Literature DB >> 3995710

Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.

P J Currie, J B Seward, G S Reeder, R E Vlietstra, D R Bresnahan, J F Bresnahan, H C Smith, D J Hagler, A J Tajik.   

Abstract

Studies of the correlation of aortic valve gradient determined by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography and that determined at catheterization have, to date, involved young patients and nonsimultaneous measurements. We therefore obtained simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic and catheter measurements of pressure gradient in 100 consecutive adults (mean age 69, range 50 to 89 years). In 63 patients pressure measurements were obtained with dual-catheter techniques and in 37 they were obtained by withdrawal of the catheter from the left ventricle to the ascending aorta. Forty-six of these patients also underwent an outpatient Doppler study 7 days or less before catheterization. The simultaneous pressure waveforms and Doppler spectral velocity profiles were digitized at 10 msec intervals and maximum, mean, and instantaneous gradients (mm Hg) were derived for each. The correlation between the Doppler-determined gradient and the simultaneously measured maximum catheter gradient was r = .92 (SEE = 15 mm Hg), that between the Doppler-determined and mean catheter gradient was r = .93 (SEE = 10 mm Hg), and that between the Doppler and peak-to-peak catheter gradient was r = .91 (SEE = 14). The correlation between the nonsimultaneously Doppler-determined gradient and the maximum gradient measured by catheter was not as strong (r = .79, SEE = 24). The continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic velocity profile represents the instantaneous transaortic pressure gradient throughout the cardiac cycle. The best correlation with continuous-wave Doppler-determined gradient was obtained with maximum and mean gradients measured by catheter. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography can be used to reliably predict the pressure gradient in adults with calcific aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3995710     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.71.6.1162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  45 in total

1.  To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences.

Authors:  B J Bouma; R B van Den Brink; J H van Der Meulen; H A Verheul; E C Cheriex; H P Hamer; E Dekker; K I Lie; J G Tijssen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Colour Doppler flow mapping.

Authors:  I A Simpson; A J Camm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-06

3.  Aortic stenosis: the spectrum of practice.

Authors:  O Khalid; D M Luxenberg; C Sable; O Benavidez; T Geva; B Hanna; R Abdulla
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is It Both Fibrocalcific and Sex Specific?

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05

5.  Follow up of patients treated with balloon dilatation of the aortic valve.

Authors:  D Teien
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-07

6.  The quest for the unholy grail.

Authors:  T Kimball
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 7.  An introduction to transoesophageal echocardiography: I. Basic principles.

Authors:  F Béïque; D Joffe; S Kleiman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?

Authors:  J Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  MRI for diagnosing aortic valve stenosis: a comparison study of MRI and ultrasound.

Authors:  C van Pul; N M C M de Jong; L M van Beek; H L M Pasmans; P F F Wijn; R F Visser
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Discrepancies between direct catheter and echocardiography-based values in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Chia-Shing Yang; Erik S Marshall; Zaher Fanari; Michael J Kostal; Joseph T West; Paul Kolm; William S Weintraub; Andrew J Doorey
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.