Literature DB >> 22802750

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Mostafa Saadat1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: APOLIPOPROTEIN E (APOE, MIM: 107741) has three functionally distinct isoforms of the protein (E2, E3, and E4), encoded by corresponding alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4, which have been well described. Findings from previous studies investigating association between APOE polymorphisms and breast cancer risk have been inconsistent. The present meta-analysis was conducted in order to investigate association of APOE polymorphisms with risk of breast cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Several electronic databases were used for identification of studies containing information on APOE polymorphisms and breast cancer risk published up to January 2012. We identified 10 eligible studies, including 3,835 subjects (2008 patients, and 1,827 healthy controls), that reported on polymorphisms of APOE and risk of breast cancer. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a fixed and random-effects models.
RESULTS: Among studies reported from Asia, an association of the ε4 allele with increased risk of breast cancer, in comparison with the ε3 allele, was observed (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.04; p=0.001). It should be noted that allele ε2 showed no association with breast cancer risk. Among Caucasians, neither the ε4 (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.17; p=0.917) nor the ε2 (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.17; p=0.514) allele showed an association with susceptibility to breast cancer, when compared with the ε3 allele. Carriers of the ε4 allele (E4E4, E4E3, and E4E2 genotypes), in comparison with the E3E3 genotype, showed an association with elevated risk of breast cancer only among Asians (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.47; p=0.002). No publication bias was detected.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggest that the APOEε4 allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for development of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apolipoproteins E; Breast neoplasms; Disease susceptibility; Meta-analysis

Year:  2012        PMID: 22802750      PMCID: PMC3394861          DOI: 10.4143/crt.2012.44.2.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1598-2998            Impact factor:   4.679


Introduction

Apolipoprotein E (APOE, MIM: 107741) is involved in cholesterol transport, lipid metabolism, and protein synthesis through mediation of binding of the low-density lipoprotein receptor and the APOE receptor of lipid particles to specific lipoprotein receptors. It is also involved in numerous other functions, including tissue repair, immune response and regulation, and cell growth and differentiation. The APOE gene is located on human chromosome 19q13.2; three functionally distinct isoforms of the protein (E2, E3, and E4), encoded by corresponding alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4, have been described. These isoforms, originally identified by isoelectric focusing, are defined by amino acid changes at positions 112 (rs. 429358) and 158 (rs. 7412): alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4 are defined, respectively, by cysteine/cysteine, cysteine/arginine, and arginine/arginine at these two sites. The most common isoform is ε3, with a frequency of approximately 70-80% [1,2]. Individual case-control association studies are usually small and underpowered and, thus, are unable to provide a definitive answer, even in cases involving existence of a true association. Thus, meta-analysis can effectively combine data from several studies, resulting in increased statistical power (lower type II error rate). Findings from previous studies investigating the association between APOE polymorphisms and breast cancer risk have been inconsistent [3-10]. Some studies have reported an association of E4, compared with the E3E3 genotype, with increased risk of breast cancer [7,9], while other reported findings have indicated no association between APOE polymorphism and risk of breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge this is the first meta-analysis to investigate the association of APOE polymorphisms with risk of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

1. Search strategy

Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine, Washington, DC), Scopus, EBSCOhost Research Databases, ProQuest, Scirus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Indian Science Abstract, Google Scholar, SAGE, Open J-Gate, High-Wire, J-STAGE, KoreaMed, and Scientific Information Database (SID) were searched for identification of studies on APOE polymorphisms and breast cancer published up to January 2012. Search terms included "breast cancer", polymorphisms, "apolipoprotein E" or "apoE" or "APOE" or "Apo E." In addition, references cited in the retrieved articles were screened in an effort to trace additional relevant studies.

2. Inclusion criteria

The meta-analysis was limited to articles published in the English language. Articles describing case-control design studies and their primary references, which showed no obvious overlap of cases with other studies were selected for analysis. A report by Menzel et al. [6] included two case-control groups; therefore it was included as two studies in the meta-analysis. Also, a report by Niemi et al. [4], who investigated risk associated with either breast cancer or benign breast cancer with APOE polymorphism, was included as two case control studies. Articles selected for meta-analysis had no overlap of subjects with other studies.

