| Literature DB >> 35328454 |
Ancong Wang1, Wenliu Qi1, Tianxin Gao1, Xiaoying Tang1.
Abstract
The growing need to understand the molecular mechanisms of diseases has prompted the revolution in molecular imaging techniques along with nanomedicine development. Conventional optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a low-cost in vivo imaging modality that provides unique high spatial and temporal resolution anatomic images but little molecular information. However, given the widespread adoption of OCT in research and clinical practice, its robust molecular imaging extensions are strongly desired to combine with anatomical images. A range of relevant approaches has been reported already. In this article, we review the recent advances of molecular contrast OCT imaging techniques, the corresponding contrast agents, especially the nanoparticle-based ones, and their applications. We also summarize the properties, design criteria, merit, and demerit of those contrast agents. In the end, the prospects and challenges for further research and development in this field are outlined.Entities:
Keywords: molecular contrast OCT; molecular contrast agent; molecular imaging; nanoparticles; optical coherence tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35328454 PMCID: PMC8949853 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Characteristics of some typical molecular imaging modalities.
| Modality | Spatial Resolution | Temporal Resolution | Penetration Depth | Sensitivity | Multiplexing Capability | Safety Profile | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ~5 mm | Seconds-minutes | >1 m | ++ | No | Ionizing radiation | +++ |
|
| ~10 mm | Minutes | >1 m | ++ | Yes | Ionizing radiation | +++ |
|
| ~1 mm | Seconds-minutes | >1 m | + | No | Ionizing radiation | ++ |
|
| ~1 mm | Minutes-hours | >1 m | + | No | Good | +++ |
|
| 0.1–1 mm | Seconds-minutes | mm-cm | ++ | No | Good | + |
|
| 3–5 mm | Seconds-minutes | 1–2 cm | +++ | Yes | Good | + |
|
| 0.5–3 mm | Seconds-minutes | <1 cm | ++ | Yes | Depends on fluorophore | + |
|
| 0.01–1 mm | Seconds-minutes | 0.5–5 cm | ++ | Yes | Depends on imaging agents | + |
|
| 0.1–1 mm | Seconds-hours | 5 mm | +++ | Yes | Good | ++ |
|
| 0.01 mm | Milliseconds-minutes | 1 mm | +++ | Depends on methods | Depends on extra fields and contrast agents | + |
In this and succeeding tables, plus signs indicate relative amounts, i.e., + low, ++ medium, +++ high.
Figure 1Schematic diagram of generalized OCT systems. A TD-OCT and a spectral-domain OCT are demonstrated in (a,b), respectively. The arrow in (a) indicates the movement of the reference arm. The arrows in (b) show the light travel paths. Adapted with permission from [11]. Copyright 2018 J-STAGE.
Figure 2(a) Schematic drawing of a GV, the gas-filled interior of which has a refractive index (red) different from that of the surrounding H2O (blue). (b) Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and (c) OCT images of GVs from Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 (Halo), Anabaena flos-aquae (Ana), and Bacillus megaterium (Mega). GVs were embedded in agarose hydrogel for OCT imaging. (d) Representative TEM images of Ana GVs before and after ultrasound treatment. (e) Diagram of the IPTG-inducible expression of ARG1 GVs inside E. coli. (f) Representative C-scans of colonies expressing GVs or green fluorescent proteins (GFPs), in the presence or absence of the inducer, and subjected to ultrasound or left intact. Adapted with permission from [40]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3Energy level diagram for a ground-state recovery pump–probe experiment. The pump radiation transfers the ground state population into the excited state. The probe radiation then measures the population transfer induced by the pump, which is manifested as a reduction in ground state absorption and an increase in excited state stimulated emission. Adapted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2006 Optical Society of America.
