| Literature DB >> 25331269 |
Loiy Elsir A Hassan, Mohamed B Khadeer Ahamed, Aman S Abdul Majid, Hussein M Baharetha, Nahdzatul S Muslim, Zeyad D Nassar, Amin M S Abdul Majid1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumption of medicinal plants to overcome diseases is traditionally belongs to the characteristics of most cultures on this earth. Sudan has been a host and cradle to various ancient civilizations and developed a vast knowledge on traditional medicinal plants. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the antioxidant, antiangiogenic and cytotoxic activities of six Sudanese medicinal plants which have been traditionally used to treat neoplasia. Further the biological activities were correlated with phytochemical contents of the plant extracts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25331269 PMCID: PMC4210631 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Parameters of different extracts of the selected Sudanese plants
| Botanical name | Local name | Used part | Solvent | Texture | Yield % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Hipatoheep | Stem | n-Hexane | Sticky | 0.8 |
| Ethanol | Solid | 2.82 | |||
| Menthol | Solid | 1.72 | |||
| Water | Powder | 3.36 | |||
|
| Hili leasa | Leaves | n-Hexane | Sticky | 7.8 |
| Ethanol | Gummy | 11.73 | |||
| Menthol | Gummy | 4.11 | |||
| Water | Powder | 1.698 | |||
| Stem | n-Hexane | Gummy | 0.82 | ||
| Ethanol | Gummy | 6.21 | |||
| menthol | Gummy | 3.94 | |||
| water | Powder | 5.94 | |||
|
| Dhawasi | Aerial parts | n-Hexane | Gummy | 0.6 |
| Ethanol | Sticky | 2.41 | |||
| Menthol | Sticky | 5.86 | |||
| Water | Powder | 4.01 | |||
|
| Tarffa | Leaves | n-Hexane | Gummy | 1.4 |
| Ethanol | Gummy | 12.64 | |||
| Menthol | Gummy | 4.14 | |||
| Water | Powder | 7.41 | |||
|
| El-Habeel | Leaves | n-Hexane | Gummy | 7.16 |
| Ethanol | Sticky | 15.68 | |||
| Menthol | Gummy | 6.64 | |||
| Water | Powder | 6.04 | |||
| Bark | n-Hexane | Gummy | 0.163 | ||
| Ethanol | Solid | 9.18 | |||
| Menthol | Solid | 3.37 | |||
| Water | Powder | 2.66 | |||
|
| Tunduli | Stem | n-Hexane | Gummy | 0.892 |
| Ethanol | Gummy | 6.81 | |||
| Menthol | 3.37 | ||||
| Water | Powder | 01.56 |
Figure 1Antiangiogenic effect of selected Sudanese plants (100 μg/ml) against sprouting of microvessels in rat aortic explants. A) Photomicrographic image of rat aortic ring of negative control showing extensive growth of microvessels. B) Photomicrographic image of rat aortic ring representative of polar extract of T. apollinea displaying potent inhibition of growth of microvessels. C) Treatment with T. nilotica showed significant inhibitory effect against sprouting of microvessels from rat aortic rings. D) Photomicrographic image of rat aortic explant treated with C. hartmannianum extract demonstrated considerable effect of antiangiogenicity. E) Photomicrographic image of rat aortic explant treated with non-polar extract of T. apollinea showing significant inhibitory effect on growth of microvessels. F) Photomicrographic image of rat aortic explant treated with standard reference, suramin exhibiting strong inhibitory effect on microvessels growth. G) Graphical representation of antiangiogenic activity of the active extracts obtained from the selected Sudanese plants. The values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n =10). **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 compared to negative control group (0.1% DMSO).
Antiangiogenic activity of the selected Sudanese plants on rat aortic explants
| Botanic name n | Part used | Extract | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Aerial parts | Ethanol | 94.6 ± 1.8** |
|
| Leaves | Water | 91.7 ± 2.2** |
|
| Bark | Ethanol | 88.7 ± 1.6* |
|
| Bark | Methanol | 86.6 ± 3.8** |
|
| Leaves | n-hexane | 81.7 ± 1.7* |
|
| Aerial part | Methanol | 79.8 ± 2.6* |
|
| Aerial parts | n-hexane | 73.1 ± 1.5* |
|
| Bark | Water | 71.5 ± 5.3* |
|
| Leaves | Methanol | 65.5 ± 2.9* |
|
| Leaves | Methanol | 68.8 ± 2.2* |
|
| Leaves | Ethanol | 63.6 ± 1.4* |
Results are presented as mean percent inhibition ± S.D, n = 3.
