Literature DB >> 35326606

Hidden in Plants-A Review of the Anticancer Potential of the Solanaceae Family in In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Tomasz Kowalczyk1, Anna Merecz-Sadowska2, Patricia Rijo3,4, Mattia Mori5, Sophia Hatziantoniou6, Karol Górski7, Janusz Szemraj8, Janusz Piekarski9, Tomasz Śliwiński10, Michał Bijak11, Przemysław Sitarek12.   

Abstract

Many of the anticancer agents that are currently in use demonstrate severe side effects and encounter increasing resistance from the target cancer cells. Thus, despite significant advances in cancer therapy in recent decades, there is still a need to discover and develop new, alternative anticancer agents. The plant kingdom contains a range of phytochemicals that play important roles in the prevention and treatment of many diseases. The Solanaceae family is widely used in the treatment of various diseases, including cancer, due to its bioactive ingredient content. The purpose of this literature review is to highlight the antitumour activity of Solanaceae extracts-single isolated compounds and nanoparticles with extracts-and their synergistic effect with chemotherapeutic agents in various in vitro and in vivo cancer models. In addition, the biological properties of many plants of the Solanaceae family have not yet been investigated, which represents a challenge and an opportunity for future anticancer therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Solanaceae; anticancer potential; apoptosis; cytotoxic effect; in vitro and in vivo studies; plant extracts; pure compounds

Year:  2022        PMID: 35326606      PMCID: PMC8946528          DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


1. Introduction

Cancer is arguably one of the most dangerous diseases for civilization, affecting all people, regardless the their origin, age or social status. Cancer is also one of the most common causes of death after cardiovascular diseases in developed countries. Statistics show that about 20 million new cases were diagnosed in the world in 2020, and as many as 10 million people died as a result of cancer [1]. Apart from the genetic determinants of the development of cancer (e.g., the presence of typical gene mutations), the most common causes of cell transformation are lifestyle factors (e.g., radiation exposure, smoking, poor diet, alcohol consumption, occupational factors or environmental contamination). Gender and age are also of great importance in the development of neoplastic diseases, and have a significant influence on cancer incidence and mortality [2,3,4,5]. Tumour development and progression are complex, involving factors in the cancer cells themselves like abnormally excessive proliferation as well as multidimensional interactions between other cells and tissues in the body. These cells can also cause angiogenesis, and are capable of dividing indefinitely and metastasizing. As such, rapid and correct diagnosis increases the chances of successful treatment [6,7]. Statistics show that one in six deaths in the world today is caused by cancer, and about 70% of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income people [8]. The problem of increased cancer incidence around the world has led to an increasing search for new compounds that are ideally toxic to cancer cells but not to normal cells. As the currently used chemotherapeutic agents show relatively high toxicity towards both neoplastic cells and normal cells [9,10,11], there is great interest in the identification of new compounds of natural origin with specific activity against different cancer types. The anticancer properties of plants have been recognised for centuries. About 60% of the drugs currently used to treat cancer were originally isolated from nature, with the plant kingdom being the most important source. The intensive development of phytochemistry and isolation methods of plant-derived compounds eventually led to the development of a number of anticancer drugs [12]. A considerable variety and number of plants are known to have medicinal properties [13,14,15]. An estimated 70,000 plant species, from algae to trees, have been used for medicinal purposes [16]. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has studied approximately 35,000 plant species for potential anticancer effects. Among them, about 3000 plant species showed reproducible anticancer activity [8]. While the bioactive principles from these plants can be obtained traditionally by extraction from various natural sources, they can be produced more efficiently using various biotechnological tools. The range of secondary metabolites known to exhibit anticancer properties is chemically broad, with the predominant groups being alkaloids, terpenoids and polyphenols [17,18]. Both pure compounds and extracts of plant origin show cytotoxic effects by inducing apoptosis in cancer cells [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Secondary metabolites, either used per se or as nanoparticles in targeted therapy, have also been found to have numerous effects on cancer, both in vitro and in vivo; they also appear to interact with chemotherapeutic agents, thus positively or negatively affecting their efficacy, and to protect normal cells against the adverse effects of anticancer therapies [25,26,27]. One family of plants commonly included in the diet is the Solanaceae. It is one of the largest plant families, and its genus—Solanum—is the richest in edible species, including potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) and eggplants (Solanum melongena); in addition, peppers are widely-consumed vegetables which are included in the related genus Capsicum [28,29]. The Solanum genus contains a range of phenolic, alkaloid, saponin, terpene and lipid compounds; as such, it has frequently been used for medicinal purposes. Many of the alkaloids from the Solanum genus are particularly interesting because they have demonstrated extensive antirheumatic, antimicrobial, antioxidant and antitumour effects, in the latter case against several types of cancer [30,31]. The present study displays selected general issues including medicinal plants in cancer treatment, nanotechnology and plant compounds in the fight against cancer, the synergy between chemotherapeutic agents and plant compounds in cancer therapy, and the Solanaceae family’s general characteristics and application. Moreover, the reports discussed the functional properties of extracts or compounds isolated from Solanaceae species that are known to exert selective anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo, as well as their synergistic effects when used in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. In some cases, the extracts were formulated by using nanoparticle-based delivery systems. The studies also address the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the death of cancer cells.

2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

This research papers included in this review focused on in vitro and in vivo studies of plant extracts or isolated compounds from the Solanaceae family administered per se, or in combination with chemotherapeutics. In certain studies, the potential mechanisms of antitumour activity were discussed. Only research articles published in peer-reviewed journals were selected. Studies in which the isolated compounds of interest were synthesized or purchased, rather than being derived from plant material, were excluded. In addition, studies that did not specify the extraction and/or purification methodology of a bioactive compound were also excluded. The present literature review was carried out using the following electronic databases: MedLars Online International Literature, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. First, the medical subject headings (MeSH) were defined using “Solanaceae”, “plant extract”, “plant-derived compounds”, “cancer cell lines”, “anticancer effect”, ‘’chemotherapeutic with combination of plant extracts’’, and ‘’nanoparticles with plant extracts’’ as descriptive terms. The same strategy was used for all of the databases, with adaptations, as appropriate. The data presented in the tables were published in the period 2015–2021 (Figure 1).
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram demonstrating the screening method for the article [32].

3. Medicinal Plants in Cancer Treatment

Phytotherapy is believed to have originated with the Sumerian and Chinese civilizations over four thousand years ago, and became particularly prominent in ancient Egypt. The first plant to be used against cancer may have been Trifolium pratense: Dioscurides reported its use in the treatment of neoplasms in De Materia Medica, together with an extract of Colchicum autumnale known to have anticancer properties, which were attributed to its colchicine content. Elsewhere, Avicenna also mentions the use of Ricinus communis, Atropa belladonna, Urtica dioica, Narcissus poeticus, Scrophularia nodosa and Ecbalium elaterium. Currently, the rapid development of phytochemistry has allowed the discovery of new compounds with potential medical properties [6,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Other families of great medical importance include the Poaceae, Fabaceae, Apiaceae, Lamiaceae, Brassicaceae, Papaveraceae, Plantaginaceae, and Solananceae, etc. [39,40]. For example, in the Poaceae, Oryza sativa exerts anticancer effects due the presence of anthocyanins and some phenols, e.g., tricin, which can be used to treat breast cancer [41]. In turn, Arachis hypogaea, of the Fabaceae family, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of colon, prostate and breast cancer, which was associated with its β-sitosterol and sterol content [42]. In addition, Senna obtusifolia extract, which is rich in betulinic acid, showed cytotoxic effects in human glioblastoma U87MG and leukemic NALM6 cells [19,43]. Daucus carota, a member of the Apiaceae family, contains bioactive carotenoids (beta-carotene and lutein), polyacetylenes, falcarindiol and falcarindiol-3-acetate, which may be effective in the treatment of leukemia [44]. In addition, Leonurus sibiricus or Leonotis nepetifolia, of the Lamiaceae, containing phenolic acids and flavonoids, were found to demonstrate cytotoxic effects against breast, leukemia, and human glioblastoma cancer cell lines [21,24,45]. In the Brassicaceae, Brassica oleracea exerts anticancer effects which have been attributed to the presence of sulforaphane, which can be used to decrease prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels [46]. In addition, alkaloid-rich Papaver somniferum extract was proved to have a cytotoxic effect against various cancer cell lines [47]. In turn, Plantago lanceolata extract, of the Plantaginaceae, has demonstrated a cytotoxic effect against several breast cancer cell lines, which has been associated with its flavonoid glycosides content [48]. Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with Solanum lycopersicum (of the Solanaceae family) with Serenoa repens, lycopene and bromelain exhibited an improvement in their lower urinary tract symptom-related quality of life [49]. The drugs used in anticancer therapy are mainly based on limiting the division of pathological cells and inducing apoptosis. The currently used anticancer cytostatic agents most often induce programmed cell death, damaging DNA. The use of natural compounds with potential anticancer activity seems interesting due to the fact that it may open up new possibilities for their use in the development of more effective methods of cancer therapy. Their antitumour activity is often based on a complex mechanism including antioxidant activity, carcinogen inactivation, antiproliferation, cell cycle arrest, the induction of apoptosis and differentiation, the inhibition of angiogenesis, and the abolition of multidrug resistance [50,51,52,53]. Cancer treatment modalities are generally based on combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, hormone therapy, immunotherapy and targeted drug therapy. Chemotherapy is an important option in the treatment of cancer, and plant-derived chemotherapeutic agents have contributed significantly to advances in its development [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. A number of clinically-applied agents from plant sources were standard ingredients in many anticancer therapies, including vinblastine, vincristine (Catharanthus sp.), paclitaxel (Taxus sp.), camptothecin derivatives (Camptotheca sp.) and podophyllotoxins (Podophyllum sp.) [9,63,64,65,66,67]. Currently, vincristine encapsulated in liposomes is approved for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, while protein-bound paclitaxel particles are approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, according to a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) report [68]. It is noteworthy that, in some cases, their use is associated with various side effects that might limit their broad clinical use [69]. Plant compounds generally suffer from low bioavailability and hydrophobicity issues, which have been addressed with the use of recently discovered nanomaterials, many of which may also be of natural origin. Nanoparticle application has led to the increase of the concentration of the drug in neoplastic cells with particular receptors on their surface [70,71,72,73,74]. A nanoparticle consists of a drug on the inside, and a so-called “ligand”—i.e., a molecule designed to bind to a tumour cell receptor—on the outside. After binding to the receptor, the nanoparticles are absorbed into the cell and the drug is released. Compounds of plant origin (pure compounds or extracts) have been used in combination with nanoparticles and with chemotherapeutic agents in adjunctive therapies [75,76]. However, it should be noted that plant preparations have more complicated and unpredictable interactions with drugs than would be expected between two conventional drugs due to the numerous active compounds found in the plant raw materials. This may be due to the fact that compounds of plant origin may influence the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the anticancer drugs used. As a consequence, toxic drug effects may be observed or treatment efficacy may be reduced [77,78,79,80]. So far, numerous studies have highlighted the positive effects deriving from the co-administration of drugs with plant extracts. For example, Hussain et al. reported a synergistic effect between cisplatin and Aloe vera extract on MCF-7 and HeLa cancer cell lines, suggesting that the plant extract may increase the therapeutic efficacy of conventional anticancer drugs [81]. In addition, Senna obtusifolia extract was found to have a synergistic effect in combination with doxorubicin [43].

