| Literature DB >> 35456788 |
Isabelle A M van Thiel1,2, Shafaque Rahman1,2, Theodorus B M Hakvoort1,2,3, Mark Davids3,4, Caroline Verseijden1,2, Patricia H P van Hamersveld1,2, Mèlanie V Bénard5, Maarten H Lodders1,2, Teun Boekhout6,7, René M van den Wijngaard1,2,5, Sigrid E M Heinsbroek1,2,5, Cyriel Y Ponsioen5, Wouter J de Jonge1,2,5,8.
Abstract
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has the potential to restore (bacterial and fungal) microbial imbalance in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and contribute to disease remission. Here, we aimed to identify fecal fungal species associated with the induction of clinical remission and endoscopic response to FMT for patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. We analyzed the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1)-based mycobiota composition in fecal samples from patients (n = 31) and donors (n = 7) that participated previously in a double-blinded randomized control trial evaluating the efficacy of two infusions of donor FMT compared with autologous FMT. The abundance of the yeast genus Filobasidium in fecal material used for transplantation was shown to correlate with clinical remission following FMT, irrespective of its presence in the material of donor or autologous fecal microbiota transfer. The amplified sequence variants within the genus Filobasidium most closely resembled Filobasidium magnum. Monocyte-derived macrophages and HT29 epithelial cells were stimulated with fungal species. Especially Filobasidium floriforme elicited an IL10 response in monocyte-derived macrophages, along with secretion of other cytokines following stimulation with other Filobasidium species. No effect of Filobasidium spp. was seen on epithelial wound healing in scratch assays. In conclusion, the enriched presence of Filobasidium spp. in donor feces is associated with the positive response to FMT for patients with UC and hence it may serve as a predictive fungal biomarker for successful FMT.Entities:
Keywords: Candida; Filobasidium; fecal microbiota transfer; macrophages; ulcerative colitis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456788 PMCID: PMC9031408 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Patient baseline characteristics stratified for positive response to fecal microbiota transfer.
| Responders | Non-Responders | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 4 (44) | 7 (32) |
|
| 46 (12.7) | 41 (11.7) |
|
| 3 (33) | 11 (50) |
|
| 7 (20) | 8 (12) |
|
| ||
| E1, proctitis | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| E2, left-sided | 3 (33) | 10 (45) |
| E3, pancolitis | 6 (67) | 12 (55) |
|
| 6 (67) | 17 (77) |
| Mesalamine oral | 6 (67) | 14 (64) |
| Mesalamine rectal | 0 (0) | 1 (5) |
| Thiopurines | 0 (0) | 1 (5) |
| Systemic corticosteroids (<10 mg) | 0 (0) | 1 (5) |
|
| 0 (0) | 1 (5) |
|
| 8 (5) | 8 (3) |
|
| ||
| Mayo 1 | 2 (22) | 2 (9) |
| Mayo 2 | 6 (67) | 11 (50) |
| Mayo 3 | 1 (11) | 9 (41) |
|
| ||
| Rectum only | 1 (11) | 3 (14) |
| Left side of colon | 7 (78) | 13 (59) |
| Pancolitis | 1 (11) | 6 (27) |
FMT-D, fecal microbiota transfer using donor feces; IQR, interquartile range; SCCAI, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index; SD, standard deviation; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Primer sequences for qPCR reactions.
