Literature DB >> 35246549

In silico identification of single nucleotide variations at CpG sites regulating CpG island existence and size.

Nivas Shyamala1, Chaitra Lava Kongettira1, Kaushik Puranam1, Keerthi Kupsal1, Ramanjaneyulu Kummari1, Chiranjeevi Padala1,2, Surekha Rani Hanumanth3.   

Abstract

Genetic and epigenetic modifications of genes involved in the key regulatory pathways play a significant role in the pathophysiology and progression of multifactorial diseases. The present study is an attempt to identify single nucleotide variations (SNVs) at CpG sites of promoters of ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 and TIMP1 genes influencing CpG island (CGI) existence and size associated with the pathophysiology of Diabetes mellitus, Coronary artery disease and Cancers. Promoter sequences located between -2000 to + 2000 bp were retrieved from the EPDnew database and predicted the CpG island using MethPrimer. Further, SNVs at CpG sites were accessed from NCBI, Ensembl while transcription factor (TF) binding sites were accessed using AliBaba2.1. CGI existence and size were determined for each SNV at CpG site with respect to wild type and variant allele by MethPrimer. A total of 200 SNVs at CpG sites were analyzed from the promoters of ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 and TIMP1 genes. Of these, only 17 (8.5%) SNVs were found to influence the loss of CGI while 70 (35%) SNVs were found to reduce the size of CGI. It has also been found that 59% (10) of CGI abolishing SNVs are showing differences in binding of TFs. The findings of the study suggest that the candidate SNVs at CpG sites regulating CGI existence and size might influence the DNA methylation status and expression of genes involved in molecular pathways associated with several diseases. The insights of the present study may pave the way for new experimental studies to undertake challenges in DNA methylation, gene expression and protein assays.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35246549      PMCID: PMC8897451          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05198-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


Introduction

Multifactorial diseases like Diabetes mellitus (DM), Coronary artery disease (CAD) and Cancers are the top leading causes of death worldwide[1]. Globally, understanding of underlying mechanisms and prevention of these diseases with different strategies are potential challenges for researchers in medicine[2]. These diseases are influenced by common risk factors such as family history, smoking, obesity, insufficient physical activity, etc[3]. Studies suggest that besides these conventional risk factors, genetic and epigenetic modifications of certain genes also play a significant role in pathophysiology and progression of these diseases[4-6]. Evidences suggest that epigenetic modifications regulate the genome structure and expression pattern of genes[7,8]. These mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNAs regulation, which can be inherited from one generation to the next[9]. DNA methylation is a common molecular alteration at CpG sites of DNA sequence which is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. DNA methylation in various cell types regulate the expression of genes and shows an association with the pathophysiology of diseases[10-13]. DNA methylation at CpG sites is an enzymatic reaction catalysed and maintained by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) family in particular DNMT3A, 3B and DNMT1[14]. DNMTs convert cytosine to 5-methylcytosine by adding methyl group at CpG dinucleotide sites of CpG islands (CGIs). CGIs are typically located at the regulatory regions, predominantly in promoters and are 500-1500 bp long[15,16]. Commonly, transcriptional activity of promoter depends on the binding efficiency of RNA polymerase II and transcription factors (TF) to the core promoter[17]. Studies suggested that the methylation of cytosines in a promoter DNA suppresses the rate of transcription, reduces the mRNA copy number and ultimately affects the protein synthesis[18-20]. Initially, genes under the study ACAT1[21,22], APOB[23,24], APOE[25-27], CYBA[28,29], FAS[30,31], FLT1[32,33], KSR2[34], LDLR[24,35], MMP9[36,37], PCSK9[13,38,39], PHOX2A[40-42], REST[43,44], SH2B3[45-47], SORT1[48-50] and TIMP1[51,52] were selected which were found to be involved in several key regulatory pathways associated with the pathology of DM, CAD and Cancers (Supplementary Table 1). These genes and gene products enormously involve in various pathways: ACAT1, PCSK9 & SORT1 in cholesterol homeostasis; APOB, APOE & LDLR in lipid metabolism; CYBA, KSR2 & PHOX2A in oxidative stress; FAS, REST & SORT1 in apoptosis; FLT1 & SH2B3 in inflammation and angiogenesis; MMP9 & TIMP1 in maintenance of extracellular matrix and vascular smooth muscle cells. Studies suggest that the single nucleotide variations (SNVs) located at promoter, exonic & intronic regions of these genes regulate the expression, alternative splicing of mRNA, structural conformation of proteins, etc[28,30,31,36,53]. Moreover, these genes were found to have genome-wide significant loci for risk of multifactorial diseases in various populations. In addition, epigenetic studies have suggested that the DNA methylation of ACAT1[54], APOB[55], APOE[19], CYBA[6], FAS[20], FLT1[56], LDLR[57], MMP9[58], PCSK9[13,59], REST[60], SH2B3[61], SORT1[62] and TIMP1[63] genes play a substantial role in regulation of gene expression. There are few reports published to show the tangible impact of SNVs at CpG sites on CpG island existence or size in genes influencing the pathophysiology of various diseases[64-66]. A genome-wide CpG SNP identification study revealed that CpG SNPs are significantly associated with the Cancers[64]. Furthermore, GWAS datasets on DM and CAD have identified novel functional SNPs at CpG sites which affect the expression and function of genes via epigenetic regulations[65]. Experimental studies on O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene rs16906252 and RAD50 gene DNase I hypersensitive sites (RHS) 7 region rs2240032 polymorphisms suggested that SNPs at CpG sites can influence the DNA methylation at promoter regions, transcription factors binding at enhancer or silencer region and miRNA binding at 3’UTR region[67-70]. The SNVs at CpG sites might modulate the existence and size of CpG islands at the promoter region; altering the methylation patterns and binding of transcription factors which ultimately affect the gene activation or silencing or expression[64,65]. Therefore, studies are warranted to identify SNVs at CpG sites regulating CpG island existence & size and their consequent effects on DNA methylation and gene expression. Hence, the present study is an attempt to identify candidate SNVs at CpG sites in promoter region of ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 and TIMP1 genes regulating the existence and size of CpG islands.

