| Literature DB >> 35458421 |
Tao Wang1, Zheng-Wei Fan1, Yang Ji1, Jin-Jin Chen1, Guo-Ping Zhao1, Wen-Hui Zhang1, Hai-Yang Zhang1, Bao-Gui Jiang1, Qiang Xu1, Chen-Long Lv1, Xiao-Ai Zhang1, Hao Li1, Yang Yang2, Li-Qun Fang1, Wei Liu1.
Abstract
The geographic expansion of mosquitos is associated with a rising frequency of outbreaks of mosquito-borne diseases (MBD) worldwide. We collected occurrence locations and times of mosquito species, mosquito-borne arboviruses, and MBDs in the mainland of China in 1954-2020. We mapped the spatial distributions of mosquitoes and arboviruses at the county level, and we used machine learning algorithms to assess contributions of ecoclimatic, socioenvironmental, and biological factors to the spatial distributions of 26 predominant mosquito species and two MBDs associated with high disease burden. Altogether, 339 mosquito species and 35 arboviruses were mapped at the county level. Culex tritaeniorhynchus is found to harbor the highest variety of arboviruses (19 species), followed by Anopheles sinensis (11) and Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (9). Temperature seasonality, annual precipitation, and mammalian richness were the three most important contributors to the spatial distributions of most of the 26 predominant mosquito species. The model-predicted suitable habitats are 60-664% larger in size than what have been observed, indicating the possibility of severe under-detection. The spatial distribution of major mosquito species in China is likely to be under-estimated by current field observations. More active surveillance is needed to investigate the mosquito species in specific areas where investigation is missing but model-predicted probability is high.Entities:
Keywords: China; arboviruses; distribution; mosquito-borne diseases; mosquitoes; risk determinants
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458421 PMCID: PMC9031751 DOI: 10.3390/v14040691
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.818
The average testing areas under curve (AUC) of the BRT models and predicted numbers, coverage areas and population sizes of affected counties for the 26 most prevalent mosquito species in China.
| Mosquito Species | Average AUC (2.5–97.5% Percentiles) | Predicted/Observed (Relative Difference %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Counties | Coverage Area (10 000 km 2) | Population Size (million) | ||
| 0.84 (0.79, 0.88) | 1324/373 (255.0) | 226.2/80.7 (180.3) | 739.8/216.3 (242.0) | |
|
| 0.87 (0.81, 0.92) | 1930/751 (157.0) | 361.5/182.5 (98.1) | 978.1/430.1 (127.4) |
|
| 0.90 (0.87, 0.94) | 469/248 (89.1) | 81.8/51.2 (59.8) | 256.2/150.8 (69.9) |
|
| 0.86 (0.82, 0.89) | 631/236 (167.4) | 137.1/55.7 (146.1) | 290.1/131.7 (120.3) |
|
| 0.88 (0.82, 0.93) | 282/124 (127.4) | 82.0/36.7 (123.4) | 108.2/51.5 (110.1) |
|
| 0.87 (0.82, 0.93) | 411/117 (251.3) | 83.1/30.7 (170.7) | 181.3/63.7 (184.6) |
|
| 0.79 (0.72, 0.86) | 280/105 (166.7) | 75.2/31.7 (137.2) | 104.5/45.6 (129.2) |
|
| 0.91 (0.85, 0.95) | 242/104 (132.7) | 54.2/24.2 (124.0) | 120.1/57.6 (108.5) |
|
| 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) | 236/97 (143.3) | 52.4/22.3 (135.0) | 115.4/39.2 (194.4) |
| 0.83 (0.77, 0.87) | 1924/587 (227.8) | 305.1/131.3 (132.4) | 1042.8/330.6 (215.4) | |
|
| 0.90 (0.85, 0.93) | 930/384 (142.2) | 193.5/87.0 (122.4) | 465.5/206.2 (125.8) |
|
| 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) | 1695/381 (344.9) | 332.7/111.8 (197.6) | 856.9/234.0 (266.2) |
|