Figure 4(a) Volumetric OCT image of tadpole. (b) Cross-sectional image in the x, z plane. (c) Cross-sectional image in the y, z plane. (d,e) are cross-sectional cuts along the yellow lines depicted in (b,c). (d) OCT image and (e) OCT image overlaid with the pump–probe signal from blood. Adapted with permission from [49]. Copyright 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 5(a) Absorption spectra of the two states of PhyA. (b) The 750 nm OCT B-scan with PhyA in Pr state (1.5 mm wide × 2 mm deep); the OCT B-scan with PhyA in Pfr state appears very similar (not shown). (c) molecular contrast OCT differential scan. (d) Unwrapped MCOCT scan. (e) A-scans with PhyA in Pr and Pfr state extracted from the locations indicated by the arrows in b. (f) A-scans with PhyA in Pr and Pfr state extracted from the locations indicated in b. Adapted with permission from [9]. Copyright 2005 American Society for Photobiology.
Figure 6(a) Setup of the interferometric CARS measurement system. DM, dichroic mirror; BS, beamsplitter; M, mirror; HPF, high pass filter; PH, pinhole; PMT photomultiplier tube; PC, personal computer. (b) CARS interferogram detected at the beamsplitter BS2 of the setup shown in (a). In the inset is shown a detail of the interference pattern and its fit by the real part of the degree of coherence function (open circles: experimental data; solid line: fit). Lc is the coherence length of the pulse. λAS is the wavelength of the CARS signal. Adapted with permission from [61]. Copyright 2004 Optical Society of America.
Figure 7(a) SH-OCT image showing an area of 100 × 50 μm in the rat-tail tendon, where many cable-like, parallel oriented, and slightly wavy collagen fiber bundles (fascicles) can be visualized; (b) 60× polarization microscope image of the same sample (scale bar: 10 μm). Adapted with permission from [71]. Copyright 2005 AIP Publishing LLC.
Figure 8(a) Experimental flowchart of MM-OCT imaging of in vivo MH-treated melanoma-bearing mice. (b) Simultaneously acquired in vivo OCT (left) and MM-OCT (right) depth-resolved cross-sectional images of melanoma tumor tissue with high overall and local cellularity, (c) low overall and local cellularity. Adapted with permission from [96]. Copyright 2021 The author(s).
Figure 9(a) Transmission electron micrographs of GNR demonstrating unaltered morphology following surface functionalization. (b) OCT in vivo image of day 5 laser-induced choroidal neovascularization lesions with disrupted RPE (white arrowhead). (c) PTOCT of untargeted and targeted GNR in vivo. Average PTOCT signal density for each cohort, with error bars representing standard error of the mean. There is a significant increase in this signal associated with both untargeted and targeted GNR injections versus PBS control. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001. (d–f) Representative OCT B-scans of mice injected with PBS (b; n = 21 eyes), untargeted GNR (c; n = 14 eyes), and targeted GNR (d; n = 14 eyes), respectively, with lesion-associated photothermal signal overlaid in gold. Note the increased concentration of photothermal signal associated with passive accumulation of GNR in the lesions, and the greater increase associated with the injection of targeted GNR. Adapted with permission from [116]. Copyright 2019 The author(s).
Figure 10Representative results of mapping the lipid distribution function and comparison with the corresponding histology sections. The first, second, and third rows show the results for lipid-rich plaque (a–c), fibrous plaque (d–f), and no lesion (g–i), respectively. Gray-scale OCT images (a,d,g) only provide morphological information, whereas the mapping results of the lipid distribution function derived from S-OCT (b,e,h) provide information about lipid composition, which corresponded well with ORO-stained histological sections (c,f,i). Scale bars, 500 µm. Adapted with permission from [128]. Copyright 2016 SPIE.
Figure 11PS-OCT sagittal images of the zebrafish. (a–f) Intensity, degree of polarization uniformity, accumulative retardation, local retardation, accumulative optic axis, and local optic axis image, respectively. The iris (I), cornea (Co), adductor mandibulae (AM), opercle (O), gill (G), pectoral fin (PecF), scales (Sc), skin (Sk), trunk musculature (TM), swim bladder (SB) and vertebral column (VC) can be identified in (a). Scale bars are 500 μm. Adapted with permission from [143]. Copyright 2020 Optical Society of America.
