indole ring formed π-stacking interactions with
Phe404 and His357 and ionic interactions with Glu361 and Lys376, similar to earlier
7-azaindole congeners. A few additional interactions were observed, including
π–π stacking between the pyrimidine ring of 110 and Phe323
and an interaction between the positively charged guanidino group of Arg355 and the
negatively charged carboxylate group of 110.As anticipated, the C-7 fluorine atom of 110 interacted with Lys376, and the
longer electronegative C–F bond length shifted 110 approximately 0.8
Å out of the binding pocket. Thus, 110 adopted a slightly different
conformation, allowing the carboxylic group to gain two additional ionic interactions with
Arg355. This observation confirmed that 7-fluoroindole could act as a bioisostere of
7-azaindole. Compound 110 showed excellent in vitro metabolic stability
(Clint < 7.7 μL/min/mg protein) in human liver microsomes and was
not susceptible to AO metabolism. The presence of fluorine atoms at the C-5 and C-7
positions of 110 may also be responsible for the enhanced metabolic
stability.[144] In vivo studies with 110 were performed at
a dose of 30 mpk b.i.d. for 10 days in the mouse influenza model, where 75% survival was
observed in animals administered the drug beginning at 48 h postinfection, whereas
oseltamivir yielded only 38% survival at its therapeutic equivalent dose in mice (10 mpk
b.i.d. for 10 days).Given the above findings, we postulate the important structural features of a probable
potent PB2 inhibitor, as shown in Figure . A
coplanar heterocycle at the C-3 position of the AI core will be beneficial for
π-stacking with a protein. A hydrophobic linker connecting a C-3-substituted
heterocycle ring with another aromatic ring might provide better binding with PB2
connected through ionic and H-bonding interactions.
Figure 43
Structural features of the 7-azaindole-based PB2 inhibitor design.
Structural features of the 7-azaindole-based PB2 inhibitor design.Taken together, AI and its isomers continue to serve as a core potential template with
which to design new antiviral agents against HIV-1, HCV, DENV, RSV, and influenza.
Replacing CH with N atoms in the AI/indole core was the most successful approach to attain
multiparameter optimization in antiviral drug research. We created a summary of the
reported bioisosteric replacements of AIs/indoles along with the C-2 and C-3 substitution
in antiviral drug discovery (Table ).
Table 7
Summary of Bioisosteric Replacements of AIs/Indoles and C-2 and C-3 Substitutions
on AIs in the Design of Antiviral Agents
Future Perspectives of AI Analogues in Regulating COVID-19-Induced Cytokine Storm or
Hyperinflammatory Syndrome in Patients
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), continues to spread globally despite unprecedented
social isolation and restrictions resulting in widespread economic decline. More than 3.2
million people have been infected, and more than 230 000 of them have died. To date,
no treatments have been definitively shown to be effective; however, a multipronged approach
to mitigate transmission, morbidity, and mortality is ongoing. While upstream prevention
strategies such as vaccination are ideal, these strategies are unlikely to be available in
time to address current clinical need. Instead, fast tracking of drug development and
repurposing of approved drugs has facilitated and expedited clinical trials that might
hasten effective therapeutics. Many of these drugs act, at least in part, to directly limit
viral replication. By contrast, the use of interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibition might have
benefits by controlling the pathological immune response to the virus. Here, we expand on
the theoretical basis of IL-6 inhibition and propose potential benefits from other
immunomodulators that could, in theory, prove more efficacious.For the latter phase of convalescence, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 can develop a
syndrome of dysregulated and systemic immune over activation described as a cytokine storm
or hyperinflammatory syndrome that worsens acute respiratory distress syndrome and can lead
to multisystem organ failure. The scarce systematic data available have shown an association
between ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, IL-6, IL-1, d-dimer, and C-reactive protein and
severe disease. If this group can be identified before decompensation, early and aggressive
