Literature DB >> 4052281

Aortic stenosis in adults. Non-invasive estimation of pressure differences by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.

L Hegrenaes, L Hatle.   

Abstract

The peak and mean aortic transvalvar pressure differences measured invasively and non-invasively by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography were compared in 87 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis. The mean values were calculated from the maximal velocities of the aortic jet recorded with a spectral display of the Doppler frequency shifts and by applying a modified Bernoulli equation. Technically satisfactory velocity curves for estimating the mean pressure differences could not be obtained in three patients and invasive measurements were not obtained in two. In all patients the peak transvalvar pressure difference was calculated since the aortic jet was identified non-invasively. The peak and mean pressure differences measured invasively and non-invasively correlated well--with only minor underestimation of the pressure differences measured with the Doppler technique--regardless of age, sex, and the presence or absence of aortic valvar regurgitation, or other valvar lesions. With a systematic search for the highest velocities in the aortic jet and with on line spectral analysis of the Doppler frequencies the peak and the mean aortic pressure differences can be determined non-invasively with a high degree of precision in almost all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4052281      PMCID: PMC481918          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.54.4.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  12 in total

1.  Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with a non-invasive ultrasound Doppler technique.

Authors:  J Holen; R Aaslid; K Landmark; S Simonsen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1976

2.  In vitro verification of Doppler prediction of transvalve pressure gradient and orifice area in stenosis.

Authors:  J A Requarth; S J Goldberg; S D Vasko; H D Allen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Evaluation of systolic murmurs by Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  A Hoffmann; D Burckhardt
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-10

4.  Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  L Hatle; A Brubakk; A Tromsdal; B Angelsen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1978-02

5.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  L Hatle; B A Angelsen; A Tromsdal
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1980-03

6.  Changes in arterial pressure during left heart pullback in patients with aortic stenosis: a sign of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  B A Carabello; W H Barry; W Grossman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Noninvasive assessment and differentiation of left ventricular outflow obstruction with Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  L Hatle
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  M Berger; R L Berdoff; P E Gallerstein; E Goldberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  R B Stamm; R P Martin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Prediction of the severity of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction by quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic Doppler studies.

Authors:  C O Lima; D J Sahn; L M Valdes-Cruz; H D Allen; S J Goldberg; E Grenadier; J V Barron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Developments in cardiovascular ultrasound. Part 3: Cardiac applications.

Authors:  C M Moran; W N McDicken; P R Hoskins; P J Fish
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Estimation of Doppler gradients at rest and during exercise in patients with recoarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  D Teien; H Wendel; S Holm; M Hallberg
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-03

3.  Discrepancy between Doppler and catheter measurements of pressure gradients across small-size prosthetic valve.

Authors:  Takuya Yamashita; Yukinori Moriyama; Naoyuki Sata; Naokazu Hamada; Takashi Horinouchi; Shigeru Amitani; Kenkichi Miyahara; Kentaro Setoyama; Kazuhiro Misumi; Hiroshi Sakamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-02

Review 4.  [Perioperative echocardiography: basic principles].

Authors:  M Nowak; P Rosenberger; T W Felbinger; A E Götz; S K Shernan; K Unertl; H K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Follow up of patients treated with balloon dilatation of the aortic valve.

Authors:  D Teien
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-07

6.  Is pressure recovery an important cause of "Doppler aortic stenosis" with no gradient at cardiac catheterisation?

Authors:  J Chambers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  MRI for diagnosing aortic valve stenosis: a comparison study of MRI and ultrasound.

Authors:  C van Pul; N M C M de Jong; L M van Beek; H L M Pasmans; P F F Wijn; R F Visser
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Y Bernard; N Meneveau; A Vuillemenot; D Magnin; T Anguenot; F Schiele; J P Bassand
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients.

Authors:  R Danielsen; J E Nordrehaug; L Stangeland; H Vik-Mo
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-05

10.  Non-invasive estimation of the mean pressure difference in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  D Teien; K Karp; P Eriksson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.