| 0.68 (0.63, 0.73) | 560/250 (124.0) | 114.8/57.3 (100.3) | 275.2/136.2 (102.1) |
|
| 0.77 (0.69, 0.84) | 1397/186 (651.1) | 582.6/78.0 (646.9) | 546.9/92.9 (488.7) |
|
| 0.76 (0.70, 0.82) | 590/161 (266.5) | 123.8/40.1 (208.7) | 285.1/78.1 (265.0) |
|
| 0.93 (0.88, 0.96) | 561/133 (321.8) | 336.2/118.5 (183.7) | 184.8/57.1 (223.6) |
|
| 0.80 (0.74, 0.86) | 429/129 (232.6) | 85.0/29.0 (193.1) | 233.7/67.5 (246.2) |
|
| 0.75 (0.65, 0.84) | 402/123 (226.8) | 113.0/35.4 (219.2) | 151.4/54.4 (178.3) |
|
| 0.82 (0.75, 0.88) | 240/108 (122.2) | 65.8/31.1 (111.6) | 77.9/40.4 (92.8) |
|
| 0.85 (0.75, 0.92) | 293/99 (196.0) | 72.8/33.2 (119.3) | 133.5/38.5 (246.8) |
|
| 0.77 (0.70, 0.84) | 261/95 (174.7) | 59.5/24.8 (139.9) | 106.5/42.0 (153.6) |
|
| 0.76 (0.68, 0.82) | 459/82 (459.8) | 158.1/20.7 (663.8) | 200.0/37.3 (436.2) |
| 0.87 (0.83, 0.90) | 1374/555 (147.6) | 197.0/102.7 (91.8) | 796.9/343.5 (132.0) | |
|
| 0.82 (0.76, 0.87) | 953/247 (285.8) | 436.5/140.8 (210.0) | 329.7/107.9 (205.6) |
|
| 0.93 (0.89, 0.96) | 624/111 (462.2) | 390.7/120.7 (223.7) | 211.4/47.3 (346.9) |
|
| 0.95 (0.84, 1.00) | 103/30 (243.3) | 23.1/7.8 (196.2) | 62.3/15.1 (312.6) |
a Top 5 mosquito species affecting the greatest numbers of counties. b Top 5 mosquito species affecting the widest areas. c Top 5 mosquito species affecting the largest population sizes. The predicted numbers are compared with the actual observations from field surveys and the relative differences (%) are given in parentheses.
Figure 1Clustering of mosquito species based on their ecological features and spatial distributions at the county level. Panels (B–H) indicate the spatial distributions of the seven clusters (clusters I–VII). The boundaries of the seven biogeographic zones are shown as red solid lines. The dendrogram in panel (A) displays the clusters I–VII of mosquito species. The features used for clustering are three quantities associated with each predictor in the BRT models. Two of the three quantities were displayed in panel (A) to indicate the possible level of ecological suitability: relative contributions (colors in ascending order from yellow to orange) and standardized median value of the predictor (numbers in the heatmap) among counties with mosquito occurrence (numbers 1–4 indicate the position of this median in reference to the quartiles of this predictor among all counties).
Figure 2Mosquito species and animals for mosquito-borne viruses in China from 1954 to 2020. The virus names colored in blue indicate newly identified pathogens in the past two decades in China. “*” indicates arboviruses that have never been reported in human cases in China, but with the detection of viruses in mosquitoes or animals, or the detection of IgG in people. The mosquito names colored in red indicate species included in ecological models.
Figure 3Distributions of reported human cases (circles or squares) and viral detections from mosquitos (shaded areas) of (A) Flavivirus; (B) Alphavirus; (C) Orthobunyavirus; (D) Orbivirus; (E) Seadonavirus and (F) other viruses in China in 1954–2020. Local confirmed (hollow circles or squares), local probable (hollow circles or squares with a cross), and imported (solid circles or squares) human cases are positioned at the center of prefectures/counties (circles) or provinces (square), depending on the finest available resolution. Human cases of JEV and DENV are not shown, as they are described in other figures. Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 2.