3. Data extraction

All studies were reviewed twice and a standardized form was used for data extraction. Data were collected on the authors, year of publication, country of origin, study design, source of control group (hospital based, population based), ethnicity, and numbers of APOE genotypes and/or APOE alleles among cases and controls. A database was established according to information extracted from each article. It should be noted that in the report by Menzel et al. [6], numbers of participants for each genotype of APOE were not reported, as with other papers as well. Also, the numbers of participants for each polymorphism of APOE were not equal. Therefore, the prevalence of the alleles was estimated from the row data. Table 1 lists the number of cases and control groups for each allele of the APOE polymorphism.
Table 1

Prevalence of APOE alleles in studies used in the meta-analysis

APOE, apolipoprotein E; ND, not described.

4. Statistical analysis

Odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of breast cancer associated with the genetic polymorphism of APOE were calculated for each comparison. First, I estimated the risk of the ε2 and ε4 alleles, compared with the wild-type ε3 allele. In the second step, I estimated the association between APOE genotypes and susceptibility to breast cancer. In this step, risks of the ε2 carriers (E2E2 and E2E3 genotypes) and ε4 carriers (E4E4, E4E3, and E4E2 genotypes) were compared with those of the E3E3 genotype. In order to account for the possibility of heterogeneity across studies, a statistical test for heterogeneity was performed based on the Q statistic test, in which a p-value less than 0.10 suggested significant heterogeneity between studies [11]. Association was measured using random-effect or fixed-effect models according to the heterogeneity of the study. The fixed-effects method assumes no significant heterogeneity between results of the individual studies being pooled, whereas, the random-effects method allows for such heterogeneity. The fixed-effects method was used by Mantel and Haenszel [11] and the random-effects method was used by DerSimonian and Laird [12]. Visual inspection of Begg's funnel plots was performed for assessment of publication bias. An asymmetric plot suggested possible bias, in which case Egger's test [13] was used.

Results

We identified 10 eligible studies, including 3,835 subjects (2008 patients, and 1,827 healthy controls), that reported on polymorphisms of APOE and risk of breast cancer, which are summarized in Table 1 [3-10]. The forest plot of the meta-analysis of the APOE alleles is shown in Fig. 1. Comparison of prevalence of the ε4 vs. ε3 alleles among cases and controls showed statistically significant heterogeneity between studies (Q=36.2, df=9, p<0.001). In order to find the source of heterogeneity, we stratified the studies based on the ethnicity of participants. As a result, heterogeneity showed a dramatic decrease among studies reported from Asia (Q=2.31, df=2, p=0.315), and a significant association was revealed. Presence of the ε4 allele indicated increased risk of breast cancer, in comparison with the ε3 allele (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.04; p=0.001). It should be noted that no association of the ε2 allele with breast cancer risk was observed (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Forest plot of the meta-analysis of associations between alleles of apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism and breast cancer risk. CI, confidence interval.

Table 2

Summary of meta-analysis of case-control studies examining alleles of APOE polymorphism and breast cancer risk

a)There is significant (p<0.001) heterogeneity between studies. APOE, apolipoprotein E; Q, Q-statistic; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Among other studies, heterogeneity was still observed. Excluding studies reported by Yaylim et al. [5] (due to a very small sample size) and Menzel et al. [6] (because there was not an equal number of the polymorphism at positions 112 and 158), heterogeneity showed a decrease (p>0.381) (Table 2). When compared with the ε3 allele, no association of either the ε4 (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.17; p=0.917) or the ε2 (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.17; p=0.514) allele with susceptibility to breast cancer was observed. From 10 studies [3-10], only five studies [3,5,7,9,10] reported frequencies of APOE genotypes; these are summarized in Table 3. The forest plot of the meta-analysis of the APOE genotypes is shown in Fig. 2. As shown in Table 4, carriers of the ε4 allele (E4E4, E4E3, and E4E2 genotypes), in comparison with the E3E3 genotype, showed an association with elevated risk of breast cancer only among Asians (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.47; p=0.002).
Table 3

Prevalence of apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes in studies used in the meta-analysis

Fig. 2

Forest plot of the meta-analysis of associations between genotypes of apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphism and breast cancer risk. CI, confidence interval.