Materials and methods

Study design

The detailed study design is presented in Fig. 1.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of study design.

Schematic representation of study design.

Literature search and databases

We have conducted a comprehensive electronic search to browse genes under study, SNVs data and their respective literature using following data bases: National Library of Medicine (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/), Cancer Genetics Web (http://www.cancerindex.org/geneweb/), Google scholar (https://scholar.google.com/), GeneCards: the human gene database (https://www.genecards.org/). The search was limited to key words ‘ACAT1’, ‘APOB’, ‘APOE’, ‘CYBA’, ‘FAS’, ‘FLT1’, ‘KSR2’, ‘LDLR’, ‘MMP9’, ‘PCSK9’, ‘PHOX2A’, ‘REST’, ‘SH2B3’, ‘SORT1’ ‘TIMP1’, polymorphisms, genetic variations, CpG islands, DNA methylation, Diabetes mellitus, Coronary artery disease and Cancer.

Promoter sequence retrieval

Promoter sequences located between − 2000 to + 2000 bp were retrieved from Eukaryotic promoter database (EPD) new to check the CpG island status of genes under the study. EPD new allows access to several databases of experimentally validated promoters and published articles of model organisms. EPDnew contains 4806 promoters from various species like Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Arabidopsis thaliana, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, etc.[71].

Prediction of CpG Islands

CpG islands (CGIs) in promoter sequence of genes under the study were predicted using MethPrimer v1.1 beta. CGI existence and size were determined for each single nucleotide variation at CpG site with respect to wild type and variant allele. MethPrimer predicts potential CGIs in the input promoter DNA sequence and designs sequence specific primers for Methylation-Specific PCR and Bisulfite-Sequencing PCR. The output results are presented in graphical view for predicted CpG island and in text format for PCR primers[72]. The criteria used for gain and loss of CGI prediction is Island size > 100bp, GC percent > 50.0, ratio of Obs/Exp no of CpG dinucleotides > 0.60[73].

Selection of SNVs at CpG sites

CpG sites were identified from the results of MethPrimer and the SNVs at CpG sites were accessed from National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Ensembl. NCBI and Ensembl are widely used genome browsers in global scientific community. The browsers were developed with the data of genomic regions, genes, gene sequence, genetic variations, phenotypes, etc. The tools visualize DNA sequence and their respective annotated genetic variations to identify the SNVs at CpG sites in CpG islands[74,75].

Transcription factor binding site prediction

AliBaba2.1 tool was used for the prediction of transcription factor binding sites in wild type and variant alleles of SNVs at CpG sites. It is an online tool to identify transcription factors and their respective binding sites for the input DNA sequence by constructing matrices on the fly from TRANSFAC 4.0 sites. AliBaba tool has significantly higher sensitivity and sensitivity/specificity ratio than other current approaches[76].

Co-expression prediction

APOE, CYBA, FAS, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, SH2B3 and TIMP1 genes were analysed to know the other co-expressing, physically interacting, co-localizing and key biological pathway related genes using GeneMANIA. GeneMANIA is a potent database of almost 2300 networks with 600 million interactions covering upto 164,000 genes in model organisms and provide genomic, proteomic, and gene function data. It is an effective approach to predict the function of input single gene/ multiple gene queries physically interacting proteins, co-expressing and co-localizing genes, genetic interactions, shared protein domains and pathways[77,78]. Layouts generated by GeneMANIA web server have nodes and edges. Nodes represent gene and its products, while edges represent co-expression interaction and weight of each edge implies the evidence of co-functionality data source.

Gene ontology enrichment analysis

Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of genes (ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1, TIMP1) was performed using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) v6.8 online tool (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp). The GO terms were classified into three categories: biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF) with significant p value of <0.05. Further, GO term enrichment analysis was used to annotate the disease class and functional clustering of genes under the study.

Results

Promoter sequence of ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 and TIMP1 genes were analysed for the prediction of CpG islands and have observed CpG islands for all the genes (Fig. 2A, B). Further, the existence and sizes of CGI for wild type and variant alleles of all the CpG SNVs were analyzed. In addition, transcription factors binding to both the wild type and variant alleles of CpG SNVs abolishing CGI were predicted.
Figure 2

CpG islands prediction in promoter sequence of genes. (A) ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR. (B) MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1, TIMP1. The figure consists: input sequence to predict the CpG islands and to design bisulfite/ methylation specific PCR primers, CpG island region.

CpG islands prediction in promoter sequence of genes. (A) ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR. (B) MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1, TIMP1. The figure consists: input sequence to predict the CpG islands and to design bisulfite/ methylation specific PCR primers, CpG island region. A total of 200 SNVs at CpG sites were studied for ACAT1 (10), APOB (3), APOE (1), CYBA (7), FAS (12), FLT1 (6), KSR2 (31), LDLR (16), MMP9 (28), PCSK9 (8), PHOX2A (22), REST (5), SH2B3 (29), SORT1 (16) and TIMP1 (6) genes. Of these, 17 (8.5%) candidate SNVs abolished the CpG islands existence and 70 (35%) SNVs potentially decreased the CpG islands size in various genes (Table 1).The percentage of abolished CGIs and change in size of CGIs of all genes are represented in Table 1 and Fig. 3.
Table 1

Single nucleotide variations (SNVs) at CpG sites associated with loss or change in the size of CpG island.