Characteristics of the presented molecular contrast OCT techniques.
| Technique | Signal Source | Spatial Resolution | Imaging Speed | Sensitivity | Extra Fields | Safety Profile | Multiplexing Capability | Contrast Agents |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Scattering and absorption | ~10 µm | +++ | + | None | Depends on contrast agents | Not yet | Exogenous |
|
| Absorption | ~10 µm | + | ++ | Pump light | Depends on contrast agents and pump light energy | Yes | Exogenous |
|
| Absorption | ~15µm | + | +++ | Pump light | Depends on contrast agents and pump light energy | Not yet | Exogenous |
|
| Coherence | ~15 µm | + | ++ | None | Depends on pump energy | Not yet | Endogenous |
|
| Coherence | ~15 µm | + | +++ | Pump and Stokes light | Depends on pump energy | Yes | Exogenous and endogenous |
|
| Phrase shift | ~15 µm | + | ++ | Photothermal light | Depends on contrast agents and photothermal energy | Not yet | Exogenous and endogenous |
|
| Phrase shift | ~5 µm | + | ++ | Magnetic field | Depends on contrast agents | Not yet | Exogenous |
|
| Absorption | ~35 µm | ++ | +++ | None | Depends on contrast agents | Yes | Exogenous and endogenous |
|
| Scattering | ~10 µm | ++ | ++ | None | Depends on contrast agents | Not yet | Exogenous and endogenous |
In this and succeeding tables, plus signs indicate relative amounts, i.e., + low, ++ medium, +++ high.
Typical contrast agents for molecular contrast optical coherence tomography imaging in reported applications.
| Name | Type | Modalities | Sample | Potential Applications | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melanin | Chromophore | PP-OCT | Scattering phantom | Melanoma | [ |
| Melanin | Chromophore | PT-OCT | Pigmented mice eyes | Retinal disease | [ |
| Melanocyte | Cell | S-OCT |
| Nonspecific | [ |
| Hemoglobin | Protein | PP-OCT | Multilayer phantom | Blood | [ |
| Hemoglobin | Protein | S-OCT | In vivo mouse dorsal skin | Hypoxia and angiogenesis | [ |
| Collagen | Protein | SH-OCT | Fish skin and young chicken wing bone | Cartilage and bone | [ |
| Collagen | Protein | SH-OCT | Multilayer phantom | Skin | [ |
| Collagen | Protein | SH-OCT | Rat-tail tendon | wound healing, aging, diabetes, and cancer | [ |
| Collagen | Protein | SH-OCT | Fish scales, pig leg tendon, and rabbit eye sclera | In vivo endoscopic applications | [ |
| Collagen | Protein | SH-OCT | Fish scales | Skin | [ |
| Collagen | Protein | PS-OCT | Tendon and Zebrafish | Muscles | [ |
| Lipid | Lipid | S-OCT | In vivo atherosclerotic rabbit model | Atherosclerosis | [ |
| Blood plasma | Blood plasma | PT-OCT | Live rat ear | Vasculature system | [ |
| Nerve fiber | Nerve fiber | PS-OCT | Nerve fibers in human eyes and rat model | Nerve system | [ |
| dsRed | Protein | PP-OCT | Mouse mammary carcinoma cells | Breast cancer | [ |
| Bacteriorhodopsin | Protein | Pump suppression OCT | Phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| Phytochrome A | Protein | Pump suppression OCT | Scattering phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| Benzene | Organic compound | NIVI | Phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| Acetone | Organic compound | NIVI | Phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| ICG | Dye | PP-OCT | Scattering phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| ICG | Dye | PT-OCT | Ex vivo pig eyes | Retinal surgery | [ |
| ICG | Dye | S-OCT |
| Nonspecific | [ |
| MB | Dye | PP-OCT | Scattering phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| MB | Dye | PP-OCT | Live | Lymphatic and vasculature systems | [ |
| ADS7460 | Dye | S-OCT | Celery stalk | Cancer and Vasculature system | [ |
| IR806 | Dye | PT-OCT | Scattering phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| MB filled PLGA nanoparticles | Compound nanoparticle | PP-OCT | Human postmortem artery sections | Atherosclerosis | [ |
| Gas vesicle | Compound nanoparticle | Engineered particle-based method | In vivo mouse retina | Nonspecific | [ |
| Hematite (Fe2O3) microparticle | Magnetic particles | MM-OCT | Macrophages | Cancer | [ |
