Literature DB >> 18435502

Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection.

Marcus D Ruopp1, Neil J Perkins, Brian W Whitcomb, Enrique F Schisterman.   

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is used to evaluate a biomarker's ability for classifying disease status. The Youden Index (J), the maximum potential effectiveness of a biomarker, is a common summary measure of the ROC curve. In biomarker development, levels may be unquantifiable below a limit of detection (LOD) and missing from the overall dataset. Disregarding these observations may negatively bias the ROC curve and thus J. Several correction methods have been suggested for mean estimation and testing; however, little has been written about the ROC curve or its summary measures. We adapt non-parametric (empirical) and semi-parametric (ROC-GLM [generalized linear model]) methods and propose parametric methods (maximum likelihood (ML)) to estimate J and the optimal cut-point (c *) for a biomarker affected by a LOD. We develop unbiased estimators of J and c * via ML for normally and gamma distributed biomarkers. Alpha level confidence intervals are proposed using delta and bootstrap methods for the ML, semi-parametric, and non-parametric approaches respectively. Simulation studies are conducted over a range of distributional scenarios and sample sizes evaluating estimators' bias, root-mean square error, and coverage probability; the average bias was less than one percent for ML and GLM methods across scenarios and decreases with increased sample size. An example using polychlorinated biphenyl levels to classify women with and without endometriosis illustrates the potential benefits of these methods. We address the limitations and usefulness of each method in order to give researchers guidance in constructing appropriate estimates of biomarkers' true discriminating capabilities. Copyright 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435502      PMCID: PMC2515362          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200710415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  9 in total

1.  The effect of random measurement error on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Authors:  D Faraggi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Measuring the effectiveness of diagnostic markers in the presence of measurement error through the use of ROC curves.

Authors:  B Reiser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Distribution-free ROC analysis using binary regression techniques.

Authors:  Todd A Alonzo; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  The Youden Index and the optimal cut-point corrected for measurement error.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Comparing the areas under two correlated ROC curves: parametric and non-parametric approaches.

Authors:  Katy Molodianovitch; David Faraggi; Benjamin Reiser
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Iterative maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of normal populations from singly and doubly censored samples.

Authors:  H L Harter; A H Moore
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 2.445

9.  Environmental PCB exposure and risk of endometriosis.

Authors:  G M Buck Louis; J M Weiner; B W Whitcomb; R Sperrazza; E F Schisterman; D T Lobdell; K Crickard; H Greizerstein; P J Kostyniak
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 6.918

  9 in total
  256 in total

Review 1.  A Review of Cutoffs for Nutritional Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ramkripa Raghavan; Fayrouz Sakr Ashour; Regan Bailey
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with febrile neutropenia using machine learning models.

Authors:  Xinsong Du; Jae Min; Chintan P Shah; Rohit Bishnoi; William R Hogan; Dominick J Lemas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Volatile fingerprinting of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and respiratory syncytial virus infection in an in vitro cystic fibrosis co-infection model.

Authors:  Giorgia Purcaro; Christiaan A Rees; Jeffrey A Melvin; Jennifer M Bomberger; Jane E Hill
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.262

4.  Identification of a metastasis-specific MicroRNA signature in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Keun Hur; Yuji Toiyama; Aaron J Schetter; Yoshinaga Okugawa; Curtis C Harris; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Comparison of Panitumumab-IRDye800CW and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid to Provide Optical Contrast in a Model of Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Tiara S Napier; Neha Udayakumar; Aditi H Jani; Yolanda E Hartman; Hailey A Houson; Lindsay Moore; Hope M Amm; Nynke S van den Berg; Anna G Sorace; Jason M Warram
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Nutritional Predictors of Wound Infection in Patients with Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Adam Kline; Pramod Kamalapathy; Katharine Bruce; Kevin Raskin; Joseph Schwab; Santiago Lozano-Calderón
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout; Julia D López; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Thomas Atwater; Sanja Antic; Qian Li; Ronald C Walker; Gary T Smith; Pierre P Massion; Matthew B Schabath; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  New approach to the evaluation of perineal measurements to predict the likelihood of the need for an episiotomy.

Authors:  Luis C Moya-Jiménez; María L Sánchez-Ferrer; Evdochia Adoamnei; Jaime Mendiola
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Significance of folate receptor alpha and thymidylate synthase protein expression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed.

Authors:  Daniel C Christoph; Bernadette Reyna Asuncion; Biftu Hassan; Cindy Tran; Julia D Maltzman; Daniel J O'Shannessy; Murry W Wynes; Thomas C Gauler; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Mathias Hoiczyk; Martin Schuler; Wilfried E Eberhardt; Fred R Hirsch
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.