Literature DB >> 32113509

COVID-19: combining antiviral and anti-inflammatory treatments.

Justin Stebbing1, Anne Phelan2, Ivan Griffin2, Catherine Tucker2, Olly Oechsle2, Dan Smith2, Peter Richardson2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32113509      PMCID: PMC7158903          DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30132-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


× No keyword cloud information.
Both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) are characterised by an overexuberant inflammatory response and, for SARS, viral load is not correlated with the worsening of symptoms.1, 2 In our previous Correspondence to The Lancet, we described how BenevolentAI's proprietary artificial intelligence (AI)-derived knowledge graph, queried by a suite of algorithms, enabled identification of a target and a potential therapeutic against SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2; the causative organism in COVID-19). We identified a group of approved drugs that could inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis and thereby inhibit viral infection of cells (appendix). The drug targets are members of the numb-associated kinase (NAK) family—including AAK1 and GAK—the inhibition of which has been shown to reduce viral infection in vitro.5, 6 Baricitinib was identified as a NAK inhibitor, with a particularly high affinity for AAK1, a pivotal regulator of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We suggested that this drug could be of use in countering SARS-CoV-2 infections, subject to appropriate clinical testing. To take this work further in a short timescale, a necessity when dealing with a new human pathogen, we re-examined the affinity and selectivity of all the approved drugs in our knowledge graph to identify those with both antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Such drugs are predicted to be of particular importance in the treatment of severe cases of COVID-19, when the host inflammatory response becomes a major cause of lung damage and subsequent mortality. Comparison of the properties of the three best candidates are shown in the table . Baricitinib, fedratinib, and ruxolitinib are potent and selective JAK inhibitors approved for indications such as rheumatoid arthritis and myelofibrosis. All three are powerful anti-inflammatories that, as JAK–STAT signalling inhibitors, are likely to be effective against the consequences of the elevated levels of cytokines (including interferon-γ) typically observed in people with COVID-19· Although the three candidates have similar JAK inhibitor potencies, a high affinity for AAK1 suggests baricitinib is the best of the group, especially given its once-daily oral dosing and acceptable side-effect profile. The most significant side-effect seen over 4214 patient-years in the clinical trial programmes used for European Medicines Agency registration was a small increase in upper respiratory tract infections (similar to that observed with methotrexate), but the incidence of serious infections (eg, herpes zoster) over 52 weeks' dosing was small (3·2 per 100 patient-years), and similar to placebo. Use of this agent in patients with COVID-19 over 7–14 days, for example, suggests side-effects would be trivial.
Table

Properties of three antiviral and anti-inflammatory candidate drugs

BaricitinibRuxolitinibFedratinib
Daily dose, mg2–1025400
Affinity and efficacy: Kd or IC50, nM*
AAK1
Cell free1710032
Cell34700960
GAK
Cell free1361201
Cell27284030
BIKE
Cell free4021032
Cell801470960
JAK1
Cell free6320
Cell1220600
JAK2
Cell free633
Cell1121100
JAK3
Cell free>400279
Cell>800142370
TYK2
Cell free53120
Cell1067600
Pharmacokinetics
Plasma protein binding50%97%95%
Cmax (unbound), nM103117170
Safety: tolerated dose≤10 mg/day≤20 mg twice daily≤400 mg/day

See regulatory approval documents for further information on these drugs. Kd=dissociation constant. IC50=half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Cmax=maximum serum concentration.

All values are IC50 except the cell free values for AAK1, GAK, and BIKE; “cell free” values indicate inhibitory activity against purified protein in biochemical assay; “cell” values indicate enzyme-inhibitory activity inside a cell.

In the absence of direct measurements of drug inhibition in cells, the predicted cell affinity and efficacy values are derived from the ratio of each compound for their primary target; for example, for baricitinib, IC50 AAK1[cell] = (IC50AK1[cell] / IC50AK1[cell free]) × IC50AAK1[cell free].

At a 10 mg dose.