immunomodulatory treatment might prevent the need for intubation and extracorporeal membrane
oxygenation. To date, observational studies suggest a possible benefit, but results of
placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials are not yet available. Given the
methodological limitations of existing studies, more evidence is needed. With the rapidly
expanding number of critically ill patients, there is an urgent need to identify multiple
putative biological targets. While IL-6 inhibition attenuates key aspects of the cytokine
cascade, we posit other immune targets of inhibition to be considered and their potential to
be more efficacious in the setting of COVID-19, specifically IL-1 inhibitors and Janus
kinase (JAK) inhibitors.Recently, molnupiravir (111) and paxlovid (112) have been
approved by the FDA for emergency use as oral antiviral drugs against COVID-19 (Figure ). However, the WHO has not yet recommended
the use of these drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. The WHO recommended baricitinib, an
oral drug, and sotrovimab, the monoclonal antibodies against COVID-19, but still a lot of
deliberations are going on, and most of the countries have not included it as a part of the
therapeutic regimen against COVID-19. However, the available treatment options for COVID-19
are essentially based on symptoms, and oxygen therapy is the main option for severely
infected patients. In cases of respiratory failure, artificial ventilation may be
necessary.[145] The symptomatic treatment modalities of COVID-19 are
based mainly on three different mechanisms, i.e., reducing the viral load by drugs targeting
viral entry, drugs inhibiting viral replication, and management of the hyperinflammatory
state by immunomodulating drugs.
Figure 44
FDA-approved oral antiviral drugs, molnupiravir and paxlovid (111 and
112) against COVID-19, and chemical structures of AI-based JAK
inhibitors.
FDA-approved oral antiviral drugs, molnupiravir and paxlovid (111 and
112) against COVID-19, and chemical structures of AI-based JAK
inhibitors.Novel virus-based structural proteins have been identified as drug targets in COVID-19,
such as the nucleocapsid N protein, spike S glycoprotein, and several virus-based
nonstructural proteins. Similarly, host-based targets, such as the ACE2 receptor, AAK1/GAK,
JAK, transmembrane serine protease 2, furin, cathepsin L, phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate
5-kinase, and two-pore channels, have also been identified as potential host
targets.[146,147]More than 100 drugs from diverse therapeutic classes were proposed for their potential to
be repurposed for COVID-19 by taking advantage of current information on their safety
pharmacology to enable rapid clinical trials and regulatory review.[148]
Recently, the potential role of AI-based JAK inhibitors 114 and
116 (Figure ) in combating
cytokine storms or hyperinflammatory syndrome in COVID-19 patients has been explored.
Hyperinflammatory syndrome is one of the primary causes of multiple organ failure and
death.[149,150] ACE2
and CD147 (cluster of differentiation 147) are the two important receptors that are thought
to be involved in SARS-CoV-2 invasion and dissemination into the host cells.[151] In the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the positive role of the
transmembrane protein ACE2 has been confirmed in alveolar epithelial cells in conjunction
with the cellular protease TMPRSS2.[152] ACE2 binds to the spike proteins
on the capsid of SARS-CoV-2 (Figure ), which
subsequently initiates clathrin-dependent endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2.[151]
Figure 45
Proposed dual mechanism (anticytokine activity and inhibitors of host cell viral
propagation) of the action of baricitinib (114) in COVID-19: (1) SARS-CoV-2
binds to host ACE 2 through the spike proteins (2) upon entry; SARS-CoV-2 induces
clathrin-mediated endocytosis. AAK1 and GAK mediate the assembly of clathrin adapter
proteins to form clathrin cages surrounding the virus before it is trafficked to
endosomes (3) upon virus entry; activation of immune cells and release of chemokines (4)
result in the recruitment of neutrophils, macrophages, NK cells, and T cells, which
further damage alveolar epithelial cells via a process called the cytokine storm (5)
baricitinib (114); AI analog has been proposed to inhibit 2 checkpoints,
i.e., inhibit viral entry via AAK1- and GAK-mediated endocytosis and inhibit cytokine
storms via JAK-STAT-dependent cytokine receptors.
