Literature DB >> 34036473

Comparison of stenosis models for usage in the estimation of pressure gradient across aortic coarctation.

Yubing Shi1,2, Israel Valverde3,4,5, Patricia V Lawford2,6, Heynric B Grotenhuis3,4, Philipp Beerbaum3,4,7, D Rodney Hose8,9.   

Abstract

Non-invasive estimation of the pressure gradient in cardiovascular stenosis has much clinical importance in assisting the diagnosis and treatment of stenotic diseases. In this research, a systematic comparison is conducted to investigate the accuracy of a group of stenosis models against the MRI- and catheter-measured patient data under the aortic coarctation condition. Eight analytical stenosis models, including six from the literature and two proposed in this study, are investigated to examine their prediction accuracy against the clinical data. The two improved models proposed in this study consider comprehensively the Poiseuille loss, the Bernoulli loss in its exact form, and the entrance effect, of the blood flow. Comparison of the results shows that one of the proposed models demonstrates a cycle-averaged mean prediction error of -0.15 ± 3.03 mmHg, a peak-to-peak prediction error of -1.8 ± 6.89 mmHg, which is the best among the models studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic coarctation; Bernoulli loss; Entrance effect; Poiseuille loss; Pressure gradient; Stenosis model

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34036473      PMCID: PMC8184908          DOI: 10.1007/s10867-021-09572-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Phys        ISSN: 0092-0606            Impact factor:   1.560


  32 in total

1.  The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans.

Authors:  I B Wilkinson; H MacCallum; L Flint; J R Cockcroft; D E Newby; D J Webb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Yunlong Huo; Mark Svendsen; Jenny Susana Choy; Z-D Zhang; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Uncertainty quantification implementations in human hemodynamic flows.

Authors:  G Ninos; V Bartzis; N Merlemis; I E Sarris
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Pressure drop across artificially induced stenoses in the femoral arteries of dogs.

Authors:  D F Young; N R Cholvin; A C Roth
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Effect of flow on the resistance of modelled femoral artery stenoses.

Authors:  S R Dodds; N K Bourne; A D Chant
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Non-invasive determination of the aortic valve area in stenosis: hydraulic orifice formula for application to echocardiography and correlation with catheterization.

Authors:  W S Seitz; I A Kashani
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  L Hatle; B A Angelsen; A Tromsdal
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-03

8.  Pressure recovery explains doppler overestimation of invasive pressure gradient across segmental vascular stenosis.

Authors:  Alessandro Giardini; Theresa A Tacy
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 9.  Coarctation of the aorta in adults: what is the best treatment? Case report and literature review.

Authors:  R Jurcut; A M Daraban; A Lorber; D Deleanu; M S Amzulescu; C Zara; B A Popescu; C Ginghina
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2011-05-25

Review 10.  Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine.

Authors:  Bernd Scheer; Azriel Perel; Ulrich J Pfeiffer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.