Statistical significance is expressed as * = P <0.05, ** = P <0.01.
Cytotoxic effect of different extracts of the selected Sudanese plants
| Plants | Part used | Solvent used | % inhibition of cell proliferation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT-116 | MCF-7 | CCD | HUVECs | |||
|
| Stem | n-Hexane | 27.79 | 40.43 | 4.16 | 5.64 |
| Ethanol | 14.98 | 42.48 | 5.42 | 6.08 | ||
| Methanol | 11.16 | 41.86 | 4.93 | 6.79 | ||
| Water | 12.95 | 33.90 | 6.18 | 8.11 | ||
|
| Leaves | n-Hexane | 95.08 | 99.38 | 45.63 | 62.05 |
| Ethanol | 49.66 | 81.10 | 38.57 | 36.25 | ||
| Methanol | 19.83 | 75.58 | 10.15 | 22.64 | ||
| Water | 17.20 | 49.81 | 8.09 | 19.79 | ||
| Stem | n-Hexane | 87.07 | 92.01 | 44.35 | 59.46 | |
| Ethanol | 33.58 | 49.28 | 32.63 | 25.43 | ||
| Methanol | 43.47 | 53.51 | 40.47 | 27.87 | ||
| Water | 28.95 | 57.53 | 38.56 | 19.89 | ||
|
| Aerial part | n-Hexane | 53.86 | 87.20 | 9.65 | 26.95 |
| Ethanol | 46.91 | 86.94 | 7.88 | 16.28 | ||
| Methanol | 47.43 | 87.09 | 10.23 | 18.91 | ||
| Water | 16.86 | 25.60 | 4.68 | 5.79 | ||
|
| Leaves | n-Hexane | 29.33 | 47.25 | 8.77 | 14.58 |
| Ethanol | 7.8 | 46.61 | 5.83 | 22.89 | ||
| Methanol | 19.61 | 46.14 | 6.65 | 17.35 | ||
| Water | 6.93 | 28.47 | 3.87 | 11.68 | ||
|
| Leaves | n-Hexane | 80.03 | 95.76 | 7.75 | 16.62 |
| Ethanol | 33.69 | 54.04 | 6.35 | 7.88 | ||
| Methanol | 17.61 | 78.22 | 7.79 | 9.58 | ||
| Water | 26.02 | 36.30 | 6.23 | 5.65 | ||
| Bark | n-Hexane | 26.30 | 42.43 | 5.74 | 6.61 | |
| Ethanol | 29.11 | 76.79 | 6.48 | 8.36 | ||
| Methanol | 13.75 | 73.64 | 9.57 | 11.59 | ||
| Water | 28.40 | 49.92 | 10.11 | 9.47 | ||
|
| Stem | n-Hexane | 33.78 | 50.07 | 5.34 | 15.45 |
| Ethanol | 8.5 | 41.99 | 3.69 | 5.77 | ||
| Methanol | 14.76 | 39.87 | 5.58 | 19.57 | ||
| Water | 21.82 | 54.41 | 6.76 | 4.38 | ||
IC (μg/ml) values of the active extracts of the selected Sudanese plants
| Extracts | Carcinoma cell lines | Normal cell lines | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT 116 | MCF-7 | HUVEC | CCD-18CO | |
|
| 27.2 | 8.48 | 116.5 | 466.4 |
|
| 5.4 | 10.78 | 46.2 | 79.82 |
|
| 20.2 | 29.36 | 98.4 | 345.6 |
| Positive controls | 5-Flourouracil | Tamoxifen | Betulinic acid | Betulinic acid |
| 3.9 | 6.67 | 88.4 | 128.9 | |
Figure 2Dose dependent inhibitory effect of the active extracts of the selected Sudanese plants against HCT 116 (A) and MCF-7 (B) cell lines. The values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n =6).