4. Nanotechnology and Plant Compounds in the Fight against Cancer

The advance of modern technology has brought new products and research techniques which have driven significant scientific progress. Nanotechnologies have successfully entered everyday life, and are increasingly used in medical sciences. Many common devices are based on the achievements of modern nanotechnology, such as energy-efficient and powerful electronic devices, versatile nanocoatings, and new-generation cosmetics [82,83,84]. In its simplest definition, nanotechnology is a “nano-scale technology”, i.e., a technology in the size range 1–100 nm. For a better understanding of these sizes, the nanometer scale (nm) is one billionth of a meter, or three to five atoms wide: less than one tenth of a micrometer in at least one dimension. The latest scientific achievements may turn out to be effective treatments for diseases that have been troubling people for centuries, among which cancer is still a challenging and often unresolved issue. In the past, the detection of neoplastic diseases was possible only after the appearance of specific symptoms, generally in an advanced stage of the disease, and even in the presence of distant metastases. A more complete view of pathologically-changed tissues can be obtained by biopsy; however, this method has many limitations, and carries the risk of complications [85,86]. In response, highly-sensitive non-invasive methods of detecting neoplastic diseases have been developed, most of which rely heavily on nanotechnology [87]. In fact, nanomaterials are widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of different types of cancer due to the possibility of precisely controlling their shapes, sizes and specific physical properties. Nanoparticles can also serve as carriers of anticancer drugs to specific cells [88], and nanomaterial-based devices used to detect the proteins or nucleic acids of cancer cells can provide an early indication of disease or monitor the effectiveness of therapy. Such biomarkers can be detected in body fluids such as blood, saliva and urine. One such group of tumour biomarkers are proteins. A number of biomarkers are routinely tested in clinical practice—PSA (prostate cancer), CEA (colorectal cancer), CA-125 (ovarian cancer), ER (breast cancer), AFP (liver cancer) and CA 19-9 (pancreatic cancer)—and nanosensors can be successfully used to detect them [89,90,91,92,93,94]. The most frequently used nanoparticles in the diagnosis of cancer diseases are gold nanoparticles, nanoshells and quantum dots [95,96]. Nanoparticles such as micelles, dendrimers, quantum dots, liposomes and carbon nanotubes can also be used in the treatment of neoplastic diseases. Traditional chemotherapeutics include alkylating agents and antibiotics that induce damage to the DNA of cancer cells. Topoisomerase or mitosis inhibitors are also used [97]. Many of these therapeutics are highly effective, but they often demonstrate a lack of specificity, resulting in severe side effects [98]. There is a clear need for new methods allowing for the effective and specific targeting of neoplastic cells. One potential strategy that has received much attention over the past few years involves the use of nanoparticles [99,100,101], as well as those based on a combination of modern nanotechnology with a rich arsenal of compounds of natural origin with anticancer properties [102,103,104,105,106]. The nanoparticles themselves are typically obtained by electrospraying, evaporation–condensation, laser ablation or pyrolysis, or high-energy ball milling. They can also be obtained chemically by chemical vapor synthesis, the sol-gel method, hydrothermal synthesis, microemulsion technique, or polyol synthesis [107,108]. It is worth emphasizing that physical methods sometimes have an advantage over chemical methods due to the lack of danger of solvent contamination in the prepared thin films, and due to the uniformity of the synthesized nanoparticle distribution [109]. However, these synthesis methods are often complicated and require strictly controlled temperature, pH and pressure conditions, as well as specialized equipment, and often environmentally-hazardous reagents containing heavy metals [110]. Hence, many research teams are interested in the biological synthesis of nanoparticles, which should offer weak contamination with toxic agents, the customization of desired properties, repeatability and easy scalability [111,112]. Among the various biological systems used for this purpose, plants deserve special attention because plant cells may contain a wide range of bioactive compounds with potential anticancer properties. One study examined the antitumour potential of Nepeta deflersiana extract in silver nanoparticles (ND-AgNPs) against human cervical cancer (HeLa) cells, as well as the influence of cytotoxic concentrations of ND-AgNP on markers of oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitochondrial membrane potential, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis/necrosis. It was found that the cytotoxicity of the tested particles was concentration dependent, and that the treatment was associated with a significant increase in ROS and lipid peroxidation, and a decrease in matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and glutathione levels. The cell cycle analysis and apoptosis/necrosis assay data showed that ND-AgNP induced SubG1 arrest and apoptotic/necrotic cell death [113]. Gomathi et al. examined the potential for silver nanoparticles to be biosynthesized in the fruit shell of Tamarindus indica. Here, too, the plant extract acts as a reducing and stabilizing agent for silver nanoparticles. These nanoparticles proved to be cytotoxic to MCF-7 cell lines; hence, they could be considered as potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of human breast cancer [114]. Because plants from the Solanaceae family produce a number of compounds with proven or potential anticancer activity, they may well be used on a large scale as the basis for new systems for the biosynthesis of nanoparticles exhibiting anticancer activity. Combined with the extremely rapid technological progress, this may be the starting point for the development and implementation of completely new and more effective methods of fighting cancer. The general scheme of the synthesis and application of nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and treatment is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2

General scheme of the synthesis and application of nanoparticles in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

5. Synergy between Chemotherapeutic Agents and Plant Compounds in Cancer Therapy

Despite its many side effects, chemotherapy remains the most popular treatment for cancer. Although many chemotherapeutic compounds are of plant origin (e.g., paclitaxel, camptothecin, colchicine, vincristine, and podophyllotoxin, etc.), being either synthetic or isolated directly from plants, they have considerable side effects. Moreover, their low water solubility, poor penetration into target cells, limited therapeutic potential and toxic side effects may limit the suitability of these natural agents for the treatment of cancer [9,11,63,115,116,117]. Therefore, new phytochemical anticancer agents require substantial evidence of efficacy from appropriate preclinical trials before their approval for use in patients [79,118,119,120,121]. It is also possible to chemically modify the molecule and improve its properties [122]. One new therapeutic strategy which is based on the synergistic action between chemotherapeutic agents and plant compounds intends to overcome these shortcomings. Synergy comes from the Greek word “synergos”, which means “working together”, and is broadly defined as the interaction of two or more compounds or other factors to produce a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate parts [123,124]. Synergistic effects are believed to arise from synergistic multi-target effects, the modulation of pharmacokinetic or physicochemical effects, interference with resistance mechanisms, or elimination and neutralization potentials [125,126,127,128]. Studies show that a secondary compound or plant extract—such as essential oil derivatives, polyphenol derivatives or terpenoid derivatives—may be capable of removing or neutralizing the toxic effects or side effects of a drug [123,129,130,131].

