| Literature DB >> 29251735 |
Ling Yuting1,2, Chunhui Li1,2, Kanheng Zhou1,2, Guangying Guan1,2, Paul L Appleton3, Stephen Lang4, David McGloin2, Zhihong Huang1,2, Ghulam Nabi1.
Abstract
Photonics, especially optical coherence elastography (OCE) and second harmonic generation (SHG) imaging are novel high-resolution imaging modalities for characterization of biological tissues. Following our preliminary experience, we hypothesized that OCE and SHG imaging would delineate the microstructure of prostate tissue and aid in distinguishing cancer from the normal benign prostatic tissue. Furthermore, these approaches may assist in characterization of the grade of cancer, as well. In this study, we confirmed a high diagnostic accuracy of OCE and SHG imaging in the detection and characterization of prostate cancer for a large set of biopsy tissues obtained from men suspected to have prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). The two techniques and methods described here are complementary, one depicts the stiffness of tissues and the other illustrates the orientation of collagen structure around the cancerous lesions. The results showed that stiffness of cancer tissue was ~57.63% higher than that of benign tissue (Young's modulus of 698.43±125.29 kPa for cancerous tissue vs 443.07±88.95 kPa for benign tissue with OCE. Using histology as a reference standard and 600 kPa as a cut-off threshold, the data analysis showed sensitivity and specificity of 89.6 and 99.8%, respectively. Corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 99.5 and 94.6%, respectively. There was a significant difference noticed in terms of Young's modulus for different Gleason scores estimated by OCE (P-value<0.05). For SHG, distinct patterns of collagen distribution were seen for different Gleason grade disease with computed quantification employing a ratio of anisotropic to isotropic (A:I ratio) and this correlated with disease aggressiveness.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29251735 PMCID: PMC5842892 DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2017.132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lab Invest ISSN: 0023-6837 Impact factor: 5.662
Figure 1Images of (a) histology, (b) cross sectional OCT structure and the corresponding (c) OCE elastogram of (1) benign prostate tissue, (2) prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and (3) malignant PCa with Gleason score 4+4. The scale is 200 µm. Young’s modulus is in the unit of kPa
Figure 23D visualization of (1) benign and PCa biopsies with Gleason score (2) 3+3 with cancer involvement 30%, (3) 3+4 with cancer involvement 40%, (4) 4+4 with cancer involvement 60% and (5) 4+5 with cancer involvement 80%. (a) OCT structural image, (b) OCE elastograms, (c) overlaid images from en face views and corresponding (d) histological photos. The red arrows in b and d indicate the origin and end of malignancy.
Figure 3Whisker plots of correlation of Young’s modulus (kPa) and pathological outcomes using (a) average method, (b) maximum method and (c) threshold method.
Figure 4ROC curves of PCa vs. benign using three statistical analysis methods.
Figure 5Whisker plots of correlation of Gleason scores and Young’s modulus (kPa) using (a) average method, (b) maximum method and (c) threshold method.
Figure 6Whisker plots of the relationship between collagen orientation (A.I ratio) and different Gleason scores. (a) Comparison among benign and malignant biopsies with different Gleason scores from 6 to 9, (b) comparison between Gleason 3+4 and 4+3, and (c) comparison between Gleason 4+5 and 5+4.
Figure 7Scatterplots of the correlation of Young’s modulus and collagen orientation (A:I ratio) using the (a) average method, (b) maximum method and (c) threshold method.
Disparity of Gleason score between initial TRUS biopsy and final prostatectomy.
| Patient number | Biopsy stiffness (kPa) | A:I ratio | Gleason grade of biopsies | Gleason grade of Radical prostatectomy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 631.07 | 3+3 | 3+4 | 7 | ||
| 795.16 | 1.79 | 3+3 3+4 | 3+4 | 7 | |
| 649.02 | 1.29 | 3+3 | 3+4 | 7 | |
| 809.61 | 2.55 | 4+3 4+4 4+5 5+4 | 4+5 | 9 | |
| 707.69 | 3+3 3+4 4+3 | 3+4 | 7 | ||
| 900.99 | 3+5 4+4 4+5 | 4+5 | 9 | ||
| 658.93 | 3+3 | 3+4 | 7 | ||
| 728.25 | 3+3 3+4 | 3+4 | 7 | ||
| 739.24 | 3+3 4+3 | 4+3 | 7 | ||
Biopsy stiffness (kPa) is the weighted mean of the stiffest biopsy amongst 12 biopsies.