Literature DB >> 4050648

A reconsideration of Doppler assessed gradients in suspected aortic stenosis.

J Krafchek, J H Robertson, M Radford, D Adams, J Kisslo.   

Abstract

To further define the clinical role of continuous wave Doppler echocardiography for determining aortic valve gradient, we studied 60 consecutive adult patients (age range 22 to 81 years, mean age 63) with suspected aortic stenosis within 24 hours of catheterization. Blind comparisons of Doppler peak and mean gradients by the simplified Bernoulli equation were made with catheterization peak-to-peak (r = 0.84), peak (r = 0.87) and mean (r = 0.84) gradients in a double-blind fashion. Despite these favorable correlations, Doppler peak gradient generally overestimated catheterization peak-to-peak gradient (1 to 53 mm Hg), making it impractical for clinical use. Doppler-catheterization correlations of peak and mean gradients were more favorable, with the least scatter noticed for mean gradient. The results of analysis of pooled data indicated that mean gradient may also be most specific for differentiating severe from less severe aortic stenosis. In this consecutive series where a full range of catheterization gradients was encountered, seven patients with predicted Doppler gradients were found to have none, which is best explained by the use of the simplified Bernoulli equation in patients with aortic insufficiency. These data indicate that prudence should be maintained when Doppler gradients alone are used for the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4050648     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(85)90455-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

1.  Echocardiographic follow-up of congenital aortic valvular stenosis.

Authors:  Ayse Guler Eroglu; Kadir Babaoglu; Leven Saltik; Funda Oztunç; Tevfik Demir; Gulay Ahunbay; Alper Guzeltas; Gürkan Cetin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Follow up of patients treated with balloon dilatation of the aortic valve.

Authors:  D Teien
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-07

3.  Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?

Authors:  J Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Non-invasive estimation of the mean pressure difference in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  D Teien; K Karp; P Eriksson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-11

Review 5.  Echocardiography.

Authors:  J B Chambers; M J Monaghan; G Jackson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-29

Review 6.  Assessment of cardiac hemodynamics and valvular function by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  D C Wallerson; J Dubin; R B Devereux
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 7.  Quantitative applications of Doppler cardiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S D Colan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  J L Fischer; T Haberer; D Dickson; L Henselmann
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.