6. Solanaceae Family—General Characteristics and Application

The Solanaceae (nightshades) are considered to be the third most economically-important family in the plant kingdom after the Poaceae and the Fabaceae. They are also one of the most significant families of trees, shrubs and herbs, with great floristic, phytochemical and ethnobotanical importance, with over 90 genera comprising 3000–4000 species spread all over the world. Almost half of these belong to the large and varied genus Solanum. It is distributed in all continents except Antarctica, with the greatest diversity being observed in Central and South America [132,133,134,135,136]. In addition to Solanum, the leading genera of the Solanaceae family include Atropa, Datura, Capsicum, Nicotiana, Lycium, Hyoscyamus, Lycopersicon, Withania and Petunia. This single-genus hyper-diversity is remarkable in angiosperms, making Solanum interesting from an evolutionary point of view, as well as for its usefulness to humans (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Selected examples of species from the Solanaceae family exhibiting anticancer activity, such as Solanum tuberosum, Capsicum annuum, Solanum melongena, Lycopersicon esulentum, Nicotiana tabacum, Datura stramonium and Lycium barbarum.

The representatives of the Solanaceae vary extremely in regards to their habit, distribution and morphology, with an astonishing variety of flowers and fruits. The flowers are usually radially symmetrical, with five united sepals, five united petals, five stamens inserted on the tube. The ovary is positioned superior. It consists of two united carpels with the partition walls often present, but more obvious in wild species than domestics. The leaves are alternate, or rarely opposite, and are usually simple. The fruit is a two-chambered capsule called a berry [28,29,137,138,139,140,141,142,143]. In addition to a wide range of other uses (e.g., traditional medicine, traditional culture, pharmacology, and ornamental horticulture), the species of the Solanaceae are of great importance as food crops around the world. In 2020, the global areas cultivated with four basic species— potatoes, tomatoes, aubergines and capsicums (chilies and green peppers)—were 16.5, 5.1, 1.9 and 2.1 million hectares, with productions of 359.1, 186.8, 56.6 and 36.1 million tons, respectively [144]. Moreover, from a biotechnological point of view, species from the seven genera of the Solanaceae have become the subject of genetic research as model plants and/or because of their importance as crops. Model plants include cultivated tomatoes and their wild relatives (genus Solanum, former genus Lycopersicon), tobacco (genus Nicotiana), and species of petunias (genus Petunia) [29,142,143] The Solanaceae are also known to possess a diverse range of biologically-active compounds that can be used to benefit human health, such as phenolics, alkaloids, saponins, terpenes and lipids. However, toxic alkaloids such as tropane alkaloids or glycoalkaloids are of particular interest because of their reported antimicrobial, anti-rheumatic and antioxidant activities [145]. They have also demonstrated antitumour activity against several types of cancer, including prostate, breast and colon cancer [146,147]. Tropane alkaloids such as atropine, hyoscyamine and scopolamine have a characteristic bicyclic structure, and particularly high concentrations have been found in Datura stramonium, Datura ferox and Datura innoxia. Atropine is a racemic mixture of two enantiomeric forms of hyoscyamine, with the L-enantiomeric form being the active one. Scopolamine, which acts as an antagonist at both the peripheral and central muscarinic receptors, is the most valuable member of a group known as the tropane alkaloids [143,147,148]. This group is highly diverse, being formed from a tropane skeleton, which is highly prone to modification. Tropane alkaloids are found in all plant parts, with the highest concentrations in roots and seeds. Their levels vary according to their species, season, location, and plant organ. From a pharmacological standpoint, they are well known as potent anticholinergic agents, meaning that they inhibit neurological signals from the endogenous neurotransmitter acetylcholine. The symptoms of an overdose may include a dry mouth, ataxia, dilated pupils, convulsions, urinary retention, hallucinations, coma, and death [140,147,149]. Glycoalkaloids are produced in more than 350 plant species, particularly those of the Solanaceae and Liliaceae families. They are a group of glycosidic derivatives of nitrogen-containing steroids consisting of a cholestane skeleton with a carbohydrate moiety of one to five monosaccharides attached at the 3-OH position [150]. Arguably, the most significant glycoalkaloids are α-solanine and α-chaconin, which are contained in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum); solasonin and solamargine, in eggplants (Solanum melongena); and α-tomatin and dehydrotomatin, which are spirosolan-type glycoalkaloids found in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) [151].

7. Anticancer Effect and Potential Mechanisms of Action of Plant Extracts from the Solanaceae Family

Thanks to their wide range of active substances, plant extracts exert a variety of effects on cancer cells, with some of them having been reported to have inhibitory effects on cell proliferation [152]. Indeed, a number of in vitro and in vivo studies have found extracts from Solanaceae family members to also have strong anticancer properties. In the Solanum genus, a Solanum lycopersicum leaf extract was shown to exhibit potential antitumour properties against breast cancer cells by modulating the expression of genes associated with cancer growth and progression [153]. In addition, a Solanum lyratum extract taken from the whole plant exhibited a proapoptotic effect against human osteosarcoma epithelial cells. The apoptosis induction took place through a number of routes: the increase of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species production; the decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential; the release of cytochrome c; the activation of caspase 3, 8 and 9; the increase of the level of proapoptotic proteins, including Bax; and the decrease of the level of anti-apoptotic proteins, including Bcl-2 [154]. Solanum nigrum fruit extract has also been found to decrease viability by the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in prostate cancer cells [155], and to inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion of glioma cells by the induction of their apoptosis [156]. Extracts of Withania species are also indicated to have specific cytotoxic properties against cancer cells. Withania somnifera leaf extract was found to have cytotoxic effects against human osteosarcoma, fibrosarcoma and lung cancer epithelial cells, and to activate tumour suppressor proteins including p53 [157]. Similarly, extracts from different parts of Withania coagulans were found to bestow antiproliferative properties and NFκB pathway induction [158]. In addition, Capsicum annuum seed extract has been shown to inhibit the migration of lung cancer and breast cancer cells by downregulating metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9, and increasing E-cadherin expression [159]. Furthermore, leaf and shoot extracts of Nicotiana glauca exhibit cytotoxic properties against lung cancer and prostate cancer cells, and demonstrate anti-angiogenic properties in vivo by inhibiting microvessel formation [160]. Recent reports on the anticancer properties of plant extracts in the Solanaceae family are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

In vitro anticancer effect of plant extracts from the Solanaceae family and their potential mechanisms of action.