S. No.CpG island and size (bp)Single nucleotide variations (SNVs) (rs number; variation)CpG coordinates on chromosomeCpG island status withChange in CpG island size (bp)
Wild type alleleVariant allele
GeneAcetyl-Coenzyme A acetyltransferase 1 (ACAT1)
1Island;341rs539426263;C/A*chr11:108121278PresentPresent339
2rs376263677;G/Cchr11:108121289PresentPresent341
3rs376263677;G/T*PresentPresent339
4rs979540931;C > G*chr11:108121307PresentPresent339
5rs551761017;C > A*chr11:108121313PresentPresent339
6rs1191223847;G > A*chr11:108121314PresentPresent339
7rs1294688280;C > Tchr11:108121367–108121378PresentPresent341
8rs1294688280;G > APresentPresent341
9rs1246409549;C > Tchr11:108121403PresentPresent341
10rs1197006182;G > Achr11:108121404PresentPresent341
GeneApolipoprotein B (APOB)
11Island;344rs745633995;G/A*chr2:21044088PresentPresent340
12rs956977643;C/T*chr2:21044082PresentPresent343
13rs973345426;C/Achr2:21044076PresentPresent344
GeneApolipoprotein E (APOE)
14Island;112rs769448;C/T**chr19:44906322PresentAbolished0
GeneCytochrome b-245 alpha chain (CYBA)
15Island;136rs1021215371;C/T*chr16:88651087PresentPresent135
16rs544939582;G/A*chr16:88651070PresentPresent135
17rs756019435;C/T*chr16:88651047PresentPresent135
18rs376510042;G/T*chr16:88651064PresentPresent135
19rs756019435;C/Tchr16:88651047PresentPresent136
20rs750384376;G/Achr16:88651046PresentPresent136
21rs373406027;G/Achr16:88651027PresentPresent136
GeneFactor associated suicide death receptor (FAS)
22Island 1;199rs752145197;G/C*chr10:88990538PresentPresent190
23rs755644207;C/T*chr10:88990539PresentPresent177
24rs886047456;G/A*chr10:88990540PresentPresent191
25rs777366435;C/A*chr10:88990541PresentPresent190
26rs533623533;G/A*chr10:88990542PresentPresent191
27rs9658677;G/Achr10:88990582PresentPresent199
28rs902017811;C/A*chr10:88990595PresentPresent128
29rs1021894100;C/T*chr10:88990642PresentPresent128
30rs769222279;G/C*chr10:88990643PresentPresent128
31rs777296029;C/A*chr10:88990656PresentPresent128
32rs904814296;G/C*chr10:88990657PresentPresent128
33rs557366318;G/A*chr10:88990715PresentPresent184
GeneFms related tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT1)
34Island 1;211rs935059277;G/Cchr13:28495711PresentPresent211
35rs61763160;C/T*chr13:28495681PresentPresent199
36rs1024357361;G/A*chr13:28495655PresentPresent198
37rs779832391;G/A*chr13:28495524PresentPresent188
38Island 2;204rs1028125144;C/Gchr13:28495300PresentPresent188
39rs998030865;G/Tchr13:28495276PresentPresent188
GeneKinase suppressor of ras 2 (KSR2)
40Island;838rs73408418;C/T*chr12:117969559PresentPresent803
41rs962883023;G/A*chr12:117969543PresentPresent804
42rs1010334504;G/Cchr12:117969521PresentPresent838
43rs891447546;G/T/A—Tchr12:117969518PresentPresent838
44rs552191962;G/Cchr12:117969510PresentPresent838
45rs182966035;G/Achr12:117969500PresentPresent838
46rs939897252;CCCAGCCGGAGCGCACCTGCT/-*chr12:117969450–117969478PresentPresent817
47rs1011133176;C/Tchr12:117969464PresentPresent838
48rs114278232;G/Achr12:117969418PresentPresent838
49rs528230001;C/Gchr12:117969394PresentPresent838
50rs7300907;G/C/A—Cchr12:117969393PresentPresent838
51rs1034361818;G/Cchr12:117969386PresentPresent838
52rs931680247;C/Achr12:117969367PresentPresent838
53rs898886083;G/Cchr12:117969341PresentPresent838
54rs545819605;C/Tchr12:117969330PresentPresent838
55rs971514425;G/Achr12:117969329PresentPresent838
56rs908447922;TCCCCCGCCGCCCC/-*chr12:117969312–117969327PresentPresent824
57rs927580374;G/Achr12:117969310PresentPresent838
58rs968768275;C/Tchr12:117969289PresentPresent838
59rs1022089500;C/Tchr12:117969287PresentPresent838
60rs954962287;G/Cchr12:117969273PresentPresent838
61rs956144219;C/Gchr12:117969268PresentPresent838
62rs890348830;G/Achr12:117969244PresentPresent838
63rs557703958;G/T/C Tchr12:117969236PresentPresent838
64rs999829657;G/Tchr12:117969228PresentPresent838
65rs886214687;G/Achr12:117969152PresentPresent838
66rs1057218279;C/Achr12:117969151PresentPresent838
67rs535742283;C/Tchr12:117969140PresentPresent838
68rs534893029;G/T/A—Tchr12:117969130PresentPresent838
69rs974051469;C/Tchr12:117969128PresentPresent838
70rs980137500;G/Cchr12:117969116PresentPresent838
GeneLow density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)
71Island 1;138rs531870546;C/Gchr19:11087615PresentPresent138
72rs543676881;G/A/T *chr19:11087616PresentPresent136
73rs1026272027;G/T**chr19:11087638PresentAbolished0
74rs887608252;C/T**chr19:11087645PresentAbolished0
75rs1006494933;G/A**chr19:11087646PresentAbolished0
76rs532491368;G/A**chr19:11087670PresentAbolished0
77rs1024897634;C/T**chr19:11087677PresentAbolished0
78rs1038399041;C/T*chr19:11087733PresentPresent108
79rs899331076;G/A*chr19:11087734PresentPresent108
80rs371798074;C/T*chr19:11087737PresentPresent108
81rs1046779346;G/Cchr19:11087738PresentPresent138
82Island 2;167rs574713917;C/Gchr19:11089227PresentPresent167
83rs17249134;G/Tchr19:11089281PresentPresent167
84rs17249141;C/T*chr19:11089332PresentPresent152
85rs549995837;C/T*chr19:11089343PresentPresent152
86rs182017676;C/A*chr19:11089347PresentPresent152
GeneMatrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9)
87Island 1;172rs139620474;C/A/T—A** or C/A/T—T**chr20:46009878PresentAbolished0
88rs370018925;C/T**chr20:46009908PresentAbolished0
89rs201069991;G/A**chr20:46009909PresentAbolished0
90rs1014494202;C/T**chr20:46009936PresentAbolished0
91rs146719297;G/A**chr20:46009937PresentAbolished0
92rs200849957;C/G/T—G or C/G/T—Tchr20:46009970PresentPresent172
93rs1805089;G/Achr20:46009971PresentPresent172
94rs1023660861;C/Tchr20:46009976PresentPresent172
95rs143695450;G/A/T—A or Tchr20:46009977PresentPresent172
96rs45482493;C/Tchr20:46009991PresentPresent172
97rs377251829;C/Achr20:46010010PresentPresent172
