| Literature DB >> 35208851 |
Awad A Shehata1,2, Sakine Yalçın3, Juan D Latorre4, Shereen Basiouni5, Youssef A Attia6, Amr Abd El-Wahab7,8, Christian Visscher7, Hesham R El-Seedi9,10,11, Claudia Huber12, Hafez M Hafez13, Wolfgang Eisenreich12, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias4.
Abstract
The gut microbiota has been designated as a hidden metabolic 'organ' because of its enormous impact on host metabolism, physiology, nutrition, and immune function. The connection between the intestinal microbiota and their respective host animals is dynamic and, in general, mutually beneficial. This complicated interaction is seen as a determinant of health and disease; thus, intestinal dysbiosis is linked with several metabolic diseases. Therefore, tractable strategies targeting the regulation of intestinal microbiota can control several diseases that are closely related to inflammatory and metabolic disorders. As a result, animal health and performance are improved. One of these strategies is related to dietary supplementation with prebiotics, probiotics, and phytogenic substances. These supplements exert their effects indirectly through manipulation of gut microbiota quality and improvement in intestinal epithelial barrier. Several phytogenic substances, such as berberine, resveratrol, curcumin, carvacrol, thymol, isoflavones and hydrolyzed fibers, have been identified as potential supplements that may also act as welcome means to reduce the usage of antibiotics in feedstock, including poultry farming, through manipulation of the gut microbiome. In addition, these compounds may improve the integrity of tight junctions by controlling tight junction-related proteins and inflammatory signaling pathways in the host animals. In this review, we discuss the role of probiotics, prebiotics, and phytogenic substances in optimizing gut function in poultry.Entities:
Keywords: dysbiosis; feed additives; gut microbiota; nutraceuticals; phytogenic substances; poultry; synbiotics; tight junctions
Year: 2022 PMID: 35208851 PMCID: PMC8877156 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10020395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Factors affecting the gut microbiota composition modified according to Carrasco et al. [21] (figure was created with BioRender.com, accessed on 15 December 2021).
Figure 2Microbiota in chickens, summarized from Shang et al. [40] (figure was created with BioRender.com, accessed on 15 December 2021).
Figure 3Intestinal epithelial barrier and intestinal microbiota interaction.
Potential biomarkers to evaluate intestinal health.
| Measurement/Function | Biomarker Type |
|---|---|
| Antioxidant activity | Superoxide dismutase (SOD), Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), Total antioxidant capacity |
| Gene expression of host protein | Fatty acid binding protein (FABP), Fibronectin, Occludin, Zonula |
| Immune activity | Acute phase proteins, Calprotectin, Lipocalin, Immunoglobulins (IgA), Interferon gamma (INF-γ) |
| Intestinal permeability | Fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d), Trans epithelial electrical resistance (TEER), Bacterial translocation |
| Enterocyte function | Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), Citrulline |
Adapted from Chen et al. [54] and Baxter et al. [59].
Figure 4The role of synbiotics on digestive physiology.
Dietary effect on the composition of the microbiome.
| Enterotypes | Biological Activities | Favorable Substance/s |
|---|---|---|
|
|
saccharolytic, proteolytic biotin, riboflavin, pantothenate and ascorbate synthesis | proteins and fats |
|
|
mucin/glycoprotein degrading thiamine and folate synthesis [ | high fiber diet |
|
|
mucin/glycoprotein degrading. transmembrane transport of sugars | Sugars |
Adapted after [22,160].
Figure 5Selected structures of bioactive substances.
Figure 6Modulation of gut microbiota by carvacrol and thymol and their biological effects, modified from Feng et al. [270] (figure was created with BioRender.com, accessed on 15 December 2021).