Name of the SpeciesPart of the PlantType of SolventClass of Compounds/Compounds Identified in Extract/FractionCancer Cell LinesActivity/Mechanism/EffectRef.
Athenaea velutina Sendtn.leavesdichloromethane: methanol (1:1)phenolic compounds and flavonoidsMCF-7, HepG2, B16-F10Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.56–200 μg/mL) (MTT test); inhibition of migration, adhesion, invasion and cell colony formation.[161]
Capsicum annuum L.red pericarpwater/methanolcapsianoside derivativesHCT116, PC-3Cytotoxic (IC50 = 51 μg/mL and 60 μg/mL) (MTT test)[162]
Capsicum annuum L.fruitsethanolcarotenoids, chlorophyll, polyphenols, tannins, and flavonoidsCalu6Cytotoxic[163]
Solanum betaceum Cav.fruitsethanolphenolicsHepG2, MDA-MB-231Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 30–80 μg/mL) (MTT test)[164]
Datura innoxia Mill.leaveswaterphenolic and flavonoid contentsK562Cytotoxic (IC50 = 0.6 mg/mL) (MTT test); antiproliferative activity by interaction with DNA and histones[165]
Datura stramonium L., Datura inoxia Mill.leavesethyl acetaterutin, gallic acid, catechin, apigenin and caffeic acidPC-3, MDA-MB 231, MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50  <  3 μg/mL) (MTT assay); anti-tumour activity (evaluation of haematological, biochemical and histological)[166]
Hyoscyamus reticulatus L., Hyoscyamus tenuicaulis Schönb.-Tem. Lycium shawii Roem. & Schult. and Solanum luteum L.shoots, leaves, stemsdichloromethane-MOLT-4Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 35.5–>50 μg/mL) (MTT test)[167]
Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.root tubers and leavesmethanol/trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), ethanol/TFA, methanol/TFA/water, and ethanol/TFA/wateranthocyaninsMCF-7, HCT-116, and HeLaAntiproliferative properties[168]
Lycium barbarum L.fruits (Goji berries)ethanol-T47DCytotoxic (IC50 = 0.75 mg/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by changes of the apoptotic protein expression (increase in pro-apoptotic proteins and a decrease in anti-apoptotic proteins)[169]
Lycium barbarum L.fruits-phenolicsHepG2Cytotoxic (18%, at 1600 μg/mL) (MTT test)[170]
Lycium barbarum L.fruitsmethanol/ethyl acetate/petroleum etherzeaxanthin-rich extractBJ HEP, A375Cytotoxic (IC50 = 75.15 and 85.06 μM for BJ HEP, 62.36 and 92.59 μM for A375)[171]
Lycium barbarum L. waterpectin-free, polysaccharides fractionMCF-10A, MCF-7, HER2, MDA-MB-231Cytotoxic 1000 μg/mL (MTT test)[172]
Lycium barbarum L.fruits-carotenoidsCaco-2 cellsEffect (range from 6.5 to 92.8%) (MTT test)[173]
Lycium barbarum L., Lycium ruthenicum Murrfruitsethyl acetatephenolics flavonoids, carotenoidsMDACytotoxic (EC50 = 4.08 mg/mL); apoptosis via modulating cell cycle arrest, cell apoptosis, and the p53 signalling pathway[174]
Lycium chinense Mill.fruit (Goji berries)ethanol-LS180Cytotoxic (MTT test)[175]
Lycium europaeum L.fruitmethanolphenolic, flavonoids, anthocyanins, carotenoids, lycopens, and condensed tannins contentA549, PC12Cytotoxic (MTT assay), morphological changes and induction of apoptosis by caspase 3/7 activation[176]
Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.leaveshydromethanol, acetone and alkaloid extractsphenolic compounds, pigments, and alkaloidsAGSCytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 9–171 μg/ mL)[177]
Nicotiana glauca Grahamleavesethanolpalmitic acid and scopoletinCCL-136Anti-proliferative effect and induction of apoptosis by changes in mitochondrial and nuclear morphology[178]
Nicotiana glauca Grahamstemn-hexanebeta-sitosterol, stigmasterol, campesterol, D-alpha-tocopherol, scopoletin, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol, Bicyclo[3.1.1]heptanesMCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 = 17.98 μg/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, chromatin condensation and cytoplasmic shrinkage[179]
Physalisalkekengi L.fruitchloroformphysalin DHeLa MCF-7, A431Growth inhibition[180]
Physalis angulata L.leavesethanol-SKOV3, HL-60Cytotoxic (IC50 in the range of 18–375 μg/mL) (MTS test)[181]
Physalis peruviana L.fruitethanol, isopropanolursolic acid, rosmarinic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, and epicatechinHeLaCytotoxic (IC50 = 60.48 μg/mL) (Resazurin Reduction)[182]
Solanum aculeastrum Dunalwhole plantmethanolsolamargine and solanineSH-SY5YCytotoxic (IC50 = 10.72 μg/mL) (sulforhodamine B (SRB) colorimetric assay)[183]
Solanum capsicoides All.seedsmethanolcarpesterolK562Cytotoxic (U251 GI50 = 24.7 μg/mL, MCF-7 GI50 = 27.1 μg/mL, 786-0 GI50 = 25.8 μg/mL, OVCAR-03 GI50 = 24.0 μg/mL, and K562 GI50 = 32.0 μg/mL) (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (TEST) software)[184]
Solanum chacoense Bitter.leaves, tubersmethanolphenolic acids and volatile compoundsMCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 132.9–390.7 μg/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by changes in expression of proliferation- and apoptosis-related genes (overexpression Bax¸ down-regulation Bcl-2)[185]
Solanum incanum L.whole plantacid base precipitation followed by the different ratios of ethanol/H2 O extraction (according to the patents—US patent 7,078,063, EU patent 1,058,334, and Japan patent 3,940,928)solamargineB16Cytotoxic (IC50 in the range of 2.91–6.85 μg/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by DNA damage and activation of caspase 9; G0/G1 cell cycle arrest[186]
Solanum incanum L.fruitwater-HCT-116Cytotoxic (IC50 = 23.35 μg/mL) (Sulphorhodamine B test); ultrastructural changes (loss of the surface microvilli, mitochondrial damage, formation of autophagic vacuoles, nuclear shrinkage, chromatin condensation and nucleolar changes)[187]
Solanum incanum L., Solanum schimperianum Hochst, Solanum nigrum L., Physalis lagascae Roem. & Schult. and Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalleavesmethanolhydroxycinnamic acid amides, steroid alkaloids, steroidal glycoalkaloid fractionsMCF-7, MDA-MB-231, HT-29, HTC-116Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of μg/mL and 1.29–19.83 μg/mL) (MTT test)[188]
Solanum lycopersicum L.fruitmethanolphenolic, ascorbic acids and flavonoid contentHepG2, HeLaCytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 156–212 μg/mL) (MTT test)[189]
Solanum lycopersicum L.fruitethanol/watercarotenoids, phenolics, sterol content, fatty acidHT-29Cytotoxic (IC50 = 150 μg/mL) (MTT test)[190]
Solanum lycopersicum L.leavesethanol-A549, HeLaCytotoxic (IC50 < 31.25 μg/mL) (MTT); significant caspase-3 activity[191]
Solanum lyratum Thunb.whole plantchloroform-HSC-3, SAS, CAL-27Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 40–80 μg/mL); induction of apoptosis (in extrinsic- and intrinsic-dependent pathways) by changing levels of the proteins p21, p16, CDK2 and CDK6, and cyclins D1 and E. It also promotes proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bad and inhibits anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl, promotes ROS and Ca2þ production, decreases mitochondrial membrane potential, increases NO production[192]
Solanum nigrum L.whole plantwateralkaloids, glycosides, flavonoids, polyphenols terpenoids, and saponinsA-375Cytotoxic[193]
Solanum nigrum L.whole plantwater-MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 = 100 μg/mL) (crystal violet staining assay) induction of apoptosis by activation of caspase-3 and loss of mitochondrial integrity. It also inhibited EMT (cancer cell metastasis and migration) by downregulating ZEB1, N-cadherin, and vimentin[194]
Solanum nigrum L.leaveswater-SCC-4Cytotoxic (IC50 = 150 μg/mL) (crystal violet staining assay); induction of apoptosis by increasing ROS production, activating caspase-9 and caspase-3, alleviating the inhibition of glucose uptake and loss of mitochondrial integrity[195]
Solanum nigrum L.fruitethanolphenolic and flavonoid compoundsMCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 value = 40.77 μg/mL) (MTT assay); arrest the cell cycle in the S phase and continued to the G2/M phase[196]
Solanum nigrum L.whole plantswater-HepG2Cytotoxic (MTT test); inhibits the proliferation and AKT/mTOR pathway[197]
Solanum paniculatum L.fruitethanolcarotenoids, phenolic compoundsMCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 value = 1.87–30 μg/mL)[198]
Solanum schimperianumHochst. ex A.Rich Solanum villosum Mill. Solanum coagulans Forssk. Solanum glabratum Dunal., Solanum incanum L., Solanum nigrum L.aerial partsethanolrutinHepG2, HEK293, MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 20.4–30.1 μg/mL) (MTT assay)[199]
Solanum sessiliflorum Dunalpulp/seedethanolcaffeic and gallic acids, beta-carotene, catechin, quercetin, and rutinMCF-7, HT-29Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 3–>30 μg/mL) (MTT assay)[200]
Solanum tuberosum L.tuber, peels, flesh, flowerswater-HT-29Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 7.2–14.4 mg/ mL) (MTS test); induction of apoptosis by upregulation of caspase-3 protease activity[201]
Solanum tuberosum L.tuberswaterpolyphenol and anthocyanin-richU937Cytotoxic; expression of specific apoptotic agents, such as caspase 8, 9, 3, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)[202]
Solanum tuberosum L.peelsethanol/watercaffeic, caffeoylquinic acid, O-glycosylated flavonol derivatives and polyamine derivativesNCI-H460, MCF-7, HepG2, and HeLaCytotoxic (GI50 values in the range of 51–365 μg/mL)[203]
Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunalroots, leaves, leaf stalk, and fruitmethanolflavonoid and phenolic content, myricetin, quercetin, gallic acid, hydroxybenzoic acidHeLa, MCF-7, RD, RG2Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.96 μg/mL–6.69 μg/mL (Presto Blue cell metabolic test)[204]
Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunalfruitsmethanolwithaferin AMDA-MB-231Cytotoxic (IC50 = 40 mg/mL) (MTT assay)[205]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalrootwater-A375Cytotoxic (IC50 = 350 μg/mL) (MTT test); induction of morphological changes (apoptotic body and nuclear blebbing) and DNA fragmentation[206]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalleaveswater-HepG2Cytotoxic (IC50 = 5.0 mg/mL)(MTT test); induction of apoptosis by caspase-3, -8 and -9 activation[207]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalroots and leaveswater, ethanol, metanol (various methods of extraction and maceration)withanoside V, withanoside IV, 12-deoxywithastramonolide, withanolide A, and withaferin AHeLaCytotoxic (IC50 = 10 mg/mL) (MTT test)[208]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalrootsethanol/wateralkaloids, carbohydrates, phytosterols and phenolicsA549Cytotoxic (IC50 = 99.7 μg/mL) (MTT test); anticancer activity via antioxidant, apoptotic, autophagy and angiogenesis inhibition mechanisms[209]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalroots-withaferin A, whitanolide, withanolide BJurkatProapoptotic mechanism involves intracellular Ca2+ accumulation and the generation of reactive oxygen species[210]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalleaveswater-C6 gliomaActivation of multiple pro-apoptotic pathways, leading to suppression of cyclin D1, Bcl-xl, and p-Akt[211]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalstemsmethanol, ethanol, waterwithaferin AMDA-MB-231Cytotoxic (IC50 values of 30 and 37 μg/mL) (MTT test)[212]