98rs140352541;G/Tchr20:46010020PresentPresent172
99Island 2;205rs762336901;C/T*chr20:46010433PresentPresent137
100rs765973004;C/G*chr20:46010475PresentPresent135
101rs756724622;C/G*chr20:46010497PresentPresent134
102rs749347450;C/T*chr20:46010509PresentPresent134
103rs200637345;C/T*chr20:46010511PresentPresent134
104rs757458476;C/T*chr20:46010515PresentPresent150
105rs745724816;G/-*chr20:46010529PresentPresent149
106rs776477347;G/A*chr20:46010539PresentPresent150
107rs201902138;C/G/T—G or C/G/T—T*chr20:46010558PresentPresent149
108rs767959655;G/A*chr20:46010561PresentPresent149
109rs753889026;C/Achr20:46010569PresentPresent205
110rs777580909;G/Achr20:46010628PresentPresent205
111rs202214757;C/Achr20:46010629PresentPresent205
112rs183834856;G/Achr20:46010630PresentPresent205
113rs984503896;C/Achr20:46010639PresentPresent205
114rs201044639;G/Achr20:46010640PresentPresent205
GeneProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)
115Island;491rs911797629;C > T*chr1:55039338PresentPresent464
116rs987969811;G > A*chr1:55039389PresentPresent464
117rs371053631;C/T*chr1:55039390PresentPresent464
118rs978397913;G/A*chr1:55039391PresentPresent464
119rs865997599;C/Tchr1:55039416PresentPresent491
120rs887437926;G/Tchr1:55039452PresentPresent491
121rs188274059;C/A/Tchr1:55039516PresentPresent491
122rs745962158;G/Achr1:55039517PresentPresent491
GenePaired like homeobox 2a (PHOX2A)
123Island;964rs946255361;G/A*chr11:72244638PresentPresent880
124rs985554082;C/Gchr11:72244600PresentPresent964
125rs565201625;C/A*chr11:72244597PresentPresent879
126rs545309058;G/A*chr11:72244596PresentPresent880
127rs919731208;G/T*chr11:72244574PresentPresent880
128rs973079104;G/Cchr11:72244555PresentPresent964
129rs904705949;C/G/A -Gchr11:72244511PresentPresent964
130rs1021763886;G/Achr11:72244510PresentPresent964
131rs1010395824;C/Gchr11:72244507PresentPresent964
132rs950416969;G/Cchr11:72244371PresentPresent964
133rs959032571;G/C*chr11:72244355PresentSplit315;641
134rs553752383;G/A*chr11:72244322PresentSplit390;571
135rs1021105224;G/A*chr11:72244319PresentSplit390;571
136rs1019884836;G/A*chr11:72244305PresentSplit390;571
137rs889804293;G/Cchr11:72244293PresentPresent964
138rs917708636;C/Tchr11:72244248PresentPresent964
139rs937911897;C/Tchr11:72244236PresentPresent964
140rs987854333;C/Gchr11:72244197PresentPresent964
141rs992203984;G/Achr11:72244196PresentPresent964
142rs956196630;G/Tchr11:72244194PresentPresent964
143rs1019771178;C/Tchr11:72244193PresentPresent964
144rs1008498233;G/Tchr11:72244187PresentPresent964
GeneRE1 silencing transcription factor (REST)
145Island;298rs964635804;G/A*chr4:56907734PresentPresent291
146rs982281493;G/Cchr4:56907790PresentPresent298
147rs928222537;G/Cchr4:56907803PresentPresent298
148rs938247687;G/Achr4:56907809PresentPresent298
149rs1047872828;G/GGCGGT*chr4:56907870–56907874PresentPresent304
GeneSH2B adaptor protein 3 (SH2B3)
150Island 1;214rs960136772;G/A*chr12:111405136PresentPresent150
151rs538445017;C/T**chr12:111405235PresentAbolished0
152rs922413124;G/A**chr12:111405236PresentAbolished0
153rs995735060;C/A*chr12:111405248PresentPresent114
154rs574117302;C/Tchr12:111405270PresentPresent214
155Island 2;796rs542650199;C/A/G—A or C/A/G—G*chr12:111405555PresentPresent778/754
156rs1028968561;C/T*chr12:111405609PresentPresent778
157rs1042427838;C/Achr12:111405693PresentPresent796
158rs763506765;G/Cchr12:111405694PresentPresent796
159rs899785538;C/Achr12:111405709PresentPresent796
160rs75390213;G/Achr12:111405712PresentPresent796
161rs943838180;G/Achr12:111405728PresentPresent796
162rs982567306;G/Tchr12:111405743PresentPresent796
163rs1015319598;C/Achr12:111405750PresentPresent796
164rs1029498594;G/Achr12:111405764PresentPresent796
165rs974278790;C/A/T—A or C/A/T—Tchr12:111405774PresentPresent796
166rs532367698;G/Tchr12:111405775PresentPresent796
167rs1013689151;G/Achr12:111405795PresentPresent796
168rs917942737;G/Cchr12:111405807PresentPresent796
169rs566012237;C/Tchr12:111405823PresentPresent796
170rs1005740439;G/Cchr12:111405854PresentPresent796
171rs1054248299;C/Tchr12:111405879PresentPresent796
172rs890806829;C/Tchr12:111405889PresentPresent796
173rs1015267150;G/Tchr12:111405900PresentPresent796
174rs962487794;C/Tchr12:111405903PresentPresent796
175rs868119397;G/C/T—C or G/C/T—Tchr12:111405908PresentPresent796
176rs1033875297;C/Tchr12:111405929PresentPresent796
177rs959781377;G/Cchr12:111405930PresentPresent796
178rs992435554;G/Achr12:111405940PresentPresent796
GeneSortilin 1 (SORT1)
179Island;931rs915825764;C/T*chr1:109398261PresentPresent928
180rs968169903;C/Tchr1:109398201PresentPresent931
181rs112431410;C/Gchr1:109398185PresentPresent931
182rs1056848876;C/T/G—Tchr1:109398179PresentPresent931
183rs1003657108;G/Cchr1:109398178PresentPresent931
184rs1037052612;G/Achr1:109398159PresentPresent931
185rs188539890;C/Tchr1:109398133PresentPresent931
186rs544729829;G/Tchr1:109398113PresentPresent931
187rs992705461;C/Tchr1:109398085PresentPresent931
188rs574878989;C/G*chr1:109398085–109398089PresentPresent932
189rs978471974;G/Cchr1:109398069PresentPresent931
190rs1043020951;C/Gchr1:109398068PresentPresent931
191rs1022467277;C/Gchr1:109398031PresentPresent931
192rs1031024794;C/Tchr1:109398005PresentPresent931
193rs1001269821;G/Cchr1:109397996PresentPresent931
194rs903970476;G/Cchr1:109397969PresentPresent931
GeneTissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1)
195Island 1;126rs779329701;G/A**chrX:47582148PresentAbolished0
196rs993047389;G/A**chrX:47582175PresentAbolished0
197rs376386551;C/T**chrX:47582232PresentAbolished0
198rs926004266;G/A**chrX:47582233PresentAbolished0
199Island 2;125rs895934083;G/A*chrX:47582749PresentPresent105
200rs936052046;C/A/T—A or C/A/T—T*chrX:47582798PresentPresent109

