Literature DB >> 23091157

Influence of in ovo prebiotic and synbiotic administration on meat quality of broiler chickens.

G Maiorano1, A Sobolewska, D Cianciullo, K Walasik, G Elminowska-Wenda, A Slawinska, S Tavaniello, J Zylinska, J Bardowski, M Bednarczyk.   

Abstract

A trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of in ovo injection of prebiotic and synbiotics on growth performance, meat quality traits (cholesterol content, intramuscular collagen properties, fiber measurements), and the presence of histopathological changes in the pectoral muscle (PS) of broiler chickens. On d 12 of incubation, 480 eggs were randomly divided into 5 experimental groups treated with different bioactives, in ovo injected: C, control with physiological saline; T1 with 1.9 mg of raffinose family oligosaccharides; T2 and T3 with 1.9 mg of raffinose family oligosaccharides enriched with different probiotic bacteria, specifically 1,000 cfu of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis SL1 and Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris IBB SC1, respectively; T4 with commercially available synbiotic Duolac, containing 500 cfu of both Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus faecium with the addition of lactose (0.001 mg/embryo). Among the hatched chickens, 60 males were randomly chosen (12 birds for each group) and were grown to 42 d in collective cages (n = 3 birds in each 4 cages: replications for experimental groups). Broilers were fed ad libitum commercial diets according to age. In ovo prebiotic and synbiotic administration had a low effect on investigated traits, but depend on the kind of bioactives administered. Commercial synbiotic treatment (T4) reduced carcass yield percentage, and the feed conversion ratio was higher in T3 and T4 groups compared with other groups. The abdominal fat, the ultimate pH, and cholesterol of the PS were not affected by treatment. Broiler chickens of the treated groups with both slightly greater PS and fiber diameter had a significantly lower amount of collagen. The greater thickness of muscle fibers (not significant) and the lower fiber density (statistically significant), observed in treated birds in comparison with those of the C group, are not associated with histopathological changes in the PS of broilers. The incidence of histopathological changes in broiler chickens from examined groups was low, which did not affect the deterioration of meat quality obtained from these birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23091157     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

Review 1.  Applications of In Ovo Technique for the Optimal Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract and the Potential Influence on the Establishment of Its Microbiome in Poultry.

Authors:  Stephanie M Roto; Young Min Kwon; Steven C Ricke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-08-17

2.  Long-Term Transcriptomic Effects of Prebiotics and Synbiotics Delivered In Ovo in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Anna Slawinska; Arkadiusz Plowiec; Maria Siwek; Marcin Jaroszewski; Marek Bednarczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The influence of in ovo injection with the prebiotic DiNovo® on the development of histomorphological parameters of the duodenum, body mass and productivity in large-scale poultry production conditions.

Authors:  Adrianna Sobolewska; Gabriela Elminowska-Wenda; Joanna Bogucka; Agata Dankowiakowska; Anna Kułakowska; Agata Szczerba; Katarzyna Stadnicka; Michał Szpinda; Marek Bednarczyk
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-19

4.  Synbiotics for Broiler Chickens-In Vitro Design and Evaluation of the Influence on Host and Selected Microbiota Populations following In Ovo Delivery.

Authors:  Aleksandra Dunislawska; Anna Slawinska; Katarzyna Stadnicka; Marek Bednarczyk; Piotr Gulewicz; Damian Jozefiak; Maria Siwek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The In Ovo Feeding Administration (Gallus Gallus)-An Emerging In Vivo Approach to Assess Bioactive Compounds with Potential Nutritional Benefits.

Authors:  Tao Hou; Elad Tako
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Modulation of microbial communities and mucosal gene expression in chicken intestines after galactooligosaccharides delivery In Ovo.

Authors:  Anna Slawinska; Aleksandra Dunislawska; Arkadiusz Plowiec; Malgorzata Radomska; Jagoda Lachmanska; Maria Siwek; Siria Tavaniello; Giuseppe Maiorano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bioprospecting of probiotics with antimicrobial activities against Salmonella Heidelberg and that produce B-complex vitamins as potential supplements in poultry nutrition.

Authors:  Sabrina da Silva Sabo; Maria Anita Mendes; Elias da Silva Araújo; Ligia Bicudo de Almeida Muradian; Edson Naoto Makiyama; Jean Guy LeBlanc; Primavera Borelli; Ricardo Ambrósio Fock; Terezinha Knöbl; Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Metabolic Gene Expression in the Muscle and Blood Parameters of Broiler Chickens Stimulated In Ovo with Synbiotics.

Authors:  Aleksandra Dunislawska; Maria Siwek; Anna Slawinska; Adam Lepczynski; Agnieszka Herosimczyk; Pawel A Kolodziejski; Marek Bednarczyk
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Effect of Bacillus cereus and Phytase on the Expression of Musculoskeletal Strength and Gut Health in Japanese Quail (Coturnix japonica).

Authors:  Saman Alam; Saima Masood; Hafsa Zaneb; Imtiaz Rabbani; Rifat Ullah Khan; Muqader Shah; Saima Ashraf; Ibrahim A Alhidary
Journal:  J Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 1.425

10.  Effect of Amniotic Injection of N-Carbamylglutamate on Meat Quality of Broilers.

Authors:  Feng-Dong Zhang; Jing Wang; Hai-Jun Zhang; Shu-Geng Wu; Jing Lin; Guang-Hai Qi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.