8. Anticancer Effect and Potential Mechanisms of Action of Pure Compounds Isolated from the Solanaceae Family

Although plants and natural extracts are very important sources of biologically-active compounds, the study of their isolated products can provide a starting point for the development of new drug candidates with unique structures and mechanisms of action. Indeed, many of the secondary metabolites produced by the Solanaceae have been found to be of medical importance, with effects on cancer cells [13]. For example, solajiangxins H, solajiangxins I and 7-hydroxylsolajiangxin I isolated from whole plant extracts of Solanum lyratum show cytotoxic effect against intestinal cancer cells [213]. Solanum aculeastrum, containing steroidal glycosides, showed antitumour activity against various cancer cell lines, including lung, colon and cervical cancer cells [214]. In turn, Shieh et al. demonstrated the time- and dose-dependent inhibition of cell viability in α-tomatine-treated non-lung cancer cells [215]. The steroidal alkaloid soladulcidine, isolated from Solanum dulcamara, and ten of its derivatives were shown to have significant antiproliferative effects against prostate cancer cells [216]. In addition, 35 withanolides and withaferin A from the roots and leaves of Withania somnifera have demonstrated efficacy against a wide range of cell lines [217,218]. Withawrightolide and four other withanolides derived from the aerial parts of Datura wrightii were similarly found to exhibit cytotoxic properties against glioma cells [219]. In addition, Physalis peruviana seed extract induced apoptosis in HeLa cells [220]. In particular, secondary metabolites of the Solanaceae family are known to induce apoptosis in various types of cancer cells by activating different signalling pathways. These differences may result from both chemical structure of the compounds and specific sensitivity of cancer cells. Such compounds with antiproliferative properties commonly affect processes associated with the cell cycle, gene expression, signal transduction pathways, changes in the mitochondrial membrane, metabolic pathways, and autophagy [31]. The cell cycle is an important mechanism that determines cell proliferation. Alkaloids such as baimantuoluoamide A and baimantuoluoamide B inhibit cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) activity, and glycoalkaloids such as solasonine, solanidine, and solamargine induce cycle arrest in the S phase. Arrest in the G2/M phase is induced by solamargine and withaferin A [24]. Withaphysalin F—isolated from the leaves of Acnistus arborescens—also has anti-proliferative properties and the ability to arrest the cell cycle in the G2/M phase, which has been attributed to the inhibition of tubulin polymerization and the induction of DNA fragmentation [221]. The compounds also influence gene expression. For example, withaferin A is known to inhibit transcription factors such as MYB and C/EBPβ [31]. In addition, solasonine, β1-solasonine, solamargine and solanigroside P isolated from the aerial part of Solanum nigrum show antiproliferative properties against gastric cancer cells, and can induce apoptosis by altering gene expression, such as by increasing Bax expression, decreasing Bcl-2 expression, and activating caspase-3 [222]. Lycopene, a carotenoid found commonly in Solanum lycopersicum, was found to regulate the expression of various apoptosis-related proteins and genes—such as caspase-3, caspase-8, Bax, Bax:Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL—among breast cancer cells [223]. Furthermore, physalin F derived from the whole plant Physalis minima has cytotoxic effects and induces the apoptosis of breast cancer cells through caspase-3 activation and DNA fragmentation [224]. In turn, solamargine increased the expression of p53, Bax and Bcl-2 in U2OS and K562/A02 cells on the mRNA and protein levels, and the mRNA expression and promoter activity of EP4, as well as the protein expression of SP1 and NF-κB subunit p65 in lung cancer cell lines [225]. In addition, they can also inhibit various signalling pathways that may be responsible for cell growth and proliferation. For example, withanolide S5 inhibits receptor tyrosine kinases, withametelin and coagulansin A downregulate the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway and the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, and 4β-hydroxywithanolide E targets the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Solamargine suppresses the phosphorylation of Akt [225]. In addition, withaferin A inhibits colon cancer by inhibiting Notch-1 signalling, as indicated by the downregulation of Notch-1 targets including Hes-1 and Hey-1; it also inhibits its cross-talk with the Akt/mTOR pathway, thus suggesting the Notch-Akt-mTOR axis as a therapeutic target in colon cancer [226]. Furthermore, α-chaconine and α-solanine reduce the expression and activity of the Akt and ERα signalling pathways in human endometrial carcinoma cells [227]. In addition, arabinogalactan upregulates two of the three MAPK cascades, including c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 kinases, and downregulates the third based on extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), and scopoletin demonstrates a strong binding affinity with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFA), which is involved in signalling [31]. Solanaceae-isolated compounds may also induce apoptosis by influencing the mitochondrial membrane. Defensin (NoD173), for example, permeates the mitochondrial outer membrane, resulting in the potential collapse of the membrane, followed by the release of cytochrome c and the activation of caspases. In turn, α-solanine was found to induce mitochondrial mediated apoptosis by opening pores and inducing the release of cytochrome c and Smac from mitochondria into the cytosol, further activating caspase-9 and decreasing the mitochondrial membrane potential [228]. They may also alter metabolic pathways: physapubescin I blocks kidney-type glutaminase, an enzyme involved in ATP production. Its downregulation may inhibit the growth and proliferation of cancer cells. Finally, physapubescin B is known to activate autophagy via mTORC1 inhibition, while physapubenolide downregulates key proteins involved in the process [31]. Recent reports on the anticancer properties of pure compounds isolated from plants from the Solanaceae family are listed in Table 2.
Table 2

In vitro anticancer effect of pure compounds isolated from the Solanaceae family, and their potential mechanisms of action.