**indicates the SNVs abolish CpG island, *indicates the SNVs change CpG island size; rs:reference sequence

Figure 3

Single nucleotide variations showing influence on CGIs status & size for ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 and TIMP1 genes.

Single nucleotide variations (SNVs) at CpG sites associated with loss or change in the size of CpG island. **indicates the SNVs abolish CpG island, *indicates the SNVs change CpG island size; rs:reference sequence Single nucleotide variations showing influence on CGIs status & size for ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 and TIMP1 genes.

CpG SNVs abolishing and reducing sizes of CGI

APOE gene has a single SNV rs769448 at CpG site, its variant allele has lost the entire 112 bp CGI. Among the 16 CpG SNVs studied in 2 CGIs (island 1:138 bp, island 2:167 bp) of LDLR gene, 5 SNVs (rs1026272027, rs887608252, rs1006494933, rs532491368, rs1024897634) have abolished the entire CGI whereas 7 SNVs have shown a 2-30 bp reduction in CGI size. In SH2B3 gene, 29 CpG SNVs were studied in 2 CpG islands (island 1:214 bp; island 2:796 bp), out of which 2 SNVs (rs538445017, rs922413124) in the first CGI has abolished the entire CGI. Whereas, remaining 3 SNVs in the first CGI and the other 2 SNVs in second CGI have shown a 18–100 bp decrease in the size of CGI. Amongst the 28 CpG SNVs selected in 2 CpG islands (island 1:172 bp; island 2:205 bp) of MMP9 gene, 5 SNVs (rs139620474, rs370018925, rs201069991, rs1014494202, rs146719297) in the first CGI have abolished the entire CGI, while 10 SNVs in the second CpG island have reduced 55-71 bp in their sizes. In TIMP1 gene, 6 SNVs were analyzed in 2 CpG islands (island 1:126 bp; island 2:125 bp), the results revealed that 4 SNVs (rs779329701, rs993047389, rs376386551, rs926004266) in the first CGI have abolished the entire CGI, whereas the remaining 2 SNVs in the second CpG island have shown a 16-20 bp reduction in their CGI size. Further, the CpG site SNVs 5 in ACAT1, 2 in APOB, 4 in CYBA, 11 in FAS, 5 in FLT1, 4 in KSR2, 4 in PCSK9, 8 in PHOX2A, 2 in REST and 2 in SORT1 are reducing the CGI sizes ranging from 1-85 bp.

Transcription factor binding site analysis

SNVs at CpG sites abolishing the CGIs of LDLR, MMP9, SH2B3, TIMP1 and APOE 1 genes were analysed to predict the difference in binding of transcription factors (TF) at the site of variation. As represented in Table 2, we have observed that SNVs 4 in LDLR, 2 in MMP9, 1 in SH2B3, 2 in TIMP1 and 1 in APOE genes have shown a difference in binding of TFs.
Table 2

Transcription factors associated with the single nucleotide variations (SNVs) abolishing CGIs.

GeneSingle nucleotide variations (rs number; variation)Transcription factors
Wild type alleleVariant allele
Low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)rs1026272027,G/T*C/EBPaplC/EBPbet
rs887608252,C/T*No TFC/EBPapl
rs1006494933,G/A*No TFGATA-1, Oct-1
rs532491368,G/ANo TFNo TF
rs1024897634,C/T*No TFOct-1
Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9)rs139620474,C/A/T –A or –TNo TFNo TF
rs370018925,C/T*No TFSp1
rs201069991,G/ANo TFNo TF
rs1014494202,C/T*Sp1Sp1, BRF-1
rs146719297, G/ASp1Sp1
SH2B adaptor protein 3 (SH2B3)rs538445017,C/TTra-1Tra-1
rs922413124,G/A*Sp-1No TF
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1)rs779329701,G/A*Egr-1NF-1
rs993047389,G/ASp1Sp1
rs376386551,C/T*Sp1N-Myc
rs926004266,G/ASp1Sp1
Apolipoprotein E (APOE)rs769448, C/T*Sp1No TF

