| Literature DB >> 31935970 |
Luigi De Masi1, Paola Bontempo2, Daniela Rigano3, Paola Stiuso2, Vincenzo Carafa2, Angela Nebbioso2, Sonia Piacente4, Paola Montoro4, Riccardo Aversano5, Vincenzo D'Amelia5, Domenico Carputo5, Lucia Altucci2.
Abstract
Plants produce a vast array of biomolecules with beneficial effects for human health. In this study, polyphenol and anthocyanin-rich extracts (PAE) from pigmented tubers of Solanum tuberosum L. varieties "Blue Star", "Magenta Love", and "Double Fun" in comparison with the more extensively studied "Vitelotte" were evaluated and compared for antiproliferative effects in human leukemia cells, and their phytochemical and genetic profiles were determined. In U937 cells, upon treatment with PAE, it was possible to reveal the expression of specific apoptotic players, such as caspase 8, 9, 3, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), as well as the induction of monocyte and granulocyte differentiation. A liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) investigation revealed the presence of polyphenolic compounds in all the varieties of potatoes analyzed, among which caffeoyl and feruloyl quinic acid derivatives were the most abundant, as well as several acylated anthocyanins. Each pigmented variety was genotyped by DNA-based molecular markers, and flavonoid-related transcription factors were profiled in tubers in order to better characterize these outstanding resources and contribute to their exploitation in breeding. Interesting biological activities were observed for "Blue Star" and "Vitelotte" varieties with respect to the minor or no effect of the "Double Fun" variety.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive molecules; cell cycle modulation; leukemia cells; pigmented potatoes; potato genotyping; potato tuber extract
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31935970 PMCID: PMC6983029 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Polyphenol and anthocyanin-rich extracts (PAE) from S. tuberosum varieties restored the apoptotic program in U937 cancer cells, as compared to untreated U937 control cells (Ctr). (A) Western blot analysis of the indicated proteins in U937 cells after PAE treatment from “Magenta Love”, “Blue Star”, “Double Fun”, and “Vitelotte” varieties at 2.5 mg/mL for 24 h. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) detection was used as loading control. (B) Western blot analysis of the indicated protein in U937 cells after PAE treatment at 2.5 mg/mL for 24 h. Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERKs 1/2) were used as loading control.
Figure 2PAE from S. tuberosum varieties induced hematological cancer cell differentiation. (A) Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of CD14 (left) and CD11c (right) expression in U937 cells upon PAE treatment from “Magenta Love”, “Blue Star”, “Double Fun”, and “Vitelotte” at 2.5 mg/mL for 24 h, as compared to untreated control cells (Ctrl). Error bars represent the standard deviation from two independent experiments carried out in duplicate. Isotype controls (ctrl) were used as negative control. (B) Oxidative stress markers evaluated in the media (NO) and homogenates (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS) of U937 cells treated with 2.5 mg/mL of PAE for 24 h, as compared to untreated control cells (Ctr). (C) Morphological analysis of granulocytic differentiation in HL60 hematological cancer cell line after treatment with 1.25 mg/mL PAE for 6 days.
Figure 3LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS profiles of polyphenol and anthocyanin-rich extracts from pigmented tubers in negative ion mode. Note: V = “Vitelotte”; DF = “Double Fun”; ML = “Magenta Love”; BS = “Blue Star”.
High-resolution (HR) MS and MS/MS data of phenolic compounds in LC-ESI-Orbitrap-MS profiles of the PAE from the four Solanum tuberosum varieties.