Table 4

Summary of meta-analysis of case-control studies examining genotypes of APOE polymorphism and breast cancer risk

There is significant (p<0.001) heterogeneity between studies. There is no significant heterogeneity between studies. E2 carriers indicates E2E2+E2E3 genotypes and E4 carriers indicates E4E4+E4E3+E4E2 genotypes. APOE, apolipoprotein E; Q, Q-statistic; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

In order to assess publication bias for reported comparisons of the alleles and genotypes of APOE polymorphism and breast cancer risk, Begg's funnel plots were prepared and Egger's test was performed on the set of 10 studies [3-10]. The funnel plots (Fig. 3) appeared to be symmetrical in shape, and results of statistical analysis showed no significant publication bias.
Fig. 3

Funnel plots of the meta-analysis of associations between alleles and/or genotypes of apolipoprotein E (APOE) polymorphisms and breast cancer risk (p-values of Egger's test were 0.556, 0.297, 0.923, and 0.488, for ε2 vs. ε3, ε4 vs. ε3, E2 carriers vs. E3E3, and E4 carriers vs. E3E3 comparisons, respectively).

Discussion

The main finding of the present study was that carriers of the ε4 allele (E4E4, E4E3, and E4E2 genotypes), in comparison with the E3E3 genotype, showed an association with elevated risk of breast cancer only among Asians. In conclusion, findings of this meta-analysis suggest that the APOE ε4 allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for development of breast cancer. The APOE ε4 allele has been associated with increased risk of several multifactorial diseases, including hypertension [14] and coronary heart disease [15]. Based on findings from animal studies, ecologic studies, and studies of migrants from areas with low fat intake to those with high fat intake, an association of dietary fat intake with breast cancer risk has been hypothesized [16]. Previous studies have reported increased risk of breast cancer in association with elevated triglyceride (TG) levels [17]. Association of increased TG concentrations with decreased levels of sex hormone binding globulin, resulting in elevated levels of free estardiol and subsequently increased risk of breast cancer, has been reported [18]. Association of elevated TG levels with breast cancer risk among women with the APOE E4 genotype has been reported. The APOE E4 genotype has been reported to reduce TG clearance from plasma, resulting in persistently elevated TG concentrations, which could result in decreased levels of sex hormone binding globulin and elevated levels of free estradiol [3,19]. Possible association of some genetic polymorphisms with altered risk of some types of cancers only in some ethnic groups has been previously reported [20-23]. For example, increased risk of gastric cancer in association with the GSTT1 polymorphism has been reported only among Caucasians [21]. In relation to the XRCC1 polymorphism, association of Arg399Gln with lung and breast cancers among Asians, but not among Western countries, has been reported [20,23]. Similarly, findings from the present study indicated the APOE ε4 allele as a risk factor for development of breast cancer in Asia. The gene encoding APOE was mapped on human chromosome 19q13.2. Of particular interest, based on published meta-analysis, single nucleotide polymorphisms of several genes, including XPD, ERCC2, XRCC1, and TGFB1, located on human chromosome 19q13, have been associated with breast cancer risk [23-25]. Therefore, it is quite probable that our present finding indicates a true association. We know that the major limitation of this study is the small number of articles available for meta-analysis, as well as its geographical distribution; for example, there are no reports from China, Western Europe, etc. Future well-designed large epidemiological studies are warranted in order to provide validation for the present findings.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis suggest that the APOE ε4 allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for development of breast cancer.
  24 in total

1.  Apo E4 gene linked to breast cancer.

Authors:  J H Tanne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

2.  Association between the apolipoprotein E genotypes and breast cancer patients in Taiwanese.

Authors:  Shun-Jen Chang; Ming-Feng Hou; Shih-Meng Tsai; Jau-Tsuen Kao; Szu-Hsien Wu; Linda Ann Hou; Li-Yu Tsai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele is not a risk factor for Turkish breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ilhan Yaylim; Nilüfer Bozkurt; Hülya Yilmaz; Turgay Isbir; Nilgün Isik; Soykan Arikan
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2003-10-01

4.  Apolipoprotein E genetic polymorphism, serum lipoproteins, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K B Moysich; J L Freudenheim; J A Baker; C B Ambrosone; E D Bowman; E F Schisterman; J E Vena; P G Shields
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.784

5.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

6.  XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis involving 28,709 subjects.

Authors:  Li-Xin Qiu; Lei Yao; Jian Zhang; Xiao-Dong Zhu; Xin-Min Zhao; Kai Xue; Chen Mao; Bo Chen; Ping Zhan; Hui Yuan; Xi-Chun Hu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with lipid levels and coronary risk.