Properties of three antiviral and anti-inflammatory candidate drugs See regulatory approval documents for further information on these drugs. Kd=dissociation constant. IC50=half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Cmax=maximum serum concentration. All values are IC50 except the cell free values for AAK1, GAK, and BIKE; “cell free” values indicate inhibitory activity against purified protein in biochemical assay; “cell” values indicate enzyme-inhibitory activity inside a cell. In the absence of direct measurements of drug inhibition in cells, the predicted cell affinity and efficacy values are derived from the ratio of each compound for their primary target; for example, for baricitinib, IC50 AAK1[cell] = (IC50AK1[cell] / IC50AK1[cell free]) × IC50AAK1[cell free]. At a 10 mg dose. Other AI-algorithm-predicted NAK inhibitors include a combination of the oncology drugs sunitinib and erlotinib, shown to reduce the infectivity of a wide range of viruses, including hepatitis C virus, dengue virus, Ebola virus, and respiratory syncytial virus.5, 6 However, sunitinib and erlotinib would be difficult for patients to tolerate at the doses required to inhibit AAK1 and GAK. By contrast, at therapeutic doses used for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the free plasma concentrations of baricitinib are predicted to be sufficient to inhibit AAK1, and potentially GAK, in cell-based assays. The predicted inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis by baricitinib is unlikely to be observed with other anti-arthritic drugs or JAK inhibitors. Our analysis of the closely related JAK inhibitors ruxolitinib and fedratinib (table) illustrates that the predicted unbound plasma exposure required to inhibit the enzymes needed for clathrin-mediated endocytosis greatly exceeds the currently tolerated exposures used therapeutically. These drugs are, therefore, unlikely to reduce viral infectivity at tolerated doses, although they might reduce the host inflammatory response through JAK inhibition. Intriguingly, another JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, shows no detectable inhibition of AAK1. The high affinity of baricitinib for NAKs, its anti-inflammatory properties, and its ability to ameliorate associated chronic inflammation in interferonopathies, together with its advantageous pharmacokinetic properties, appear to make it a special case among the approved drugs. In addition, the potential for combination therapy with baracitinib is high because of its low plasma protein binding and minimal interaction with CYP enzymes and drug transporters. Furthermore, there is the potential for combining baricitinib with the direct-acting antivirals (lopinavir or ritonavir and remdesivir) currently being used in the COVID-19 outbreak, since it has a minimal interaction with the relevant CYP drug-metabolising enzymes. Combinations of baricitinib with these direct-acting antivirals could reduce viral infectivity, viral replication, and the aberrant host inflammatory response. This work demonstrates that the use of an AI-driven knowledge graph can facilitate rapid drug development.
  7 in total

1.  Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI.

Authors:  Marwin H S Segler; Mike Preuss; Mark P Waller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Feasibility and biological rationale of repurposing sunitinib and erlotinib for dengue treatment.

Authors:  Szu-Yuan Pu; Fei Xiao; Stanford Schor; Elena Bekerman; Fabio Zanini; Rina Barouch-Bentov; Claude M Nagamine; Shirit Einav
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.970

3.  Anticancer kinase inhibitors impair intracellular viral trafficking and exert broad-spectrum antiviral effects.

Authors:  Elena Bekerman; Gregory Neveu; Ana Shulla; Jennifer Brannan; Szu-Yuan Pu; Stanley Wang; Fei Xiao; Rina Barouch-Bentov; Russell R Bakken; Roberto Mateo; Jennifer Govero; Claude M Nagamine; Michael S Diamond; Steven De Jonghe; Piet Herdewijn; John M Dye; Glenn Randall; Shirit Einav
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease.

Authors:  Peter Richardson; Ivan Griffin; Catherine Tucker; Dan Smith; Olly Oechsle; Anne Phelan; Michael Rawling; Edward Savory; Justin Stebbing
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  JAK1/2 inhibition with baricitinib in the treatment of autoinflammatory interferonopathies.