Name of the SpeciesPart of the PlantCompounds/FractionCancer Cell LinesActivity/Mechanism/EffectRef.
Brugmansia suaveolens(Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) Bercht. & J.PreslleavesSUPH036-022AMCF7, A549Cytotoxic (MTT test) and induction of apoptosis by loss of mitochondrial integrity and increase of ROS[229]
Capsicum annuum L.pericarppolyphenolic contentU937Cytotoxic (Trypan blue assay)[230]
Capsicum chinenses L.fruitscapsaicin and dihydrocapsaicinSH-SY5YCytotoxic (IC50 = 69.75 μg/mL) (Trypan blue assay)[231]
Datura innoxia Mill.aerial partsdinnoxolide A, 21,27-dihydroxy-1-oxowitha-2,5,24-trienolide, daturamalakin B, withametelinU251 and SK-LU-1Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.2–19.6 μM) (SRB assay)[232]
Datura inoxia Mill.leavesphytosterol, rinoxiaBHCT 15Cytotoxic (IC50 = 4 μM), apoptotic effects by targeting BAX/Bcl2 pathway[233]
Datura metel L.seedsindole alkaloids, daturametelindoles A–DSGC-7901, Hepg2, MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 6.73–47.63 μM/mL) (MTT test)[234]
Datura metel L.whole plantssteroidal saponins (metelosides A–E)HepG2, MCF-7, and SK-Mel-2Cytotoxic (SRB assay)[235]
Lycium ruthenicum Murrayfruitspetunidin 3-O-[6-O-(4-O-(trans-p-coumaroyl)-α-l-rhamnopyranosyl)-β-d-glucopyranoside]-5-O-[β-d-glucopyranoside]DU-145Cytotoxic (IC50 = 361.58 μg/mL) (MTT test), apoptosis through the ROS/PTEN/PI3K/Akt/caspase 3 signalling pathway[236]
Lycium shawii Roem. & Schultwhole plantaloe emodin, dehydrocostus lactone costunolide, lyciumate, aloe emodine 11-O-rhamnoside, emodin-8-O-β-d-glucoside and lyciumaMDA-MB-231Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of >72 μg/mL) (MTT test)[237]
Physalis alkekengi var. franchetii Mast.aerial partsphysalin AA549Cytotoxic (IC50 = 28.4 μM/mL) (MTT test); cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and increase of ROS[238]
Physalis alkekengi var. franchetii Mast.-physakengose GU-2OS, HOSCytotoxic (MTT test), increase of lysosome dysfunction, induction of apoptosis (mitochondrial-dependent pathway) and inhibition of mTOR signalling[239]
Physalis alkekengi var. franchetii Mast.calyxwithanolidesA549, K562Cytotoxic (IC50 value in the range of 1.9–4.3 μM/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by suppressing the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway[240]
Physalis angulata L.stems and leavesphysangulatins A−N; withaphysalin Y;withaphysalin ZC4-2B, 22Rvl, 786-O, A-498, ACHN, A375-S2Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.18–11.59 μM/mL) (MTT test)[241]
Physalis angulata L.stems and leavesphysalins and analogues (physalins V-IX, 16,24-cyclo-13, 14-seco withanolides)C4-2B, 22Rv1, 786-O, A-498, ACHN, A375-S2Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.24–3.17 μM/mL) (MTT test)[242]
Physalis angulata L.whole plantphysalin B, physalin FHL60, A549, HeLa, HuCCA-1, HepG2, MDA-MB-231), T47-D), S102, H69AR, MRC-5Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.76–11.92 μM/mL) (MTT, XTT test)[243]
Physalis angulata L.aerial partswithanolideMG-63, HepG-2, MDAMB-231Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 3.50–15.74 μM/mL)[244]
Physalis angulata L.whole plantwithanolidesA549, HeLa and p388Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.91–>30 μM/mL) (MTT test); apoptosis-inducing activity by flow cytometric analysis[245]
Physalis crassifolia Benth.fruits17β-Hydroxy-18-acetoxywithanolidesLNCaP, PC-3M, MCF-7, NCI-H460 and SF-268Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.12–>5.0 μM/mL) (AlamarBlue)[246]
Physalis ixocarpa Lam.fruitsixocarpalactone ASW1990, MCF-7, HeLaCytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 3.22–7.51 μM/mL) (CCK-8 assay); induction of apoptosis by inhibition of PHGDH[247]
Physalis minima L.whole plantwithanolidesA549, SMMC-7721, MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 value in the range of 40.01–82.17 μM/mL) (MTT test)[248]
Physalis minima L.whole plant5, 6-β-epoxywithanolidesA549, SMMC-7721, MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 31.25–80.14 μM/mL) (MTT test)[249]
Physalis minima L.aerial partswithanolide E, withaperuvin C, 4b-hydroxywithanolide E, 28-hydroxywithaperuvin C, physaperuvin G, and 4-deoxywithaperuvinHepG2, SK-LU-1, and MCF7Cytotoxic (IC50 in the range of 0.051–0.86 μg/mL)[250]
Physalis minima L.aerial partsphysaminilides HeK, withanolidesA375Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.2–7.5 μM/mL) (MTT assay)[251]
Physalis peruviana L.seedsperulactones I–L, 17-deoxy-23β-hydroxywithanolide E, 23βhydroxywithanolide E, 4-deoxyphyperunolide A, 7β-hydroxywithanolide F, 7βhydroxy-17-epi-withanolide K, 24,25-dihydro-23β,28-dihydroxywithanolide G, and 24,25-dihydrowithanolide E, withanolidesLNCaP, 22Rv1 ACHN, M14, SK-MEL-28Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.11–> 2 μM/mL) (MTS assay)[252]
Physalis peruviana L.aerial parts4-hydroxywithanolide EHT-29, HCT116, Caco-2Cytotoxic (IC50 = 0.84 μM/mL) (CCK-8); cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase (at low concentrations) and induction of apoptosis (at higher concentrations) by changes in apoptosis-related proteins and genes and histone modification[253]
Physalis philadelphica Lam.aerial parts7-epi-philadelphicalactone A; withaphysacarpin philadelphicalactone C, ixocarpalactone ALNCaP, ACHN, UO-31, M14,SK-MEL-28Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.06–>10 uM/mL) (MTS assay)[254]
Physalis pubescens L.Fruitsphysapubescin BSKOV3, HepG2, MDA-MB-231, PC-3, Du145Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.85–16.05 μM) (MTT test); cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase (associated with reduced Cdc25C levels and increased levels of CyclinB1, p21 as well as p-Cdk1)[255]
Physalis pubescens L.stems and leavesphysapubescin E physapubside A physapubside B physapubescin F physapubside C physapubescin G physapubescin H physapubescin I and two withanolidesC4-2B, 22Rvl, 786-O, A-498, ACHN, Caki-2, A375-S2, A375Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.17–5.30 μM/mL) (MTT test)[256]
Physalis pubescens L.fruitsphysapubescin BES-2, A2780, A2780/TRInduction of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest[257]
Physalis pubescens L.fruitsphysapubescin ISW1990Cytotoxic (IC50 in the range of 2.06–5.04 μM/mL)[258]
Salpichroa scandens Dammeraerial partssalpichrolides A, C, D, G, M, S, T, and 2,3-dihydrosalpichrolide B and derivativesLNCaP, PC-3, MCF-7, T47DCytotoxicity (IC50 values in the range of 29.97–64.91 μM/mL) (MTS assay)[259]
Solanum capsicoides All.seedscarpesterolU251, MCF-7, 786-0, OVCAR 03, K562Cytotoxic (GI50 values in the range of 24.0–226.3 μg/mL)[184]
Solanum incanum L., Solanum schimperianum Hochst, Solanum nigrum L., Physalis lagascae Roem. & Schult. and Withania somnifera (L) Dunalleavessteroidal glycoalkaloid fractionsMCF-7,MDA-MB-231, HT-29, HTC-116Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.29–>50 μg/mL) (MTT test)[188]
Solanum lycopersicum L.different partsα-tomatineCT-26Inhibition of tumour growth and induction of apoptosis through caspase-independent signalling pathways[260]
Solanum lyratum Thunbwhole plantsesquiterpenoids including solajiangxin H and lyratol DMCF-7, HCT-8, A549, SGC-7901, BEL-7402)Cytotoxicity (IC50 value in the range of 4.8–5.9 μg/mL) (CCK-8); induction of apoptosis (mitochondrial-dependent pathway) by changes in apoptosis-related proteins[261]
Solanum lyratum Thunb.whole plantsteroidal compoundsSGC-7901, BEL-7402Cytotoxic (IC50 value in the range of 0.39–71.89 μmol/mL) (MTT test)[262]
Solanum melongena L.fruit peelssolasonine; solasodine; solamargineHuh7, HepG2Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 9.6–91.8 μM/mL) (SRB assay); cell cycle arrest in S-phase, induction of apoptosis,[263]
Solanum melongena L.sepalsmelongenamides H-IHeLa, Ishikawa and MGC-803Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 15.3–32.1 μM/mL) (CCK8 assay)[264]
Solanum nigrum L.whole plantdegalactotigonin, solasodine, O-acetyl solasodine, and soladulcoside APANC1, MIA-PaCa2, A549, NCI-H1975, and NCI-H1299Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 2.9–>30) (Cell Migration Assay),; induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest via inhibiting the EGFR signalling pathways[265]
Solanum nigrum L.fruitssolaoiacidA549Cytotoxic (IC50 = 2.3 μmol/mL (MTT assay)[266]
Solanum nigrum L.fruitsalkaloid glycosidesHL-60, U-937, Jurkat, K562, and HepG2Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 2.72–39.19 μM/mL) (MTT assay)[267]
Solanum nigrum L.leavesuttroside BHepG2Cytotoxic (IC50 = 0.5 μM) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by down-regulating the activation of MAPK and mTOR pathways[268]
Solanum nigrum L.-degalactotigonindifferent lines of osteosarcoma cellsCytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 12.91–31.46 μM/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis, suppression of migration and invasion by repression of the Hedgehog/Gli1 pathway through GSK3b inactivation.[269]
Solanum nigrum L.fruitssolanine A; 7a-OH khasianine, 7a-OH solamargine; 7a-OH solasonineMGC803, HepG2, SW480Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 6.00–9.25 μM/mL) (SRB assay)[270]
Solanum septemlobum Bungewhole plantseptemlobin D and 11,12-O-isopropylidenesolajiangxin FP-388, HONE-1 and HT-29Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 3.0–7.3 μM/mL) (MTT test)[271]
Solanum torvum Swartz.Fruitsmethyl caffeateMCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 = 0.62 μM/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by caspase activation via cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Further, increased DNA fragmentation, apoptotic body and changes in apoptosis-related proteins (Bcl-2, Bid and Bax)[272]
Withania adpressa Coss.leavesglycowithanolide named wadpressine, withanolide F, withaferin A, coagulin L and nicotiflorinMM-CSCs, RPMI 8226Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 0.1–>20 μM/mL) (MTT test)[273]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalrootswithasilolides A−F, withanoneA549, SK-OV-3, SK-MEL-2, and HCT-15Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of <10.0 μM/mL) (SRB assay)[274]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalleaveswithaferin A and its derivativesPANC-1, DU145, MCF7Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 1.1–>25 μM/mL)[275]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalrootsprotein fractionMBA-MB-435, MDA-MB-231, T47D, MCF-7, HCT-116, A549Cytotoxic (IC50 = 92 μg/mL) (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by decrease of the mitochondrial membrane potential levels, promotion of the reactive oxygen species production, changes in apoptosis-related proteins regulation and caspases-3 activation. Further, cell cycle arrest in G2/M-phase.[276]
Withania somnifera (L.) Dunalroots and leaveswithanoside V, withanoside IV, 12-deoxywithastramonolide, withanolide A, and withaferin AHeLaCytotoxic (IC50 value in the range of 3.2 to 7.7 μM/mL) (MTT test)[208]
The mechanisms of action described in the text and included in Table 2 are presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4

Schematic diagram presenting the potential anticancer effect of compounds from the Solanaceae family through the induction of apoptosis and the activation of signalling pathways in cancer cells (created using BioRender).