*change in transcription factor binding; No TF: No transcription factor

Transcription factors associated with the single nucleotide variations (SNVs) abolishing CGIs. *change in transcription factor binding; No TF: No transcription factor To the 4 SNVs of LDLR gene that abolished CGI, TFs binding site prediction has shown that rs1026272027 wild type allele has a binding site for C/EBPapl and variant allele has a binding site for C/EBPbet. For rs887608252,C/T, rs1006494933,G/A and rs1024897634,C/T SNVs, there were no TF binding sites for their wild type alleles, but their variant alleles have binding sites for C/EBPapl, GATA-1 & Oct-1 and Oct-1 TFs respectively. Likewise, 2 SNVs abolishing CGIs in MMP9 gene have shown the difference in binding of TFs, rs370018925 wild type allele has no binding site for any TF whereas variant allele is bound by Sp1 transcription factor. Though the rs1014494202 has Sp1 binding site for wild type allele, variant allele has an additional binding site for BRF-1 transcription factor. For rs922413124 in SH2B3 gene, there was a binding site for Sp1 in wild type allele, but it is abolished in variant allele. Similarly, APOE rs769448 has binding site for Sp1 transcription factor but its variant allele is lacking a site for binding of any transcription factor. Furthermore, 2 SNVs that abolished CGIs in TIMP1 gene has shown that the wild type alleles of rs779329701 and rs376386551 has binding sites for Egr-1 and Sp1 transcription factors while variant alleles have binding sites for NF-1 and N-Myc transcription factors respectively.

Co-expression analysis

GeneMANIA co-expression network revealed that APOE, LDLR, MMP9, SH2B3 and TIMP1 genes might regulate the expression of several other genes. Single gene queries have shown that APOE gene influencing the expression of APOC3, APOA1, APOB, LIPC; LDLR influences LCN2, TIMP1; MMP9 influences LIPC, MMP1, LCN2; SH2B3 influences VLDLR, LDLRAP1, TGFB1, KIT; TIMP1 influences VLDLR, LDLR, MMP1, MMP9, MMP3, LCN2, SH2B3 genes (Fig. 4A–E). While multi gene queries interestingly displayed that APOE, LDLR, MMP9, SH2B3 and TIMP1 genes expression are associated with each other (Fig. 5).GeneMANIA consolidated networks revealed that the APOE, LDLR, MMP9, SH2B3, TIMP1 genes are involved in various signaling pathways. It has been shown that APOE & LDLR genes are involved in lipid and lipoprotein metabolisms, while MMP9 and TIMP1 genes are significantly modulating the degradation of extracellular matrix. In addition, these genes show an internal correlation in their co-expression network (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Figure 4

Concentric bipartites by GeneMANIA represents Co-expression networks of A.APOE B.LDLR C.MMP9 D.SH2B3 E.TIMP1 genes.

Figure 5

Linear bipartite by GeneMANIA represents Co-expression networks of multi gene queries for APOE, LDLR, MMP9, SH2B3 and TIMP1.

Concentric bipartites by GeneMANIA represents Co-expression networks of A.APOE B.LDLR C.MMP9 D.SH2B3 E.TIMP1 genes. Linear bipartite by GeneMANIA represents Co-expression networks of multi gene queries for APOE, LDLR, MMP9, SH2B3 and TIMP1. The gene ontology enrichment analysis of the genes set is shown in Fig. 6. The top 10 GO terms of biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF) and disease class analyses in genes were sorted by p‑value or gene count. According to the BP analysis, the GO term pathways were mainly associated with the cholesterol biosynthesis, metabolism and homeostasis, regulation of apoptosis, receptor mediated endocytosis, etc (Fig. 6A). For the CC analysis, the GO terms of these genes were mainly located and enriched in the plasma membrane, extracellular exosomes and space, golgi apparatus, etc (Fig. 6B). In the MF analysis, 15 genes were mainly enriched and associated with binding activity and transporter activity particularly protein binding, metal ion binding, identical protein binding, low-density lipoprotein particle receptor binding, cholesterol transporter activity, etc (Fig. 6C).
Figure 6

Gene ontology (GO) annotation. The top 10 GO terms in each category. (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular component. (C) Molecular function. (D) Disease class. (E) Functional annotation clustering.

Gene ontology (GO) annotation. The top 10 GO terms in each category. (A) Biological process. (B) Cellular component. (C) Molecular function. (D) Disease class. (E) Functional annotation clustering. The GO terms disease class analysis of these genes revealed that the genes are associated with metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, etc (Fig. 6D). Later, functional annotation clustering of these genes was performed and functional chart of cluster with highest gene enrichment score (3.17) is shown in Fig. 6E. Out of the 15 genes APOB, APOE, LDLR, PCSK9, SORT1 genes are associated with golgi complex, early endosome, cholesterol metabolism, etc (Supplementary data 1).