Authors:  Gina A Montealegre Sanchez; Adam Reinhardt; Suzanne Ramsey; Helmut Wittkowski; Philip J Hashkes; Yackov Berkun; Susanne Schalm; Sara Murias; Jason A Dare; Diane Brown; Deborah L Stone; Ling Gao; Thomas Klausmeier; Dirk Foell; Adriana A de Jesus; Dawn C Chapelle; Hanna Kim; Samantha Dill; Robert A Colbert; Laura Failla; Bahar Kost; Michelle O'Brien; James C Reynolds; Les R Folio; Katherine R Calvo; Scott M Paul; Nargues Weir; Alessandra Brofferio; Ariane Soldatos; Angelique Biancotto; Edward W Cowen; John J Digiovanna; Massimo Gadina; Andrew J Lipton; Colleen Hadigan; Steven M Holland; Joseph Fontana; Ahmad S Alawad; Rebecca J Brown; Kristina I Rother; Theo Heller; Kristina M Brooks; Parag Kumar; Stephen R Brooks; Meryl Waldman; Harsharan K Singh; Volker Nickeleit; Maria Silk; Apurva Prakash; Jonathan M Janes; Seza Ozen; Paul G Wakim; Paul A Brogan; William L Macias; Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study.

Authors:  J S M Peiris; C M Chu; V C C Cheng; K S Chan; I F N Hung; L L M Poon; K I Law; B S F Tang; T Y W Hon; C S Chan; K H Chan; J S C Ng; B J Zheng; W L Ng; R W M Lai; Y Guan; K Y Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  390 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Aspects of Co-morbidities in COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Farzaneh Pouya; Zeynab Imani Saber; Mohammad Amin Kerachian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-04

2.  Deep Learning applications for COVID-19.

Authors:  Connor Shorten; Taghi M Khoshgoftaar; Borko Furht
Journal:  J Big Data       Date:  2021-01-11

Review 3.  Advances in the possible treatment of COVID-19: A review.

Authors:  Pankaj Chibber; Syed Assim Haq; Irfan Ahmed; Nusrit Iqbal Andrabi; Gurdarshan Singh
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.432

4.  B-cell depleting therapies may affect susceptibility to acute respiratory illness among patients with Multiple Sclerosis during the early COVID-19 epidemic in Iran.

Authors:  Farinaz Safavi; Bardia Nourbakhsh; Amir Reza Azimi
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 5.  Current Trends and Future Approaches in Small-Molecule Therapeutics for COVID-19.

Authors:  Mark Laws; Yasmin M Surani; Md Mahbub Hasan; Yiyuan Chen; Peiqin Jin; Taha Al-Adhami; Madiha Chowdhury; Aqeel Imran; Ioannis Psaltis; Shirin Jamshidi; Kazi S Nahar; Khondaker Miraz Rahman
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  A hypothesis for pathobiology and treatment of COVID-19: The centrality of ACE1/ACE2 imbalance.

Authors:  Krishna Sriram; Paul A Insel
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Coronavirus disease 2019: investigational therapies in the prevention and treatment of hyperinflammation.

Authors:  Isabelle Amigues; Alexander H Pearlman; Aarat Patel; Pankti Reid; Philip C Robinson; Rashmi Sinha; Alfred Hj Kim; Taryn Youngstein; Arundathi Jayatilleke; Maximilian Konig
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  COVID-19 in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Ali Nowroozi; Sepideh Razi; Kamal Kant Sahu; Fabio Grizzi; Jann Arends; Mahsa Keshavarz-Fathi; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  A review of COVID-19 biomarkers and drug targets: resources and tools.

Authors:  Francesca P Caruso; Giovanni Scala; Luigi Cerulo; Michele Ceccarelli
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 10.  Drug repurposing approach to combating coronavirus: Potential drugs and drug targets.

Authors:  Jimin Xu; Yu Xue; Richard Zhou; Pei-Yong Shi; Hongmin Li; Jia Zhou
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 12.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.