Proposed dual mechanism (anticytokine activity and inhibitors of host cell viral
propagation) of the action of baricitinib (114) in COVID-19: (1) SARS-CoV-2
binds to host ACE 2 through the spike proteins (2) upon entry; SARS-CoV-2 induces
clathrin-mediated endocytosis. AAK1 and GAK mediate the assembly of clathrin adapter
proteins to form clathrin cages surrounding the virus before it is trafficked to
endosomes (3) upon virus entry; activation of immune cells and release of chemokines (4)
result in the recruitment of neutrophils, macrophages, NK cells, and T cells, which
further damage alveolar epithelial cells via a process called the cytokine storm (5)
baricitinib (114); AI analog has been proposed to inhibit 2 checkpoints,
i.e., inhibit viral entry via AAK1- and GAK-mediated endocytosis and inhibit cytokine
storms via JAK-STAT-dependent cytokine receptors.Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, a reciprocal state tends to be established in which
downregulation of the renin–angiotensin system affords a natural protective effect
along with an upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines.[153] From the
clinical data, higher serum levels of many cytokines, such as IL 6, IL 2, IL-1b, IL-8,
IL-17, IFN-g, TNF-a, IP 10, MCP-1, IL-10, and IL-4, have been documented in COVID-19
patients.[154]Therefore, targeting JAK-STAT-dependent signaling with JAK inhibitors to reduce the
production of IL-6 and other cytokines was thought to be a direct approach to mitigate the
cytokine storms associated with COVID-19 (Figure ). Five clinical trials were explored which were designed to address the safety
and efficacy of 114 in COVID-19-infected patients at clinical doses of
2–4 mg daily for 7–14 days.[149] Moreover, 114
has been reported to block the intracellular trafficking of SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is
regulated by clathrin-associated host adaptor proteins controlled by AAK1 and cyclin
G-related kinases (GAK).[155] Molecule 114 binds with high
affinity to AAK1 (17 nM), JAK1 (6 nM), and JAK2 (6 nM), affording a potential advantage in
countering SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 infectivity.[156] In addition,
114 has been reported for treating inflammatory conditions, such as
rheumatoid arthritis and myelofibrosis. Recently, in 2021, the FDA issued warnings for the
use of the JAK inhibitors against chronic inflammatory conditions. The FDA advisory
highlighted the increased risk of heart-related events such as heart attack, stroke, blood
clots, and death of few patients. There is higher risk involved with these drugs for current
or past smoking patients or who had a heart attack. It was advised that all of the clinical
health care professionals must consider the benefits and risks for the individual patient
prior to initiating or continuing therapy using JAK inhibitors against COVID-19
infection.Next, it was proposed that 114 may be effective against the elevated levels of
cytokines at its therapeutic dose in COVID-19 patients.[156,157] Fine tuning of the selectivity of AI toward JAK
and AAK1 may yield multitargeted molecules against COVID-19. JAK-targeting compounds may be
developed as anticytokine medicines against various inflammation-associated diseases,
including COVID-19. In contrast, compounds selective for AAK1 can be established as
early-phase medication agents in SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections.Virus-based nonstructural proteins (nsps) serve an essential function in the lifecycle of
SARS-CoV-2.[158] The eukaryotic mRNA 5′-cap structure is
considered necessary for RNA stability by affording a molecular signature for self- or
nonself-mRNA distinction.[159] To escape innate host immunity, the
5′-end of the viral RNA gets modified by forming an m7GTP cap and a
C2′-O methyl cap on the adjacent nucleotide (Figure ).[160] In eukaryotes, 5′ capping is
introduced on newly transcribed host mRNA already present within the nucleus to which
SARS-CoV-2 does not have access. To overcome this inaccessibility, the virus has evolved to
synthesize its own cap-forming protein machinery in the cytoplasm.