Authors:  Anna M Bennet; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Zheng Ye; Frances Wensley; Anette Dahlin; Anders Ahlbom; Bernard Keavney; Rory Collins; Björn Wiman; Ulf de Faire; John Danesh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  The relationship between apolipoprotein E epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphisms and hypertension: a meta-analysis of six studies comprising 1812 cases and 1762 controls.

Authors:  Wenquan Niu; Yue Qi; Yuesheng Qian; Pingjin Gao; Dingliang Zhu
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Apolipoprotein E Allelic Frequency Altered in Women with Early-onset Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tirtsa Porrata-Doria; Jaime L Matta; Summer F Acevedo
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2010-05-24

10.  Association of NQO1 polymorphism with spontaneous breast cancer in two independent populations.

Authors:  H-J Menzel; J Sarmanova; P Soucek; R Berberich; K Grünewald; M Haun; H-G Kraft
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  23 in total

1.  Serum levels of apolipoprotein E correlates with disease progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiangdong Xu; Jianxin Wan; Linjing Yuan; Junhui Ba; Pinning Feng; Weiqing Long; Hao Huang; Pingjuan Liu; Yuesu Cai; Min Liu; Jinmei Luo; Laisheng Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-10-05

2.  Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) polymorphism is related to differences in potential fertility in women: a case of antagonistic pleiotropy?

Authors:  Grazyna Jasienska; Peter T Ellison; Andrzej Galbarczyk; Michal Jasienski; Malgorzata Kalemba-Drozdz; Maria Kapiszewska; Ilona Nenko; Inger Thune; Anna Ziomkiewicz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Secretomes are a potential source of molecular targets for cancer therapies and indicate that APOE is a candidate biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma metastasis.

Authors:  Zan Liu; Yuan Gao; Fengxia Hao; Xiaomin Lou; Xiuwei Zhang; Yang Li; Di Wu; Ting Xiao; Longhai Yang; Qingchang Li; Xueshan Qiu; Enhua Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Association between apolipoprotein E genotype and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Anand; S S Prakash; R Veeramanikandan; Richard Kirubakaran
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Cognitive impairment in older patients with breast cancer before systemic therapy: is there an interaction between cancer and comorbidity?

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Robert A Stern; Gheorghe Luta; Meghan McGuckin; Jonathan D Clapp; Arti Hurria; Paul B Jacobsen; Leigh Anne Faul; Claudine Isaacs; Neelima Denduluri; Brandon Gavett; Tiffany A Traina; Patricia Johnson; Rebecca A Silliman; R Scott Turner; Darlene Howard; John W Van Meter; Andrew Saykin; Tim Ahles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The association of genetic polymorphisms with neuroconnectivity in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Rebecca A Harrison; Vikram Rao; Shelli R Kesler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Association of the apolipoprotein E 2 allele with concurrent occurrence of endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatiana I Ivanova; Ludmila I Krikunova; Nikolay I Ryabchenko; Liana S Mkrtchyan; Vera A Khorokhorina; Lyubov E Salnikova
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 6.543

8.  Age, gender, and cancer but not neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases strongly modulate systemic effect of the Apolipoprotein E4 allele on lifespan.

Authors:  Alexander M Kulminski; Konstantin G Arbeev; Irina Culminskaya; Liubov Arbeeva; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Eric Stallard; Kaare Christensen; Nicole Schupf; Michael A Province; Anatoli I Yashin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism influences aggressive behavior in prostate cancer cells by deregulating cholesterol homeostasis.

Authors:  Godwin O Ifere; Renee Desmond; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Tim R Nagy
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 10.  The potential applications of Apolipoprotein E in personalized medicine.

Authors:  Sylvia Villeneuve; Diane Brisson; Natalie L Marchant; Daniel Gaudet
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.