Discussion

The multifactorial diseases like diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease and cancers are leading cause for morbidity and mortality worldwide. Genetic and epigenetic modifications are also recognized as significant risk factors for the pathophysiology of these diseases. Studies reported that epigenetic modifications play a crucial role in cell differentiation at embryonic development[79]. Besides, environmental factors and age affect the DNA methylation and demethylation patterns in mammalians[80]. The methylation patterns of promoter DNA depends upon the presence of CpG sites, CpG islands existence and their respective size in the promoter region. Genetic variants and epigenetic modifications of CGIs at promoter regions autonomously have a great impact on the regulation of gene expression. The genes selected for the study are influencing the various pathways such as lipid metabolism and cholesterol homeostasis (ACAT1, APOB, APOE, LDLR, PCSK9, SORT1), oxidative stress (CYBA, KSR2, PHOX2A), apoptosis (FAS, REST, SORT1), inflammation & angiogenesis (FLT1, SH2B3), maintenance of extracellular matrix and vascular smooth muscle cells (MMP9 & TIMP1). Elucidation of gene expression regulating mechanisms have a significant role in understanding the pathogenesis and risk prediction of several diseases[21-28,30-38,40-51]. Accumulating evidences have shown that the genetic variants of the APOE, LDLR, SH2B3, TIMP1, MMP9 genes were found to have an impact on risk of the diseases like diabetes, coronary artery disease, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, cancer, lung cancer, etc[21,36,45,52,81-87]. Dayeh, T. A. et al., have reported that CpG SNVs are associated with differential DNA methylation and gene expression in human pancreatic islets in type 2 diabetics[88]. Hawkins, N. J. et al., and Rapkins, R. W. et al., studied the association of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene rs16906252 polymorphism with DNA methylation and reported that the individuals with MGMT rs16906252 T-allele has 5.5 folds and 2.64 folds highly methylated than C-allele individuals in colorectal cancer and glioblastoma patients respectively[67,68]. Another study on effect of RAD50 gene DNase I hypersensitive site7 (RHS7) region rs2240032 polymorphism on DNA methylation has shown that, it is significantly affecting the 5q31 locus IL13 gene promoter DNA methylation status[69]. To date, there are very limited studies reported on the effect of single nucleotide variations at CpG sites on CpG island existence, size and their respective methylation status. Furthermore, Palumbo, D. et al., reported that the methylation variability depends upon the CpG cluster density such as high density regions showing low levels of CpG methylation variability, while intermediate density and low density regions have increasingly higher levels of CpG methylation[89]. Study by Zhou, D. et al., identified 9,42,429 loci for CpG SNPs from HapMap phase II and observed that 51.9% were CpG gain-SNPs and 47.9% were CpG-loss-SNPs and his successive studies on tumor tissues of colon cancer have shown that CpG-loss-SNPs are lowering the methylation in tumor tissues and inferred that the SNPs at CpG sites are significantly associated with traits in cancers[64]. In addition, Wang, Z. et al., identified novel functional CpG-SNPs by conditional false discovery rate (cFDR) analysis from statistical data of two large GWAS of type 2 DM and CAD. Among them, 13 CpG-SNPs of DM, 15 CpG-SNPs of CAD have a significant methylation quantitative trait locus effect and increased susceptibility to disease[65]. In view of the above, the present study has been designed to analyze the impact of single nucleotide variations at CpG sites in promoter CpG islands of ACAT1, APOB, APOE, CYBA, FAS, FLT1, KSR2, LDLR, MMP9, PCSK9, PHOX2A, REST, SH2B3, SORT1 & TIMP1 genes on their respective existence and size. It has been shown that, APOE is involved in lipid metabolism, tissue repair, inflammation and plays a significant role in age related diseases. APOE modulates its effect on angiogenesis, tumor cell growth and metastasis induction in cancers[90]. A study reported that methylation of APOE is significantly lower in men with coronary heart disease than healthy control men and is inversely proportional to APOE plasma levels. Thus, it is considered that the DNA methylation is a potential factor for regulation of APOE gene expression[19]. In the present study, we have observed that APOE rs769448 has abolishing the CGI existence that might influence the methylation pattern and further may regulate the gene expression. The GO enrichment analysis has shown that the APOE gene is a key regulator in the cholesterol metabolism and transportation contributing to the initiation and progression of multiple diseases. Similarly, Low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene encodes a cell surface LDL receptor protein mediating endocytosis of LDL particles regulate cholesterol levels. Evidences suggest that elevated circulating cholesterol levels are involved in the coronary artery disease, cancer growth promotion and progression[91-93]. Ghose, S. et al. reported that LDLR gene undergoes hypomethylation and induces an increased expression which subsequently decreases the LDL levels and reduces the risk of CAD[94]. In the present study, we have observed that 31% of CpG SNVs abolished the CGI existence and ~ 44% decreased the size of CGI. The abolishment and reduced CGI size, decreases the possibility of methylation and inversely increases the gene expression. The increased gene expression associates with decreased LDL-cholesterol levels and lead to reduced risk of diseases. Furthermore, Src homology 2-B adaptor protein 3 (SH2B3) plays a critical role in haematopoiesis and acts as a negative regulator of several tyrosine kinases and cytokine signaling. SH2B3 was associated with diseases like atherosclerosis and thrombosis, cancers, diabetes, etc[95-97]. A recent study on Celiac disease (CeD) revealed that the expression of SH2B3 is influenced by the methylation and it is reported that hypomethylation is associated with higher expression of the genes in CeD patients than controls. The methylated DNA sequence is showing differences in binding of regulatory elements to control the expression of gene at mRNA level[61]. The present study investigations have shown SH2B3 gene promoter has 7% CGI abolishing SNVs besides 17% size reducing SNVs. The differences in CGI existence, binding of transcription factors and CGI size influences the methylation patterns to regulate the expression. According to gene ontology disease class term SH2B3 is playing a significant role in metabolic, cardio vascular and immune diseases. In recent years, there is a growing interest on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) family to understand their significant association with various disease pathophysiologies such as cancers, CAD and DM[87]. MMP9 and Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP1) were known to be associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease and several cancers[98-101]. A study on MMP9 promoter methylation suggested that serum circulating levels were inversely associated with methylation level in Diabetic nephropathy patients. MMP9 demethylation increases its serum circulating levels that might be accompanying with the incidence and prognosis of diabetic nephropathy[102]. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) are inhibitors of the MMPs involved in extracellular matrix degradation. In chronic periodontitis, TIMP1 promoter methylation positively correlated with severity of the disease[63]. In another study, DNA methylation in TIMP3 gene contributed to its lower expression and eventually lead to metastasis of oral cancer[103]. In the present analysis, ~ 18% of MMP9 and ~ 67% of TIMP1 CpG SNVs have shown for the loss of CGIs, further 57% of MMP9 and 33% of TIMP1 CpG SNVs reduced the size of CGI. GO enrichment analysis of MMP9, TIMP1 revealed that these two genes are playing a significant role in metabolic, neurological, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Altogether, abolishment and reduction of CGI size, differential binding of TFs could influence their gene expression in ECM remodelling and degradation which can further mediate the pathological conditions of various diseases. Further, 50% of ACAT1, ~ 67% of APOB, 57% of CYBA, ~ 92% of FAS, 50% of FLT1, ~ 13% of KSR2, ~ 44% of LDLR, ~ 36% of MMP9, 50% of PCSK9, 36% of PHOX2A, 40% of REST, ~ 14% of SH2B3, ~ 13% of SORT1 and 33% of TIMP1 SNVs are altering the size of CGIs. Among all the 200 SNVs in the genes under study, we have observed that approximately 9% of SNVs at CpG site are abolishing the existence of CpG island; whereas 35% are decreasing the size of CGIs. Consequently, loss of CGI & decreased CGI size leads to the intermittent and asymmetrical DNA methylation pattern of gene which can regulate the expression of genes by affecting binding of transcription factors to the promoter. The findings of the study suggest that the SNVs at CpG sites in the promoter region regulating CGI existence and size might influence the DNA methylation status and expression of genes that take part in molecular pathways associated with multifactorial diseases like diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, etc. The insights of the present study may pave the way for new experimental studies to undertake challenges in DNA methylation, gene expression and protein assays.