Figure 46
Methylation of N-7 of GTP and the C2 hydroxyl group of the adjacent nucleotide by nsp14
and nsp16, respectively. B = base.
Methylation of N-7 of GTP and the C2 hydroxyl group of the adjacent nucleotide by nsp14
and nsp16, respectively. B = base.In particular, nsp14 and nsp16 are responsible for methylation of the guanine of the GTP
and the C2′ hydroxyl group of the nucleotides (Figure ).[160]Both nsp14 and nsp16 are S-adenosyl methionine (SAM)-dependent
methyltransferases (MTases) and seem to be essential for the viral lifecycle.[158] In SARS-CoV-2, nsp16 in conjunction with nsp10 methylates the 5′-end
of virally encoded mRNAs to mimic cellular mRNAs, thus protecting the virus from host innate
immune restriction. nsp16 seems to be a very promising molecular target for drug discovery,
and the crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nsp10 and nsp16 in complex with the purine analogs
sinefungin (pan-MTase inhibitor) and SAM (natural methyl donor) provides a strong foundation
for structure-based inhibitor design for COVID-19 (Figure ).[158,160] The binding pattern of the 7-azaindole analogs
96, 99, (R)-101, 103,
109g, and 110 includes N-1 and N-7 of AI, which undergo
H-bonding interactions similar to the purine ring of m7GTP (N-1, 2-N1,
2-H2, O-6) and occupy the purine-binding domain at the Pb2 cap-binding site
(Figures and 41). These
features confirm the bioisostere nature of 7-azaindole with purine in the PB2 binding
pocket. The anti-influenza activity of 7-azaindole results from its inhibition of the
influenza virus cap-snatching mechanism. SARS-CoV-2 also exhibits a similar capping
mechanism for its RNA stability with the help of nsp14 and nsp16.[160]
Figure 47
N-1,2-NH2 and O-6 of the guanine ring and N-1 and N-7 of the AI ring
recognize the same binding pocket due to the observed bioisosterism.
N-1,2-NH2 and O-6 of the guanine ring and N-1 and N-7 of the AI ring
recognize the same binding pocket due to the observed bioisosterism.Therefore, we believe that structure-guided optimization to form 7-azaindole-based
nucleosides could generate promising scaffolds. Alternately, the incorporation of
carbocyclic/heterocyclic mimics of sugar amino acids at the C-3, C-4, or C-5 position of
7-azaindole could be a rational structural design strategy to develop AI-based inhibitors to
combat COVID-19 and other viral diseases.
Conclusion
Our in-depth and critical survey of a decade of work on AIs and their analogs reinforces
the perspectives of remarkably successful antiviral agents against a wide spectrum of RNA
viruses. It is thus imperative to modify AI-containing compounds to attenuate the H-bonding
capacity, physiological profile, pharmacological characteristics, and physicochemical
properties of AIs to obtain lead compounds against different viruses.
Authors: Sven Verdonck; Szu-Yuan Pu; Fiona J Sorrell; Jon M Elkins; Mathy Froeyen; Ling-Jie Gao; Laura I Prugar; Danielle E Dorosky; Jennifer M Brannan; Rina Barouch-Bentov; Stefan Knapp; John M Dye; Piet Herdewijn; Shirit Einav; Steven De Jonghe Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Alexandria P Taylor; Ralph P Robinson; Yvette M Fobian; David C Blakemore; Lyn H Jones; Olugbeminiyi Fadeyi Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Olivia Perwitasari; Xiuzhen Yan; Jason O'Donnell; Scott Johnson; Ralph A Tripp Journal: Assay Drug Dev Technol Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 1.738
Authors: Michael B Plewe; Scott L Butler; Klaus R Dress; Qiyue Hu; Ted W Johnson; Jon E Kuehler; Atsuo Kuki; Hieu Lam; Wen Liu; Dawn Nowlin; Qinghai Peng; Sadayappan V Rahavendran; Steven P Tanis; Khanh T Tran; Hai Wang; Anle Yang; Junhu Zhang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 7.446