| Magnetite microparticle | Magnetic particles | MM-OCT | In vivo | Nonspecific | [ |
| Fe3O4 nanoparticle | Magnetic nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Zebrafish | Endoscopic imaging | [ |
| Fe3O4 nanoparticle | Magnetic nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Mice breast tumor tissue | Cancer | [ |
| Nano-screenMAG | Compound nanoparticles | MM-OCT | Scattering phantom and human mesenchymal stem cells | 3D cell tracking in the retina | [ |
| Polymer-coated magnetite nanoparticle | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Mice breast tumor tissue | Cancer | [ |
| Polymer-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Live Swiss albino mice dorsal part skin | Nonspecific | [ |
| Polymer-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle | Compound nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Live Swiss albino mice dorsal part skin | Nonspecific | [ |
| Dextran-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticle | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Melanoma mice model | Melanoma | [ |
| Protein-coated iron oxide microparticle | Compound nanoparticles | MM-OCT | Scattering phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| Polyethylene glycol-covered iron oxides particle | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Ex vivo aorta specimens | Atherosclerosis | [ |
| Iron-gold (Fe-Au) nanoparticle | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | In vivo Swiss albino mice model | Melanoma | [ |
| Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle | SPIONs | MM-OCT | Human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells | Cancer | [ |
| amino-polyvinyl alcohol coated SPIONs | SPIONs | MM-OCT | Melanoma skin cancer samples of mice | Cancer | [ |
| Magnetic graphene quantum dot nanoparticle | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | 3T3 cells | Tracking transplanted corneal stem cells | [ |
| Iron oxide nanoparticle- encapsulated microsphere | Compound nanoparticle | MM-OCT | Cancer cells | Cancer | [ |
| NaGdF4: Er3+/Yb3+ nanoparticle | Upconversion nanoparticles | PT-OCT | Chicken tissue | Pharmacokinetics and theranostics studies | [ |
| Gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | S-OCT | Ex vivo human breast carcinoma | Breast cancer | [ |
| Gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Live mouse ear | Cancer | [ |
| Gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | PS-OCT | Lymphatics of the hind limb of mice | Cancer | [ |
| Gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Sentinel lymph node of mice | Lymphatic system | [ |
| Gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Pork tissue | Nonspecific | [ |
| Gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Pigmented mice eyes | Retinal disease | [ |
| ICAM2-targeted gold nanorod | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Live mice eyes | Sight threatening diseases | [ |
| Gold nanosphere | Gold nanoparticle | PS-OCT | Phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| Gold nanosphere | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Live cells (MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-468) | Nonspecific | [ |
| Gold nanoshell | Gold nanoparticle | Engineered particle-based method | HeLa and Jurkat cells | Cardiovascular disease | [ |
| Gold nanoshell | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Phantom | Cancer | [ |
| Gold nanoshell | Gold nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Ex vivo human breast tissue | Cancer markers | [ |
| Gold nanocage | Gold nanoparticle | Engineered particle-based method | Mouse ear tumor | Cancer | [ |
| Gold nanocage | Gold nanoparticle | S-OCT | Scattering phantom | Nonspecific | [ |
| Antibody-conjugated gold nanoparticle | Compound nanopraticle | Engineered particle-based method | Excised hamster cheek pouch tissues | Cancer | [ |
| Gold coated iron oxide nanorose | Compound nanoparticle | PT-OCT | Atherosclerotic lesions in rabbit arteries | Atherosclerosis | [ |
| Gold nanobipyramid | Gold nanoparticle | PS-OCT | Live mouse | Nonspecific | [ |