Limitations

A primary limitation of the study is that this is an in silico study, designed to know the impact of single nucleotide variations at CpG sites on CpG island existence, size and their respective DNA methylation pattern and gene expression. Another limitation of the study is that the genes are randomly selected from the various pathways to test the hypothesis. Therefore, the predicted results should be essentially validated using experimental analyses such as genotyping, DNA methylation and their subsequent gene expression assays for further correlation with disease phenotypes. Supplementary Data 1. Supplementary Figure 1. Supplementary Table 1.
  59 in total

1.  Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Anthony Howell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 23-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  DNA methylation and its role in the pathogenesis of diabetes.

Authors:  Amita Bansal; Sara E Pinney
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Blood Leukocyte DNA Methylation Predicts Risk of Future Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Golareh Agha; Michael M Mendelson; Cavin K Ward-Caviness; Roby Joehanes; TianXiao Huan; Rahul Gondalia; Elias Salfati; Jennifer A Brody; Giovanni Fiorito; Jan Bressler; Brian H Chen; Symen Ligthart; Simonetta Guarrera; Elena Colicino; Allan C Just; Simone Wahl; Christian Gieger; Amy R Vandiver; Toshiko Tanaka; Dena G Hernandez; Luke C Pilling; Andrew B Singleton; Carlotta Sacerdote; Vittorio Krogh; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Yun Li; Guosheng Zhang; James D Stewart; James S Floyd; Kerri L Wiggins; Jerome I Rotter; Michael Multhaup; Kelly Bakulski; Steven Horvath; Philip S Tsao; Devin M Absher; Pantel Vokonas; Joel Hirschhorn; M Daniele Fallin; Chunyu Liu; Stefania Bandinelli; Eric Boerwinkle; Abbas Dehghan; Joel D Schwartz; Bruce M Psaty; Andrew P Feinberg; Lifang Hou; Luigi Ferrucci; Nona Sotoodehnia; Giuseppe Matullo; Annette Peters; Myriam Fornage; Themistocles L Assimes; Eric A Whitsel; Daniel Levy; Andrea A Baccarelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics.

Authors:  Miho M Suzuki; Adrian Bird
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  The role of DNA methylation in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Lian Duan; Junyuan Hu; Xingjiang Xiong; Yongmei Liu; Jie Wang
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 6.  Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements.

Authors:  Robin Andersson; Albin Sandelin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Harmon Eyre; Richard Kahn; Rose Marie Robertson; Nathaniel G Clark; Colleen Doyle; Yuling Hong; Ted Gansler; Thomas Glynn; Robert A Smith; Kathryn Taubert; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  DNA Methylation Readers and Cancer: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Niaz Mahmood; Shafaat A Rabbani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of blood DNA methylation and its association with subcortical volumes: findings from the ENIGMA Epigenetics Working Group.

Authors:  Paul M Thompson; Gunter Schumann; Tianye Jia; Congying Chu; Yun Liu; Jenny van Dongen; Evangelos Papastergios; Nicola J Armstrong; Mark E Bastin; Tania Carrillo-Roa; Anouk den Braber; Mathew Harris; Rick Jansen; Jingyu Liu; Michelle Luciano; Anil P S Ori; Roberto Roiz Santiañez; Barbara Ruggeri; Daniil Sarkisyan; Jean Shin; Kim Sungeun; Diana Tordesillas Gutiérrez; Dennis Van't Ent; David Ames; Eric Artiges; Georgy Bakalkin; Tobias Banaschewski; Arun L W Bokde; Henry Brodaty; Uli Bromberg; Rachel Brouwer; Christian Büchel; Erin Burke Quinlan; Wiepke Cahn; Greig I de Zubicaray; Stefan Ehrlich; Tomas J Ekström; Herta Flor; Juliane H Fröhner; Vincent Frouin; Hugh Garavan; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Jacqueline Hoare; Bernd Ittermann; Neda Jahanshad; Jiyang Jiang; John B Kwok; Nicholas G Martin; Jean-Luc Martinot; Karen A Mather; Katie L McMahon; Allan F McRae; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Tomáš Paus; Luise Poustka; Philipp G Sämann; Peter R Schofield; Michael N Smolka; Dan J Stein; Lachlan T Strike; Jalmar Teeuw; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Julian Trollor; Henrik Walter; Joanna M Wardlaw; Wei Wen; Robert Whelan; Liana G Apostolova; Elisabeth B Binder; Dorret I Boomsma; Vince Calhoun; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Ian J Deary; Hilleke Hulshoff Pol; Roel A Ophoff; Zdenka Pausova; Perminder S Sachdev; Andrew Saykin; Margaret J Wright; Sylvane Desrivières
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 13.437

Review 10.  Epigenetics: a molecular link between environmental factors and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Charlotte Ling; Leif Groop
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.