| Phenolics | Mass Parent ion ( | MS/MS | Compound | Molecular Formula | V mg/100g DW | DF mg/100g DW | ML mg/100g DW | BS mg/100g DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 353.0149 | 191.0235 | 3- | C16H18O9 | 32.2 ± 2.0 | 32.0 ± 2.0 | 12.0 ± 1.0 | 108.0 ± 30.0 |
|
| 353.0867 | 191.0151 | 5- | C16H18O9 | 31.0 ± 1.0 | 21.0 ± 6.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 59.0 ± 3.0 |
|
| 387.1025 | 335.2375 | tuberonic acid glc | C18H28O9 | 10.1 ± 0.06 | 10.7 ± 0.08 | 8.6 ± 0.08 | 6.7 ± 0.1 |
|
| 367.1026 | 191.0210 | feruloyl quinic acid | C17H20O9 | 105.0 ± 5.9 | 98.0 ± 9.7 | 97.0 ± 8.9 | 107.0 ± 25.0 |
|
| 771.2523 | 720.3513 | quercetin-3- | C33H40O21 | 6.5 ± 0.2 | ND | 5.5 ± 0.1 | ND |
|
| 609.1450 | 301.1120 | rutin | C27H30O16 | 13.3 ± 0.6 | 8.5 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | ND |
|
| 463.0901 | 301.9224 | quercetin-3- | C21H20O12 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | ND |
|
| 381.1183 | 301.1876 | quercetin-3- | C15H10O10S | 18.7 ± 0.2 | 29.0 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.2 | ND |
Note: DW = dry Weight; ND = not detected; V = “Vitelotte”; DF = “Double Fun”; ML = “Magenta Love”; BS = “Blue Star”.
HR MS and MS/MS data for the identification of anthocyanins (An) in LC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS profiles of the PAE from the four S. tuberosum varieties.
| An | Mass Parent Ion ( | MS/MS | Tentative ID | Molecular Formula | V mg/100g DW | DF mg/100g DW | ML mg/100g DW | BS mg/100g DW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 887.2609 | 271.0234 | pelargonidin 3-(4‴-p-coumaroylrutinoside)-5-glc | C42H47O21 | 16.32 ± 0.02 | 14.32 ± 0.09 | 18.12 ± 0.04 | 12.08 ± 0.05 |
|
| 903.2558 | 287.0124 | cyanidin-3-(p-coumaroyl)-rutinoside-5-glc | C42H47O22 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 917.2715 | 301.0051 | peonidin 3- | C43H49O22 | 1.23 ± 0.08 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 917.2715 | 301.1581 | peonidin 3-caffeoylrutinoside-5-glc | C43H49O23 | 1.08 ± 0.06 | ND | 1.10 ± 0.07 | ND |
|
| 933.2664 | 303.1961 | delphinidin 3- | C42H47O23 | 0.85 ± 0.03 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 919.2508 | 317.1110 | petunidin 3-(4‴-p-coumarylrutinoside) | C37H39O18 | ND | 2.52 ± 0.03 | ND | 2.05 ± 0.04 |
|
| 933.2664 | 317.0415 | petunidin 3- | C43H49O23 | 3.78 ± 0.03 | 3.28 ± 0.03 | 3.05 ± 0.02 | 3.45 ± 0.03 |
|
| 977.2926 | 331.1865 | malvidin 3- | C45H53O24 | 8.91 ± 0.05 | 6.57 ± 0.03 | ND | 1.02 ± 0.01 |
|
| 917.2715 | 271.3245 | pelargonidin 3-(4‴-feruloylrutinoside)-5-glc | C43H49O22 | ND | 5.21 ± 0.04 | 4.07 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
|
| 949.2614 | 317.1456 | petunidin 3- | C43H49O24 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 1.62 ± 0.04 | ND | 1.60 ± 0.03 |
|
| 963.2773 | 317.1335 | petunidin 3- | C44H51O24 | ND | 0.42 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.65 ± 0.04 |
Note: DW = dry weight; ND = not detected; An = anthocyanins; V = “Vitelotte”; DF = “Double Fun”; ML = “Magenta Love”; BS = “Blue Star”; glc = glucopyranoside; rha = rhamnopyranosyl.
Figure 4Comparative genetic profiling of pigmented potato cultivars. Gene expression analysis in tubers of potato genotypes as monitored by absolute Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Each value represents the mean of three determinations (± SD). Means denoted by the same letter did not differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s test.