Figure 4The reported and model-predicted distributions of dengue and JE at the county level in China. (A) Reported annual incidence rate of human dengue and locations of DENV detected from mosquitoes; (B) spatial distribution of model-predicted incidence rate of dengue; (C) reported annual incidence rate of human JE and locations of JEV detected from mosquitoes and host animals; (D) spatial distribution of model-predicted incidence rate of JE.
Mean (standard deviation) relative contributions of major factors to the spatial distributions of dengue and JE, estimated by two-stage GBRT models.
| Category | Variable | Dengue (Relative Contributions %) # | Japanese Encephalitis (Relative Contributions %) # | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 1 | Stage 2 | ||
| Environmental | Basin (binary variable) | 3.27 (2.20) | 3.65 (1.55) | ||
| Paddy field (%) | 2.27 (0.48) | ||||
| Rainfed cropland (%) | 3.05 (0.59) | 3.20 (0.84) | |||
| Forest (%) | 1.82 (0.58) | 3.20 (0.62) | |||
| Grasslands (%) | 23.99 (8.87) | ||||
| River (%) | 2.52 (0.51) | ||||
| Rural residential land (%) | 3.69 (0.96) | ||||
| Other construction land (%) | 2.29 (0.46) | ||||
| Ecoclimatic | Annual mean temperature | 16.25 (4.88) | 14.92 (6.65) | 17.17 (6.52) | 2.68 (0.54) |
| Isothermality | 3.43 (0.68) | 3.82 (1.33) | 2.54 (0.44) | ||
| Temperature seasonality | 3.00 (2.23) | 8.78 (2.17) | |||
| Mean temperature of wettest quarter | 11.29 (2.62) | 2.05 (0.51) | |||
| Mean temperature of warmest quarter | 34.14 (7.35) | 6.34 (4.46) | |||
| Annual cumulative precipitation | 7.00 (5.60) | 27.30 (8.36) | |||
| Precipitation seasonality | 2.71 (0.62) | 2.77 (1.41) | 4.00 (0.65) | 4.03 (1.33) | |
| Precipitation of driest quarter | 4.62 (1.26) | 9.84 (2.77) | 5.16 (1.07) | ||
| Social | Index of case importation | - | 5.85 (3.93) | - | - |
| Proportion of women | 2.18 (0.43) | 2.75 (0.46) | |||
| Proportion of ≥60 years old | 3.01 (0.62) | 2.68 (0.62) | |||
| Number of general hospitals | 5.35 (1.30) | 3.75 (0.64) | |||
| Number of clinics | 3.18 (0.70) | ||||
| Biological | Density of population | 5.01 (1.06) | 4.03 (0.84) | 2.67 (0.62) | 2.33 (0.55) |
| Mammalian richness | 2.93 (0.76) | 6.86 (1.19) | 4.46 (0.81) | ||
| Density of pig | 3.79 (0.79) | 5.92 (2.29) | |||
| Density of cattle | 2.66 (1.02) | 3.04 (0.50) | |||
| Density of duck | 3.40 (0.72) | 5.09 (1.57) | |||
| Density of goat | 2.69 (1.73) | 3.10 (0.63) | |||
| Density of sheep | 2.60 (1.77) | 2.37 (0.52) | |||
| Density of chicken | 16.29 (8.28) | ||||
| Presence of | - | - | 16.11 (7.08) | ||
| Presence of | - | - | 2.61 (0.53) | ||
| Presence of | - | - | 2.08 (0.61) | ||
| Presence of | 7.13 (1.15) | 17.27 (7.56) | - | - | |
# The relative contributions were indicated as mean (standard deviation). “-” factors were not included in the whole model. & The presence of predominant mosquito species indicated the occurrence probability of each species predicted by the model. Stage 1 models the presence/absence of any reported human case, and stage 2 models the annual average incidences from 2014 to 2018 among presence locations. Mammalian richness indicated the number of mammal species.