Literature DB >> 3539164

Non-invasive estimation of the mean pressure difference in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

D Teien, K Karp, P Eriksson.   

Abstract

The mean pressure difference across the valve in aortic stenosis is an indicator of the severity of the obstruction to flow. Non-invasive determination of the mean pressure gradient by Doppler ultrasonography is, however, complicated by the squared relation between instantaneous velocities and pressure differences. The validity of a new simple formula for calculation of the mean pressure difference from the peak pressure difference was evaluated in 26 patients with aortic stenosis. The formula is: delta pmean = 0.64 delta ppeak, where delta pmean is the mean pressure gradient and delta ppeak the peak pressure gradient. There was a close correlation between the mean pressure differences determined by application of the formula to the peak pressure differences measured at catheterisation and the mean pressure differences obtained by planimetry (r = 0.97, SEE = 4.7 mm Hg). The correlation between mean pressure differences determined by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound and the formula and those measured by planimetry was also close (r = 0.91, SEE = 7.6 mm Hg) and only three patients showed a difference between the two methods of greater than 10 mm Hg. The new formula is a simple and reliable means of estimating the mean pressure difference from Doppler recordings and it facilitates the comparison of Doppler and catheterisation data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3539164      PMCID: PMC1236892          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.56.5.450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  12 in total

1.  Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. I.

Authors:  R GORLIN; S G GORLIN
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J Krafchek; J H Robertson; M Radford; D Adams; J Kisslo
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula.

Authors:  S R Cannon; K L Richards; M Crawford
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Noninvasive quantification of the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Y Zhang; E Myhre; S Nitter-Hauge
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  L Hatle; B A Angelsen; A Tromsdal
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-03

7.  Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  L Hegrenaes; L Hatle
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-10

8.  Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  R B Stamm; R P Martin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Quantification of transvalvular pressure differences in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  D Teien; P Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

Authors:  P J Currie; J B Seward; G S Reeder; R E Vlietstra; D R Bresnahan; J F Bresnahan; H C Smith; D J Hagler; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of stenosis models for usage in the estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Yubing Shi; Israel Valverde; Patricia V Lawford; Heynric B Grotenhuis; Philipp Beerbaum; D Rodney Hose
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.560

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.