Figure 3Photomicrographic images of the cancer (HCT 116 and MCF-7) and normal (HUVEC and CCD-18Co) cell lines taken under an inverted phase-contrast microscope at × 200 magnification with a digital camera at 48 hours after treatment with the active extracts of the selected Sudanese plants. The controlled cells showed a fully confluent growth with the compact layer of proliferating cells. Whereas, treatment with the active extracts caused a drastic reduction in the density of cell-population however, treatment with the extracts did not produced significant cytotoxicity against the tested normal cells (HUVEC and CCD-18Co) when compared to the negative control group. The picture revealed that the cells revealed sever morphological changes in their native cellular characteristics. Treatment caused the cells to lose the psuedopodial like membrane projections. Higher magnification of the photomicrographs revealed several clear features of apoptosis, such as the membrane blebbing, nuclear condensation and apoptotic bodies in the treated cells.
Correlation between antioxidant activity of different extracts of selected Sudanese plants and the total content of flavonoids and phenolics in the extracts
| Plants | Part used | Solvent used | DPPH (IC 50 in μg/ml) | Total flavonoids (mg/g) | Total phenolics (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Stem | n-Hexane | >1000 | 28.1 ± 0.00 | ND |
| Ethanol | 192.63 | 40.2 ± 0.04 | 115.4 ± 0.01 | ||
| Methanol | 140 | 36.6 ± 0.01 | 161.4 ± 0.03 | ||
| Water | >1000 | 13.3 ± 0.01 | 78.5 ± 0.001 | ||
|
| Leaves | n-Hexane | >1000 | 88.1 ± 0.01 | ND |
| Ethanol | 54.76 | 77.1 ± 0.00 | 111.6 ± 0.01 | ||
| Methanol | 13.437 | 64.5 ± 0.002 | 139.9 ± 0.01 | ||
| Water | 30.05 | 57.6 ± 0.001 | 105.6 ± 0.01 | ||
| Stem | n-Hexane | >1000 | 58.6 ± 0.02 | 3.46 ± 0.01 | |
| Ethanol | 160.94 | 13.1 ± 0.01 | ND | ||
| Methanol | 119.45 | 17.9 ± 0.01 | 41.02 ± 0.003 | ||
| Water | 591.98 | ND | 12.5 ± 0.02 | ||
|
| Aerial part | n-Hexane | >1000 | 66.9 ± 0.01 | ND |
| Ethanol | 120.22 | 78.1 ± 0.00 | ND | ||
| Methanol | 48.803 | 10.7 ± 0.01 | 25.7 ± 0.00 | ||
| Water | 2835.07 | 23.5 ± 0.02 | 23.5 ± 0.01 | ||
|
| Leaves | n-Hexane | >1000 | 67.8 ± 0.00 | ND |
| Ethanol | 880.70 | 13.1 ± 0.04 | 15.3 ± 0.04 | ||
| Methanol | 12.62 | 24.9 ± 0.02 | 333.9 ± 0.01 | ||
| Water | 67.53 | 22.6 ± 0.001 | 171.6 ± 0.02 | ||
|
| Leaves | n-Hexane | >1000 | 42. ±0.002 | ND |
| Ethanol | 146.35 | 45.2 ± 0.001 | 169.2 ± 0.02 | ||
| Methanol | 14.067 | 57.7 ± 0.001 | 392.8 ± 0.01 | ||
| Water | 967.55 | 27.6 ± 0.02 | 268.2 ± 0.03 | ||
| Bark | n-Hexane | >1000 | 42.1 ± 0.01 | 1.9 ± 0.01 | |
| Ethanol | 9.47 | 28.1 ± 0.02 | 404.1 ± 0.06 | ||
| Methanol | 28.91 | 24.2 ± 0.02 | 96.5 ± 0.05 | ||
| Water | 22.47 | 29.7 ± 0.01 | 523.3 ± 0.01 | ||
|
| Stem | n-Hexane | 212.56 | 67.5 ± 0.02 | 85.2 ± 0.01 |
| Ethanol | 900.58 | 8.5 ± 0.02 | 19.9 ± 0.01 | ||
| Methanol | 76.38 | 4.6 ± 0.02 | 40.3 ± 0.2 | ||
| Water | >1000 | ND | 335.7 ± 0.01 |
ND = Not Detected. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Each experiment was repeated three times; (n =3).