| Gene Name | Gene Symbol | 5′-Forward Sequence | 5′-Reverse Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| GGCAGATCCAGTGCAAAGTC | TCACTCCCAGGAGGATGC |
|
|
| CGCCATGAGAACTTCCTACC | CCACTGCTGACGCAATTGTA |
|
|
| AAGCAGTCTGGGGAAGACAA | CTAGGAAGCTCAGCGACAGC |
|
|
| ACCAAACCTCTTCGAGGCAC | AGCCATCATTTCACTGGCGA |
|
|
| AGTGAGGAACAAGCCAGAGC | GTCAGGGGTGGTTATTGCAT |
|
|
| AAATTTGGGGTGGAAAGGTT | TCCTGATTTCTGCAGCTCTGT |
|
|
| GCCACCCTGATGTCTCAGTT | GTGGAGCAGGTGAAGAATGC |
|
|
| TTTGTGGGACAAGGAACACA | ATGCCATGGGACTGTCAACT |
|
|
| AGAGCACAGCAATGGAGGAA | GACGTTTCCCCACTCTGAAA |
|
|
| CCTGCTGCACTTTGGAGTGA | GAGGGTTTGCTACAACATGGG |
|
|
| TTTGTGGGACAAGGAACACA | ATGCCATGGGACTGTCAACT |
|
|
| GTCAGTGGTGGACCTGACCT | TGAGCTTGACAAAGTGGTCG |
|
|
| CCTGGCGTCGTGATTAGTGAT | AGACGTTCAGTCCTGTCCATAA |
|
|
| ACGGCGAGCCCTTGG | TTTCTGCTGTCTTTGGGACCT |
|
|
| ACCTGATGGCGGGAATCAT | ATCATACCCCCCATAGGCACT |
Figure 1Filobasidium spp. abundance in donor material is associated with positive response to fecal microbiota transfer (FMT). (A) Internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1)-based mycobiome composition plot showing abundance of on genus level, with subjects stratified for response to FMT with donor feces (FMT-D) or with autologous feces (FMT-A). Each column represents one patient sample set. Characters in taxa list indicate taxonomic rank (g, genus; f, family). Donor samples are only displayed for FMT-D as FMT-A uses baseline fecal material. FMT-D, fecal microbiota transfer using donor feces; FMT-A, fecal microbiota transfer using autologous feces. (B) Abundance of the genus Candida in donors and patient samples at baseline or at 12-weeks follow-up. FMT-D responders vs. FMT-D non-responders at baseline, p = 0.014 (Kruskal–Wallis). (C) Basidiomycota to Ascomycota ratio. (D) Mycobiome composition of fecal material for transplantation (both FMT-A and FMT-D) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities is not different between responders and non-responders. (E) Significant differentially abundant genera in fecal material for transplantation (padj < 0.05). Bar length indicates Log2FoldChange. (F) Abundance of the genus Filobasidium spp. in fecal matter for FMT and at 12 weeks after the first FMT. (G) Phylogenetic tree of Filobasidium and Cryptococcus clades. Names in brackets are former names. Purple taxa indicated with ‘ASV’ are the four most abundant amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) within the genus Filobasidium in this cohort. Length of each tip indicates genetic similarity between neighboring taxa.
Figure 2Stimulation of monocyte-derived macrophages to Filobasidium spp. results in cytokine response. (A–L) Relative expression levels of cytokines IL1β, IL6, TNFα, and IL10 across M0, M1, and M2 polarized monocyte derived macrophages ((A–D), (E–H), (I–L), respectively) after 4 h stimulation with yeast species (n = 5–6 individuals). mRNA expressions are normalized against housekeeping genes, PPIA and PSMB6. (M–X) Released cytokines (IL1β, IL6, TNFα, IL10) by monocyte-derived macrophages skewed into M0, M1, or M2 phenotype ((M–P), (Q–T), (U–X), respectively) and stimulated with yeasts for 24 h (n = 4–6 individuals). Data represented as median and separate data points. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.005; **** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Cytokine release from different states of macrophages after pre-treatment with lipopolysaccharide and stimulation with Filobasidium species or Candida albicans. (A–L) Released cytokines by LPS pre-incubated monocyte-derived macrophages skewed into M0, M1, or M2 phenotype ((A–D), (E–H), (I–L), respectively) stimulated with yeasts. All data represented as median and individual data points (n = 3–4 donors). * p <0.05; ** p <0.01.
Figure 4Stimulation of epithelial cells to Filobasidium species results in no pro-inflammatory response. (A,C–G) Relative expression of IL8, DEF5A, DEFB1, CLDN1, OCLN, and TJP1 upon stimulation of HT29 epithelial cells with yeast for 4 h (n = 3). Expression normalized against references genes HPRT and GAPDH. (B) Supernatant IL8 concentrations after 24 h stimulation of HT29 monolayers. (H) Epithelial wound healing assay with simultaneous stimulation with yeast species. Closure is expressed as percentage of scratch area closed at 4 h intervals for 24 h. (I) Wound closure after 24 h of incubation with yeast. Data are presented as median and separate data points and were tested using Kruskal–Wallis tests.