9. Anticancer Effect and Potential Mechanisms of Action of Nanoparticles in Combination with Plant Extracts from the Solanaceae Family

Plant-based nanomaterial synthesis has been growing in popularity. The approach is more environmentally friendly than chemical or physical methods, and many studies have reported that it yields nanoparticles with improved pharmacological properties [277]. Regarding extracts from the Solanaceae, the available data indicate that silver nanoparticles generated by Datura inoxia exert significant antiproliferative effect against lung cancer cells. They also induce apoptosis cell cycle arrest and inhibit DNA synthesis [278]. Recent reports on the anticancer properties of nanoparticles using extracts from the Solanaceae family are listed in Table 3.
Table 3

Anticancer effect of nanoparticles in combination with plant extracts from the Solanaceae family, and their potential mechanisms of action.

Name of the SpeciesPart of the PlantType of Solvent/Active CompoundsType of NanoparticlesCancer Cell LinesActivity/Mechanism/EffectRef.
Atropa acuminate Royle ex Lindl.leaveswater/total phenolic, flavonoid and tanninAgHeLaCytotoxic (IC50 = 5.418 μg/mL) (MTT test)[279]
Lycium chinense Mill.fruitswaterAu, AgMCF 7Cytotoxic (MTT test)[280]
Lycopersicon esculentum L.fruitsbenzene/lycopeneAg, Au, FeCOLO320DM, HT29 and HeLaCytotoxic (MTT test)[281]
Solanum elaeagnifolium Cav.leaveswaterAg-AgO-Ag2OA-549Cytotoxic (IC50 = 67.09 μg/mL) (MTT test)[282]
Solanum incanum L.leaveswaterAg-NPsHepG2, MCF-7Cytotoxic (IC50 values in the range of 21.76–129.9 μg/mL) (MTT test)[283]
Solanum lycocarpum A.St.-Hil.fruitsglycoalkaloidsNP-AERT4Cytotoxic (2D model: IC50 = 4.18 μg/mL, 3D model: three-fold higher than in 2D cell culture) (2D—the neutral red assay, 3D—CellTiter-Glo®3D); induction of apoptosis by cell cycle arrest[284]
Solanum lycocarpum L.fruitsethanol-soluble fraction glycoalkaloids, solamargine and solasonineAE-loaded folate-targeted nanoparticlesMDA-MB-231, RT4Folate-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles are potential carriers for targeted glycoalkaloidic extract delivery to bladder cancer cells (2D model: IC50 = 3.78 μg/mL, 3D model: 7.7 μg/mL) (2D model—Neutral Red Uptake assay, 3D model: CellTiter-Glo®3D)[285]
Solanum lycopersicum L.tomato’s pomaseethyl acetate/lycopenelycopene-NPsMCF-7, HCT-116, HepG2,Cytotoxic (IC50 in the range of 72.40–92.54 μg/mL) (MTT test)[286]
Solanum muricatum L.leaveswaterAgHeLaCytotoxic (IC50 = 37.5 μg/mL) (MTT assay)[287]
Solanum trilobatum L.unripe fruitswaterAgMCF7Cytotoxic (MTT test); induction of apoptosis by changes in expression of proliferation- and apoptosis-related genes (overexpression Bax¸ down-regulation Bcl-2), and activation of caspases 3 and 9[288]
Solanum trilobatum L.leaveswaterMn-Ag co-doped FeOMCF-7, HeLaCytotoxic (IC50 value in the range of 37.11–60.49 μg/mL) (MTT test)[289]
Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad. & WendlleaveswaterAuC666-1Cytotoxic (MTT test); triggering cell death by autophagy and apoptosis (mitochondrial-dependent pathway)[290]
Withania somnifera L.leaveswater/total flavonoid, phenolic and tanninSeA549Cytotoxic (IC50 = 25 μg/mL) (MTT test)[291]
Withania somnifera L.leaveswater/phenolic, flavonoid and tanninZnHEP2, PC3, MCF-7, HCT-116,Cytotoxic (IC50 value in the range of 19.17–88.3 7 μg/mL) (MTT test)[292]

10. Synergistic Effect of Chemotherapeutic Drugs and Plant Extracts from the Solanaceae Family

The occurrence of drug resistance indicates the need to search for new chemotherapeutic agents and improved combinations of them. Combined anticancer therapy uses drugs that target different pathways, as this can result in improved cytotoxicity for the cancer cell, with both additive and synergistic effects [293]. Synergy can also be observed between conventional drugs and chemical compounds and extracts, and some plant-derived compounds have been found to improve the effeciency of anticancer therapy [124]. For example, Solanum nigrum leaf extract has been found to enhance the effect of cisplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil, resulting in the induction of intestinal cancer cell autophagy through the accumulation of microtubule-associated proteins [294]. Moreover, whole-plant Solanum nigrum extract has intensified the effect of doxorubicin in the suppression of the growth of HeLa [295] and breast cancer cells [296]. Recent reports on the synergistic properties of extracts from the Solanaceae family and anticancer drugs are listed in Table 4.
Table 4

Anticancer synergistic effect of chemotherapeutic drugs and plant extracts from the Solanaceae family.

Name of the SpeciesPart of the PlantType of Slovent or Fraction or CompoundChemotherapeutic DrugsCancer Cell LinesActivity/Mechanism/EffectRef.
Capsicum frutescens L.-capsaicindoxorubicinCaco-2 and CEM/ADR 5000Enhancement of the doxorubicin cytotoxicity in cancer cells and chemosensitizing activity (inhibition of P-glycoprotein activity)[297]
Lycium barbarum L.fruitswaterdoxorubicinMCF-7, MDA-MB-231Enhancement of the doxorubicin cytotoxicity in cancer cells[298]
Solanum cernuum Vell.leavescernumidinecisplatinT24, RT4, 5637Enhancement of the cisplatin cytotoxicity in cancer cells. Inhibition of cell migration, down-regulation of MMP-2/9 and p-ERK1/2, increase EGFR activity. Furthermore, down-regulation of Bcl-2, up-regulation of Bax and reduction of the mitochondrial membrane potential[299]
Solanum incanum L.extract—according to the patent (US patent 7,078,063, EU patent 1,058,334, and Japan patent 3,940,928) SR-T100extract containing solamarginecisplatin, paclitaxelES2, TOV-21G, IGROV1, A2780, A2780CP70, ov2008 and ov2008CP20Suppression of C/EBPβ and COL11A1 expression and its promoter activity[300]
Solanum nigrum L.leaveswatercisplatin, doxorubicinHep3B, HepJ5Induction of caspase-7 and accumulation of microtubule associated protein-1 light chain-3 A/1B II[301]
Solanum nigrum L.leaveswatercisplatin, doxorubicin, docetaxelES-2, SKOV-3, OVCAR-3Induction of caspase-3 and accumulation of microtubule associated protein-1 light chain-3 A/1B II[302]
Solanum nigrum L.unripe fruitglycoside fraction (methanol)doxorubicinNCI/ADR-RESOvercoming doxorubicin resistance by inhibiting the JAK-STAT3 signalling pathway by downregulation of JAK1, STAT3, pSTAT3, and Mdr1 expression. Furthermore, the cell growth suppression was proven to be apoptotic, based on results obtained from DNA fragmentation, annexin V apoptosis assay and PARP cleavage analysis.”[303]

11. Anticancer Effect in In Vivo Studies of Compounds of the Solanaceae Family

Due to due to their high content of bioactive compounds, Solanaceae family members have also been used in a number of in vivo studies. This review categorizes in vivo studies as extracts, pure compounds, nanoparticle extracts and chemotherapeutic extracts. For example, Wu et al. showed that SR-T100—extracted from Solanum incanum (solamargine alkaloid)—caused all papillomas (35/35) and 27 of the 30 UVB-induced microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma in hairless mice to disappear within 10 weeks of the daily use of topical SR-T100 [304]. In other studies, Wu et al. found that Solanum incanum extract (SR-T100) paclitaxel and cisplatin inhibited the growth of A2780CP70 cells in mouse xenografts, compared to the vehicle control, and that the combination of cisplatin and SR-T100 was more effective than either treatment alone. The authors suspect that SR-T100 may represent a potential therapeutic adjunct to chemotherapy for ovarian cancer treatment [300]. Furthermore, Solanum lyratum aerial part extract was found to significantly inhibit the growth of S180 sarcoma in mice in vivo, and to increase the proliferation of splenocytes, natural killer cells and cytotoxic T cells, as well as interleukin 2 and interferon-γ, by splenocytes. The authors propose that the extract exhibits its anti-tumour effects through its immunomodulatory properties [305]. Solasodine and rhamnosyl glycosides isolated from Solanum sodomaeum were found to demonstrate antitumour properties in a mouse model [306]. In turn, Deng et al. revealed that the fraction from Lycium barbarum polysaccharide could reduce immunotoxicity and enhance the antitumour activity of doxorubicin in mice. The results showed that Lycium barbarum polysaccharide did not protect against the bodyweight loss caused by doxorubicin, but it promoted the recovery of bodyweight starting at day 5 after doxorubicin treatment in tumour-free mice. Lycium barbarum polysaccharide also improved peripheral blood lymphocyte counts, promoted cell cycle recovery in bone marrow cells, and restored the cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Furthermore, in H22 tumour-bearing mice, Lycium barbarum polysaccharide enhanced the antitumour activity of doxorubicin, and improved the peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and the cytotoxicity of splenocytes [307]. Diwanay et al. noted that the alkaloid-free polar fraction of Withania somnifera resulted in protection towards cyclophosphamide-induced myelo- and immunoprotection, as was evident from the significant increase in white cell counts and hemagglutinating and hemolytic antibody titers. Treatment with these candidate drugs may be important in the development of adjunctive therapy with anticancer chemotherapy [308]. The anticancer and radio-sensitizing efficacy of a Withania somnifera extract/Gadolinium III oxide nanocomposite (WSGNC) was also investigated in mice. WSGNC treatment combined with γ-radiation led to a significant decrease in the solid Ehrlich carcinoma size and weight in mice; this was associated with a significant decrease in mitochondrial enzyme activities, glutathione content and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, as well as a significant increase in caspase-3 activity, malondialdehyde concentration and DNA fragmentation in cancer tissues. The authors indicate that WSGNC can be considered as a radio-sensitizer and an anticancer modulator, suggesting a possible role in the reduction of the radiation exposure dose during radiotherapy [309]. Further studies are presented in the Table 5.
Table 5

In vivo anticancer effect of plant extracts and pure compounds from the Solanaceae family and their potential mechanisms of action.

Name of The SpeciesPart of the PlantType of SolventClass of Compounds/Compounds Identified in Extract/FractionPotential Mechanism of ActionRef.
Athenaea velutina Sendtn.leavesdichloromethane: methanol (1:1)phenolic compounds and flavonoidsSuppression of the development of pulmonary melanomas following the intravenous injection of melanoma cells to C57BL/6 mice[161]
Datura stramonium L., Datura inoxia Mill.leavesethyl acetaterutin, gallic acid, catechin, apigenin and caffeic acidAlleviative effects in benzene induced leukaemia in Sprague Dawley rats[166]
Physalis alkekengi L.aerial partshydro alcoholic-Tumour progression on the 28 ER+ BC BALB/c mice animal model (the tumour size among the different doses of extract lose to 0.6 mm was in the greatest dimension with dosage of 10 mg/kg)[310]
Physalis ixocarpa Lam.fruits-ixocarpalactone AInhibition of the tumour growth in a SW1990 xenograft mouse model with low toxicities, suggesting its potential therapeutic application in pancreatic cancer treatment[247]
Physalis pubescens L.fruits-physapubescin BAntitumour efficacy in human prostate cancer PC3 xenograft in nude mice[255]
Solanum incanum L.whole plant SR-T100acid base precipitation followed by the different ratios of ethanol/H2 O extraction (according to the patents—US patent 7,078,063, EU patent 1,058,334, and Japan patent 3,940,928)solamargineExtract SR-T100-treated C57BL/6 mice, the tumour burden of lung metastases was significantly reduced compared to that in control mice[186]
Solanum incanum L.whole plant SR-T100acid base precipitation followed by the different ratios of ethanol/H2 O extraction (according to the patents—US patent 7,078,063, EU patent 1,058,334, and Japan patent 3,940,928)solamargineAnimal experiments showed that all papillomas (35/35) and 27 of 30 UVB-induced microinvasive SCCs in hairless SKH-hr1 female mouse mice disappeared within 10 weeks after once-daily application of topical SR-T100 extract[304]
Solanum lycopersicum L.different parts-α-tomatineIntraperitoneally administered α-tomatine (5 mg/kg body weight) also markedly inhibited growth of the tumour using CT-26 cancer cells without causing body and organ weight changes. The reduced tumour growth in the BALB/c mice by 38% after 2 weeks was the result of increased caspase-independent apoptosis associated with increased nuclear translocation of AIF and decreased surviving expression in tumour tissues.[260]
Solanum nigrum L. fruitsmethanolrutin, solasonine, quercetin and solamargineReduction of the growth and infiltration of C6 glioma tissue and suppressed the proliferation of tumour cells in Wistar rats brain[311]
Solanum nigrum L.stems-polysaccharide fraction (SN-ppF3)Tumour suppression mechanisms observed in SN-ppF3-treated mice were most probably due through enhancing the host immune response[312]
Solanum nigrum L.leaves-uttroside BDrastic inhibition of tumour growth produced by uttroside B in NOD-SCID mice bearing human liver cancer xenografts demonstrates the chemotherapeutic efficacy of uttroside B[268]
Solanum nigrum L.--degalactotigoninDegalactotigonin injected intraperitoneally after tumour inoculation, significantly decreased the volume of osteosarcoma xenografts in athymic nude (nu/nu) mice model and dramatically diminished the occurrence of osteosarcoma xenograft metastasis to the lungs[269]
Withania somnifera L.leaveswaterASH-WEX extractReduced the intracranial tumour volumes in vivo and suppressed the tumour-promoting proteins p-nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), p-Akt, vascular endothelial growth factor in the albino rat model of orthotopic glioma allograft[211]

12. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Cancer is a devastating disease, and the currently available treatments for patients are generally associated with undesirable adverse effects. The use of medicinal plants to manage or arrest the carcinogenic process provides an additional strategy that can be used alongside treatments with canonical drugs. Many plant-derived bioactive compounds have achieved favorable results in clinical studies, and their tumouricidal properties against various cancers are under investigation. This literature review evaluated the anticancer properties of natural products from the Solanaceae family. They were grouped in terms of extracts, pure compounds, nanoparticles with extracts, and chemotherapeutic agents with extracts, and their potential mechanisms of action were given. Although all of the studies found the extracts to demonstrate strong in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity in cancer cell lines and animal models, more research is needed in order to elucidate their specific mechanisms of action, and to determine their potential for cancer prevention and treatment. Plants of the Solanaceae family are widely discussed due to their multi-directional activity. Multiple in vitro studies have been reported with promising results. On the other hand, the anti-tumour potential of the secondary metabolites from Solanaceae is also quite clear. In addition, nanotechnology techniques can enhance their action and eliminate negative effects on normal cells. Thus, plants of the Solanaceae family should be tested further in order to better elucidate their therapeutic potential not only in in vitro and in vivo studies but also in clinical applications. However, the study of these plants should not limit the study of the plethora of anticancer plants, some of which are still unexplored. Research is needed in order to elucidate the antitumour mechanism of action of many already studied and unexplored plants.
  253 in total

1.  An anti-cancerous protein fraction from Withania somnifera induces ROS-dependent mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Parvaiz A Dar; Sameer A Mir; Javeed A Bhat; Abid Hamid; Laishram R Singh; Fayaz Malik; Tanveer A Dar
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.953

2.  Evaluating the cytotoxic effects of the water extracts of four anticancer herbs against human malignant melanoma cells.

Authors:  Binbing Ling; Deborah Michel; Meena Kishore Sakharkar; Jian Yang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.162

3.  Comparative Phytochemical Characterization, Genetic Profile, and Antiproliferative Activity of Polyphenol-Rich Extracts from Pigmented Tubers of Different Solanum tuberosum Varieties.

Authors:  Luigi De Masi; Paola Bontempo; Daniela Rigano; Paola Stiuso; Vincenzo Carafa; Angela Nebbioso; Sonia Piacente; Paola Montoro; Riccardo Aversano; Vincenzo D'Amelia; Domenico Carputo; Lucia Altucci
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Anti-proliferative withanolides from the Solanaceae: a structure-activity study.

Authors:  Huaping Zhang; Abbas K Samadi; Mark S Cohen; Barbara N Timmermann
Journal:  Pure Appl Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Solanum Incanum Extract Downregulates Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1-Mediated Stemness and Inhibits Tumor Formation in Ovarian Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Wu; Wen-Tai Chiu; Ming-Jer Young; Tzu-Hao Chang; Yu-Fang Huang; Cheng-Yang Chou
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Withania somnifera Root Extract Has Potent Cytotoxic Effect against Human Malignant Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Babli Halder; Shruti Singh; Suman S Thakur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The historical role of species from the Solanaceae plant family in genetic research.

Authors:  Christiane Gebhardt
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  In Vitro Protective Effects of Lycium barbarum Berries Cultivated in Umbria (Italy) on Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  M R Ceccarini; S Vannini; S Cataldi; M Moretti; M Villarini; B Fioretti; E Albi; T Beccari; M Codini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Natural Products as a Vital Source for the Discovery of Cancer Chemotherapeutic and Chemopreventive Agents.

Authors:  Gordon M Cragg; John M Pezzuto
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 10.  Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations.

Authors:  Jaison Jeevanandam; Ahmed Barhoum; Yen S Chan; Alain Dufresne; Michael K Danquah
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  Anticancer and Antioxidant Activities of the Root Extract of the Carnivorous Pitcher Plant Sarracenia purpurea.

Authors:  Yen-Hua Huang; Wei-Yu Chiang; Pin-Jui Chen; En-Shyh Lin; Cheng-Yang Huang
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.